Wikipedia:Featured list candidates

Nominating featured lists in Wikipedia Welcome to featured list candidates! Here, we determine which lists are of a good enough quality to be featured lists (FLs). Featured lists exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and must satisfy the featured list criteria. Before nominating a list, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at peer review. This process is not a substitute for peer review. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured list candidate (FLC) process. Those who are not significant contributors to the list should consult regular editors of the list before nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. A list should not be listed at featured list candidates and another review process at the same time. Nominators who have previously successfully nominated a list may have two concurrent featured list nominations only if the first active nomination has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed. The featured list director, Giants2008, or his delegates, PresN and Hey man im josh, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. Each nomination will typically last at least twenty days, but may last longer if changes are ongoing or insufficient discussion or analysis has occurred. For a nomination to be promoted to FL status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. The directors determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews: actionable objections have not been resolved in a timely manner; or consensus for promotion has not been reached after significant time; or reviewers are unable to judge whether the criteria have been met. It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the process focuses on finding and resolving problems in relation to the criteria, rather than asserting the positives. Declarations of support are not as important as finding and resolving issues, and the process is not simply vote-counting. Once the director or a delegate has decided to close a nomination, they will do so on the nominations page. A bot will update the list talk page after the list is promoted or the nomination archived, typically within the day, and the {{FLC}} template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates or adds the {{Article history}} template. If a nomination is archived, the nominator should take adequate time to resolve issues before re-nominating.  – Table of contents – Closing instructions

Featured content: Featured articles Featured lists ← Featured pictures Featured topics Featured list tools: Featured list criteria Featured list candidates Featured list removal candidates Featured list statistics Wikipedians by promoted featured list nominations Today's featured list This month's queue TFL submissions TFL statistics Featured lists that have appeared as TFL Featured lists yet to appear as TFL Featured list log Random featured list Former featured lists Removal candidates log

Nomination procedure Before nominating a list, ensure that it meets all of the FL criteria and that any peer reviews are closed and archived. It is recommended that the list have no other open discussions. Place {{subst:FLC}} on the talk page of the nominated list. From the FLC template, click on the red "initiate the nomination" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text. If you are unsure how to complete a nomination, please leave a post on the FLC talk page for assistance. Below the preloaded title, complete the nomination page, sign with ~~~~ and save the page. Finally, place {{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/name of nominated list/archiveNumber}} at the top of the list of nominees on this page by first copying the above, clicking "edit" on the top of this page, and then pasting, making sure to add the name of the nominated list. When adding a candidate, mention the name of the list in the edit summary. Optional: Consider reviewing other open nominations – anyone is encouraged to review regardless of FLC experience. This does not imply quid pro quo. Helping to review lists helps the Wikipedia community by cutting down the backlog as a way to help pay it forward, and can increase how quickly your own nomination is reviewed. Reviewing procedure Please read a nominated list fully before deciding to support or oppose a nomination. To respond to a nomination, click the "Edit" link to the right of the list nomination (not the "Edit this page" link for the whole FLC page). To support a nomination, write * '''Support''', followed by your reason(s). If you have been a significant contributor to the list before its nomination, please indicate this. Supports are weighted more strongly if they are given alongside justifications that indicate that the list was fully reviewed; a nomination is not just a straight vote. To oppose a nomination, write * '''Oppose''', followed by your reason(s). Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to address the objection, the director may ignore it. Please focus your attention on substantive issues or inconsistencies, rather than personal style preferences. Reviewers who object are strongly encouraged to return after a few days to check whether their objection has been addressed, and nominators are encouraged to use {{reply to}} or other templates to notify reviewers when replying. To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s> ... </s>), rather than removing it. If a nominator feels that an oppose vote has been addressed, they should say so, rather than striking out the reviewer's text. Nominators should not cap, alter, strike, or add graphics to comments from other editors; replies are added below the signature on the reviewer's commentary. If a nominator finds that an opposing reviewer is not returning to the nomination page to revisit improvements, this should be noted on the nomination page. Graphics (such as {{done}} and {{not done}}) are discouraged, as they slow down the page load time. To provide constructive input on a nomination without specifically supporting or objecting, write * '''Comment''' followed by your advice.

