Edge Rewrite
everything Source code View original
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a228ca56da8f4afc

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

Page extended-confirmed-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RFR)
"WP:PERM" redirects here. You may be looking for Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission or Help:Permanent link.
This page is under extended confirmed protection, but non-EC users may edit its subpages.

    Requests for permissions
    Shortcuts

    This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, and template editor rights, and AutoWikiBrowser access.

    Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

    Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

    Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 01:30, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

    Permissions

    Handled here

    • Account creator (add request · view requests): The account creator flag is granted to users who are active in the request an account process. The flag removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24 hour period. It also allows users to make accounts with names similar to other accounts. The account creator flag is only given to users who participate in the ACC process and may be removed without notice should a user's participation in the account creation process cease.
    • Autopatrolled (add request · view requests): The autopatrolled flag is granted to users who are active in the creation of new articles. This tool is granted so their creations are auto patrolled in Special:NewPages. Unlike other requests, any user may nominate an editor for Autopatrolled, even without that user's consent. A user who wishes to have this flag generally should have created at least 25 articles and must be trusted, experienced, and must have demonstrated they are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, especially WP:BLP and Wikipedia:Notability.
    • AutoWikiBrowser (add request · view requests): AutoWikiBrowser is a semi-automated MediaWiki editor for Windows, designed to make tedious repetitive tasks quicker and easier. It is essentially a browser that automatically opens up a new page when the last is saved. When set to do so, it suggests some changes (typically formatting) that are generally meant to be incidental to the main change. Please read the rules of use and registration requirements on the main page before requesting permission. This is not a true user right, but access needs to be granted by administrators just like other permissions. If approved, your name will be added to the CheckPage. Users with under 250 non-automated mainspace edits or 500 total mainspace edits are rarely approved. You will need to give a reason for wanting AWB access.
    • Confirmed (add request · view requests): The confirmed flag may be granted to new users who have not yet hit the threshold for autoconfirmed status. These are users who have not had both 10 edits and 4 days experience. People with this flag can upload files and edit semi-protected pages before hitting the autoconfirmed flag. Users requesting this flag must indicate clearly why they should be exempted from the customary confirmation period.
    • Event coordinator (add request · view requests): The event coordinator user right allows editors to create multiple new accounts, and to temporarily confirm accounts so that they can create new articles.
    • Extended confirmed (add request · view requests): The extended confirmed flag is normally automatically added to accounts after 500 edits and 30 days, but may be added to legitimate alternate accounts of users that already have this access. The flag allows users to edit pages under extended confirmed protection.
    • File mover (add request · view requests): The file mover user right is intended to allow users experienced in working with files to rename them, subject to policy, with the ease that autoconfirmed users already enjoy when renaming Wikipedia articles.
    • Mass message sender (add request · view requests): Mass message sender enables users to send messages to multiple users at once. This flag is given to users who have made requests for delivery in the past, clearly showing an understanding of the guidance for use.
    • New page reviewer (add request · view requests): The new page reviewer user right allows users to mark pages as patrolled and use the page curation toolbar. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Page mover (add request · view requests): The page mover user right allows users experienced in working with article names to move them, subject to policy, without leaving behind a redirect. They may also move all subpages when moving the parent page(s). General guidelines include making 3,000 edits and 6 months of editing history. At administrators' discretion, the right may be accorded on a time limited basis or indefinite.
    • Pending changes reviewer (add request · view requests): The reviewer flag is granted to users who are experienced enough with Wikipedia editing and its policies for contributing to the process of reviewing articles placed under pending changes.
    • Rollback (add request · view requests): Rollback enables users to remove vandalism much more quickly and efficiently than by undoing it. Users who do not demonstrate an understanding of what constitutes capable vandalism fighting, either because they have no or little history of doing so, or show a poor ability to discern between good and bad faith edits will not be granted this right. Also, it is unlikely that editors with under 200 mainspace edits will have their request granted. For a more detailed explanation of rollback and information about when it is appropriate to use the tool, see Wikipedia:Rollback. For information about the technical details of the feature, see here.
    • Template editor (add request · view requests): The template editor flag allows users to edit protected templates and Lua modules. General guidelines for granting include making at least 1,000 edits overall (with at least 150 to templates or modules), being a registered user for over a year, and having a record of successfully proposing significant edits to several protected templates. Users should demonstrate proficiency with template syntax and an understanding of the need for caution when editing heavily-used templates.
    • Temporary account IP viewer (add request · view requests): Temporary account IP viewers are able to view the IP address information associated with temporary accounts.

