Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People

Wikipedia's inclusion policy for articles on individuals can be found at WP:BIO.

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to People. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary, it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|People|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to People.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

• WikiProject Deletion sorting/People/archive
• WikiProject Deletion sorting/People/archive 2
• WikiProject Deletion sorting/People/archive 3
• WikiProject Deletion sorting/People/archive 4
• WikiProject Deletion sorting/People/archive 5

watch

People

Dipo Faloyin

Dipo Faloyin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO and WP:NAUTHOR. No significant coverage of this author and journalist in reliable sources. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 23:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, and Journalism. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 23:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Nigeria, England, and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:44, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Author is quite possibly notable, but this page looks like LLM slop so should be deleted. pburka (talk) 03:19, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Jean Saulnier

Jean Saulnier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. In searching for Jean Saulnier I came across a pianist who won the Prix d'Europe; a French theologian and regent at the University of Paris who died in 1430; and a French engineer born in 1958. All of them have potential for articles. I could find nothing on the 14th century knight. Even if this isn't a hoax, a single offline source does not demonstrate WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 22:56, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. 4meter4 (talk) 22:56, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete I did a French Gsearch, nothing about a knight from this time; some mentions on a family history site from the 1600s, an aviator from the 1980s an a pianist. Nothing about this knight. One source isn't enough to show notability. No FR wiki article either, so that's not helping things. Oaktree b (talk) 23:31, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and France. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:57, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Pablo (footballer, born March 1991)

Pablo (footballer, born March 1991) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing to say about this football player other than his name, age, physical attributes, and outcomes of games that he played in. Should be deleted, as Wikipedia is not a database. silviaASH (inquire within) 06:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, and Football. silviaASH (inquire within) 06:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:21, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep – Full of coverage: , , , , more than 100 apps in Brazilian Série B and Série C. Svartner (talk) 12:54, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Sources identified above are utterly routine transfer announcements with no more than three press release-based sentences of secondary coverage (first two sources), a non-independent profile from a club (third), and a database-style listicle that doesn't have a single sentence on him (fourth)! JoelleJay (talk) 14:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:09, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:14, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Eric Ingram

Eric Ingram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AI slop. TNT. msk 00:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Spaceflight. msk 00:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Every source is either WP:ROUTINE or WP:PRIMARY, and the entire thing reads like Eric's publicist provided ChatGPT with his CV and asked it to write a Wikipedia article about him and then uploaded it. Unless someone is able to demonstrate WP:NOTABILITY and provide multiple sources showing significant, unaffiliated, non-routine coverage, the best bet is deletion. Even if someone can find and prove notability with sources, what's there now should be WP:TNT'd anyway.Foxtrot620 (talk) 04:56, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Suspected AI-generated articles, and Virginia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:05, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Sujata Madhok

Sujata Madhok (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not see a pass of WP:NBIO, WP:BASIC or WP:NAUTHOR. The available sourcing I could find on Google as well as listed in the article is mainly bylines, routine DUJ office-holder/election mentions, report credits, and quotes in articles about other topics, rather than significant independent coverage of Madhok herself. The article also has long-standing BLP sourcing problems. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: The article has not seen any sourcing since two decades and there is no independent WP:SIGCOV as well. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 19:40, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Journalism, and India. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Salaam Bhatti

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Salaam Bhatti
• Articles for deletion/Salaam Bhatti (2nd nomination)

Salaam Bhatti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Congressional candidate. Fails WP:NPOL EaglesFan37 (talk) 23:28, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Politics, and Virginia. EaglesFan37 (talk) 23:28, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. This fails WP:NPOL and otherwise fails GNG. Nothing seems to have changed after the first deletion discussion resulted in a consensus to merge it to 2026 United States House of Representatives elections in Virginia#District 1. Now that he lost the Democratic primary, there's no chance of meeting NPOL this year, either. PA Uploader (talk) 01:34, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Duy-Loan Le

Duy-Loan Le (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-promotional BLP that is non-salvageable per WP:TNT. The lady is not notable, since she did not receive independent coverage from WP:RS. MitYehor📘^^talk 20:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Women, Engineering, Vietnam, and United States of America. MitYehor📘^^talk 20:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:25, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - Non-notable subject, reads like a resume/spam article. Ping me if significant coverage is found. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 02:30, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep I have found coverage of her in newspaper articles dating back to 1981, and I have started adding citations into the article. The article itself is a bit disorganized and reads like a CV in parts, so I am still working on tidying it up and retaining information that points to her notability.DaffodilOcean (talk) 04:04, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: verifiable independent recognition such as this evidence of her place in List of Women in Technology International Hall of Fame inductees. PamD 20:54, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Samantha Youssef

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Samantha Youssef
• Articles for deletion/Samantha Youssef (2nd nomination)

Samantha Youssef (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCREATIVE. The only secondary coverage is a single lifestyle feature in Chatelaine. WP:BEFORE finds nothing better. Kqol • talk 18:34, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Canada. Kqol • talk 18:34, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: After having a look, I've turned up nothing. The Chatelaine article is part interview, so is WP:PRIMARY and does not count towards establishing notability. This claims she has been featured in articles published by Musique Plus and Wired. Neither turned up hits. The only other page I found was this one sentence article from MSN, which isn't even a proper outlet. This is sad, but this means Youssef only passes WP:ANYBIO#1 with her Toronto International Film Festival award. Without clearing WP:GNG however, and the fact this is a BLP means this cannot be kept as there are no sources providing significant coverage. 11WB 💬 00:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Lorne Honickman

Lorne Honickman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person only has WP:SIGCOV in the following two new pieces: and . The first seems to be a blog. Thus, he fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:GNG HerrHeulsuse (talk) 16:54, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, Judaism, and Canada. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 16:54, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:06, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Harry Jaggard

Harry Jaggard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Concerns about WP:NOTABILITY per Wikipedia's definition, which is significant coverage in WP:RELIABLE sources. If not enough significant coverage in enough reliable sources, no article.

The sources currently in the article are:

• lovin.co, which seems like a bit fluffy of a local paper in Beirut.
• WP:DAILYEXPRESS, considered unreliable
• Bookingagentinfo, which doesn't provide adequate coverage and doesn't count to notability
• WP:NYPOST, also unreliable
• NK News, which is probably ok and reliable for use here, but is the only one

When I do my own googling for sources, I have a hard time finding other reliable sources that cover Jaggard. grapesurgeon (talk) 13:48, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Entertainment, Travel and tourism, Internet, and United Kingdom. grapesurgeon (talk) 13:48, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep There are sources in other languages, including Radio Free Asia: and Hankyung Thief-River-Faller (talk) 04:32, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Richard Sprenger

Richard Sprenger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. All presently-used sources are either down+unrecoverable or passing mentions. On a search, I've only found passing mentions, mostly in the context of Sprenger running food safety programs. Could be convinced otherwise in a WP:HEY scenario, but atm I don't think we are near sufficient sourcing to support an article. Vermont (🐿️—🏳️‍🌈) 04:11, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Food and drink, and United Kingdom. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 04:16, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Health and fitness, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:51, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Princess Antoinette of Anhalt

Princess Antoinette of Anhalt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She seems notable only for her genealogy (WP:NOTGENEALOGY), like many articles of this sort. Much of the article is hardly even about her, and the only reference mentioning her son's death only mentions her as his mother. The best course of action would be to redirect to her father or husband, of which I think her father would be the most stable option. OliviaRigby (talk) 02:14, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Royalty and nobility, and Germany. OliviaRigby (talk) 02:14, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Russell Adam Burnham

Russell Adam Burnham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am Russell Adam Burnham, the subject of this article. I request deletion under WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE. I first contacted the Wikimedia volunteer response team (ticket [Ticket#2026080410000091]), who advised me to nominate the article myself and to disclose that I am the subject. I regard myself as a non-notable, private person.

The article fails WP:BASIC. Nearly every reference is primary or non-independent: U.S. Army publications, DVIDS, a local Scouting district page, my own company's website, and books about my ancestors. The only independent secondary news coverage is a short 2003 Seattle Post-Intelligencer item announcing my award. WP:BASIC states: "Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject." Searches turn up only routine Army announcement coverage and mirrors of this article.

All independent coverage traces to a single event: the 2003 U.S. Army Soldier of the Year award (WP:BIO1E). I have otherwise remained, and intend to remain, a low-profile individual (WP:BLP1E). Soldier of the Year is an internal service recognition, not a "well-known and significant award or honor" under WP:ANYBIO. The rest of the article describes an ordinary military career. I retired as a major, a rank that carries no presumption of notability. My great-grandfather's notability is not mine (WP:NOTINHERITED).

I did not create this article and never consented to it. A notability tag citing WP:MILPEOPLE was added in 2010 and removed by the article's principal author; the concern never reached AfD until now. The page has caused real-world harm: my children have been teased and ridiculed because of it, and it exposes my family to hostile actors. Per WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE: "Unless the subject clearly passes the general notability guideline (GNG) or is a current or former elected or appointed official, editors should seriously consider honoring such requests." I was never an elected or appointed official. I ask the community to honor this request. RussRocka (talk) 03:03, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, and Arizona. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 04:08, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete I agree notability is not established and this reads like a fan page. Mccapra (talk) 06:41, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete Nom makes a solid case for non-notability (even if it is an article about him). Solider of the Year is a single event, and not really notable outside of a limited circle. Intothatdarkness 14:29, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per individual request re WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE: — Maile (talk) 17:45, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per request. Recommend SNOW unless contrary arguments show up soon. M kuhner (talk) 21:34, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Victor Orly

Victor Orly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Following up on an already deleted article related to this artist here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Capitale_%26_Victor_ORLY_Gallery . Sources are broken (most return 404 or not exist). Most of the sources also are YouTube video by the person themselves, which violates BLP. ABehjat (talk) 18:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Arts. ABehjat (talk) 18:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• del no evidence of notability. --Altenmann >talk 19:03, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: France and Ukraine. Shellwood (talk) 19:25, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - Largely unsourced promotional article on an artist that does not meet WP:GNG nor WP:NARTIST. The exhibitions, and awards are non-notable or are unsourced, and I'm unable to find sources to substantiate the claims. None of the "public works" are notable nor or at notable institutions, or were donated by the artist, not curated into collections by an acquisition board. Netherzone (talk) 22:35, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Paul Zimmer (internet personality)

Paul Zimmer (internet personality) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for failing WP:GNG, the accusations about financial exploitation are potentially a WP:BLP issue that needs multiple citations from multiple independent reliable sources. Aasim (話す（はなす）) 15:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Aasim (話す（はなす）) 15:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Bands and musicians, Internet, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:47, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep but remove the sections on financial exploitation - GNG is met through two New Statesman articles and one The Cut article. Exploitation is not well-sourced. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 22:17, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Paul Curry (murderer)

Paul Curry (murderer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be a textbook WP:BLP1E. His Jeopardy! appearance was not notable, and he isn't even included on j-archive.com, the main archive for Jeopardy! clues and contestants. The only thing he got any attention for was the murder of his wife. There is no other biographical information out there on him. GBooks gave only false positives, and the only result for "Paul Curry" + "Linda Kinkade" was an LA Times article that makes no mention of the Jeopardy! appearance. I don't think there's enough here per WP:NCRIME to warrant moving the page to Murder of Laura Kinkade, as all of the coverage was from 2021-22, and most of it is from unreliable sources like The Sun or Fox News. It does not pass WP:CRIME's threshhold of sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role. Suggest either deletion or redirection to List of Jeopardy! contestants, although I'm not sure if it would be due weight there. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Television, and Crime. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete per 1E. The Jeopardy appearance is not significant enough to be a separate appearance. SenshiSun (talk) 16:55, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of California-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Padmaja Venugopal

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Padmaja Venugopal
• Articles for deletion/Padmaja Venugopal (2nd nomination)

Padmaja Venugopal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non elected politician. Fails NPOL and GNG. Thilsebatti (talk) 15:36, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, India, and Kerala. Thilsebatti (talk) 15:36, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep several sources in the article provide GNG with sigcov. Additional sources such as this one also help ~2026-33562-67 (talk) 17:30, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - NPOL is out of the question, of course, but GNG is met: I see sigcov from The Hindu, Hindustan Times, New Indian Express, ThePrint, etc. Jishara (talk) 22:12, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: I suspect this is the same subject as the first nomination from 2024 that ended in deletion, though that does not necessarily mean the issues from that iteration that led to that result are as applicable to the current version (I have no opinion on that front). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:37, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep per above, article lists several secondary sources Junosang^{leave a message} 17:09, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 11:49, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete WP:NPOL doesn't apply since she's never held elected office, so notability rests entirely on WP:GNG, which isn't met. All the coverage is the routine stuff every party candidate gets, election announcements, result reports and some interview quotes. None of it is independent nor there is any in-depth writing about her specifically. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:07, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Women, India, and Kerala. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:15, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Aras Can Dönmez

Aras Can Dönmez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created in violation of WP:NOLLM. Quoting GnomingStuff: since v1, note WP:AISIGNS e.g. undue emphasis on broader trends, superficial analyses, AIVOCAB etc.

