Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

6 October 2026

To nominate an article for deletion or merging, follow these instructions.

Guide to deletion

Walking Cricket

Walking Cricket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

LLM-generated article about an unnotable topic. Declined at AfC but the creator moved it to mainspace anyway.. Vestrian24Bio 16:32, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Cricket. Vestrian24Bio 16:32, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. ‑‑gurkubondinn 16:33, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Super Speeds

Super Speeds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company as well as being entirely unsourced. Having searched around per WP:BEFORE, I found nothing. BuffaloTaro (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Motorsport, Transportation, and India. BuffaloTaro (talk) 15:31, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Kliny (selo), Kolchuginsky District, Vladimir Oblast

Kliny (selo), Kolchuginsky District, Vladimir Oblast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability for this selo. Possible duplicate or alternate counting unit for Kliny (settlement), Kolchuginsky District, Vladimir Oblast. –dlthewave ☎ 15:11, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Russia. –dlthewave ☎ 15:11, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Dubki (selo), Kolchuginsky District, Vladimir Oblast

Dubki (selo), Kolchuginsky District, Vladimir Oblast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a duplicate or alternate census unit of Dubki (settlement), Kolchuginsky District, Vladimir Oblast. These two articles have identical locations however the settlement has the higher population count. –dlthewave ☎ 15:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Russia. –dlthewave ☎ 15:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Petar Popović (tennis)

Petar Popović (tennis) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, including SIGCOV. WP:BEFORE is difficult because this name is so common, even when searching in Serbian. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 14:53, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Tennis, and Serbia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 14:53, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Rashid Al Zlami

Rashid Al Zlami (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My search has not uncovered any sources which fulfill WP:CREATIVE; he's been quoted some but, i think, that isn't sufficient without further sources or evidence of substantial works or influence. ~ Lindsay^Hello 14:02, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Poetry, and Saudi Arabia. ~ Lindsay^Hello 14:02, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Kandasamy Nallasivam

Kandasamy Nallasivam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the requirements of WP:ANYBIO, is almost solely reliant upon Wordpress websites and primary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sri Lanka. Dan arndt (talk) 13:32, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Dutch Coal Trade Union

Dutch Coal Trade Union (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources found. Because of the contents, it seems the Steenkolen Handels-Vereniging is meant, which already is described in SHV Holdings. Tekstman (talk) 13:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, and Netherlands. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 14:48, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Chaleun Sekong Group

Chaleun Sekong Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed drafification; WP:DRAFTOBJECT applies. Wikipedia is Not a trade directory. The word "conglomerate" nor the styling of this business as a conglomerate grants no notability in and of itself. The references do not show it to pass WP:NCORP. Alleged involvement in money laundering is WP:ROTM 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 13:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies, and Laos. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 13:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Bolaji Akinola

Bolaji Akinola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing notability here. Most coverage is him being quoted as STOAN spokesman or columns he wrote himself. The PhD and the 2025 adviser appointment look like one press release run in several papers, Vanguard, ThisDay and Blueprint have near identical text. Books are self published, no reviews. Ex MARAN president and media adviser to a minister doesn't seem enough on its own. ArcticSnowWind (talk) 12:38, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, and Nigeria. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 14:50, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: No substance of WP:GNG here and nothing useful comes from a search for other sources. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:21, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Preeni Withanage

Preeni Withanage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notwithstanding that the page was accepted through the AFC process, I don't think this subject is notable. None of the sources in the article seem to provide any significant coverage of her as a person; she is often quoted in her official capacity as a representative of NERD and other organisations. I haven't found anything else of use for meeting WP:GNG; there's this interview, but again that's really about the government policy rather than about her. Nothing suggesting any of the WP:ANYBIO criteria are met. Chocmilk03 (talk) 08:45, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Science, Engineering, and Sri Lanka. Chocmilk03 (talk) 08:46, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  Keep. I understand the concern that several sources quote Withanage in her official capacity. However, I think there is enough independent coverage to warrant considering WP:GNG. In particular, the 20 June 2017 Daily Mirror article gives substantial coverage to her analysis and recommendations concerning LNG pricing, infrastructure costs and Sri Lanka's long-term electricity-generation plan, rather than merely mentioning her. There is also an extended 2019 Echelon interview, as well as independent coverage of her petroleum-sector work in The Island, Daily Mirror and Tamil Guardian over multiple years.

