Draft:Readpeak

Submission declined on 30 April 2026 by Cosmic840 (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Cosmic840 5 months ago. Last edited by Cosmic840 5 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 11 April 2026 by Nighfidelity (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Nighfidelity 5 months ago.

Submission declined on 3 February 2026 by Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk).

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.

Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

promotional language: see Words to watch;
personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
informal language.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.

Declined by Hurricane Wind and Fire 8 months ago.

Comment: see WP:NCORP for more information. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 10:07, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Comment: Still no proof that his company is notable. Nighfidelity (talk) 14:58, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Comment: Reference 2 is unreliable because LinkedIn is user-generated and References 3 and 8 look to be on ExchangeWire's blog so they are unreliable. See WP:RS for more information on reliable sources.
You are advertising the services and features of the company, especially in with editorial coverage highlighting both product evolution and strategic leadership appointments. We are trying to effectively summarize what reliable secondary sources say about the company in a neutral point of view that odes not promote the subject. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 14:35, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Readpeak is a Finnish digital advertising technology company headquartered in Helsinki^[1], specializing in programmatic native advertising. It operates a self-service demand-side platform (DSP) where advertisers and agencies can create, optimize, and manage native advertising campaigns across a network of publisher sites.^[2]

History

Readpeak was founded in 2014 by Tomas Forsbäck.^[1]^[3] Since its founding, the company has expanded its operations across multiple European markets.^[2]^[4]^[5]

References

1 2 "Readpeak Oy - Y-tunnus 2615511-5 - Helsinki - Katso taloustiedot, vastuuhenkilöt ja muut tiedot". www.proff.fi (in Finnish). Retrieved 2026-02-03.
1 2 "Finsk nativeplattform till Sverige". www.dagensmedia.se (in Swedish). Retrieved 2026-02-03.
↑ Manninen, Laura (2025-05-05). "Suomalaisyritys kasvaa nopeasti, mutta vastassa ovat globaalit jätit – Tarinassa tuli käännekohta". Talouselämä (in Finnish). Retrieved 2026-04-30.
↑ Jerijervi, Dag Robert (2022-10-27). "Martin Garfalk skal bygge ny native-plattform i Norge". www.kampanje.com (in Norwegian Bokmål). Retrieved 2026-02-03.
↑ Marketing, ADZINE-Magazin für Online. "Readpeak holt Programmatic-Experten Tim Beckmeyer an Bord". www.adzine.de (in German). Retrieved 2026-02-03.

External links

www.readpeak.com

[:0-1] 1 2 "Readpeak Oy - Y-tunnus 2615511-5 - Helsinki - Katso taloustiedot, vastuuhenkilöt ja muut tiedot". www.proff.fi (in Finnish). Retrieved 2026-02-03.

[:1-2] 1 2 "Finsk nativeplattform till Sverige". www.dagensmedia.se (in Swedish). Retrieved 2026-02-03.

[3] Manninen, Laura (2025-05-05). "Suomalaisyritys kasvaa nopeasti, mutta vastassa ovat globaalit jätit – Tarinassa tuli käännekohta". Talouselämä (in Finnish). Retrieved 2026-04-30.

[4] Jerijervi, Dag Robert (2022-10-27). "Martin Garfalk skal bygge ny native-plattform i Norge". www.kampanje.com (in Norwegian Bokmål). Retrieved 2026-02-03.

[5] Marketing, ADZINE-Magazin für Online. "Readpeak holt Programmatic-Experten Tim Beckmeyer an Bord". www.adzine.de (in German). Retrieved 2026-02-03.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

This page was redesigned at the edge.

History

References

External links