Due to AI use, the article appears to contain multiple verification fails and a hallucinated URL (which I tagged). I used Google Translate to translate the sources. Ca ^{talk to me!} 09:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Turkey, Arts, Suspected AI-generated articles, and People. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 10:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete, fails NOLLM. ‑‑gurkubondinn 10:31, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - absolutely full of AI hallucinations. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 17:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Jason Butcher (entrepreneur)

Jason Butcher (entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This "entrepreneur, investor, business advisor, and mentor" fails WP:GNG. Sourcing are PR puffery, churnalism. Santa Saana (talk) 07:16, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Canada. Santa Saana (talk) 07:16, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Technology, and Caribbean. Bridget (talk) 10:52, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as spam. Author rightfully blocked as promo-only account. Just another businessman doing business. MediaKyle (talk) 13:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Victor Henningsen

Victor Henningsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete - The article currently does not cite any sources, and I was unable to find significant coverage of Henningsen in secondary sources beyond an obituary in the New York Times. His positions at Henningsen Foods and various local and nonprofit organisations do not appear to confer presumed notability. SuperCode111 (talk to me!) 02:13, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and Politics. SuperCode111 (talk to me!) 02:13, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:15, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy delete This is a paid death notice, not a journalistic obituary. Reywas92^Talk 13:18, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Ravenswing 18:43, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Koloi Lebona

Koloi Lebona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough material to substantiate notability. All I could find was passing mentions in BEFORE. dxneo (talk) 23:28, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Africa, and South Africa. dxneo (talk) 23:28, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - I see a decent chunk of sigcov in this book, where he gets two pages of coverage. He also gets a decent chunk of sigcov in the fourth chapter of the Cambridge Companion to Recorded Music, and a decent chunk in this book on contracts in South African music. That should be enough to clear the requirements. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 00:27, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep In addition to what's listed above, also coverage in German , showing further critical notice. Oaktree b (talk) 01:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note to closing admin, please delete the article if there are enough sources represented here to signify notability but the article isn’t improved. We can’t keep keeping low quality articles. This should be some kind of guideline. dxneo (talk) 17:30, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Marko Nešić (born 1976)

Marko Nešić (born 1976) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability. I had prodded this article. Other editor deprodded it and added sources. I think that the sources are unreliable, a very short mention or that they redirect to the home page of the papers. Rolluik (talk) 16:10, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Bands and musicians, Music, Serbia, and Yugoslavia. Rolluik (talk) 16:10, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep – The article has been significantly improved. Reliable, independent secondary sources (RTS, Muzički centar Kragujevac) and documentation of an international career (Munich 2024) have been added, confirming notability. The subject also meets academic criteria. Sources are now adequate. -- ~2026-42807-56 (talk) 11:22, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. Zero sources identified that are both independent and provide SIGCOV. No indication of meeting NPROF. JoelleJay (talk) 15:43, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete - for lack of significant coverage. Women in Music Serbia is not about him, and Pressek is basically a press release. Ping me if you add more. Bearian (talk) 00:56, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Alfred Jowers

Alfred Jowers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contains a lot of unsourced and/or dubious information. Of the information with citations,

• 1. I was able to find an entry for Alfred Jowers in the England 1881 Census. However, it lists Jowers' birth year as approximately 1876, age as 5 at the time, and parents who seem unlikely to have the initials "F.W.". Censuses can have incorrect data, however, there is no source with the birth year of Jowers stated in the article.

• 2. I cannot find an online copy of the 1834-1914 directory, however, there is a copy of the 1834-1900 directory on the Internet Archive. It does indeed list Jowers on page 514 as a RIBA associate.
• 3. No mention of Jowers or the RIBA Silver Medal award in page 384.
• 4. No mention of Jowers or Medal of Merit in https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015024298120&seq=344 page 254].

I have not checked the other 4 sources yet, however, this article likely contains AI hallucinations, especially seeing the creator's talk page with previous warnings of AI use. TruenoCity (talk) 22:45, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. TruenoCity (talk) 22:45, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:57, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

  Also, It is totally unfriendly and against WP:BEFORE to dismiss legitimate citations as "AI hallucinations" without even evaluating them. Making assumptions about an editor's work in bad faith instead of conducting the necessary due diligence before submitting a deletion suggestion is inappropriate. As the architect of St. Matthew's Church in Ealing Common (Grade II listed, Historic England Entry No. 1413693), the subject satisfies WP:CREATIVE. Small citation errors should be routinely cleaned up under WP:PRESERVE, not carelessly nominated for deletion based on conjecture. Kennerth28 (talk) 08:20, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

  • @Kennerth28: I have evaluated 4/8 of the citations and determined they are not legitimate per the reasons above, and I would not consider them as “small citation errors”. With a significant amount of unsourced and/or unverifiable information, it is difficult to conduct a cleanup without significantly rewriting the article. I also noticed you first created a draft at Draft:Alfred Jowers and then created a main space copy while the draft was pending review. This is discouraged per WP:AFCREVIEW. In this current state, I think it should stay in draftspace to improve until it is ready for mainspace (deleting this mainspace article but keeping the draftspace one, although that is currently nominated for MFD). TruenoCity (talk) 15:00, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep The subject satisfies both WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. Alfred Jowers is best known as the architect of St Matthew’s Church, Ealing Common, a Grade II listed building (Historic England List Entry No. 1413693). Earlier versions of this article contained formatting and citation errors. The subject’s baseline notability is evidenced by the architectural legacy he left behind, which is documented in independent, published records such as Historic England and the Directory of British Architects 1834–1914 (Brodie et al. , p. 1018). WP:PRESERVE says: "Minor factual discrepancies should be cleaned up, not deleted. Kennerth28 (talk) 08:09, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

KEEP - Under WP:PRESERVE and WP:CLEANUP, if an article has gaps in sourcing or weak citations, the right approach is to fix those issues, add tags to flag what needs work, or build on it gradually, not just get rid of it entirely. Deletion is only really appropriate when a subject simply doesn’t have enough inherent notability to warrant an article at all. Since Jowers’ place in British architectural history is clearly established, this article should stay in mainspace so it can be improved over time. Futhermore, Per Wikipedia’s WP:BEFORE guideline, any request to delete an article calls for a full, careful review of all its sources. If you’ve only checked half the references you’re looking at and openly say you haven’t looked at the rest that falls well short of what’s needed. It’s not right to dismiss the remaining sources just by guessing they’re unreliable, instead of actually checking them; that’s not how our deletion rules work especially when there is independent reporting about the subject in question. Kennerth28 (talk) 11:31, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Kennerth28, you have !voted twice, and need to remove one. Lamona (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

I do apologise for voting twice x Kennerth28 (talk) 01:02, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

My stance would be to draftify to allow for it to be improved until it is ready for mainspace. However, there is already a copy in draftspace at Draft:Alfred Jowers and therefore would not follow the regular draftify. The main concern is that it significantly contains unsourced and unverifiable information, and therefore would require significant research and rewrite than a cleanup. Of the information that have citations albeit at least half of the citations being invalid, I determined that was a significant concern; it takes a lot of volunteering time to look online for a copy for each historical offline source. TruenoCity (talk) 17:43, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment I left this on the talk page: The "transactions" - As is often the case, the identification of journals (of the past, especially) is complex. There is a v.4 that looks to be 1875 (MDCCCLXXV), and a v. 4ns (ns=new series) that is dated 1922. I do not find Jowers listed in either, although presumably he would be listed as a member. He is not. The citation needs to be re-checked. Thanks. Lamona (talk) 16:32, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

  @Lamona needs to vote too! Kennerth28 (talk) 00:47, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

• User:TruenoCity I did find mention of the silver medal in: The Art Journal, n. 33, 1872, p. 126. G-Books — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lamona (talk • contribs) 17:28, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

I also find it in The Builder, but on page 190 not 384. It says: the Institute Silver Medal be awarded to the author of the Essay on the Decoration of a Suite of Apartments in a first-class Town Mansion, bearing the device of two leaves within a circle (Alfred Jowers;, Associate). The WP article says "for essays" which I will now correct. Lamona (talk) 00:13, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Anis Ahmed (military officer)

Anis Ahmed (military officer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. He is only briefly covered by independent reliable sources. BookishReader (talk) 19:30, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, and Pakistan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:40, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Olakliz

Olakliz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how this meets WP:GNG, at least the cited sources do not prove that: some are non-independent, and most do not provide the WP:SIGCOV we're looking for. A cursory search doesn't help at all. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:12, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Internet, and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:12, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Felipe Vasquez (businessman)

Felipe Vasquez (businessman) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:V The sources I found are paid press releases and database listings. The article also contains several inconsistent claims. For example, the subject is said to have attended multiple schools at the same time, extraordinarily rapid wealth, serve as "Mayor" of Hell, Michigan....Likely fabricated or promotional. Lone Wolf ^howl 09:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:44, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Politicians, United States of America, and Texas. Lone Wolf ^howl 09:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. This is a very strange article without much relevant or reputable sourcing at all. It does seem to be the case that the company had acquired Hell, but they seem to have sold it more recently; otherwise, it's very difficult to pin down good sourcing for anything in the page, which doesn't seem to pass GNG anyway. PA Uploader (talk) 14:13, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Speedy delete based off of Template:db-promo and possibly Template:db-ban. I'll note that the page creator, Special: Contributions/Sharuiti2, has been banned for gaming autoconfirmed privileges and editing the dormant draft Draft:Simple Modern (company), of which Vasquez is supposedly CEO. guninvalid (talk) 01:14, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - for lack of significant coverage about him, rather than the company. Bearian (talk) 02:55, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Roger Michalski

Roger Michalski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:NBIO All the sources I found are primary sources, press releases, and self-submitted speaker bio pages. I could not find any significant independent secondary coverage of the subject. Lone Wolf ^howl 08:19, 1 August 2026 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, and United States of America. Lone Wolf ^howl 08:19, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Virginia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:35, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep. I’d like to contest this nomination and respectfully disagree with the assessment that no significant independent coverage exists.