  I acknowledge that many of these reports focus on the policies and projects she was involved in rather than providing a conventional biographical profile, but I believe the cumulative independent coverage is substantial enough for the subject to meet GNG. Grove317 (talk) 21:57, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 12:12, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Institute of Apparel Management

Institute of Apparel Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This private training institute does not meet WP:NORG. None of the cited sources gives the significant, independent, secondary coverage required by WP:ORGCRIT. Moarnighar (talk) 12:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related AfD discussions. Moarnighar (talk) 12:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Bangladesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:58, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Emani 22

Emani 22 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A stub page about a deceased musician that lacks WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO and WP:REFERENCE, which makes it vulnerable for an AFD. Darrion N. Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 17:55, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, Women, Music, United States of America, and California. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 18:03, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment. There's lots of news coverage of her death in a car crash, much of which describes her as a potentially notable musician. However I'm having trouble finding much sigcov prior to her death, or about her music. pburka (talk) 15:08, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

  A lot of her music had 100s of thousands of listeners. Even if she is less famous now, she still has a lot of coverage with songs of emani's interlude as a feature, and has amased arge social platforms wth 100s of thousands of followers. ~2026-51183-42 (talk) 15:33, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  Can you provide some examples of coverage of her songs in reliable sources? pburka (talk) 15:39, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, as she received numerous obituaries written by notable news agencies. She received notable obituaries from the news agencies People, TheWrapand Billboard. Her article provides biographical information about her, and as well about her career, and I also found a VoyageLA article from 2018. I also see that her article focuses more on her life and career in text. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 20:34, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to A Love Letter to You 3 as an WP:ATD. I cannot find anything substantial except obits. The VoyageLA article linked above is an interview. Kelob2678 (talk) 07:19, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 08:42, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep per WP:NMUSIC - Fire Starter, a song which she was a featured artist on, charted on Billboard Bubbling Under. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 22:52, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to A Love Letter to You 3 - unbalanced ratio of words and citations. SH360! (Must edit! Must report!) 11:02, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

I don't think having an "unbalanced ratio of words and citations" is an actual explanation for why you're voting for a redirect. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 14:39, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

@SlapstickHumor360!:, do you have an actual explanation of why you actually voted for redirect? You used that same sentence for Maggiano, DiGirolamo & Lizzi. Your vote is not really an answer, as having an "unbalanced ratio of words and citations" is not really an argument of why the article should be redirected. Being a stub is not a reason for deletion and for redirect. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 23:43, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

• Keep She received so much coverage after her death for a reason. A redirect to A Love Letter to You 3 would not make sense as she had her own body of work, as the write up in Respect (magazine) shows: . Thriley (talk) 18:07, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

  This is a 96-word announcement of a song. Kelob2678 (talk) 21:24, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:53, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Immigrant entrepreneurship

Immigrant entrepreneurship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potentially LLM written article that's mostly just an essay about a vague and broad topic instead of an article about a well established concept. "Immigrant entrepreneurship" can be anything. Cubnorth (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Business-related AfD discussions. Cubnorth (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:01, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - per nom. This might shed some light. — Iadmc♫^talk  06:45, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep with reduction. Immigrant entrepreneurship is a widely accepted term and the subject of a substantial body of academic research. I rewrote the article in my sandbox, simplifying the prose and reducing its length by more than 50%, then replaced the live article. I also added a definition section to help clarify the concept. I believe the revised version addresses the concerns raised and is much more conducive to other editors expanding, restructuring, or rewriting the article as needed. The subject is specifically studied and tracked by organisations including the OECD, which includes a dedicated section of its International Migration Outlook 2 to the subject, and is the focus of a specific chapter in Elsevier's Handbook of the Economics of International Migration, among many other major academic publications. This is precisely the type of significant subject that Wikipedia should include. Its prominence can be quickly verified through searches of Google and JSTOR.

Wikipedia contains many obscure subjects that may legitimately warrant articles, but this is an established and important area of study that deserves inclusion because of it encompases such a broad range. The sources I have provided are all strong academic publications devoted again specifically to the subject. Even the source provided by ladmc, the German Historical Institute's Immigrant Entrepreneurship project covering immigrant entrepreneurship in American history broadly, reinforces the importance and established use of the term.

That said, although I am strongly opposed to LLM generated content, I recognise that my writing style may resonate with this issue. My writing also tends toward an essay style, which is something I have done professionally since long before AI existed and is a legitimate complaint by other editors. I am trying to work this out of my writing in general. I believe this may be partly because I develop highly polished articles. I made nearly 300 edits on Wikipedia developing this article, (not what you find in LLM generated content) and probably an equal amount of the work was done outside Wikipedia because I find it considerably easier to structure, move material around that way.

My proposed solution is the normal one for a notable subject where the article faces such concerns, that is to substantially reduce it. Over the next few days, during this discussion, I intend to shorten the prose considerably, probably by about half, while retaining as much of the existing structure and sourcing as possible.