Nominations urgently needing reviews edit · history · watch · refresh The following lists were nominated almost 2 months ago and have had their review time extended because objections are still being addressed, the nomination has not received enough reviews, or insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met. If you have not yet reviewed them, please take the time to do so: Monuments of national significance in Chernivtsi Oblast (FLC) Triple Crown of Thoroughbred Racing (Japan) (FLC) List of songs recorded by My Chemical Romance (FLC) List of Kim Seon-ho live performances (FLC) Source reviews needed Monuments of national significance in Chernivtsi Oblast (FLC) edit · history · watch · refresh The following lists were nominated for removal more than 14 days ago:

Nominations

Malcolm Todd discography

Nominator(s): eve the eternal (hi) 18:38, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating the discography of American singer-songwriter Malcolm Todd for featured list status because I believe the page is up to the standards (of course, you may think otherwise). The article has been updated to meet FLC criteria, following multiple edits. This article gives a comprehensive record of his studio albums, mixtapes, EPs, singles, and music videos. eve the eternal (hi) 18:38, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "project later debuted on chart listings in 2026 internationally" - I think "project later debuted on chart listings internationally in 2026" would read more naturally

Changed.

• The singles table is sourced to chart data from the relevant countries. Therefore any release that did not chart anywhere is unsourced. You will need to add additional sources for these releases to confirm that they exist

Added sources to those releases.

• Think that's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
• Support on prose and tables. I haven't looked at the sources but I am sure someone will do a full source review -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:42, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

List of films in the Criterion Collection

Nominator(s): BakedintheHole (talk) 17:02, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because...

In the past, several attempts have been made to publish a page listing every film in the Criterion Channel, but they repeatedly fell into the traps of WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTSALE, or other Wikisins. After extensive research, rewriting, and peer review, I have successfully created and had published a page that encompasses the list in an easy to navigate, clean, and efficient way. I believe the extreme thoroughness, extreme detail, and great design of the page make it eligible for this distinct honor. It is my hope you feel the same. BakedintheHole (talk) 17:02, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (8/5/26)

• There are unsourced statements, particularly this one: While the Criterion Collection began releasing films originally on LaserDisc and VHS, they switched to DVD in 1998. Their DVD releases are considered the main canon of films in the collection, with the first DVD release being designated the first spine number. Thus, films previously released by the Criterion Collection on formats other than DVD are not included on this list.
• Colored background cannot be the only means of conveying information, as is the case on the table to differentiate between laserdisc and DVD releases. Additionally, there is no need for every cell to have a colored background.

Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:19, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Noted! I will gladly amend. As for the second point, how may I best differentiate LaserDisc, DVD, and LaserDisc/DVD releases without falling into WP:NOTCATALOG? BakedintheHole (talk) 13:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Well, being released on DVD appears to be the default. So, you could notate laserdisc releases with (LD) and laserdisc/DVD releases with (LD/DVD). You could even use {{small|'''(LD)'''}} and {{small|'''(LD/DVD)'''}} to make them as unobtrusive as possible. They would render as (LD) and (LD/DVD). And then you include those in the color field of the key. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:27, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Great idea! Thank you, I'll add it! BakedintheHole (talk) 20:57, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• In addition to the above.....
• "the Criterion Channel launched, a streaming service" - there seems to be at least one word missing here (or if not, then the comma is not needed)
• In the tables, titles starting with "A" or "The" should sort based on the next word in the title
• Directors' names should sort based on surname, not forename
• As it's a sortable table, directors' names should be linked on each usage, not just the first
• Notes column is unsourced (eg without a source how do we know that film 8 is the first from Hong Kong and that none of 5, 6, and 7 were from that territory?)
• In the second and subsequent tables, bolding cannot be the only means of conveying information, because screen readers used by visually impaired people do not read out the fact that the words are in bold
• Note a refers to "both films being released as number 151", but there actually seem to be three films with number 151 in the table
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:07, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  Noted. For point #6, I am unsure of how to add colored columns in tables such as the ones I have created. Hence the bold. I would be glad to remove the bold, would you be able to show me how to add colors to those rows, please?

  For point #7, both films were released as #151 on Laserdisc. See the note and the legend. Is there a way I may make it clearer? BakedintheHole (talk) 12:55, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  Bolding and background colors are both visual, so just adding a background color will not help. You'll need to add some sort of symbol as well. I suggest that you replace the bolding, with a background color and add a symbol too. Look at a current FL nom, (e.g. List of World Heritage Sites in France) to see how to do that. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:11, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  Perfect example! Thank you!! BakedintheHole (talk) 17:46, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  Re #151, the point I was making was that Traffic, Akira, and Letter from an Unknown Woman all seem to be #151. So that's three films released with that number, not just two........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:07, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  I think the issue is that two films were released as #151 on LaserDisc and only one was released as #151 on DVD. In concurrence to a recommendation offered by Bgsu98 above, I think I know a way to make this clearer and will try tonight! BakedintheHole (talk) 21:00, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• The image should have alt-text.
• Reviewers before me have already told you about the color/bolding issue.