Now I acknowledge that some of the initial sources were company adjacent, however, there is meaningful third-party coverage of Roger Michalski that demonstrates notability:

1. Trade press coverage

Inside Radio, an established broadcasting and media industry trade publication, quoted Michalski directly in an August 2025 news piece covering Salem Media’s business expansion as editorial coverage of an industry development. [https://www.insideradio.com/free/salem-media-pushes-beyond-radio-with-new-investments/article_40836415-bbfb-45b3-b4da-89ef3a276d88.html]

2. Independent interview

In March 2024, Michalski was featured as the subject of a dedicated interview on Liberty Ventures, an entrepreneurship platform hosted by Alexander McCobin, where he discussed his career trajectory and business philosophy, coverage entirely independent of Eagle Financial Publications. [https://www.libertyventures.xyz/content/top-financial-newsletter-editor-shares-the-ins-and-outs-of-the-business-roger-michalski]

3. Multiple SEC-filed press releases over a decade

As VP and Publisher of Eagle Financial Publications, a subsidiary of NASDAQ-listed Salem Media Group, Michalski has been the named spokesperson and quoted executive in multiple official BusinessWire press releases filed between 2015 and 2025, covering acquisitions of DividendInvestor.com, TradersCrux, Intelligence Report, Hilary Kramer’s services, George Gilder’s products, and Jim Fink’s investment services. These are verifiable public record documents. [https://investor.salemmedia.com]

4. Role and significance

Michalski has led Eagle Financial Publications for over 20 years, growing it into one of the largest financial newsletter operations in the U.S. with 230,000+ subscribers under a publicly traded parent company. His role is comparable to other publishing executives who have established Wikipedia articles. I’m actively working to strengthen the article’s sourcing and am open to feedback on how to improve it rather than deletion. Stubbing or a cleanup tag would be more appropriate here than outright deletion given the verifiable public record of this individual’s professional activities.

Greatsokratis (talk) 14:50, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - for lack of significant coverage. Interviews and press releases don't count towards notability. Bearian (talk) 02:53, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Shujaat Khan (engineer)

Shujaat Khan (engineer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Basically a WP:PROMO created by a WP:COI. Non-notable local activist. Longhornsg (talk) 07:57, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Education, Religion, Islam, Bangladesh, and New York. Longhornsg (talk) 07:57, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Not notable and not neutral. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 13:19, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Just not notable. The sources don't even mention the subject. — Raihanur (talk) 18:13, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:41, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete subject is definitely not notable. Mccapra (talk) 21:19, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

John Chidley-Hill

John Chidley-Hill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The majority of the sources used are self-published and being used to back up claims in the article, which is written like a resume. Prior to this nomination, one of the sources used was the subject's resume (I removed it from the page prior to realizing the rest of the sources were almost all self-published). It is clear that the subject has done a lot of writing however, I am not seeing WP:N being met. Covering hundreds of events does not equal notability. FiddleheadLady (talk) 01:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Journalism. FiddleheadLady (talk) 01:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Appreciate your thoughtful editing! The sources now in the piece are primarily published via The Canadian Press, not the subject himself, so the information gleaned is via the subject's work. I believe the length and breadth of the career does warrant some notability. Outro (talk) 03:17, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: Sadly, most journalists are not notable even if they are very well-known, simply because folks don't often write about journalists. In this case, I can't find a single GNG-worthy source. The article has many references, but it's all the subject's own work (not "self-published" as the nom suggests, rather "self-authored") ... I would love to see more representation of Canadian journalists on Wikipedia but unfortunately Mr. Chidley-Hill does not meet our requirements. MediaKyle (talk) 12:08, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Yes, thank you for the 'self-authored' correction. My bad! FiddleheadLady (talk) 01:08, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete I find no sources about him, only by him. Ironically, it may be that his lawyer father has a better claim to fame as I found mentions of his work in G-Books (but didn't investigate further). Lamona (talk) 16:08, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Brother Love (rock musician)

Brother Love (rock musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claims are reaching a non-notable chart and working with non-notable musicians. Could not independently corroborate claim of television commercials or airtime on Podsafe Music Network, which does not appear to be a notable claim either. Could not find any reviews of the albums. The only result on newspapers.com for "Larry Florman" + "Brother Love" was a Tennessean blurb about him copyrighting the name. HER & Kings County does not appear to be notable either. The article has been in deplorable condition since 2005, suggesting this is not a notable musician. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Music, and New York. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Craig Snyder (writer)

Craig Snyder (writer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sign of notability. Allan Nonymous (talk) 14:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Allan Nonymous (talk) 14:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Journalism, Photography, and Florida. Shellwood (talk) 15:19, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Article contains no sources, full of uncited info. Author does not appear to meet WP:GNG and seems to have little to no news coverage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bungle491 (talk • contribs) 04:05, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: per non, in addition, this article fails WP:BLP and WP:V. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 12:38, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - poorly sourced; one link to the subject's website is not enough for a BLP. Ping me if you add much more. Bearian (talk) 17:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete WP:GNG, WP:BLP and WP:V due to a complete lack of independent coverage. Staticspector (talk) 23:30, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Samson G Balfour Smith

Samson G Balfour Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable musician. Sources are insufficient to establish notability under WP:GNG. Mascius (talk) 11:48, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Mascius (talk) 11:48, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and France. Shellwood (talk) 11:59, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

see all the official links on page about the collaborations & past published works, as not just musician, but multimedia artist from early 2000 to 2026 ~2026-42318-12 (talk) 12:11, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. He may be a multifaceted multimedia artist, but I also can't find sources that establish notability. – Insincere Giraffe (talk) 19:11, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Inclusion is not decided on the basis of collaborations, published works, or length of career, but by what is written about the subject in reputable sources. I see no evidence of such coverage here. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:06, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - poorly sourced; one citation is not enough for a BLP. Ping me if you add more. Bearian (talk) 17:30, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Diogo Ribeiro (lexicographer)

Diogo Ribeiro (lexicographer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I didn't find sources despite searching with different terms. Fails WP:GNG Wikipicked (talk) 07:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Article is already sourced to Konkani Vishwakosh, a local language encyclopedia sponsored by the Government here. SerChevalerie (talk) 08:14, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

For an article to pass WP:GNG it need multiple reliable sources, not just one. Also typically an encyclopedia is not considered a reliable source. Hopefully that helps you understand why this was nominated for deletion. Dobblesteintalk 14:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Subject meets WP:SCHOLAR and WP:AUTHOR: See here and here and here where their work has been cited by others. SerChevalerie (talk) 09:13, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

That is great, but those need to be cited in the article. The article only having one source referenced in it now is the reason it has been nominated.

Dobblesteintalk 13:18, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Christianity, and Portugal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep as per the scholarly sources identified in this discussion. Also encyclopaedias can be very reliable as per WP:Tertiary or unreliable on a case by case basis, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:33, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Rasha Thadani

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Rasha Thadani
• Articles for deletion/Rasha Thadani (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Rasha Thadani (3rd nomination)

Rasha Thadani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Plenty of WP:NEWSORGINDIA but not significant coverage to meet GNG or ANYBIO. Yes, she may fall under WP:NACTOR but still needs to have the coverage to support per ANYBIO. I do not see it here. CNMall41 (talk) 05:53, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and India. CNMall41 (talk) 05:54, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 06:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - clears GNG from the Hindustan Times source, the The Statesman source, and the NDTV source, and also definitely clears NACTOR through major roles in two notable productions (Azaad Srinivasa Mangapuram) Jishara (talk) 13:42, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Strong keep - The nomination appears pretty conclusory to me. They just lump the sources together as "plenty of NEWSORGINDIA" without actually showing why the reliable independent sources in the article don't satisfy WP:GNG requirements. Just dropping "NEWSORGINDIA" isn't enough to prove someone isn't notable. In the article, there is good independent coverage from outlets like The Hindu, The Indian Express, India Today, Cinema Express, Hindustan Times. And on the day of release of subject's new movie, just after this nomination, reviews came for Srinivasa Mangapuram and reviews on her acting in Azaad were already there before this, sources of reviews talk about subject's performance. Sources like ANI or basic press releases can be removed or replaced as @Honeybrowneyes has raised concerns about it but that's just normal cleanup and editing procedure, basically pages keep on improving in wikipedia all the time, it doesn't mean the whole article fails GNG. Nominator mentioned WP:NACTOR might apply but doesn't explain why an actress who landed credited major roles in two notable movies, complete with independent review of Azaad (second movie reviews came after nomination), somehow misses the bar. I have removed the NDTV source already, and editors can clean up the weaker or promotional links (if they think any such type sources exist), but the actual independent coverage is more than enough to keep the article. Wikipicked (talk) 04:20, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete and Draftify The article still needs much better sources to cite.

1. Two of the sources are from Asian News International (see: WP:RSPANI) on which there still remains no consensus on WP:ICTFSOURCES.

2. As already mentioned by User:CNMall41, most of the sources are WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Particularly this interview of hers for Femina appears quite WP:NEWSORGINDIA.

3. Also churnalism. 'Who is Rasha Thadani' by NDTV is literally a web story. A very low-quality citation, in my humble opinion.

4. This The Hindu citation (ref. no. 9 and 10) and this The Hindu citation (ref. no. 15) are duplicate references (see: WP:DUPCITES) and one should be removed and other invoked.

5. Only five citations (see note for latter) have bylines, the rest are published by 'entertainment desk' or similar names.

:Note: In this citation, the article claims it's written by Vinita Kumar but when you go through it, you see her name nowhere but rather 'India Today Entertainment Desk.' At the end, 'published by Anurag Bohra' is mentioned.

References

Honeybrowneyes (talk) 15:26, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

This version was live when you responded in this Afd.

I agree with some of your sourcing concerns. I've already removed the NDTV web story, and I have no objection to replacing ANI or other routine or promotional references where stronger sources are available. On the other hand, I don't think those issues, by themselves, demonstrate that the subject fails WP:GNG, if that's the reason why you're leaning towards delete. In the 4th point you said there were duplicate sources, they are not duplicate sources, the second citation was reused. Wikipicked (talk) 04:54, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

I appreciate that. I have struck through the points regarding NDTV web story and The Hindu reference. Honeybrowneyes (talk) 07:33, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

NDTV is a collection of Instagram posts and The Hindu is a non-bylined fancruft article. Nothing that is useful for notability. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:54, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: To meet NACTOR the subject should have played significant roles in multiple productions which I cannot find here. Fails both GNG and NACTOR. Thilsebatti (talk) 07:24, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - Only two film appearances. None of the sources described or covered about her "work" exclusively. Her only notable work is a song from her debut film. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 07:27, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Purushottam Das

Purushottam Das (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion under WP:GNG and WP:MUSICIAN. The article fails to demonstrate significant, independent, non-trivial coverage in reliable secondary sources. The existing references are minimal and do not establish the depth of coverage required to satisfy general notability requirements. A search for this entity did not return sufficient secondary coverage to pass WP:N. Itz.mas10 (talk) 17:18, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bands and musicians. Itz.mas10 (talk) 17:18, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:02, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:35, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:18, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

List of million-plus urban agglomerations in India

List of million-plus urban agglomerations in India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Urban agglomerations in India because of WP:NOTDB. A cut-off at a million is chosen for no set reason, and there is nothing encyclopedic about collecting a set of items based on a certain characteristic. The cited content in the Census section does not directly mention the topic of the article. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 12:39, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Lists, and India. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 12:39, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Dude, it's perfectly acceptable to have an arbitary cut-off! Urban agglomerations in India has a cut-off of 100 places for no set reason! List of United States cities by population has a cut-off of 100,000, it's totally discretionary by article and these are all absolutely encyclopedic! We tend not to include whatever threshold the list uses in the title but come on... However unlike your other nominations these do actually overlap so a merge would be appropriate IF you merge the areas and whatever else is not already there. Reywas92^Talk 15:46, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  This means that all those pages need to go as well, so that Wikipedia better conforms to its policies HerrHeulsuse (talk) 05:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  This seems to be like a WP:ALLORNOTHING argument. Population lists are not WP:NOTDB unless it lists down an entire census file as is. However, the articles can be considered for merging as there are similarities to both and as there is information in List of million-plus urban agglomerations in India that is not there in Urban agglomerations in India. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 09:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