One problem on Wikipedia is that articles can grow through incremental additions until they become sprawling and unorganised. I would like to leave this article with well developed structure but limited prose that makes it conducive to future contributions by other editors, while retaining the substantial academic sourcing that provides a foundation for future expansion. This is an approach I plan on taking in all of my future writing, limited prose with strong structure.

I appreciate the work done by all editors, including those critcal of my work JondeJon1 (talk) 13:05, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

I want to elaborate a little more as the nominator. There is no one unique thing that ties the information in this article together except for 'immigrants can be entrepreneurs'. This means that in my opinion, that's all the article is really saying. If the observations that followed were conclusive and uniform, then I'd understand a bit more, but as it stands almost all of them boils down to 'it varies', which is obvious. I respect that this is an area of interest for you, but as it stands I believe this topic is far too broad to be a useful article. Cubnorth (talk) 13:24, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

I understand the concern that the subject is broad, but I think that breadth is also what makes it valuable as an encyclopedia topic. Wikipedia benefits when it covers important central concepts, not just narrowly defined subjects. The study of immigrant entrepreneurship has considerable importance within sociology and social economics, which is why there is such substantial academic literature devoted to it.

The difficulty for me has been presenting the body of material without turning the article into an essay or adding my own synthesis. I could write a more cohesive argument connecting the research, but that would not be appropriate for Wikipedia. The article needs to be built from what the sources actually say, which can make it difficult to present the material cohesively.

At the same time, I am addressing the perception of LLM-assisted writing in the typical manner, by substantially reducing the prose and making the article more direct and source-focused. This often works against your concern, since reducing the prose can also make it harder to explain the connections among the research. I will post a rewritten version in the next few hours.

I understand where you are coming from, but I think this is a case where creative editing and restructuring can solve the problems. It would be a shame to lose an important area of study that belongs in an encyclopedia when the underlying subject and sourcing are very strong.JondeJon1 (talk) 08:05, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio ^giuliano 06:33, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NEWLLM. The topic is notable, but the article is AI-generated. Kelob2678 (talk) 06:44, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

  I did try and shorten the article substantially to alleviate LLM concerns which is a common way to deal with these problems, it also addressed my tendency towards writing essays. It would be a shame to lose a good topic well sourced by academic citations.JondeJon1 (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

• Comment what the indications of AI generation here, still learning!AadamentAardvark (talk) 03:29, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
• Additional comment The rewriting has unfortunately not changed my stance that the topic is too broad to say anything meaningful. Cubnorth (talk) 11:44, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

  If anything is salvageable from this, I'd suggest a merge to Middleman minority or Model minority

  CSGinger14 (talk) 01:39, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:45, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Clans of Baganda

Clans of Baganda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose a limited merge of sourced encyclopedic content to Baganda#Clan_structure because, while an encyclopedic article can probably be written on this topic, this article is a massive pile of unsourced original research and thus fails the WP:NOT test of WP:GNG. No prejudice against a properly sourced and researched article being written on this topic in the future. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Uganda. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:57, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Merge WP:SELECTIVELY per nominator's rationale. FaviFake (talk) 19:35, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Keep as the article itself is very detailed and properly written, even though it lacks proper sourcing. I'd suggest that the page be worked on and more secondary sources be added to it instead of merging it as per nom. Farhanansari1994 (talk) 15:34, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

  What are the sources that would support this page, and why does this unsourced page as it stands pass the WP:NOT test of WP:GNG? Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:40, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:44, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

List of Trivial Pursuit editions

List of Trivial Pursuit editions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Trivial Pursuit because it is seemingly an indiscriminate list. (Oinkers42) (talk) 00:18, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Games and Lists. (Oinkers42) (talk) 00:18, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Irrespective of the final decision, that list needs to be wholly reformatted if it is retained. It currently combines the worst features of tables with the worst features of definition lists into one terribly-formatted and unsortable sequence of entries. I suggest a table with eight columns (edition name, release year, and the six coloured ovals with a matching colour name in text for the categories). Also remove text such as "very hard to find", which is irrelevant here. Mindmatrix 15:43, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: ProQuest returns nearly 60,000 hits for the term "Trivial Pursuit" (in quotation marks), so there should be sufficient sources to potentially flesh out this list or convert it into its own article (say, Editions of Trivial Pursuit), as merging wholesale into the parent would likely overwhelm that article. Mindmatrix 15:43, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

Comment If merged into the Editions section of Trivial Pursuit, the updated table should be collapsible so it won't overwhelm the article. And then the Trivial Pursuit Millennium Edition page should probably be considered for deletion, since it's already covered in this list. SupermarketCake (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