    Handled elsewhere

    Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

    Review and removal of permissions

    The requests for permissions process is not used to review or remove user rights:

    The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight permissions are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

    Process

    Requestors

    To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting the permission.

    Administrators

    Full instructions at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Administrator instructions

    Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

    Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add {{done}} or {{not done}} respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, {{already done}} should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

    Other editors

    Requests for permissions is primarily intended for editors requesting a permission for their own account. Other editors are welcome to comment if they have specific information that is relevant to that request that a patrolling administrator is unlikely to discover for themselves. Otherwise, since only administrators can effectively respond to these requests, general comments or 'clerking' by other users are rarely helpful. Non-administrators cannot "decline" to grant a request, because they're not in a position to accept it.

    A limited exception to this is Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled, where third party nominations are encouraged. Other editors should still avoid offering general remarks on requests and leave the final decision to an administrator.

    Current requests

    Account creator

    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Autopatrolled

    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Aesurias

    I believe that my created articles are free of any issues that would be raised by a npp, so this would help reduce the new pages backlog. aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 04:26, 27 July 2026 (UTC) aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 04:26, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    (Non-administrator comment) I've run across Aesurias' work many times at DYK and have been impressed with the quality. I did a quick check of several recent creations and found no issues that would warrant patrolling. Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:25, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) +1 please! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:44, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
     Done Sohom (talk) 18:32, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    AutoWikiBrowser

    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Beta Beta Beta

    Would like to use when I get my computer back, will use to do edits that if done manually would be tedious. Beta Beta Beta - talk 22:06, 6 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Beta Beta Beta, can you give us any more specific examples? In solidarity, asilvering (talk) 22:19, 16 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    To provide one example, simple copy editing would be far easier with AWB than having to look through the page for the possibility of a slip-up. Beta Beta Beta - talk 22:39, 16 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Шахматист2025

    I want to automate creation of a bunch of redirects for sports seasons, like 2014–15 Swedish Hockey League season. Шахматист2025 (talk) 00:09, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

     Done * Pppery * in solidarity 19:17, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Salmon of Knowledge

    I've been active on Wikipedia for a little over a month, most of my work pertaining to copy editing and counter-vandalism. In doing these activities, I've had the opportunity to observe both articles containing formatting or stylistic flaws and the edits that introduced them. After seeing these flaws appear so frequently, I was encouraged to work on fixing as much of them as I could. However, doing so manually is incredibly tedious and would take time out of other activities that were arguably more important, such as fighting vandalism and writing articles. I knew that certain tools existed to remedy this very issue, but one of the most powerful such tools required permission to use. Because of these considerations, I'd like to request the ability to use AutoWikiBrowser. Salmon of Knowledge (talk) 01:21, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

     Done * Pppery * in solidarity 19:18, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]


    Confirmed

    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Event coordinator

    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Extended confirmed

    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    File mover

    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    Mass message sender

    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


    New page reviewer

    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Wikiediter2029

    Experience with WP:GAN reviewing, and recent changes patrolling. Furthermore, I am a experienced editer, making and nominating a WP:GAN article (61016), I have also have been on this platform for about a year and understanding of key rules in Wikipedia, such as WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:DICT, WP:NPOV, and WP:CRYSTALBALL. I have also made this to help with the huge backlog, and review as much articles as possible on Wikipedia. Wikiediter2029 (talk) Nosey? Stalk My edits 15:10, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request — MusikBot talk 15:20, 20 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:CipherSleuth

    Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights... volunteer my time to help with the backlog. CipherSleuth (talk) 21:10, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:CostalCal

    Hello. I am writing to respectfully request the reinstatement of my New Page Patrol permission. I understand that these tools were revoked due to concerns regarding speed-reviewing. I take full responsibility for this issue; I allowed myself to prioritize clearing a backlog over taking the necessary time to thoroughly view each article, which was a mistake on my part.