List of towns in India by population

List of towns in India by population (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTDB and WP:NOTSTATS, this should be deleted. This is the type of things you would find in a statistics website, not on Wikipedia. Anything encyclopedic about the population of India can be put in that article. The fact that other pages also break Wikipedia policy is not a strong reason to keep it. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 12:31, 29 July 2026 (UTC) Edited 14:31, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Lists, and India. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 12:31, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep Wikipedia has plenty of statistics and this is fine. It's just a subset that extends List of cities in India by population. NOTSTATS says "Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing" – nothing here is unreadable or confusing. It says "statistics should be placed in tables to enhance readability" – this is a table. There's also no other list of towns in India on Wikipedia so the suggestion to merge to India is baffling. If you can show me that these places are listed for each state that would be better. Reywas92^Talk 14:18, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: This seems to be an example of WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 19:29, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 13:19, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete There are 1004 entries on this list, and at this scale (<100K people), the full number of qualifying entries is likely much larger. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:07, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Matthew Miller (producer)

Matthew Miller (producer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article currently has two sources, one of them is self-published. I was not able to find other sources about this Matt Miller. Appears to fail WP:NBIO. If more sources are found, please ping me. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:59, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Television. Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:59, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  I've added five additional independent, reliable secondary sources (The Hollywood Reporter, Deadline ×2, Assignment X, Give Me My Remote) that verify Miller's career as creator/showrunner of Forever (ABC) and Lethal Weapon (Fox), his overall deal with Warner Bros. Television, and his current work as co-showrunner of Ride or Die (2026). This should address the WP:NBIO concern. LenaKlif (talk) 17:14, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and California. Shellwood (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: A show runner or producer is not automatically notable. The additional sources do not rise above the HEY barrier. This person has an extremely common name, and when I searched, I found a dozen other people with similar names. There are many different people who are two degrees away from me on LinkedIn alone. Can the proponents, who have the burden of proof share their three best sources? Otherwise, it could be deleted by default. Bearian (talk) 20:32, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Bearian: Happy to share specific sources, since a common name is a fair concern here. These all identify this specific Matt Miller by context (creator/showrunner of Lethal Weapon) rather than just listing his name in passing:

  1. Deadline (Aug 2018) — exclusive interview where Deadline identifies him as "Lethal Weapon developer/executive producer/showrunner Matt Miller" and quotes him at length on the Season 3 casting process.

  2. UPI (Feb 2019) — independent wire report identifying him as "the creator, executive producer and showrunner of Fox's Lethal Weapon television series," with original quotes from a TCA press event.

  3. Variety (Aug 2019) — exclusive report on his overall deal with Warner Bros. Television and a new project ("Dead Eddie"), confirming his ongoing standing as a working showrunner beyond Lethal Weapon.

  There's also a fourth: TV Insider (Jul 2018), a standalone Q&A interview identifying him by name and role, and a fifth from Deadline (Feb 2019) covering the show's future under his leadership.

  None of these are passing mentions — each is centered on him specifically as the person driving decisions on the show, over a sustained period (2018–2019), from multiple independent outlets. Combined with the Hollywood Reporter piece on his overall deal renewal and the Deadline coverage of Ride or Die (2026), I think this satisfies WP:NBASIC's "multiple, independent, reliable" bar. Happy to add these directly to the article if that helps. LenaKlif (talk) 18:32, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the suggested sources?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:44, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Mohammad Junaid (volunteer)

Mohammad Junaid (volunteer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. All the sources are related to some viral incidents involved with him. Thilsebatti (talk) 05:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of India-related AfD discussions. Thilsebatti (talk) 05:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:49, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep - it's undeniable IMO that he has the sigcov from Hindustan Times, news18, Muslim Mirror, India Today, ThePrint, etc etc. What is more of a concern is BLP1E, but I think he squeaks by that because there's two distinct incidents - his detention, and the purported rift. What I think needs to be done is that rift needs to be added to the article. But in article sourcing shows notability. Jishara (talk) 19:07, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep reliable Indian newspapers have covered him significantly. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 07:08, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep He faced government crackdown for helping the student protests with basic necessities like food and water, this is very well documented.Who is Junaid Malik? Man who distributed free food at CJP’s Jantar Mantar protest

Ghaziabad student Junaid who fed CJP protesters moves Supreme Court over ‘police harassment’

Junaid, who fed CJP protesters for 35 days, alleges police picked him up and questioned him

CJP volunteer Junaid claims Delhi cops detained him over protest food distribution ~2026-42092-10 (talk) 11:38, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Not important or notable enough. Kalpesh Manna 2002 (talk) 12:26, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete. wp:gng, WP:BLP1E — Preceding unsigned comment added by JnhoIVe (talk • contribs) 05:59, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 06:07, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Ananta Mandal

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Ananta Mandal
• Articles for deletion/Ananta Mandal (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Ananta Mandal (3rd nomination)

Ananta Mandal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An artist lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. Last of The Time (talk) 05:57, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Arts, India, and West Bengal. Last of The Time (talk) 05:57, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:47, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep, just the opposite, from what I can read of the sources and related material the subject easily meets GNG. And per the results of the first two deletion attempts, one to Keep and the other no consensus but with GNG sources a factor in each. From the close of the first AfD: "Sourcing concerns appear to have been remedied." From the close of the second AfD: "Evidence of substantive coverage in reliable sources has been shown." Randy Kryn (talk) 10:01, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete, no critical reviews, no museum shows, no public collections, no ULAN or other artist registry, too early for wiki --SalomonSalmon (talk) 20:06, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - the article is imperfect, but I see Indian Express, Hindustan Times, and Bombay Times - that's plenty sufficient to clear GNG. Jishara (talk) 19:03, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Strong Keep – The subject appears to satisfy the requirements of WP and WP:ARTIST. There are multiple reliable, independent secondary sources that provide significant coverage of the artist and his work, beyond routine mentions or primary sources.

Examples of significant coverage from reliable sources include:

Multifarious Impressions of Ananta Mandal – The Times of India. Capturing Landscapes on His Canvas – The Times of India. Treat for the senses – Millennium Post. Rich Canvases Saturate Watercolor Event – Houston Chronicle, which discusses Ananta Mandal's award-winning work at the Watercolor Art Society–Houston exhibition.

Ananta Mandal: The monsoon muse - painting rain soaked realities – Astaguru. The subject's artworks have been auctioned and exhibited by AstaGuru, one of India's leading fine art auction houses, further demonstrating recognition within the professional art community.

The subject has also held multiple solo exhibitions at established art institutions, including Jehangir Art Gallery, Nehru Centre, and Academy of Fine Arts, Kolkata, demonstrating sustained professional recognition.

The article also documents awards and recognitions from established organizations, including the Bombay Art Society, AIFACS, Academy of Fine Arts, Kolkata, Government College of Art & Craft, The San Diego Watercolor Society, The Watercolor Art Society-Houston and the Western Federation of Watercolor Societies.

Taken together, these independent sources and achievements demonstrate that the subject has received significant coverage and satisfies Wikipedia's notability requirements.

This is the article's 3rd AfD nomination. Unless substantial new evidence or policy-based arguments have been presented that were not considered in the previous discussions, repeated nominations may be unnecessary. Based on the available evidence, I support keeping the article. If consensus is to keep, the AfD templates should be removed following the close of this discussion. WitchScarlet (talk) 23:28, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Withdrawn – After taking a closer look at the in-depth coverage provided by User:WitchScarlet, the subject meets WP:GNG. Last of The Time (talk) 05:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. I see this has been withdrawn, but as I created a source assessment last night, I'd like to add it here as part of the record.

It looks like this watercolorist has won a handful of regional watercolor awards and has had reviews in The Times of India , Bombay Times, The Indian Express, Hindustan Times, and the Afternoon Despatch & Courier see (Wikipedia:NEWSORGINDIA). 3 of the articles are "reviews" of the Nehru Centre Art Gallery GROUP exhibit in 2011. There is no particular notability for the Nehru Centre Art Gallery exhibition. The issue seems for be whether multiple mentions in borderline publications adds up to "significant coverage". Same with the regional "awards". Do multiple regional awards adds up to a significant award? In the previous AFD discussions, the quality of the sources is never convincingly presented. That is why the article keeps getting nominated for deletion. This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. He has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums. I would argue that is is time for this article to go. The sum of the sources do not add up to notable. I think mine is a substantial policy-based argument. WP:TOOSOON. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 17:50, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Source assessment table prepared by User:WomenArtistUpdates

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://articles.talentsofworld.com/ananta-mandal-an-indian-artist/			This looks like a user generated profile. ARtistsof the World has become https://talentsofworld.com/ananta-mandal-an-indian-artist	✘ No
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/people/Multifarious-impressions-of-Ananta-Mandal/articleshow/27172339.cms	The Times of India		puff piece	? Unknown
https://anantamandal.com/blog/world-art-dubai-ananta-mandals-solo-exhibition/			primary source blog post	✘ No
https://anantamandal.com/press/the-times-of-india-26-march-2011-mumbai	Bombay Time via artist's website		Review of exhbition at the Nehru Centre Art Gallery. Artist can Rent space in this gallery.	✘ No
https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/painting-his-love/	The Indian Express		anoterh review of the Nehru Centre Art Gallery	✘ No
"Get a glimpse of Mumbai's charisma on canvas". Hindustan Times. 22 March 2011.	Hindustan Times		another review of the Nehru Centre Art Gallery https://anantamandal.com/press/hindustan-times-22-march-2011-mumbai	? Unknown
"A journey from reality by Ananta Mandal". Afternoon. 4 May 2010.	Afternoon Despatch & Courier Mumbai India		no by line. Weird column that relates to no event	? Unknown
https://www.nwws.org/portals/0/PDFs/JulyAugust2017HotPress.pdf			$500.00 prize from the Northwest Watercolor Society	✘ No
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/entertainment/theater/article/Rich-canvases-saturate-watercolor-event-4373940.php			Coverage of the award at the Northwest Watercolor Society	✘ No
https://www.nwws.org/portals/0/PDFs/JulyAugust2017HotPress.pdf			Another link to $500.00 prize from the Northwest Watercolor Society	✘ No
gale.com/apps/doc/A238274471/ITOF?u=wikipedia&sid=bookmark-ITOF&xid=a6f8ef6f	"Western Federation of Watercolor Societies exhibition held in Utah."		dead link to "Watercolor" magazine. Does not seem to be a national publication	? Unknown
gale.com/apps/doc/A155401931/ITOF?u=wikipedia&sid=bookmark-ITOF&xid=17fcbd42	San Diego Watercolor Society's 26th International Exhibition award winners		dead link to American Artist	? Unknown
gale.com/apps/doc/A214525552/ITOF?u=wikipedia&sid=bookmark-ITOF&xid=5f16497b	"North East Watercolor Society 2009 international exhibition winners."		dead link to Watercolor magazine	? Unknown
gale.com/apps/doc/A167026987/ITOF?u=wikipedia&sid=bookmark-ITOF&xid=8c670000.	"Awards presented at the 32nd Annual Western Federation of Watercolor Societies Exhibition."		dead link to American Artist	? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Strong keep – clearly notable – As with very strong independent sources the artist is meet clearly notable WP:NARTIST. More than 12 years after the article was created, it remains well sourced and supported by significant independent coverage, many significant shows, multiple significant all India and International Juried art shows awards, satisfying GNG. Based on the available sourcing and the outcomes of the previous two AfD discussions, I do not see a policy-based justification for deletion.

I'm not sure why this article is being nominated for AfD for a third time, as I don't see any new policy-based evidence showing that the subject no longer meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. However the deletion has been withdrawn.