(please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:43, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments by Mattximus

• The sentence "This list uses the spine numbers of DVD releases unless otherwise noted for all films" should be in notes (linked form the heading of the table) and not in the lead.
• Same with "Film titles in bold text indicate the film was previously released on LaserDisc." Leads for tables should summarize table.
• Similarly, the two tables should have a short paragraph describing the list. For example. "there are x movies released by criterion from x to 2026". Something like this.
• The notes column is mostly blank, and not overly useful. Can this information be moved to a paragraph lead? For example, "The Grand illusion is the first French film in the collection, which now contains x French films".
• You mention countries a lot, would it not be worth adding this column? As of now I only know the first French film, not any others. Or language?
• You have dvd, and laserdisc, but not blu ray? This seems like an important omission.
• Image missing alt-text
• Movie "i live in fear" missing date

Quite a few important changes needed before it reaches featured list status. Mattximus (talk) 17:18, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Keyshia Cole discography

Nominator(s): Indigault (talk) 02:00, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the featured list criteria. Since its previous nomination, the discography has undergone a substantial overhaul. The lead has been expanded to provide a more comprehensive overview of Keyshia Cole's recording career, while the prose and sourcing have been reviewed and improved throughout. The tables have been updated for consistency and completeness, and all chart positions, certifications, and release information have been verified against reliable sources. I have also addressed the issues raised during the previous nomination and subsequent peer review. I welcome any comments or suggestions for further improvement. Indigault (talk) 02:00, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1973

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:29, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

With the list for 1971 having been promoted and the list for 1972 having some support, here's the list for 1973. In this particular year, Jim Croce had two number ones, the second of them sadly posthumously. Feedback as ever most gratefully received! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:29, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (8/5/26)

• "He and Stevie Wonder were the only acts with more than one number one during the year." --> This sentence reads awkwardly, particularly the "more than one number one" part. Recommend finding an alternate way to word it.

ChrisTheDude: Let me know when you've had a chance to examine my one and only comment. Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:30, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: - tweaked it, see what you think -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:05, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support. Looks good! Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:37, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• Did Vicki Lawrence achieve a top 100 entry later? "top 40" was suddenly introduced into the prose while we were talking about top/hot 100.
• Most of the images are from much after 1973 and need a "(pictured in x)" added to them. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:52, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
  • @MPGuy2824: - I added dates to the non-contemporary images. Re: Vicki Lawrence, her only two other Hot 100 entries peaked at 75 and 81. I referenced the top 40 because people generally consider that a song was only a true "hit" if it entered the top 40 (in line with the syndicated radio show being American Top 40)...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:30, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
    • In that case, a wikilink for "top 40" wouldn't be unwarranted. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
      • @MPGuy2824: - done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:44, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:36, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Dank

• "his first Hot 100 number one in February with "Crocodile Rock"; it was the first of six chart-toppers for the British singer within a four-year period, which contributed to him being the top-performing act of the 1970s on the Hot 100.[5] John ranks as one of the biggest-selling acts of all time": I promised myself I wouldn't get too much into the weeds, and it's totally your call, but ... I don't see the narrative benefit in framing a question along 4 different time scales in rapid succession (Feb 1970, 4 years, the 1970s, all-time). But there may be reasons why each of these time scales is important, and you'd know better than me.
• Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
• Checking the FLC criteria:
• 1. Nothing else is jumping out at me as a prose problem. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the table links.
• 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, and it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find).
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements. I don't see an image-license problem.
• 6. It is stable.
• Support, provisional on a clean source review. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 16:20, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
  • @Dank: - thanks for your review. I reduced the number of different timescales in the Elton John bit -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:05, 6 August 2026 (UTC)
    • Looks good. - Dank (push to talk) 19:17, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Brandon Flowers