MOS:COLLAPSE is a tad wishy-washy, but makes clear that we should not collapse article content. So, if this was added to Trivial Pursuit, it would stand strong in its uncollapsed glory. Given that would be... awkward, it recommends making a separate article (well... what do we have here). This list isn't indiscriminate in anyway, it has clear criteria (be an edition of Trivial Pursuit). It meets NLIST as useful, and has also been treated as a class by secondary sources . (The Gamer is WP:VALNET, whose sources can't normally be used to provide notability, but I have no clue how that interacts with NLIST, and The Gamer is generally regarded as more reliable than other VALNET publications.) So, keep 1brianm7 (talk) 07:06, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio ^giuliano 06:44, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep and cleanup - Formatting is hellish, but the list does have clear criteria, is useful and has available support by secondary sources so can't see rationale to get rid of it entirely. Merging is not a suitable alternative as it would overwhelm target article.

BleachPuffin (talk) 12:22, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• weak keep per BleachPuffin. This isn't indiscriminate (criteria are clear and finite), and that's the only reason given for the redirect. Week because I'm not personally sure we need this, but eh. Hobit (talk) 03:07, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
• Found these sources: Wargamer.com: , Encyclopædia Britannica: , Business Insider: , Encyclopedia.com: (last 2 paragraphs), Canadian Museum of History: (2nd to last paragraph), review of a specific edition by Pop Insider: (author has written for Travel + Leisure, Observer, etc). --Mika1h (talk) 18:07, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

  Most of these sources barely cover the editions, mostly just saying "there are a lot of themed editions of Trivial Pursuit". Not really seeing the need to create an exhaustive list of every themed edition of a game. (Oinkers42) (talk) 21:36, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:24, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Comment - Article is now in a far cleaner state than it was when it was originally proposed and that Mindmatrix, and SupermarketCake commented on and 1brianm7 voted keep on. Version originally proposed for redirection. Still believe that this article should be kept, but current format does a much better job of showing the information itself so it is probably easier to make a judgement as to whether the article is worthwhile.

Regardless of result of this proposal, at the risk of encountering the wrath of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, I suggest that the six separate pages for Monopoly editions are proposed for same fate (either cleanup, or redirection). BleachPuffin (talk) 15:34, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Bilguun Oyuntsetseg

Bilguun Oyuntsetseg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this page needed? It doesn't redurect to any other project with actual article, and only links to Wikidata page. It's first time I even see something like this, and there are millions of pages on Wikidata which do not have articles on Englihs Wikipedia. Personally I do not think this template should be used like that. Artemis Andromeda (talk) 10:47, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Mongolia-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:59, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Ranpokunagama Maha Vidyalaya

Ranpokunagama Maha Vidyalaya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE didn't yield anything with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. Page was created by the user "Ranpokunagama Maha Vdyalaya" — it's a evident COI/UPE case too. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 10:27, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Sri Lanka. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 10:27, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Capital Brewery

Capital Brewery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This business is not notable enough to warrant an article. The bulk of the information is unreferenced and I have not been able to find reliable, independent sources. I made an attempt to verify the award from the Beverage Testing Institute as well as some others, but I couldn't locate much of anything that verifies claims made in the article. I'm not aware that winning tasting competitions, even at a national level, warrant notability without independent coverage. Fails WP:NOTADVERT. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Business, Companies, and Wisconsin. S1mply.dogmom (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Keep - Being once named the best brewery in the US should earn this a keep. I added a few sources and removed some of the unsourced promotional info. TheDeafWikipedian (talk) 20:52, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete - Agree. Not enough notability for a stand-alone entry. Can be merged into a small blurb in the Middleton, WI page. HoundofBaskersville (talk) 20:03, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 09:41, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete Sources in article fail WP:NCORP. There was actually a decent amount of coverage on this subject, but I really struggled to find sources that were both independent and significant.

Source analysis of references in article for WP:SIRS:

1. Passports and cocktails: significant coverage, but it's a WP:BLOG, so I'm not sure on reliability.
2. The Capital Times: Should be independent and reliable, but I'm not convinced on significant coverage. Most of the article talks about the award, but very little actually about the brewery.
3. Isthmus: Trivial coverage, only two brief mentions of Capital Brewery.
4. Pioneer Press: I'm not sure on the independence of this specific article since it features a lot of quotes from the brewery's president, but the Anheuser-Busch lawsuit was (relatively) widely covered. For example, this is a better article from the same source. Also not sure on the significance, but I could see it squeaking by.
5. Baltimore Sun: Independent and reliable, but trivial coverage of Capital.
6. Isthmus2: Not significant coverage; it's about the process of a beer that was made partly by Capital, but very little on the brewery itself.
7. US Open Beer: Primary source, also covers the same thing as the capital times article.