I'd like to add the source assessment table here. Examples of reliable, independent sources that provide significant coverage include:

Accordingly, I believe the appropriate outcome is Keep. RedRabbit7 (talk) 03:19, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Source assessment table prepared by User:RedRabbit7

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/spotlight/multifarious-impressions-of-ananta-mandal/articleshow/27172339.cms	The Times of India		Significant media coverage by The Times of India	✔ Yes
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/entertainment/theater/article/Rich-canvases-saturate-watercolor-event-4373940.php	Houston Chronicle		The subject won the First Place Award for the artwork Waiting for the Morning from the Watercolor Art Society–Houston, USA.	✔ Yes
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/spotlight/capturing-landscapes-on-his-canvas/articleshow/26580729.cms	The Times of India		Independent coverage of the subject's solo exhibition at Kamalnayan Bajaj Art Gallery, Mumbai.	✔ Yes
https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/painting-his-love/	The Indian Express		Independent coverage of the subject's solo exhibition at Nehru Centre Art Gallery, Mumbai.	✔ Yes
https://www.astaguru.com/blogs/ananta-mandal-the-monsoon-muse---painting-rain-soaked-realities-511	India's leading fine art auction houses AstaGuru		The subject's artworks have been auctioned and exhibited by AstaGuru	✔ Yes
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chandigarh/Mandals-country-canvas-in-town-for-art-lovers/articleshow/17633151.cms	The Times of India, Chandigarh		Independent coverage of the subject's solo exhibition at Sector 9, Chandigarh	✔ Yes
https://www.gurukahanmuseum.org/exhibits/ananta-mandal	Guru Kahan Art Museum, Gujarat		The subject's work is on permanent display at the museum.	✔ Yes
https://www.millenniumpost.in/features/creative-india-takes-centre-stage-670157	Millennium Post		Independent coverage of the subject's solo exhibition at Lokayata Art Gallery, New Delhi.	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

• Delete - While this autobiography (per talk page history of creator), has been withdrawn by the nominator, I strongly agree with User:WomenArtistUpdates that this fails WP:GNG and WP:NARTIST. The sources are either trivial mentions that do not provide in-depth significant coverage and the one potententially good source (Times of India) is indeed a promotional "puff piece" that does not provide in-depth critical analysis of his work. Awards are non-notable. It's WP:PROMO and should not be retained in the encyclopedia. Having said that, the work itself is well crafted, but that is not a criteria for notability nor inclusion. Netherzone (talk) 22:43, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 03:46, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Ata Muhammad Mazari

Ata Muhammad Mazari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NOTINHERITED.

I don't think the subject could pass WP:GNG solely because he is a relative of Lal Masjid leaders; there is no significant independent coverage of him specifically. Lone Wolf ^howl 08:49, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Pakistan. Lone Wolf ^howl 08:49, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  as i have added the reference the family of ghazi themselves demanded the the body of the atta muhammad and few others which is clearly mentioned in the soruce altough and there is another link in which his father wait outside for dna test for attta muhammad his son Tariqmazari (talk) 10:36, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  https://www.dawn.com/news/258175/lal-masjid-dead-a-living-torture Tariqmazari (talk) 10:37, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - for lack of significant coverage, or even an assertion of notability. Possible speedy deletion candidate. Bearian (talk) 19:41, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - as per nomination. Salman Al Basri (talk) 07:34, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs source analysis, nominator is a blocked sock.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:15, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Jamuna Das Choudhury

Jamuna Das Choudhury (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG,WP:V. Only source is a primary government gazette. Article itself acknowledges "detailed biographies... are scarce in publicly available records." No independent secondary coverage exists. Colonial honorific titles alone do not establish notability. Lone Wolf ^howl 06:10, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. Lone Wolf ^howl 06:10, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Jharkhand. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:50, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - for lack of significant coverage. One source is not enough for any biography. Bearian (talk) 19:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs more input by legitimate editors - the nominator is blocked as a sock.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:06, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Strong suspicion of LLM use as the repeated "sources say" text is very typical. Sentence cited by nominator is also concerning. M kuhner (talk) 20:59, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Kenneth Baer

Kenneth Baer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. Has placed some op-eds, but is a mid-level political appointee and roving spokeman in U.S. politics. Provides cookie cutter quotes to news media on behalf of his clients. Lacks the WP:SIGCOV or impact to establish notability. Longhornsg (talk) 22:52, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, News media, Politics, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 22:52, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Journalism, England, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:39, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I was doing a search for sources and discovered that were two degrees of separation, which isn't surprising because I was a Democratic committee person for over a decade. Therefore as is my practice I won't "vote" on this matter, and will trust the process. Bearian (talk) 03:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Profile seems notable, have few notable news sources too, yet i want more editors to cast theiur vote to make the clarity.Rainfixer (talk) 05:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

  This is a passing mention in an op-ed from 20 years ago. The other WaPo source is a photo. The other sources are a marriage announcement and a geneology website. None of these are WP:RS that establish WP:NBIO. Longhornsg (talk) 18:58, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete sources are OPEDs and not used for proving notability HerrHeulsuse (talk) 14:40, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:35, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• weak keep More than a few reviews for the "Reinventing Democrats:" book, , , , although the book might be more notable than the author. A redirect to the book perhaps might suffice? Oaktree b (talk) 00:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - He is notable per WP:NAUTHOR and I think in general as well. Dcpoliticaljunkie (talk) 16:54, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

James M. Kirby

James M. Kirby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like a nice enough human, but only notable for being commissioner of this (minor) state agency. Majority of the article (much of which has since been trimmed) was only sourced from his obituary, which appears to be the primary source of biographical information. Other sources are just passing mention in government documents or minor local media. Seems a clear case of WP:1E, with no other WP:SIGCOV. ZimZalaBim^talk 16:22, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and South Carolina. Shellwood (talk) 16:43, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related AfD discussions. ScalarFactor (talk) 16:38, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Merge with South Carolina Commission for the Blind per nom.

A.Classical-Futurist (talk) 07:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 23:33, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to South Carolina Commission for the Blind#Commissioners per nom. Delete if that article's AfD closes as such. charlotte ^👸♥ 00:50, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Daniel Tay

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Daniel Tay
• Articles for deletion/Daniel Tay (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Daniel Taylor,Student

Daniel Tay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted in 2016, reinstated in 2017, has had a {{refimprove}} ever since. Of the three sources:

• Behind the Voice Actors. Reliable per WP:BTVA, which also says coverage is routine and does not contribute to notability.
• Bustle. No consensus on reliability per WP:BUSTLE.
• Hello Magazine. Possibly reliable, but very sparse.

So that's one source that's routine coverage, one that's uncertain, and one that might be reliable but still says very little about the subject.

A WP:BEFORE for "Daniel Tay" + "Elf" or "Daniel Tay" + "Doogal" turned up only routine mentions of him as an actor in the movie, or unreliable looking clickbait "where are they now" articles from unreliable-looking gossip churnalism sites. This one seems the most reliable, but I'm still on the fence as no editors are credited on the site and it's more broadly a sports website. Everything else was sketchy looking sites like "Just Jared". As Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Spano proved, merely being the subject of a handful of "where are they now" gossip columns is not SIGCOV. He got no coverage for any of his roles beyond routine mentions of "Name of character, played by Daniel Tay..." Merely name-dropping someone as playing a role is not SIGCOV.

Suggest either deletion or redirection to Elf (film) as his most notable role. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:08, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• KEEP. Not sure what the reasoning is behind all this is. He was a former child actor who starred in Elf, American Splendor, The Magic Roundabout (voiced Doogal), and voice-over gaming work. Redirecting to one film (Elf) is not feasible. SIGCOV is not going to happen when it comes to a "former child actor" except on the "where are they now" coverage sites; which is still occurring for this BLP even as late as 2025 (People, E! Now, Celebrity Tonight, Celebrity News Today, Diario AS, Wales Online, Irish Star) . There is enough in this article for a stand-alone stub at WP. No, WP is not IMDB. Who said it was? and in fact, this article gives much more info than IMDB for this BLP. Last, if one wishes to "compare" article for article (Nick Spano), one only needs to peruse the List of former American child actors to see that Tay is in very good company to remain when it comes to "reason for AfD". Maineartists (talk) 18:58, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Film, and New York. Ten Pound Hammer (they/them) • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:08, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• delete doesn't meet ACTOR for the reasons above. One role typically isn't enough and the lack of sourcing isn't helping. Already deleted a few times due to the lack of sourcing, with nothing found since then to show notability either. Oaktree b (talk) 20:19, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep per GNG - E! Online in 2018, People in 2024, Bustle in 2020, Cosmopolitan in 2018, Glamor UK in 2016 Jishara (talk) 03:02, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

COMMENT with above and in keeping with "per conversation" confirming RS, NPR, Entertainment Weekly, Wales Online and Diario AS (translated). Google Books: Screening Text: Critical Perspectives on Film Adaptation, Real Lives, Celebrity Stories, Jon Stewart: A Biography. Reviews: NYT, NYT2. ADDED: NPR, Variety, Business Insider, Westword, Entertainment Weekly. Updated article page substantially. Maineartists (talk) 01:07, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 23:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

15 (software engineer)

15 (software engineer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to 15.ai. Personal life section is primary sourced fluff, everything else is better covered in the website article. No indication of independent notability. REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 10:35, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Comics and animation, Computing, and Internet. REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 10:35, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering, Artificial intelligence, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to 15.ai. No notability for a standalone article. Skyshiftertalk 12:50, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Passes WP:BASIC; independent notability is met as the subject is a primary focus of both the articles 15.ai and Voiceverse NFT plagiarism scandal, both of which have plenty of sources that are not currently used in the nominated article. The article is incomplete, but the problems are entirely WP:SURMOUNTABLE. –GM 16:10, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  Voiceverse NFT plagiarism scandal is clearly a subtopic of 15.ai, I'm not convinced it needs to be a standalone article (at the very least it needs a hatchet taken to it to pare it down from 80,000 bytes). This is not is convincing case for independent notability. REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 23:36, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  What?! That topic is clearly not a subtopic of 15.ai. It easily passes WP:GNG, has WP:SUSTAINED coverage over a long period of time, has multiple sections and paragraphs that don't involve 15.ai at all, and has an entire Legacy section filled with WP:RS talking about how important it was in the general landscape of video games and NFTs. Why in the world would that article be a subtopic of 15.ai as opposed to, say, a subtopic of Troy Baker or a subtopic of NFT controversies? The article itself is GA quality, so I don't know where you're getting this notion at all that the article needs to be rewritten. Proposing that the nominated article and the whole Voiceverse article be merged into 15.ai is seriously baffling and raises the question of whether you actually read all of the article's sources in full (I did). –GM 00:18, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to 15.ai cause there really isnt much to the article that isnt already discussed at 15.ai, tbh the pseudonymous nature of the individual is going to make quality blp sources extremely difficult and a lot of the sources used i think currently at least border on WP:BLPGOSSIP. i do want to also note an article about this individual was already blanked and redirected once before and i think the reasoning why is still a solid argument for the redirect today Ibnqirtaiba (talk) 14:28, 28 July 2026 (UTC) —  Ibnqirtaiba is a confirmed sockpuppet of BrocadeRiverPoems, see investigation.
• Redirect to 15.ai, the subject does not have independent notability as the majority of the sources are about the website and not the individual themselves. MidnightMayhem (talk) 06:08, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep due to WP:CREATIVE #3, subject created 15.ai which has been primary subject of multiple international independent periodical articles and more. I don't see why independent notability is important that it mandates a redirect, there does not seem to be official policy that require this. We have articles Speechify and Cliff Weitzman, who is notable for nothing outside of Speechify. Arguably Weitzman's article should be a redirect more than 15's because 15.ai's reach was much wider than Speechify. Bronymike2010 (talk) 07:18, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

@Bronymike2010 see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and WP:NBLP. Issac I Navarro (talk) 07:41, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

@Issac I Navarro That's where WP:CREATIVE comes from on the same page, an additional criteria along with the regular notability criteria. Independent notability is moot because subject qualifies CREATIVE #3, warranting an article. Bronymike2010 (talk) 07:46, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

@Bronymike2010, and must also pass WP:GNG.