Nominator(s): – SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · articles made) 05:47, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this article as I have recently greatly expanded it. I have updated citations so now every award is cited. Introductory statements for every award are also cited. The lead, as well as the infobox, have also been expanded and fixed to reflect Flowers' career and accolades.– SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · articles made) 05:47, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• The awards should all be in one table with the name of the awarding body as a column. The "lots of little tables" format has been deprecated for a long time. See List of awards and nominations received by SZA for an example -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:28, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Fixed. –SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · finished projects) 09:13, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• The infobox image needs alt-text. Besides this and the sorting issue that Chris pointed out below, accessibility looks good. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:10, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Added. –SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · finished projects) 10:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Brandon Flowers has received numerous accolades" - "numerous" seems a little generous here given the number of awards in the table
• "First rising to prominence as the frontman of rock group the Killers, Flowers has released seven studio albums with the band since 2002." - all unsourced
• "Flowers launched a successful solo career with the release of his debut single "Crossfire" in 2010" - unsourced
• "which sold more than 400,000 copies " - unsourced
• " The Desired Effect (2015), sold over 100,000 copies" - unsourced
• "earned Flowers' an AML Award for Lyrics in 2015" - no reason for apostrophe on his name
• In the table, "Crossfire" should sort under C, The Desired Effect should sort under D, and Flowers' name should sort under F
• His name should be linked on each use in the table
• Some of the refs have formatting issues. Refs 4, 11 and 12 show no publisher. Many have no retrieved date. Date formatting is inconsistent. The author of ref 10 is not NME because NME is not a person.
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:59, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Fixed. –SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · finished projects) 08:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:16, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620

Source + prose review forthcoming. I've got jury duty today, but they told us we could bring our phones and some reading material...! Dylan620 in public/on mobile (he/him • talk) 13:46, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Disclosing for transparency's sake that I did already make a minor fix on the article itself. Dylan620 in public/on mobile (he/him • talk) 13:51, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Carrying out this review made me listen to the phenomenal Pressure Machine for the first time in a while, so thank you for that! The writing in the lede is clear, fluid, succinct, and professional—I have no concerns with the prose. I *do* have minor concerns from the source review, though most of it is down to ref formatting.

• Ref 1: Given that albumlinernotes is owned by AllMusic/Rovi, and in light of the RS/P entry for that umbrella, I am not comfortable with it being used as a source for information on a living person, even for an uncontroversial claim such as stating that Flowers became famous as the Killers' frontman.
• Publications (websites, magazines, news agencies) are wikilinked inconsistently. Some are linked, while others are not. The following three schemes...
  • All linked
  • All unlinked
  • Linked on first mention, unlinked after
• ...are all acceptable, but one must be chosen and applied throughout.
• All ref titles should follow the same casing structure, too, whether that means they are in Sentence case. or Title Case, regardless of how they originally appeared in the source. For instance, ShockWaves appears in three different ways (SHOCKWAVES, ShockWaves, Shockwaves) across three consecutive refs. All ref titles should be standardized to appear one way or the other.
• Onto the positives: the same date format is used for all refs, and the sources generally are awards organizations or reputable magazines.

Excellent work overall, and I look forward to supporting after the above issues are addressed. Dylan620 in public/on mobile (he/him • talk) 14:31, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Fixed. –SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · finished projects) 03:28, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

Timeline of the 2000 Pacific hurricane season

Nominator(s): Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 18:50, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Another editor and I are hoping to make a good topic for 2000 Pacific hurricane season from this and two active GANs. This timeline is modeled after recently featured Pacific hurricane season timelines, namely the ones for 1996 and 1998. The season itself wasn't terribly active – 19 storms formed, but only six became hurricanes. However, Hurricane Carlotta killed 18 when it sank a freighter, the remnants of Tropical Storm Paul helped to cause severe floods in Hawaii, and two tropical storms made landfall in Mexico. I will endeavor to address any concerns as quickly as I can. (Disclaimer: this is a WikiCup nomination.) Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 18:50, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support - all good, I found no issues at all -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:18, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• "The season officially began on ... June 1 in the Central Pacific" The ref doesn't support this statement.
• Add the acronym during the first use of National Hurricane Center and wikilink it. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:55, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

