Draft:Frank Krueger
Submission declined on 31 July 2026 by QuantumRealm (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Submission declined on 10 June 2026 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Theroadislong 59 days ago.
| |
Submission declined on 8 March 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). No changes since last decline, so same result. Declined by ChrysGalley 5 months ago. | |
Submission declined on 25 February 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft lacks inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. We require inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.
You must place an inline citation directly after:
Please edit your draft to support your statements with inline citations. Learn how to create inline citations in the:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for academics. The draft requires either:
Declined by ChrysGalley 5 months ago.
or multiple published secondary sources that:
| |
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.
Declined by Thilio 6 months ago.LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. | |
Comment: The subject does not appear to meet the criteria of WP:NACADEMIC at least on the text and sources presented here. Some information is unsourced, and that needs to be fixed in line withWP:BLP. If the subject does not meet the criteria of NACADEMIC then the other options are WP:NAUTHOR and WP:BASIC, which currently isn't demonstrated.If the submitting editor has any connection with the subject, this must be declared under WP:COI. ChrysGalley (talk) 16:32, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
Frank Krueger is a neuroscientist and psychologist. He is a professor in the School of Systems Biology at George Mason University, where he directs the SCI:FI Laboratory.[1] His research addresses the neural basis of interpersonal trust and social decision-making.[2][3]
Since 2017 Krueger has held an honorary professorship in psychology at the University of Mannheim.[4]
Research
[edit]Krueger was a co-author of a 2007 study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine trust between partners in an economic exchange.[2] With Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg he set out a model of interpersonal trust drawing on neuroscience, psychology and economics in a 2019 review in Trends in Neurosciences.[3] In 2025 he was the first of fifteen authors of an article in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications calling for transdisciplinary research on trust in the context of artificial intelligence.[5]
He edited The Neurobiology of Trust (Cambridge University Press, 2021), a multidisciplinary volume on the neurobiological basis of trust.[6]
His earlier research included studies of charitable giving, moral cognition, religious belief and the consequences of traumatic brain injury. Work he co-authored on the neural basis of religious belief was reported in The New York Times,[7] research on charitable donation in The Economist,[8] and a study of adolescents' responses to violent media in Live Science.[9]
Editorial work and awards
[edit]Krueger has been specialty field editor for social neuroergonomics at Frontiers in Neuroergonomics since 2020.[10] He held a Fulbright U.S. Scholar Award for 2025-2026 for research at Tamagawa University in Tokyo.[11]
References
[edit]- ↑ "Frank Krueger". George Mason University College of Science. Retrieved 30 July 2026.
- 1 2 Krueger, Frank; McCabe, Kevin; Moll, Jorge; Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus; Zahn, Roland; Strenziok, Maren; Heinecke, Armin; Grafman, Jordan (2007). "Neural correlates of trust". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104 (50): 20084–20089. doi:10.1073/pnas.0710103104.
- 1 2 Krueger, Frank; Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas (2019). "Toward a Model of Interpersonal Trust Drawn from Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics". Trends in Neurosciences. 42 (2): 92–101. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2018.10.004.
- ↑ "Prof. Dr. Krueger Honorarprofessur". University of Mannheim. 17 May 2017. Retrieved 30 July 2026.
- ↑ Krueger, Frank; et al. (2025). "A call for transdisciplinary trust research in the artificial intelligence era". Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 12 (1): 1124. doi:10.1057/s41599-025-05481-9.
- ↑ Krueger, Frank, ed. (2021). The Neurobiology of Trust. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-48856-3.
- ↑ Wade, Nicholas (10 March 2009). "Religious Thoughts and Feelings Not Limited to One Part of Brain". The New York Times.
- ↑ "The joy of giving". The Economist. 12 October 2006.
- ↑ Hsu, Jeremy (19 October 2010). "Does Constant Violence Desensitize or Bore Teens?". Live Science.
- ↑ "Social Neuroergonomics". Frontiers in Neuroergonomics. Retrieved 30 July 2026.
- ↑ "Frank Krueger". Fulbright Scholar Program. Retrieved 30 July 2026.
Category:Living people Category:American neuroscientists Category:German neuroscientists Category:George Mason University faculty
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.