As GM mentions below part of the claim is WP:BLP1E Issac I Navarro (talk) 07:58, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

@Issac I Navarro: No, I'm saying that I disagree with the WP:BLP1E argument. The subject does pass WP:GNG. It's just a matter of improving the article, which I unfortunately cannot because I am blocked due to edit warring. Once the block is over, though, I'll make sure to improve it substantially. –GM 08:00, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Fully understood. I was pointing out to Bronymike2010, the rationale and policy/guidelines being cited. Issac I Navarro (talk) 08:04, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

@Issac I Navarro: No problem. I only wanted to clarify because I saw that you were repeating the same argument above, hoping you'd reconsider. –GM 08:05, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

What sources are you looking at that illustrate that this is not a case of BLP1E? Issac I Navarro (talk) 08:08, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

@Issac I Navarro: Here's a sample of multiple WP:RS showing coverage occurring at different periods for different reasons:

• Feng, Bai (March 15, 2020). "模型参数过亿跑不动？看MIT小哥，少量数据完成高质量文本转语音！" [Struggling with Models with Over 100 Million Parameters? See How an MIT Student Achieved High‑Quality Text‑to‑Speech with Minimal Data!]. QQ News (in Chinese). XinZhiYuan. Archived from the original on February 27, 2025. Retrieved February 22, 2025. (pre-2021 15.ai)
• Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). "Generate Your Favourite Characters' Voice Lines using Machine Learning". Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. (during operation in 2021)
• Wright, Steve (January 17, 2022). "Troy Baker-backed NFT company admits to using content without permission". Stevivor. Archived from the original on January 17, 2022. Retrieved October 5, 2025. (Voiceverse scandal)
• Abisola, Shojobi (January 3, 2025). "The MIT Project That Paved Way For Modern Voice AI". Independent. Archived from the original on February 27, 2025. Retrieved February 27, 2025. (post-15.ai)
• Irpan, Alex (July 21, 2025). "Brony Musicians Seize The Means of Production: My Eyewitness Account to BABSCon 2025". Alex Irpan. Archived from the original on July 30, 2025. Retrieved October 1, 2025. (fandom impact and involvement; the author is a Senior Research Scientist at Google Deepmind with over 26,000 citations on Google Scholar with an h-index of 31(!), so WP:EXPERTSPS applies)

–GM 08:16, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

WP:EXPERTSPS explicitly does not apply to BLPs: Never use a self-published source as a third-party source about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer.. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:31, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speechify and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff Weitzman have been nominated for deletion. Madeleine (talk) 20:48, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Neutral/Week merge Merge/Redirect per nom and Skyshifter. I am not seeing how this subject would warrant it's own page. That being said, I would prefer a merger over a redirect, as there does appear to be some useful and encyclopedic content. Issac I Navarro (talk) 07:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Issac I Navarro: The above arguments are essentially invoking WP:BLP1E, in that the claim is that the subject is only notable for having created 15.ai. In my opinion, WP:BLP1E is inapplicable here. The subject is covered in connection with both having created and operated 15.ai and separately for a substantial and well-documented role in the Voiceverse NFT plagiarism scandal that is notable enough to have its own article. BLP1E directly states Reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event. which isn't true here. –GM 07:54, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  After reading the sources that GM has pointed out (above), I have striked my redirect. I have a very week stance on a merger due to the bio may pass WP:GNG. Though, I wouldn't be opposed to a merge. Issac I Navarro (talk) 08:31, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Issac I Navarro: I don't think a merge is appropriate here, as it would then be grounds for WP:SPLITTING again as the 15.ai article should be focused on the website. The Background section is already long as it is and largely focuses on the technology behind what made the website unique. It wouldn't make sense to merge only to include additional information about its creator irrelevant to the website when we could easily fix it by having a separate article per WP:GNG. Also see WP:SPINOFF for this: the main situation where spinoff articles become necessary is when the expansion of a section creates an undue weight problem for the article. –GM 08:35, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Issac I Navarro: Respectfully disagree that a merge is preferable to a redirect. Note the above blocked confirmed sockpuppet User:Ibnqirtaiba removed over half of the content originally in the article, so its current state cannot reliably be consulted as its basis. With the sources above, there is more than likely content to be added back that would not belong to potential merge targets. WP:MERGE advises against merging where the separate topics can be expanded into standalone articles, and the sourcing presented above establishes that this one can, under both WP:GNG and WP:NCREATOR criterion 3. Madeleine (talk) 21:06, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per above arguments. Subject meets WP:GNG per above sources, and WP:NCREATOR makes it cut and dried. Merging is not appropriate per GM. At least one editor has expressed intent in improving the article after the AfD ends, so redirecting is less appropriate than keeping. WP:NCREATOR expressly permits coverage of a creator's significant work, rather than requiring every article to be a conventional profile of the creator; particularly important in the case of a pseudonymous creator.

BLP1E applies only when all its conditions are satisfied, beginning with reliable sources covering the person only in connection with one event. The cited coverage above spans the development and operation of 15.ai, the 2022 Voiceverse incident, and retrospective discussion of the project's influence. The sourcing signifies that this is a sustained body of work and its consequences, than a person briefly caught in a singular news event. Madeleine (talk) 20:33, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 23:29, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - decidedly not BLP1E - it's a creative process, which is generally not considered 1 event, in the same way that someone known for one book or one song or one company is not a BLP1E - in this case, there's a lot of coverage during and after the project on different stages of it and on the subject's work. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 00:37, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

If 15.ai did not exist- for arguments sake- if we removed all notability inherited from involvement with 15.ai, what does this article look like? Help me understand what encyclopedic content is left if we remove any information about 15.ai? Sesamehoneytart 02:16, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

NCREATOR (and NACTOR, but here NCREATOR)'s whole thing is that this is the way notability can, in fact, be inherited - from notable work to its creator. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 13:31, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

NCREATOR does not give automatic inheritance. At most, it says notability is *likely* if xxx or yyy. So for arguments sake- if we removed all notability inherited from involvement with 15.ai, what does this article look like? Help me understand what encyclopedic content is left if we remove any information about 15.ai? Sesamehoneytart 17:39, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect to 15.ai#History per WP:NOPAGE. I am not seeing anything in the article or the above sources to justify a standalone biography that could expand on information not already in the 15.ai article. The struck !vote above makes a good point that being pseudonymous makes it harder to write a biographical article. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:24, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

  @Helpful Raccoon: To be fair, that very sockpuppet had removed most of the content that was present on the article and was later proven to have a personal grudge against the subject, so there was some foul play happening with the article and should not be consulted as a reliable basis. As for expanding the article, I find that the sources that discuss the subject's fandom to be sufficient to allow for its own article; additionally, WP:NOTINHERITED expressly mentions WP:NCREATOR as one of the four notability guidelines that do allow for inherited notability. Madeleine (talk) 07:51, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

  bro you are straight up lying bc I removed exactly 200 bytes from the article lmaaaao skyshifter is the one who made the sweeping removals and you are definitely just a gregarious madness sock lol ~2026-43260-11 (talk) 06:33, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

  Ignoring whether the subject meets WP:GNG/WP:NCREATIVE, the point of WP:NOPAGE is that it is not always best to have a standalone article for every notable topic. In this case, if a reader of the 15.ai article clicks a link to this article hoping to learn more about the creator of 15.ai, they will be disappointed after seeing that it does not contain any additional information. I did look at the previous version of the article. I don't see any WP:RS that discuss the subject's fandom; the Alex Irpan blog post fails WP:BLPSPS. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 01:41, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: A WP:HISTMERGE needs to be done with Draft:15 (software engineer). Just a note to @Madeleine961: you should use the WP:MOVE functionality to move pages out of draftspace instead of cut-and-paste moves. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 08:30, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

   Done, and I left a note at the original author's talk about this as well. ASUKITE 13:52, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Helen Hoang (economist)

Helen Hoang (economist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, WP:NAUTHOR, WP:NACADEMIC. citations are self-published (own companies, own byline) and commercial retailer listings for her self-published books, with no independent reviews. No academic notability demonstrated. Lone Wolf ^howl 08:28, 27 July 2026 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:54, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Businesspeople, Economics, Vietnam, and Australia. Lone Wolf ^howl 08:28, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  • Weak keep I found another independent review on Region Canberra which is a local media outlet, so that makes two independent media reviews. https://region.com.au/canberra-author-hopes-best-selling-book-can-help-solve-australias-youth-financial-literary-crisis/867890/ LPascal (talk) 10:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Weak Keep. While the sourcing here is light, there's enough to pass GNG in my view. The HerCanberra piece by Erin Cross is a proper independent feature, and the ACT government's Innovation Connect grant is a form of third-party recognition and combined with the body of authored work (multiple volumes already out), I think this is a reasonable case for notability Xcccccccc123 (talk) 19:39, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Xcccccccc123 The Innovation Connect grant awarded to EconTech holds absolutely no weight in regards to notability, nor does the subject's own publication volume. JoelleJay (talk) 11:56, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  Ah I see! Xcccccccc123 (talk) 07:19, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Women-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:43, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related AfD discussions. ScalarFactor (talk) 16:41, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:56, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - (with some regret, because I think that teaching children about economics is a very worthwhile thing to do). However, there is not enough independent coverage about the subject so as to meet WP:NBIO, and I couldn't find enough independent reviews of the books to help towards WP:NAUTHOR. I have reservations about the HerCanberra and region.com.au sources. The similarity in publication dates (three days apart in May 2025), use of the same supplied photo, and use of some of the same quotations make me think that they are more towards the promotional end of the journalism spectrum than the critical investigation end. Possibly a case of WP:TOOSOON, but delete for now. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 06:48, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Keep The subject appears to meet WP:GNG through significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Any concerns about sourcing or article quality are matters for improvement, not deletion. Per WP:ATD, deletion is not the appropriate remedy where notability can be demonstrated from [], [] and []. Another issue is that,the nominator of this article is a sock puppet. ~2026-43171-10 (talk) 22:35, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

  @~2026-43171-10, just on the sources you highlighted: I've already expressed my reservations about #1, #2 is not independent (the bio will have been written by the subject), and #3 is not independent either (from the byline, it was written by the subject). Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 04:50, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Radiogad

Radiogad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BEFORE search shows a large amount of routine coverage related to his work, much of it unbylined and some consisting of interviews. The sources are also very similar to the line of UPE articles that were previously deleted. I am unable to find a single in-depth profile on him by a credible author in an independent source. Fails GNG Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:23, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Entertainment, and Nigeria. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:23, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: There are sources from 2018 to 2024; how we judge these sources are subjective but laying indirect accusations of UPE is not acceptable. This discussion aside, Jeraxmoira has tried in different ways to link me to UPE and sock puppetry. This relentless way of looking for dirt is becoming personal. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 09:35, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  I am patrolling the articles previously reviewed by SafariScribe that are now back in the NPP queue. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:58, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  That’s not an issue. I have no issue with any article being deleted. I cannot remember why I created an article in 2024 but I’m quite sure there are sources from 2018 to 2024, hence probably why I created it them but trying to say I’m an undisclosed paid editor (indirectly or otherwise) doesn’t sit well with me. The next thing, there’ll be a “private evidence” against me, lol. I just don’t have any personal “issue” against you, that’s what I’m driving at. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 11:00, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  The second line in the nomination statement refers to Isaac Bholu and Shashicka Tyre-Hill, both of which have now been deleted. Please don't make this about yourself when it isn't. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:55, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:00, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:57, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Rakesh Shah (Nepali filmmaker)

Rakesh Shah (Nepali filmmaker) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Attached references are PR, and Non RS, fails to satisfy GNG. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 06:10, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, and Nepal. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 06:10, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Reading the all listed sources,it looks sufficient to list. There are multiple independent sources covering the subject. ~2026-41537-25 (talk) 06:36, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

06:17, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep — I believe the article satisfy, and has also been updated to satisfy WP:GNG and address all concerns regarding promotional tone. The subject has received significant, multi-source independent coverage in national and entertainment media detailing his career as a lyricist and producer. The following high-quality secondary references have been integrated:

• Suchana Prabhab — National media coverage highlighting his role as the Creative Producer for the crime series Aarati.
• Celebrity Nepal (English Edition) and Celebrity Nepal (Nepali Edition) — In-depth professional profile cataloging his filmmaking career, production credits, and lyricist history.
• Kalika Khabar — Independent feature covering his work on the multilingual feature film Prativairam.
• Suchana Prabah — Secondary media coverage tracking his cross-border digital content and music video productions.