Only reference I could find that I thought might be applicable was this one (I accessed through open athens), which covers a dismissed 2014 lawsuit from minority shareholders of the brewery. However, it doesn't really discuss the brewery itself, and even if it did count, I'm not convinced this subject passes the stricter notability guideline for companies. ExitTheWarrior (talk) 15:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Note: I added some archive urls to the article due to dead links and paywalls. ExitTheWarrior (talk) 15:06, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Vincent Favretto

Vincent Favretto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE received through VRT, citing real-life harm from identity theft. Relatively low-profile, with the only sources cited being championship results rather than secondary sources expected for GNG. A WP:BEFORE only brings out brief mentions in local newspapers, as well as this article which I am not able to assess due to it being paywalled. Even with a few more sources of that caliber, I can't see this being more than a borderline GNG pass, meaning we should honor the subject's request for privacy. Chaotic Enby (in solidarity · talk · contribs) 08:22, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Sport of athletics. Chaotic Enby (in solidarity · talk · contribs) 08:22, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of France-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:06, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Centrist Party of Canada

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Centrist Party of Canada
• Articles for deletion/Centrist Party of Canada (2nd nomination)

Centrist Party of Canada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously removed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Centrist_Party_of_Canada I don't see any significant media coverage or other evidence for its notability. Ureekish (talk) 05:58, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Canada. Ureekish (talk) 05:58, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related AfD discussions. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 06:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom – can't even find independent sourcing about the party, it's all just other groups with similar names. aesurias (she/her) (talk) 06:36, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Feda Musa Zaid Abdelhady

Feda Musa Zaid Abdelhady (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources are predominantly primary with little to no significant independent coverage. The title of ambassador does not establish notability automatically. The best coverage is interview-based news or just interviews with little journalist independent coverage of the bio. Ureekish (talk) 05:28, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bilateral relations, Palestine, Canada, and New Jersey. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 06:01, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Bhomiaji Maharaj Temple, Sopra, Bhopalgarh

Bhomiaji Maharaj Temple, Sopra, Bhopalgarh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources JoyWeaver (talk) 05:24, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, Hinduism, and India. JoyWeaver (talk) 05:24, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Sopra, Bhopalgarh#Beliefs where few lines are mentioned. Just a ROTM shrine of worship in a village....found no sources having significant coverage to warrant standalone notability. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 05:58, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related AfD discussions. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 06:02, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Youngseo

Youngseo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to AllDay Project. Fails WP:BANDMEMBER and most of the sources here are about the reality show she participated in years ago, about the band she's in, or promotional. Lots of puffery as well both in the sources and in the Wikipedia content -- e.g. writing in wikivoice that the Elle Korea source calls her a "sought-after model" even though the article explicitly says that was her first-ever solo photoshoot. I looked up her name in Hangul too and there's still no significant coverage about her; in fact most of the results are about another Youngseo, an athlete, who seems far more notable. Handsome Ellis (talk) 03:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related AfD discussions. Handsome Ellis (talk) 03:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Television, and South Korea. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:28, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to AllDay Project per the nominator's well-stated investigation. This article is clearly an attempted promotion for the performer who may achieve notability someday, but she's just barely out of the starting gate now. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:53, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Don't Have a Cow (That's So Raven)

Don't Have a Cow (That's So Raven) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to That's So Raven season 2#ep23 because the article relies on 3 listicles, with all 3 not going in depth about the episode itself. Emcgonigle (talk) 03:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Disney. Emcgonigle (talk) 03:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Hurricane Georges tornado outbreak

Hurricane Georges tornado outbreak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Hurricane Georges because there was only one significant tornado, and no fatalities as a result of the tornadoes. There were a few dozen injuries, but given Georges killed over 600 people total, I feel giving the tornado outbreak, which killed zero, its own dedicated article is WP:UNDUE given context. Also, merging the article into the main article's impacts section would likely improve the main article, as for such a significant hurricane, the impacts section is rather lacking, in large part due to the over abundance of sub-articles. IMO there wouldn't even be a need to list out all the tornadoes in the main article, just a sentence each for all the tornadoes that caused injuries. AutisticYapper (talk) 02:50, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Weather, Alabama, Florida, and Georgia (U.S. state). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Support merging to the proposed target. Lorstaking (talk) 09:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Support - per nomanators rational.