    I completely recognize why speed-reviewing is detrimental to the project. Rushing through the queue increases the risk of missing subtle copyright violations, promotional material, or articles that do not meet standard notability guidelines. The patrol queue exists as a safeguard, and my previous pacing did not uphold that standard.

    To ensure this never happens again, I am committing to a fundamentally different approach to page curation. Moving forward, my workflow will explicitly include

    Running Earwig's Copyvio Detector on every single article before any other action is taken, manually opening and reading the actual text of at least three independent sources to confirm WP:GNG is met, rather than just skimming the reference list, and strictly limiting myself to a set number of reviews per session to prevent fatigue and rushing.

    I remain deeply committed to building this encyclopedia, as evidenced by my track record of creating 49 successful articles from scratch. I would be entirely open to a probationary period where my first 50 reviews are closely spot-checked by an administrator to prove that my new workflow is permanently established. Thank you for your time and consideration. CostalCal (talk) 01:23, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 01:30, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @CostalCal Did you write this request yourself, in compliance with the talk page guidelines? Toadspike [Talk] 03:55, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @User:Toadspike Yes. I did. CostalCal (talk) 17:47, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Not that it affects the status of this request, but your wording is very similar to the examples in Wikipedia:Identifying LLM unblock requests. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 22:50, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done you received multiple warnings across the last three months asking you to correct your behavior. The fact that (a) you failed to do so and (b) have not engaged with the cleanup effort in relation to your reviews, gives me no confidence that you will in fact correct your behavior going forward at this time. Please find a non-NPP avenue to contribute to the project for the time being. That being said, while I don't see this as a permanent dis-qualifier, I do think applying so quickly after the revocation is hurting your chances here. Sohom (talk) 18:30, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sohom Datta NPP is my heart and soul. CostalCal (talk) 19:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @CostalCal Do you still have access to the AFCH script? If so I suggest joining the August 2026 AfC backlog drive. Re-reviews are conducted by other reviewers at will and depending on how many you pass and fail, it may justify whether or not you're ready to get the NPR right back. AfC is a step below NPP so it would likely work out. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 02:31, 28 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @Hurricane Wind and Fire Joined. CostalCal (talk) 03:29, 28 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @CostalCal If you'd like I can re-review as many of your reviews as I can if you're comfortable with that. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 03:59, 28 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @Hurricane Wind and Fire Sure. CostalCal (talk) 14:54, 28 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Norellia.sh

    I would like to receive NPP rights so that I can assist with the ever growing NPP backlog, and so that I may get some practice before the September NPP drive. I participate in WP:AfC, WP:AfD, and am knowledgable in areas such as WP:N, WP:V, and the WP:CSD criterion, as well as WP:PROD cases. I am coming back from an editing hiatus, but I am back and ready to roll back into the swing of editing! I am also a WP:CVUA instructor, and an active member of the WP:CVU. Thanks for taking the time to consider my request! 「Norellia.sh」(talk) 05:13, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 05:20, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
     Done temporarily, until October 1. —TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 04:32, 28 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Axolitl

    Hi. I would like to become a New Page Reviewer to help improve the project and to assist my work at WP:WPAFC. I participate in the AfC process lots, and am familiar with the deletion policies and different processes. I have also written one article, and may complete another draft soon, although article creation is something I don't do very often. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 00:22, 29 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]


    Page mover

    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


    Pending changes reviewer

    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Equivalent-Text2598

    Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I patrol recently edited and see edits which I cannot accept which is a little annoying. I would also like to help more around wikipedia due to how much information I have found useful inside it. I like countering vandalism of pages as well. For all these reasons, I'd love the permission.