These and more other reliable, secondary sources establish clear notability separate from PR announcements.

For these reasons, I support Keep Horizon Editor (talk) 15:08, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Most of references you have provided is not by-lined By journalists. So how come a subject is notable with these references which has no journalists name. And the references are PR. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 14:44, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - The sources contained in this article and available are sufficient to prove its notability. Major Nepali national and genre media outlets such as Gorkhapatra, Online Khabar, Ratopati, Celebrity Nepal, and Thulo Parda have independently published a lot of material on this topic. Therefore, there is no reason to delete this article. ~2026-42776-13 (talk) 03:34, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

I support keep this article because sources provided are valid. ~2026-41553-75 (talk) 06:10, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Yes Gorkhapatra is a reliable source but as the references doesn't contain any Journalist name. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 14:49, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:58, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - just because the secondary sources are not in english does not mean it is not significant. Entychologist (talk) 02:12, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep - As per norm above --BengalMC (talk) 06:19, 4 August 2026 (UTC)BengalMC

It's not about language, it's about the references, most of the references are not by-lined by journalists. And those are PR. Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 14:50, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Keep - This is not a sudden PR. The subject has received continuous coverage from multiple major national media outlets for more than three years, starting as early as 2023. These are established national news platforms. Horizon Editor (talk) 15:49, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Kofi Ofori-Mensah

Kofi Ofori-Mensah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sources are entirely self-published (SSRN/OSF/Zenodo preprints, subject's own org and ORCID pages) and promotional (university student blog, interview). No independent, reliable coverage establishes notability. Reads as self-promotional. Lone Wolf ^howl 18:47, 26 July 2026 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:57, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, and Ghana. Lone Wolf ^howl 18:47, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:27, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. I don't see anything that reads as a clear claim to notability here. I've nominated the (clearly AI-generated) book covers for deletion on Commons. Omphalographer (talk) 22:28, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 21:05, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: The References that are considered as self Publish are Now being Modified with the sources from Reliable sources and National Online News. Muktee1494 (talk)

Delete. None of the added sources are independent. No indication that the subject is covered in anything beyond PROMO. JoelleJay (talk) 12:19, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

SomethingAboutChickens

SomethingAboutChickens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. All citations are primary: IMDb (unreliable per WP:IMDB), YouTube (unreliable per WP:RSPYT), and Wikipedia itself (circular, never a valid source). Lone Wolf ^howl 14:33, 26 July 2026 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:59, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Lone Wolf ^howl 14:33, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: Additional sources found when searching Google News for "Darrell Moten" and "SomethingAboutChickens": Business Insider (2022), Cinema Blend/Yahoo (2026), NBC (2026). The coverage from AGT is obviously new and may not be long-term. From my search, I'm not sure there's enough about him pre-AGT. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:49, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  For what it's worth, the NBC article, at least, would not be independent sourcing in this case, as NBC is the network that broadcasts AGT–and in any event isn't even from NBC News, but from "NBC Insider" on nbc.com, which exists solely to promote programming aired on NBC or other NBCUniversal platforms. (No opinion or comment on anything else.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:39, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:20, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Magic, Television, and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:35, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 22:17, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Only 1 source meets WP:SIGCOV (the Business Insider Article mentioned by Significa liberdade), otherwise coverage is not WP:SUSTAINED. Further later coverage outside of AGT and the BI profile may warrant an article, but not now. UppercutPawnch (talk) 06:57, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Princess Olga of Hanover

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Princess Olga of Hanover
• Articles for deletion/Princess Olga of Hanover (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Princess Olga of Hanover (b. 1958)

Princess Olga of Hanover (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See previous AFD. Doesn't seem to have been significantly improved (but I can't see the old article...) so should be deleted for the same reasons: fails WP:BASIC, WP:GNG, and WP:NOTGENEALOGY. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 13:57, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, and Austria. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 13:57, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:18, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: for clarity, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Olga of Hanover (b. 1958) was for someone else with this title (as the disambiguation shows, that one was born in 1958; the current subject died that year). At one point, a previous iteration of this article (after the first deletion in 2020, a 2024 recreation was quickly G4'd) was actually called Princess Olga of Hanover (1884–1958) instead in deference to the other one (which, to add to the confusion, was the original article at this title, before the existence of articles for both necessitated disambiguation in 2008). No opinion on any of this. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:54, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Like it or not (and it's clear that some editors do not) the grandchild of a king was and is notable. These are the people who filled the columns of newspapers of the time. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:38, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  I neither like nor dislike. I merely want the community to weigh in as this article was previously deleted. Since you are an admin, can you at least weigh in on whether the current articles has significant improvement over the deleted version? Can you demonstrate with fact (vice supposition) that this person is notable? - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 14:38, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  If that is the best argument for keeping the article, th article should be deleted. We have a guideline, WP:INVALIDBIO, which clearly states that A being related to someone notable "is not a reason for a standalone article on A". If she did indeed fill the columns of newspapers, please show it because that would be a proof of notability. Surtsicna (talk) 17:56, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  Sorry, but I don't have access to hard copies of 19C/early 20C German newspapers! But, as we should all know, they are still valid sources. As we all also should know, royal families were a big deal at the time and "being related to someone notable" doesn't really apply to a king's granddaughter. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:19, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Surtsicna, Geschichte, Smeat75, TimothyBlue, and Bearian: Tagging participants of previous AFD. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 14:42, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Redirect, as I said the first time, in relevant parts: "per User:Bearian/Standards#Notability_of_Consorts_of_nobility, ... and WP:CHEAP, to Prince Ernest Augustus, 3rd Duke of Cumberland and Teviotdale, her father .... I note she was unmarried, and avoided publicity either by way of scandal or charitable work." The only new thing in this version is speculation about her marriage prospects, which was about as scandalous as she got. Thank you, UtherSRG, for the ping. Bearian (talk) 15:12, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• REDIRECT - agree with Bearian on the target. Fails GNG and NOTGENEOLOGY, there is no WP:SIGCOV. At best this merits a sentence in the target - the article can basically be rewritten as: "She was the great-great-granddaughter of a king, lived a reclusive life, and nothing is known beyond geneological facts and speculation."  // Timothy :: talk  18:07, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect, no GNG sources have been identified, and presumptions of coverage based on INVALIDBIO are, well, invalid. JoelleJay (talk) 12:27, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 07:25, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

• Keep I'm new to this so apologies for any misstep but I think it's useful to keep an actual page for this person because of the other people with the same name and title. It would be of use to any researcher or interested person to have an actual physical page with a photograph, (since one exists) in order to clarify and confirm which Princess Olga they are looking at, especially when birth and death dates are coincidental. It would send a clear message that Wiki has done its homework and isn't mixing up princesses or dates. Under these circumstances I think the lack of detail is not a problem and I agree that (rightly or wrongly) princesshood confers notability in most cases. ~2026-42636-56 (talk) 09:32, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  None of those arguements are within our policies and guidelines for articles about individual people. - In solidarity, UtherSRG (talk) 14:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Tom Cotter (environmentalist)

Tom Cotter (environmentalist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing that shows significant coverage, few passing mentions. Fails WP:GOLDENRULE Accesscrawl (talk) 10:23, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Religion, Environment, United States of America, and California. Accesscrawl (talk) 10:23, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 20:59, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

S. George

S. George (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG, few passing mentions. Accesscrawl (talk) 10:04, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Film, Television, India, and Kerala. Accesscrawl (talk) 10:04, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 18:07, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Karl von Ergert

Karl von Ergert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Old article since 2011 with no references or suitable notability. The corresponding article from the German wiki has no references to support. Majash2020 (talk) 08:23, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, and Austria. Shellwood (talk) 10:10, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete no coverage in Gscholar, all I could find was in what seems to be a newspaper. Still not enough. Not much for sourcing in other language wikis either. Oaktree b (talk) 15:09, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:25, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Comment At a glance, no English-language online sources. Contrary to the nominator, however, the German article does appear to have some print sources. I suspect at least some of those are passing mentions, but I don't know. LittlePuppers (talk) 22:24, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: as per Oaktree, also no hits in full text search in either Archive or Hathitrust. Coeusin (talk) 15:51, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Kevin Hamilton (diplomat)

Kevin Hamilton (diplomat) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Uncited for over 15 years. Fails WP:BIO. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. LibStar (talk) 02:15, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bilateral relations, and Canada. LibStar (talk) 02:15, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: zero valid secondary sources to prove notability. I tried doing a BEFORE, but came up empty everywhere --TitCrisse (t•c) 12:50, 24 July 2026 (UTC).

• Keep: Ambassadors are notable. Obviously. Altitude Multitude (talk) 14:45, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  Which notability guideline are you basing this on? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:06, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  Meets wp:people obviously. Ambassador to multiple countries so definitely not wp:oneevent. Altitude Multitude (talk) 16:11, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  I can't find anything on WP:PEOPLE that says ambassadors are inherently notable, in fact I can't see any mention of ambassadors at all. Which section of that guideline are you using? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:46, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  Articles need sources. JoeyDirigo (talk) 00:51, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  Ambassadors are not inherently notable. 100s have been deleted. LibStar (talk) 03:14, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  There is a Wikipedia guideline that says the circumstances of one article should not be used to judge another article, for lack of a better way of putting it. So why have these guidelines if we are just going to keep bypassing them? Altitude Multitude (talk) 10:47, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  you have failed to present an argument for keeping. LibStar (talk) 03:25, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  How am I supposed to force you to see what you have intentionally failed to see? Altitude Multitude (talk) 10:14, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  Where does the guideline state ambassadors are inherently notable? LibStar (talk) 10:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  Nowhere, as most of us know. Geschichte (talk) 13:42, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: There used to be (emphasis added) a common outcome that effectively presumed notability of ambassadors, but that train has left the station, so to speak. I'm assuming good faith that they might recall the old practice, which has since changed. I believe that this changed in response to critics, but correct me if I'm mistaken. If this can be fixed, then ping me. Let them have 2 or 3 more days to find significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 17:32, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  Pinging Altitude Multitude in all fairness, so they can keep up with the discourse. Bearian (talk) 17:33, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 07:36, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Ambassadors aren't automatically notable. If List of ambassadors of Canada to Turkey (in List of ambassadors and high commissioners of Canada) wasn't a redlink, I'd have !voted to redirect there. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:59, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Michael Richard Bell