List of left-handed presidents of the United States

Nominator(s): In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 01:00, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because this is a very interesting, well written article. It highlights an amazing rate of lefties in office. This is my first FL and I don't know exactly what to say, but I hope this is enough. Please tell me if it is not. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 01:00, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose. WP:FLCR says there must be a minimum of eight items and this only has seven. I don't think the additional two who were ambidextrous post-injury count. Even if they did, I don't think a list that's just bullet-pointed names with minimal context meets the other criteria of being comprehensive and engaging. It's still basically a stub and lacks visual appeal of a table with multiple columns of additional information or adequate substance otherwise for a star, unfortunately. Reywas92^Talk 02:02, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose. I have to agree with User:Reywas92 here. Aside from the fact that there are only seven presidents listed and Featured Lists require at least eight of whatever, there is just not enough substance to this article for it to qualify as a Featured List. It is an interesting article, but it has so much more possibility. For example, has anything been written about a president's handedness beyond just "oh, he was left-handed"? Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:22, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
  • I looked at several of the sources, and it's all about cognition and left-handedness generically, can't imagine there's much to say about any one specifically. The page was at AFD a few years ago and was only kept by a 5-4 !vote. I tend to agree that it's rather trivial, even if there are some sources that focus on the trait in the most prominent job in the world. — Reywas92^Talk 03:45, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

List of World Heritage Sites in France

Nominator(s): Tone 19:29, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Well, the 2026 Tour de France just concluded, so I guess it is a good moment to nominate the French list of World Heritage Sites. Many were shown when the caravan was passing nearby! 54 sites on the main list and 33 tentative sites at the time of writing (will check for possible updates when the UNESCO session ends in a couple of days). Standard style. By the way, the list is massive and I guess there are many typos. Feel free to correct them on the fly, it will be faster for everyone. I'll take care of edits that require more in-depth work. Thanks in advance! In the meantime, the list for Spain lost the FL status, I'm getting it fixed eventually. Tone 19:29, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• Did a few copy edits.
• Improve the alt-texts for the maps. Currently it is "List of World Heritage Sites in France is located in France".
• 400 000. I'm not sure if you've purposely left out the comma or not.
• "especially in view of combining the architecture and sculptural decorations. " This needs something, but I can't think of a copy edit that doesn't use the word harmonious that is mentioned in the source.
• cave lion - disambiguate, if possible.
• Ha, menhirs remind me of Obelix.
• Will continue with the Tentative list later. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:33, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

  First round, done. Yes, Obelix :) This is where he is from ;) As for cave lion, there are two European species but one lived way before the cave paintings, so the choice which one to link is clear. Looking forward for the next iteration, thanks! Tone 16:55, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Continuing ... did a few more copy-edits.
• "Saint-Ouen Abbey in the background on the right" I think it is the one in the center but I can't be sure
• "The fortified towns of the Netherlands in northwestern Europe" Add some information about how many are in France, maybe with a couple of examples that have wikilinks.
• "numerous elements of intangible cultural heritage" I'm guessing that there is a limited number of those associated with this region. Add that number.
• A few of the images are missing alt-texts.
• That's all that I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:05, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  Got it! I rewrote the pasture one, while for the fortified towns, there is actually nothing useful in the source, no actual place names or numbers. This is a frequent issue with those older nominations... Thanks for edits! Tone 14:58, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

List of constituencies of the Gujarat Legislative Assembly

Nominator(s): -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:44, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

FL review checklist:      Prose: 0/3 Done      Source: Pending      Accessibility: Pending      Image: Pending

The 15th in the Indian constituency series. I've improved the lead, included some history and brought the table accessibility to FL-standards. Similar, recent FL: Chhattisgarh. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:44, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• "Gujarat Legislative Assembly is the fifth-largest state in India..." --> I think there are some extra words in there by accident. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:14, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  Fixed. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 16:24, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Gujarat is the fifth-largest state in India, covering 196,024 km2 (75,685 sq mi);[4] and the ninth-most populous state with a population of 60.4 million" - semi-colon should be a comma
• "After the latest election in 2022, the assembly is governed by the Bharatiya Janata Party which won 156 out of the 182 seats" => "After the latest election in 2022, the assembly is governed by the Bharatiya Janata Party, which won 156 out of the 182 seats"
• That's it, I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude fixed both. Thanks for the review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:52, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Blue Swords Cup

Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:41, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

The Blue Swords Cup was the marquee figure skating competition of East Germany. After German unification, the competition continued for several more years before it was absorbed into the ISU's new Junior Grand Prix series. Fun fact: The 1989 competition was interrupted when the fall of the Berlin Wall began, allowing competitors to bring home pieces of the wall as souvenirs. Anyway, please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions, and I look forward to your constructive input. Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:41, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "The Blue Swords Cup was held every year from 1961 to 1996, after which point, it was incorporated into the new ISU Junior Grand Prix of Figure Skating series." => "The Blue Swords Cup was held every year from 1961 to 1996, after which point it was incorporated into the new ISU Junior Grand Prix of Figure Skating series."

