Draft:Fluid Topics
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Comment: The page describes how the company could talk about itself, but not how others would describe it. This is a serious issue for the "notability": the article is missing IN-DEPTH COVERAGE FROM INDEPENDENT SOURCES. Please can you edit it now and add one of the following: 1. Information requested above, or; 2. Visit WP:N, navigate to notability page for companies and businesses, and find which criteria is pass, and, include a note about it in the FIRST PARAGRAPH. Please make this edit immediately, to avoid delays with publishing. Thank you! Gryllida 11:39, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
| Industry | Software; Knowledge Management |
|---|---|
| Founded | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Lyon, France |
| Key people |
|
| Parent | Antidot |
| Website | www |
Fluid Topics
[edit]Fluid Topics is a French SaaS company headquartered in Lyon, France, specialized in centralizing and delivering product documentation(technical documentation, software documentation, etc.). [1]
The product is also used to create documentation portals, knowledge bases, help sites and chatbots.[2]
Fluid Topics has offices in France, Germany and in the United States.
History
[edit]Fluid Topics traces its origins to technology developed by Antidot, a company founded in 1999 by Fabrice Lacroix. The Fluid Topics platform itself emerged later as part of a strategic shift toward content delivery and knowledge access solutions. In 2014, the company pivoted to focus on its Content Delivery Platform, designed to transform how users search, read, and interact with large volumes of product documentation.
In December 2018, the company raised €5.5 million to support its growth.[3]
In April 2024, Fluid Topics raised €15 million in a Series B funding round led by Kennet Partners, with participation from Ventech and Crédit Mutuel Innovation.[4]
In March 2026, it was named among the 100 companies that matter in Knowledge Management.[5]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ↑ "Des entreprises pépites". Le Point. 2012-03-23.
- ↑ "Evolution of tech comm - writing for agents". YouTube. 2025-07-05.
- ↑ "Antidot raises 5.5 million euros". FrenchWeb. 2019-01-24.
- ↑ Lucy Adams (2024-04-04). "Fluid Topics raises €15M for GenAI-powered customer service". KMWorld. Retrieved 2026-03-26.
- ↑ Marydee Ojala (2026-03-09). "KMWorld 100 Companies That Matter in Knowledge Management". KMWorld. Retrieved 2026-03-26.
History
[edit]Fluid Topics traces its origins to technology developed by Antidot, a company founded in 1999 by Fabrice Lacroix. The Fluid Topics platform itself emerged later as part of a strategic shift toward content delivery and knowledge access solutions. In 2014, the company pivoted to focus on its Content Delivery Platform, designed to transform how users search, read, and interact with large volumes of product documentation.
In December 2018, the company raised €5.5 million to support its growth.[1]
In April 2024, Fluid Topics raised €15 million in a Series B funding round led by Kennet Partners, with participation from Ventech and Crédit Mutuel Innovation.[2]
In March 2026, it was named among the 100 companies that matter in Knowledge Management.[3]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ↑ "Antidot raises 5.5 million euros". FrenchWeb. 2019-01-24.
- ↑ Lucy Adams (2024-04-04). "Fluid Topics raises €15M for GenAI-powered customer service". KMWorld. Retrieved 2026-03-26.
- ↑ Marydee Ojala (2026-03-09). "KMWorld 100 Companies That Matter in Knowledge Management". KMWorld. Retrieved 2026-03-26.
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.