WXchaser (^{Say what?}) 15:15, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• As I said on the Georges talk page, I prefer the merge target be Effects of Hurricane Georges in the United States. I'm against merging all of Georges' sub-articles, as that could be over 11,000 words of content (too long). However, if this is merged into the main Georges article, then I suggest it be handled like Hurricane Frances' tornado outbreak and have the table be collapsed automatically. That way it won't add too much visual clutter to the main article. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Feminist Media Studies

Feminist Media Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not find non-database secondary sources Historyexpert2 (talk) 02:47, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related AfD discussions. Historyexpert2 (talk) 02:47, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:11, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Social science. Bridget (talk) 11:19, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Keep, clear pass of WP:NJOURNALS, indexed in WOS and Scopus, and a top quartile journal in its category. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:16, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Keep per Headbomb. Guettarda (talk) 14:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

'Til Death Do Us Part (Philippine TV series)

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/'Til Death Do Us Part (Philippine TV series)
• Articles for deletion/'Til Death Do Us Part (Philippine TV series) (2nd nomination)

'Til Death Do Us Part (Philippine TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The addition of a notability tag to this article was rejected. The previous deletion discussion rested upon stating that any television show that aired was presumed notable, which certainly isn't the case now (if it ever was). The sources cited in the original discussion were admitted to be poor at best; virtually the entire "keep" rested on that idea that aired television was definitely notable. I tried searching myself but only came up with the same sources already pointed out in that previous deletion discussion. AaronNealLucas (talk) 02:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Philippines. AaronNealLucas (talk) 02:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: for context, the first nomination was from 2008 (as the nominator already noted, our standards have changed in 18 years). No opinion on if this can meet 2026 standards. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:13, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Kelly Rian Sanson

Kelly Rian Sanson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actress; her sole major role appears to have been in Cinderella's Curse and thus fails WP:NACTOR. No evidence of passing WP:GNG either. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:05, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and England. Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:05, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Women-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:29, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Weak keep - NACTOR through Cinderella in Cinderella's Curse and Olive Oyl in Popeye's Revenge - the second one is slightly borderline, but I'd say it's a major enough role as a main antagonist. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 22:38, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Olive Oyl appears to be a minor role in that movie, making her fall short of NACTOR. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:55, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

At least from reviews like this one she seems to be major, and the plot synopsis also seems to depict her as the second main antag - not as much screentime as Popeye but I do still think that's enough. Jishara (please ping upon response) (talk) 21:48, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:07, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People and United Kingdom. AnonymousScholar49 (talk) 01:11, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Lycée Français International de Delhi

Lycée Français International de Delhi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:33, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, India, and Delhi. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:30, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: Found a couple sources , , and . Although I doubt they consititute SIGCOV. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 15:37, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

@Dz5t 8O12: The standard of SIGCOV depends on how much commentary each source makes about the subject. From WP:SIGCOV: ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." So if the source only has a single sentence about the school, that is not SIGCOV. If it has two paragraphs about the school, that is SIGCOV.

• In "4-yr-old boy ‘locked in dark room, tortured’. Delhi kindergarten horror in French embassy premises" I don't see an extended discussion on the Lycee itself, so I don't think it counts as SIGCOV.
• "French International School now open for Indian students" does have SIGCOV as the main topic of the article is about how it now has space for Indian students. If The Asian Age is a reliable source (if it has proper fact-checking processes) that would be great!
• "French International School in Delhi now open for Indian students" is also SIGCOV as the LFID is the main topic of that article. While The Economic Times is not listed in Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources my understanding is that it should be a reliable source.

So far two of the three sources have SIGCOV. If The Asian Age is an RS, I will make a keep vote.

You can look for coverage in French newspapers and magazines, including those about French expatriates, for additional coverage.

WhisperToMe (talk) 18:20, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep In addition to the sources above, there is also this review from The Good Schools Guide. Kelob2678 (talk) 17:43, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:17, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:06, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Hector Rivas

Hector Rivas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC. The business-journal and local-paper pieces are about ThriftBooks. the sports coverage is about Henry Organ or quotes him briefly as an agent. The rest are a press release, PR firm's award-semifinalist list and a Forbes contributor interview. SOFILUIZA // COMMS 16:21, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Sports, Washington, and Washington, D.C.. SOFILUIZA // COMMS 16:21, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep How does this fail WP:BASIC? He meets WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV with almost 40 citations. ThriftBooks, which he founded, is really famous and would not stand a chance of being deleted. Rivas almost became the second Jeff Bezos. His notability should be very obvious. I will let the Wikipedia article speak for itself. Naturalezas45 (talk) 17:08, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete. The best sources I could find look to be a business profile with limited biographical coverage, an interview with his partner, and similar coverage with reliability or independence issues. He is not notable even if one of his businesses is. Eluchil404 (talk) 15:59, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 21:07, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:04, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