Michael Richard Bell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod. Marked for notability concerns since 2013. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 03:23, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bilateral relations, and Canada. LibStar (talk) 03:23, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: This is basically an unsourced BLP. I haven't even checked for sources, this just isn't the article we should have. Ping me if anyone saves it. MediaKyle (talk) 10:30, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. To be fair, this was created at a different time in Wikipedia's policy evolution — once upon a time, diplomats were considered "inherently" notable so long as it was possible to verify that they existed, regardless of whether they could actually pass WP:GNG on their sourceability or not. That's long since been deprecated, however, and now a diplomat requires GNG-worthy reliable source coverage and doesn't get an article at all anymore if he can't be shown to have that. Bearcat (talk) 20:46, 23 July 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: no valid secondary sources to prove GNG --TitCrisse (t•c) 11:58, 26 July 2026 (UTC).
• Delete - poorly sourced; one link is not enough for a BLP. Ping me if you add more. Bearian (talk) 02:12, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
• Keep. Whilst I appreciate the sourcing is terrible and there doesn't seem to be a great deal online about him, I personally think that it is common sense that anyone who was ambassador to the USSR/Russia, one of the prime diplomatic postings in the world, should be considered notable. @Bearian, MediaKyle, Bearcat, and TitCrisse: I have added a link to his obituary (he died in 2021, so this is not a BLP incidentally). -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:21, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Got it. I'm moving into the neutral zone. Bearian (talk) 09:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Sure, it seems like a role that should be considered notable in principle. However, it is not a role so "inherently" notable that its holders would be exempted from having to pass GNG just because they existed — we've learned many, many lessons over the years about the kind of things editors try to pull on biographical articles about people, either to hagiographize or demonize them based on personal whims rather than proper sourcing, and the person's paid-inclusion obituary from the newspaper classifieds is not a notability-building source: an obituary has to be journalist-written content in the news section, not placed by their own family in the classifieds, to count as a notability builder.
    So people can never, ever, ever be exempted from having to have reliable sourcing just because they existed as people with jobs — and as far as I'm concerned, "common sense" demands not keeping poorly sourced or unsourced biographical articles about people just because their jobs sounded important. Bearcat (talk) 14:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To allow folks to respond to Necrothesp's. query
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 04:05, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Earl Krugel

Earl Krugel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge into 2001 Jewish Defense League plot in California. WP:BLP1E. RS cover Krugel only in the context of his involement in the plot. Longhornsg (talk) 00:52, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Crime, Terrorism, Islam, Judaism, United States of America, and California. Longhornsg (talk) 00:52, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Oppose/keep, there's lots and lots of coverage about him in the context of his involvement the JDL decades before the crime (stretching back to the 1970s). I'd oppose redirecting it to this case, he is not notable for only one event. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:21, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Its impossible to tell whether those results are even for the same person just based on a search query. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:15, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

They're all about him working with the Jewish Defense League. By this logic we can't determine that there weren't multiple Earl Krugers involved in the same bombing. PARAKANYAA (talk) 15:44, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

This is an index of a search term and are most likely reprints of the same nationally syndicated content related to the case. Provide the actual articles. Longhornsg (talk) 03:19, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

It's the search term indexed in reverse so you can see that there are numerous news articles that discuss him in reference to the Jewish Defense League prior to 2001 bombing happening . This was not even the only bombing he committed . I would not call that BLP1E. He also received equal amounts of significant coverage for being a murder victim; we can't do "BLP1E" if he's received significant coverage for two events, so even discounting the 1970-1990s coverage; it is not true that RS cover him only in relation to the plot. Also, he's not a BLP, so BLP1E does not even apply. PARAKANYAA (talk) 16:00, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Stil can't view the articles so this doesnt meet WP:V. Longhornsg (talk) 20:19, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

That's not how WP:V works. WP:OFFLINE sources are allowed. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:16, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

And if he's redirected to anything, though I still oppose that, it should be Jewish Defense League, not the plot article. He was involved in numerous JDL incidents. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:17, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 00:59, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Merge selectively as suggested and as reasonable in these circumstances. He's dead, and the organization has been shut down for 11 years, so new sources are unlikely. Bearian (talk) 20:10, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 02:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Graham Williams (promoter)

Graham Williams (promoter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Fun Fun Fun Fest because Williams himself does not qualify as notable, neither under WP:CREATIVE nor WP:ENTERTAINER. chickenpox4dinner (talk · contribs · email) 16:02, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Music. chickenpox4dinner (talk · contribs · email) 16:02, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Texas. Shellwood (talk) 16:10, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per WP:SHORTTEXT. FaviFake (talk) 17:38, 21 July 2026 (UTC)
• Strong keep - He passes WP:CREATIVE through criterion 3 and may pass #2 on WP:ENTERTAINER, but I'm not sure that even applies for promoters. He's "behind" 600 shows a year. With little introduction, Austin-American Statesman calls him renowned. He's a legendary promoter!. Where do people go to when they need music news? Graham Williams! The ups, downs, and middles of his career are documented. Do note that all but one of the links I provided are from after the end of Fun Fun Fun Fest. He did well-documented work before and after. - Embyarby (talk) 04:37, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 16:25, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep per Embyarby Jishara (talk) 19:30, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: the person is notable and needs standalone page. Xcccccccc123 (talk) 20:18, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Keep Is clearly notable outside Fun Fun Fun Fest as well. GenuineArt (talk) 03:49, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I could call it keep at this point, but it's close enough that one last relist seems prudent. Both sides could make their cases better.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 19:53, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Mengu Suokhrie

Mengu Suokhrie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the page does not fulfil WP:SINGER or WP: It also does not have coverage to fulfil WP:SIGCOV. Their one significant movie was almost a decade ago which did not garner her any significant award or media coverage outside Nagaland. Thereby, it does not fulfil WP:NACTOR. Astra Travasso (talk) 04:40, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Women, Film, Music, and India. Astra Travasso (talk) 04:40, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Nagaland-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:51, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 01:39, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 06:02, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Christina Angela Ntulo

Christina Angela Ntulo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose draftifying or deleting this because I do not see a clear WP:NBIO/WP:BASIC or WP:GNG pass. The subject is verifiable and has held NGO/mental-health roles, but the sourcing is mostly organizational profiles, affiliated/primary pages, press-release republications, conference material, and routine mentions, with little significant independent coverage of Ntulo herself. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:40, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Health and fitness, and Uganda. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:40, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Women-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:41, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 19:21, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 21:05, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Draftify If the article could be strengthened, it could be worth keeping. I searched for her without her middle name and found two more sources, but neither strengthens the independent coverage req for WP:GNG: 1) A 2011 NPR article (independent, but it's just a quote from her) and 2) A WHO Africa Q&A with her. SupermarketCake (talk) 20:48, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Subhi Taha

Subhi Taha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG, relying on primary or self-published sources. The subject lacks the necessary in-depth, independent, secondary media coverage for inclusion. Sakiv (talk) 00:24, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Philippines, and Palestine. Sakiv (talk) 00:24, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:41, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. Khalitate (talk) 08:33, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Unclear how this topic does not meet GNG given the sourcing:

• "Manufacturing consent: How youth are used to push normalization at diplomatic events". Middle East Monitor. 2025-03-07. Retrieved 2025-11-09.
• El-Mansi, Zainab Saeed (2024-12-01). "'Siyada Asliya Falastiniya' in the Digital Narratives of "PreOccupation Podcast" and "Sbeih.jpg"". Cairo Studies in English. 2024 (2): 8–27. doi:10.21608/cse.2024.320962.1189. ISSN 0575-1624.
• Ho-Chun Herbert Chang; Shaman, Benjamin; Chen, Yung-chun; Zha, Mingyue; Noh, Sean; Wei, Chiyu; Weener, Tracy; Magee, Maya (2024). "Generative Memesis: AI Mediates Political Memes in the 2024 USA Presidential Election". arXiv:2411.00934 [cs.CY].
• Salam, Erum (2021-05-13). "'It's different this time': Palestinian Americans find support in US progressives". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2025-11-09.
• Dana, Karam (2025). To Stand with Palestine: Transnational Resistance and Political Evolution in the United States. Columbia University Press. doi:10.7312/dana18616. ISBN 978-0-231-18616-2.
• Lapowsky, Issie (2018-10-31). "Inside YouTube's Push to Counter Toxic Videos With 'Good' Creators". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 2026-07-19.
• Weat The Peace. "wearthepeace". www.instagram.com. Retrieved 2025-03-07. Palestinian activist Subhi, who many know him by his handle Sbeih.jpg, has now been suspended off Instagram indefinitely from both his main account and his backup account.
• Khalidi, Raja (2016-08-01). "Twenty-First Century Palestinian Development Studies". Journal of Palestine Studies. 45 (4): 7–15. doi:10.1525/jps.2016.45.4.7. ISSN 0377-919X.
• The New Arab Staff. "Nas Daily slammed for 'both sides' take on Israel-Palestine". The New Arab. Archived from the original on 2025-01-17. Retrieved 2025-03-07.
• "UK: Pro-Palestine students face expulsion for sharing Middle East Eye posts". Middle East Eye. Retrieved 2025-11-09.

Also unclear which of the RS above are meant to be primary or self-published sources, some of which are from peer-reviewed academic journals. إيان (talk) 06:58, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Based on my review, these all appear to be brief, single-sentence references to Taha, none of which rise to the level of SIGCOV. Khalitate (talk) 05:10, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep, seconding إيان above. I also don't see how these are "primary or self-published sources" for the most part. Taha is also mentioned in a few paragraphs here: https://web.archive.org/web/20210226100620/https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/26/arts/immigrant-blankets-arab.html - I believe this individual satisfies basic GNG Handsome Ellis (talk) 08:26, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

:Keep, some sources brought up do cement notability. This has a paragraph of SIGCOV, the "Cairo studies" journal has SIGCOV. The other journals that I cannot access may also have SIGCOV, so I'll vote keep here. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 17:22, 25 July 2026 (UTC) Note: Struck comment from non-extended-confirmed editor per WP:CT/A-I. — Sakiv (talk) 00:33, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 13:51, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep per the Cairo Studies in English journal article, the Middle East Monitor article provided by HerrHeulsuse, and the New York Times piece dropped in by Handsome Ellis. These all pass sigcov. Also, sources made by Arab/Islamic heritage people isn't really a problem as they're all independent and they're in reliable sources. Jishara (talk) 02:56, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Delete: Too niche? The sources provided are predominantly made by people of Arab/Islamic heritage or advocacy websites. The Guardian doesn't count as an independent source in such topics as well. He could have an article on Fandom, not Wikipedia. --Esperfulmo (talk) 23:54, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

i'm not sure why sources written by "people of Arab/Islamic heritage" wouldn't count for determining notability. The Guardian is considered "generally reliable". most of the sources listed are academic or newspapers, not advocacy websites. Rainsage (talk) 15:44, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

@Rainsage and HerrHeulsuse: an opinionated source doesn't prove general notability outside of a particular niche group. The Guardian isn't generally reliable. It's filled with erroneous articles. E.g. , debunked: . The Guardian can accordingly be used for light topics, not as proof of notability. Though, I'd completely avoid it when possible. Please, revise WP:GNG: "Independent of the subject". --Esperfulmo (talk) 21:39, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Muslims are 25% of the world's population-- not exactly a niche group. Your opinion of The Guardian is not the consensus opinion on RSN. Rainsage (talk) 22:38, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

Please, don't force the discussion somewhere else; no "discrimination" tone! Even if they were fewer, this argument is irrelevant. There has to be sensibility about finding a reliable source for a certain context. The Guardian doesn't fulfill this. --Esperfulmo (talk) 09:58, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom and Esperfulmo. —Biosketch (talk) 02:04, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Keep there is significant coverage: the Zainab El-Mansi article, NYTimes article, and Karam Dana book that were already mentioned. there is also this academic article and this TheMarker article . brief mentions in this academic book: and in RNS . the subject has had some recognition for his YouTube: he was part of YouTube's Creators for Change program and was nominated in the 2019 Shorty Awards..Rainsage (talk) 15:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A source analysis would be useful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:53, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

People proposed deletions

Hume Peabody (via WP:PROD on 12 May 2025)