Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Shipibo–Konibo language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Conibo language)
Shipibo-Conibo
Shipibo
Native toPeru
RegionUcayali Region
EthnicityShipibo-Conibo people
Native speakers
26,000 (2003)[1]
Panoan
  • Mainline Panoan
    • Nawa
      • Chama
        • Shipibo-Conibo
Dialects
  • Shipibo–Konibo
  • Kapanawa
  • ?Xipináwa
Language codes
ISO 639-3shp
Glottologship1254

Shipibo (also Shipibo-Conibo, Shipibo-Konibo) is a Panoan language spoken in Peru and Brazil by approximately 26,000 speakers.

History

[edit]

In 1557, the Spanish explorer Juan de Salinas y Loyola encountered the Kokama and Pariache; the latter have been identified as Konibo. He described them as though they had been organized into a chiefdom. Throughout the 18th century, the Shipibo, Konibo, and Xetebo allied with the Kokama to defend their territory from the Spaniards; they were successful until 1790. Afterwards, the Franciscans missionized them until their expulsion in the 1820s.[2] They produced the first surviving works on Shipibo-Konibo, including a Konibo grammar sketch and vocabulary in 1800, though these would remain unpublished until a century later.[3]

Dialects

[edit]
A Shipibo jar

Shipibo has three attested dialects:

  • Shipibo 'tamarin monkey ones' and Konibo (Conibo) 'eel ones'[2], which have merged[3]
  • Kapanawa of the Tapiche River, which is obsolescent[3]

Extinct Xipináwa (Shipinawa) is thought to have been a dialect as well,[4] but there is no linguistic data.[5]

Phonology

[edit]

Vowels

[edit]
Monophthongs of Shipibo, from Valenzuela, Márquez Pinedo & Maddieson (2001:282)
Monophthong phonemes[6]
Front Central Back
Close i ĩ i ɯ ɯ̃ e
Mid o õ o
Open a ã a

In connected speech, two adjacent vowels may be realized as a rising diphthong.[7] /i/ and /o/ are lower than their cardinal counterparts (in addition to being more front in the latter case): [], [], /ɯ/ is more front than cardinal [ɯ]: [ɯ̟], whereas /a/ is more close and more central [ɐ] than cardinal [a]. The first three vowels tend to be somewhat more central in closed syllables, whereas /ɯ/ before coronal consonants (especially /n, t, s/) can be as central as [ɨ].[8]

Nasalization

[edit]

The oral vowels /i, ɯ, o, a/ are phonetically nasalized [ĩ, ɯ̃, õ, ã] after a nasal consonant, but the phonological behaviour of these allophones is different from the nasal vowel phonemes /ĩ, ɯ̃, õ, ã/.[6] Oral vowels in syllables preceding syllables with nasal vowels are realized as nasal, but not when a consonant other than /w, j/ intervenes.[7]

Unstressed vowels

[edit]

The second of two adjacent unstressed vowels is often elided.[7] Unstressed vowels may be devoiced or even elided between two voiceless obstruents.[7]

Consonants

[edit]
Consonant phonemes[9]
Labial Dental/
Alveolar
Retroflex Palato-
alveolar
Dorsal Glottal
Nasal m m n n
Plosive p p t t k c/qu
Affricate ts ts ch
Fricative voiceless s s ʂ s̈h ʃ sh h j
voiced β b
Approximant w hu ɻ r j y
  • /m, p, β/ are bilabial, whereas /w/ is labial–velar.
    • /β/ is most typically a fricative [β], but other realizations (such as an approximant [β̞], a stop [b] and an affricate []) also appear. The stop realization is most likely to appear in word-initial stressed syllables, whereas the approximant realization appears most often as onsets to non-initial unstressed syllables.[6]
  • /n, ts, s/ are alveolar [n, ts, s], whereas /t/ is dental [].[9]
  • The /ʂ–ʃ/ distinction can be described as an apical–laminal one.[6]
  • /k/ is velar, whereas /j/ is palatal.[9]
  • Before nasal vowels, /w, j/ are nasalized [, ] and may be even realized close to nasal stops [ŋʷ, ɲ].[7]
  • /w/ is realized as [w] before /a, ã/, as [ɥ] before /i, ĩ/ and as [ɰ] before /ɯ, ɯ̃/. It does not occur before /o, õ/.[7]
  • /ɻ/ is a very variable sound:
    • Intervocalically, it is realized either as continuant, with or without weak frication ([ɻ] or [ʐ]).[6]
    • Sometimes (especially in the beginning of a stressed syllable) it can be realized as a postalveolar affricate [d̠͡z̠], or a stop-approximant sequence [d̠ɹ̠].[7]
    • It can also be realized as a postalveolar flap [ɾ̠].[6]

References

[edit]
  1. Shipibo-Conibo at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015) (subscription required)
  2. 1 2 Valenzuela, Pilar M. (2003). Transitivity in Shipibo-Konibo Grammar (PDF) (phd thesis). Eugene, OR: Ann Arbor: UMI.
  3. 1 2 3 Fleck (2013), p. 18.
  4. Fleck (2013), p. 14.
  5. Loukotka, Čestmír (1968). Wilbert, Johannes (ed.). Classification of South American Indian Languages (PDF) (4th ed.). Latin American Center, UCLA: Latin American Center, University of California Los Angeles. ISBN 9780879031077.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Valenzuela, Márquez Pinedo & Maddieson (2001), p. 282.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Valenzuela, Márquez Pinedo & Maddieson (2001), p. 283.
  8. Valenzuela, Márquez Pinedo & Maddieson (2001), pp. 282–283.
  9. 1 2 3 Valenzuela, Márquez Pinedo & Maddieson (2001), p. 281.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Campbell, Lyle. (1997). American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of Native America. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-509427-1.
  • Elias-Ulloa, Jose (2000). El Acento en Shipibo (Stress in Shipibo). Thesis. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima - Peru.
  • Elias-Ulloa, Jose (2005). Theoretical Aspects of Panoan Metrical Phonology: Disyllabic Footing and Contextual Syllable Weight. Ph.D. Dissertation. Rutgers University. ROA 804 .
  • Fleck, David W. (10 October 2013). "Panoan Languages and Linguistics" (PDF). Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History (99): 1–112. doi:10.5531/sp.anth.0099. hdl:2246/6448. ISSN 0065-9452.
  • Kaufman, Terrence. (1990). Language history in South America: What we know and how to know more. In D. L. Payne (Ed.), Amazonian linguistics: Studies in lowland South American languages (pp. 13–67). Austin: University of Texas Press. ISBN 0-292-70414-3.
  • Kaufman, Terrence. (1994). The native languages of South America. In C. Mosley & R. E. Asher (Eds.), Atlas of the world's languages (pp. 46–76). London: Routledge.
  • Loriot, James and Barbara E. Hollenbach. 1970. "Shipibo paragraph structure." Foundations of Language 6: 43–66. (This was the seminal Discourse Analysis paper taught at SIL in 1956–7.)
  • Loriot, James, Erwin Lauriault, and Dwight Day, compilers. 1993. Diccionario shipibo - castellano. Serie Lingüística Peruana, 31. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto Lingüístico de Verano. 554 p. (Spanish zip-file available online http://www.sil.org/americas/peru/show_work.asp?id=928474530143&Lang=eng) This has a complete grammar published in English by SIL only available through SIL.
  • Valenzuela, Pilar M.; Márquez Pinedo, Luis; Maddieson, Ian (2001), "Shipibo", Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31 (2): 281–285, doi:10.1017/S0025100301002109
[edit]