BengalOS

BengalOS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a Linux distribution. I can find very little information about this software and it does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPRODUCT based on the sources in the article or my wider searches. In terms of the article's sources: is a page listing various softwares including this one; does not seem to be independent and is a blog linking a social media post. Chocmilk03 (talk) 23:47, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Software-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:24, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  Other references include:

  - https://wiki.debian.org/immutable (both the distro and talks mentioning it). Note that although the source repositories are hosted on Debian infrastructure it is an independent project

  Other referencs

  - https://linmob.net/weekly-update-32-2026/ mentioning it along other distributions

  - Mention at Mobile Linux Hackday: https://www.linuxexpres.cz/aktuality/mobile-linux-hackday-8

  - Coverage on Habr: https://habr.com/ru/news/1056084/

  - Runtimewire: https://runtimewire.com/article/phosh-0-56-0-mobile-linux-immutable-updates?utm_source=chatgpt.com Blurredmobi (talk) 05:52, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  Another talk sorting BengalOS into the phone operating system space: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b48AU0tqCwg&t=513s Blurredmobi (talk) 16:13, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

  I modeled this after KDE Linux which serves a similar role but for Desktop systems. Blurredmobi (talk) 05:55, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  Wikipedia needs significant coverage of BengalOS, which means sources that examine it in some level of detail. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:41, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Phosh, fails WP:GNG per nom and my above comment. Current article has no reliable sources so there is nothing to merge. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 07:44, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

I'd support this proposed redirect, seems a sensible target. Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 07:54, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:02, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Merge to Phosh: I cannot find much of any RS about this topic to suggest it is notable enough for an independent article. Maayaaaaa (talk) 02:51, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Purili

Purili (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPRODUCT, contested draftification, only contains primary sources, and I found no mentions in reliable sources. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:30, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related AfD discussions. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:30, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related AfD discussions. ~ A412 ^talk! 22:31, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Lacks coverage in reliable sources. The engine probably was created in June 2026 and announced in this post on Reddit. Kelob2678 (talk) 22:00, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 01:00, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Baxter Kruger

Baxter Kruger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR. Citations are the subject's own ministry site, affiliated theology organisations and blogs. Kqol • talk 23:10, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Authors, Religion, Christianity, and United States of America. Kqol • talk 23:10, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Scotland and Mississippi. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:31, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: I don't see anything particularly wrong with this article. Bearian (talk) 01:18, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

  Keep As Bearian noted the article seems fairly well rounded. There's a number of academic sources present, more than half of which (having not done a completely comprehensive review) I'd suspect cover the subject in at least 100 words, if not more.

  I also don't think it's reasonable to discount a fair number of the additional sources entirely simply because they're Christian organizations. Just because they're also Christian doesn't mean they're affiliated or biased in some manner when discussing the topic, that they can't discuss the individual in a neutral, detached manner (beyond the fact of their implying the existence of a God, which is an unreasonable lens for us to look at this issue from seeing as we're trying to establish notability for a theologian). I think that takes a really narrow and somewhat diminutive view of theology, which isn't really practical at all; obviously the sources covering them are going to be broadly Christianity-focused in nature. Were we hoping for an expose in the Wall Street Journal?

  CSGinger14 (talk) 00:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 00:57, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Come with Me 2 Hell

Come with Me 2 Hell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NALBUM. No in-depth coverage in sources. Deletion is recommended because the album is a collaboration between two different artists, making it impossible to choose between them, and the record label issuing the album doesn't have its own Wikipedia page. Binksternet (talk) 00:56, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related AfD discussions. Binksternet (talk) 00:56, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

I am also nominating the next album for deletion for the exact same reasons. Binksternet (talk) 01:00, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Come with Me 2 Hell Part 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Redirect to Three 6 Mafia as WP:ATD. There's nothing notable about this album. WidgetKid ^Converse 02:01, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Sarfraz Khan (actor)

Sarfraz Khan (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and NACTOR. I think making this a redirect is irrelevant at this point. Thilsebatti (talk) 00:56, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Businesspeople, and India. Thilsebatti (talk) 00:56, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: unrelated to the nominator's concerns, this has (when not blanked and redirected) been tagged as containing LLM text since August. (The page itself has existed in some form since 2012, so there are definitely non-LLM revisions, but it probably doesn't help the cause any.) No opinion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:18, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Suspected AI-generated articles, Maharashtra, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:18, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: At minimum, the promotional VR1 Media, Acting by Sarfraz and Care Shield sections should probably all be deleted; I am leaving them in place during this discussion though. AllyD (talk) 07:10, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Cole Williams (musician)

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Cole Williams (musician)
• Articles for deletion/Cole Williams (musician) (2nd nomination)

Cole Williams (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted in 2021 and recreated. Sources are local New Orleans outlets, his own website and YouTube. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. Kqol • talk 23:12, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, United States of America, and Louisiana. Kqol • talk 23:12, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Info - Note on soft closure: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was soft delete.