    Thanks for your time. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 15:40, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user has 95 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 15:50, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I now have 173 edits in the mainspace. Equivalent-Text2598 (talk) 14:52, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:0ximjub43r

    I am requesting the pending changes reviewer permission to assist with maintaining the quality of articles on English Wikipedia. My contributions have primarily focused on expanding and improving articles by adding reliable, independent sources, improving references, and organizing content in accordance with Wikipedia's content policies. 0ximjub43r (talk) 22:12, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]


    Rollback

    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:AriuCH

    I would like to request Rollback rights. My last request was on 18 May. According to previous advice, I have tried to follow a clear workflow, including issuing warnings and reporting Vandalism, Block evasion, and Disruptive editing at AIV, RFPP, and AN/EW. In addition, I use Twinkle for warnings, reports, and reverts. AriuCH (talk) 18:27, 2 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([3][4]). — MusikBot talk 18:30, 2 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:أوس

    I've recently been using SWViewer and Twinkle to revert vandalism, so this permission would be very useful for me. I'm already very familiar with how it works, as I already have this permission on other Wikimedia projects. -- 🐦‍🔥 Aws 💬 Talk 14:23, 12 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Vydrakk

    I would like to request Rollback permissions firstly in order to make use of tools like Huggle & AntiVandal. Secondly rollback permissions will allow me to increase the speed of my workflow as most of it consists of RC patrolling edits by unregistered & new accounts. My contribution history demonstrates that I have multiple months of RC Patrol experience and no history of edit warring. At the time of writing this I have 656 live edits of which 220 are in the Main namespace and 262 are in the User Talk namespace, this shows my track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits. Vydrakk (talk) 10:03, 15 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Thomasfan1916

    I would like to request my Rollback rights. My previous request on June 15 was declined because I was blocked for making disruptive edits. Since I'm autoconfirmed, I use Twinkle to revert the edits which was vandalized by the IPs (or later TAs). Thomasfan1916[built buses?] 20:15, 23 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Norellia.sh

    I am requesting permanent rollback rights after a 1 month trial in the past, as well as my recent 3 month trial. Over the course of the past few months, I have served as a CVUA instructor, and have continued using antivandalism tools like Wikishield and CVPI to prevent vandalism from infecting the wiki. 「Norellia.sh」(talk) 08:29, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 31 July 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 08:30, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Bungle491

    I would like to request rollback rights. I check the recent changes page a couple times a day and I use Twinkle currently to revert vandalism. I have over 200 mainspace edits as well as extended-confirmed permissions. I always use warning templates after reverting edits and make reports to AIV when necessary. Rollback would help me look through recent changes much more effectively with tools such as Interceptor or WikiShield. If not permanent, a month-long trial run of rollback would also work, so that I could reapply eventually. Bungle491 (talk) 06:27, 28 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Cipher Nox

    Vandalism cleanup. Prior Huggle experience on a former vanished account. - - Cipher Nox (talk) 01:26, 29 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Automated comment This user has 186 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 01:30, 29 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @MusikBot: Close to 200 edits on this account, with extensive past experience on my vanished account. Happy to wait until I reach the threshold if preferred! - - Cipher Nox (talk) 01:39, 29 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Cipher Nox, it doesn't look like you've been consistently warning users when you revert them. It's good that you're open to gaining more experience first; I would reapply in a few weeks after working on this point and building up a bit more of a track record.  Not done for now. —TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 02:45, 29 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Template editor