Previous discussions: 2021-03 (closed as ✗ soft delete)

Logs: 2021-03 ✗ deleted

--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 00:55, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Vincent Olise

Vincent Olise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. The coverage is about his son Michael Olise and mentions in passing WP:NOTINHERITED. Kqol • talk 23:16, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and Nigeria. Kqol • talk 23:16, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related AfD discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:18, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. Notable enough on his own as a cricket player as per. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vixissimi (talk • contribs) 23:40, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

  Corroboration of the above source in the New Nigerian archives here, here, here, here, here, and here. Vixissimi^📨 07:58, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

  cc @Jsthewikiperson Vixissimi^📨 08:15, 5 October 2026 (UTC)

  Keep. Olise is notable enough in his own right through his international cricket career. The Nigerian news archives provided by Vixissimi prove Vincent Olise is notable under WP:NCRIC. Jsthewikiperson (talk) 07:05, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 00:55, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Fawna MacLaren

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Fawna MacLaren
• Articles for deletion/Fawna MacLaren (2nd nomination)

Fawna MacLaren (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of Playboy Playmates of 1989 because fails WP:GNG Demt1298 (talk) 00:54, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, and Sexuality and gender. Demt1298 (talk) 00:54, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: this survived the first nomination in May 2011 because the then-nominator violated a topic ban in starting it. The closing statement indicates the door was left open for an immediate renomination, but given it took a little over 15 years to come back to AfD there clearly wasn't much hurry–but it was tagged as a potential NBIO failure that December. (No opinion on the article.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:23, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of California-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:24, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails GNG & NACTOR both. LegacyWiki (talk) 04:21, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Dorcel TV

Dorcel TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of adult television channels because fails WP:GNG Demt1298 (talk) 00:45, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Popular culture, and Sexuality and gender. Demt1298 (talk) 00:45, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Europe, Netherlands, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:24, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Dianne Chandler

Dianne Chandler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of Playboy Playmates of 1966 because fails WP:GNG Demt1298 (talk) 00:42, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Popular culture, and Sexuality and gender. Demt1298 (talk) 00:42, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:25, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Joe Allen (writer)

Joe Allen (writer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No credible claim to pass WP:NAUTHOR. I could only find a handful of books that have a low double digit number of reviews on amazon.

All the sources on the page appear to be primary sources. WP:BEFORE didn't turn up any WP:SIGCOV in secondary sources. Giulio 00:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Journalism, and Politics. Giulio 00:17, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment: this has been tagged as a potential NBIO failure with COI issues since 2015. (No opinion.). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:26, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:26, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete doesn't pass WP:NAUTHOR, can't find any WP:SIGCOV of Allen or his works. Orange sticker (talk) 10:41, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Antonio Adamo

Antonio Adamo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to List of pornographic film directors because fails to meet WP:GNG. Demt1298 (talk) 00:07, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Sexuality and gender. Demt1298 (talk) 00:07, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Italy. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:26, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Flag of Missoula, Montana

Flag of Missoula, Montana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging Flag of Missoula, Montana to Rainbow flag (LGBTQ) as the content of the former makes more sense as a part of the History section of the latter. There is no "Flag of Missoula, Montana"; "A Resolution of the Missoula City Council Recognizing the Pride Flag as an Official Flag of the City of Missoula" did not create a flag for the city, but rather it gave unprecedented recognition to the rainbow pride flag (and any variant) as an official flag. To give a similar example from my home city, the rainbow and transgender pride flags have official status in Vancouver, but they are not "flags of Vancouver". The difference here is that Missoula doesn't have its own flag.

The scope of the content then is not really a "Flag of Missoula, Montana", but the event of the rainbow pride flag being officiated by the resolution. This can easily be a paragraph on the Rainbow flag (LGBTQ) article. Yue🌙 (talk) 00:03, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, LGBTQ+ studies, and Montana. Yue🌙 (talk) 00:03, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

Would your opinion be the same if we found a way to mention this unofficial flag? SenshiSun (talk) 00:46, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

@SenshiSun: My opinion would not stay the same, but not only is FOTW not a reliable source on its own, but it seems even the authors of that page are unsure if such a flag exists. Yue🌙 (talk) 05:00, 6 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related AfD discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:27, 6 October 2026 (UTC)
• This could be mentioned at History of Missoula, Montana#Modern era but it's not notable on its own. Reywas92^Talk 13:41, 6 October 2026 (UTC)