    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Axolitl

    Hi. I am requesting TE rights so I can make edits to template-protected template faster. I have numerous (over 5) template requests, of which I believe around 5 have been accepted, and have made over 3 sandbox edits. My main template edite are those which help readability on Dark Mode while minimally affecting light mode, such as my series of edite to Wdefcon templates ({{Edit COI/backlog}}, {{AfC information}}, etc.). With TE, I would be able to make more of these, alongside others. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 22:49, 14 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Standard Guidelines review:
    1. Green tickY (guideline: >1 year, applicant: 1.5 year)
    2. Green tickY (guideline: >1000 edits, applicant: ~1100)
    3. Green tickY (guideline: >150 template edits, applicant: 170)
    4. Green tickY (guideline: !<6 months, applicant: N/A)
    5. Green tickY (guideline: 3 sandboxes, applicant: 6)
    6. Red XN (guideline: 5 requests, applicant: 3 (plus 1 pending))
    Primefac (talk) 22:11, 15 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Having counted again, I believe I have at least 4 accepted, 1 pending, and 2 declined edit requests? Axolitl (talk | contribs) 22:19, 15 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I also don't know if this matters, but I just had another edit request answered, leaving me at 5 accepted edit requests. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 03:17, 16 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:CharlesEditor23

    I recently possessed the template editor right, but it expired on July 1. I would like to request permanent template editor rights. I have met all the criteria for granting. I also am willing to prove I can be responsible again with possessing the template editor right permanently. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Could you point to a few examples of where you have used the right on high-risk templates in the past few months? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:35, 24 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes. I have used the template editor right on Module:Gridiron color/data & Module:College color/data, which are both high-risk templates. Here's the edit diff from May 22, 2026 from when I previously had the WP:TPE right and used it to change the HTML hex color codes for the Canadian Football League (CFL)'s Hamilton Tiger-Cats. Here's the edit diff from April 29, 2026 from when I previously had the template editor right and used it to change the historical HTML color codes for the National Football League (NFL)'s Dallas Cowboys. Here's the edit diff from March 29, 2026 from when I previously had the template editor right and used it to change the URL source reference for the California Golden Bears. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 03:40, 26 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Are the examples I've provided sufficient enough? The main reason why I'm requesting WP:TPE right is so I may be able to make changes to high risk templates such as Module:Gridiron color/data & Module:College color/data. I'm happy to answer any & all other questions. CharlesEditor23 (talk) 16:47, 28 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I will note I haven't had a chance to look at them yet; please be patient. Primefac (talk) 21:53, 28 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary account IP viewer

    Sorry, temporary accounts cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

    User:Beyhive Navy

    Hello. I am requesting permission to access this user group because I have experience in sockpuppet investigations, watching TA based on their same pattern of edits by the sockpuppeteer. I ONLY agree to using the IPs if the sockpuppeteer’s location is confirmed based on old or recent patterns (before we started using TAs). I believe I am familiar with this policy as I have always been aware of the edit filter, reverting counter vandalism, and this will be easier for me to prove block evasion. Beyoncé and Rihanna's navy 🐝🪖 13:37, 25 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

     Done – robertsky (talk) 05:10, 28 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:0ximjub43r

    I am requesting temporary account IP viewer access as I have become increasingly involved in maintaining and improving English Wikipedia. While my primary contributions have focused on article improvement, sourcing, and content maintenance, I intend to expand my work into recent changes patrol and counter-vandalism. Access to temporary account IP information would assist me in identifying patterns of disruptive editing and reporting abuse when carrying out those maintenance activities. 0ximjub43r (talk) 21:30, 27 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    no Declined @0ximjub43r: Going through your contribution history, I find that there is a lack of page patrolling, counter-vandalism, or SPI work. While having TAIV access does smoothen such work, it is not a requirement as much of the behaviours linking different temporary accounts can be inferred. Do try applying again after you have gained some experience in these work. – robertsky (talk) 10:54, 28 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Alpha Beta Delta Lambda

    Hello! I would like to request TAIV right as it'll help me identify with block evasions in vandalism patrolling. Alpha Beta Delta Lambda (talk) 21:39, 28 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

     Done — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:15, 28 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions&oldid=1303932167"