•  Done

• It might be a silly question, but if the Blue Swords Cup has been held "numerous times" since 1996, why are those results not listed? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:45, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Those results are listed at ISU Junior Grand Prix in Germany. I have added an extra row to each table directing readers there. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:58, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• I would maybe change the note to "For results from 1997 onwards, see ISU Junior Grand Prix in Germany". But support nonetheless -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:55, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  I amended it to For results after 1996, see ISU Junior Grand Prix in Germany. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:08, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. I liked the anecdote about the fall of the Berin Wall. I read through the whole linked reference. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:04, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Prince

Nominator(s): NP (talk) 23:48, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I have been spending some time improving it, and I believe it now meets the criteria.

Thanks, NP (talk) 16:11, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• The infobox image should have alt-text.
• If the award already has an article, then wikilink it. If it isn't notable enough for an article, then remove that section completely.
• I'd suggest that you merge all the award sections together into one table.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 16:17, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824: Done. All captions and row scopes have been added. I also added alt-text to the infobox image and made sure all the awards were wikilinked. NP (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  • You actually have to add table captions and not just leave it as "caption_text", Also put that line above the header cells. That's where reviewers expect it.
  • I also see tables where the row scope wasn't done.
  • I tried to look for a recent award FL for a person, but could only find one for movies. Anyway, I believe you should make one large table like in List of accolades received by United 93 (film). It would make comparison easier and wouldn't create an unnecessarily long Table of Contents.
  • Another point still remains with awards like "Music & Media Year-End Awards". Since they aren't notable enough for an article, you should remove them completely. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

    I'll work on adding caption text soon. Which tables are lacking row scopes? I can't find them.

    I'll work on making the list one large table, plus I removed awards lacking a separate article; let me know if I missed any. NP (talk) 20:00, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

    @MPGuy2824: Just finished adding captions and merging everything into one table. NP (talk) 02:25, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose in current form. Literally dozens of the awards/nominations are unsourced -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:29, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Just finished adding sources to all the nominations. Let me know if I missed any. NP (talk) 18:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose. I agree with User:ChrisTheDude. You can't have that much unsourced content and expect this to be promoted. Either add the appropriate sources, or withdraw this nomination. Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:43, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Bgsu98: Just finished adding all the necessary sources. Let me know if I missed any. NP (talk) 18:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Okay, I will take a look at this in a little while. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:07, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "He was well known for his eclectic work across multiple genres, flamboyant and androgynous persona, and wide vocal range which included a far-reaching falsetto and high-pitched screams." - unsourced
• "Prince began his professional music career in 1975" - unsourced
• In the table, any entry that starts with "A" or "The" should sort based on the next word
• Any entry which starts with a " should sort based on the first actual word (unless that first word is "A" or "The", in which case it should sort based on the next word)
• Linking/lack of it is very random in the table. Within the first three rows, Purple Rain is linked but 1999 is not. Everything should be linked, basically
• Some song titles are not shown in quote marks (eg ASCAP Awards)
• "Death of the Prince" - why the Prince? Also, what does this even mean - he won an award for dying?
• I haven't looked at the sources but I am sure someone will do a full source review in due course -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:21, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Thank you for the review! Added sources, links, quotations, etc. to everything. I think "Death of the Prince" was just a poorly translated posthumous award, so I changed it to "Prince". NP (talk) 23:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  Sorting of titles starting with " or The is still not fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:23, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Also, on that 2016 award....."Best International Průser" - what does that mean? "Průser" is not a word in English -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Which awards start with "The"? I can't find any. Also, "Best International Průser" translated to "Best International Screw-up", which makes no sense. I can just remove it. NP (talk) 15:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Why was that even on there? Did you not verify these entries? Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:15, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  I verified all the English awards, but I don't know Czech so I assumed it was just poorly translated. The rest are in English and are verifiable. NP (talk) 19:29, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  "The Beautiful Ones" starts with The, as do "The Gold Experience" and "The Hits/The B-Sides" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

  Oh I see what you mean, I wasn't thinking about song names. I'll work on that right now. NP (talk) 14:20, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Everything should be sorted now. Thanks for all the feedback. NP (talk) 15:34, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

2026 Women's T20 World Cup squads

Nominator(s): Vestrian24Bio 06:15, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Here's the squads list from the recently concluded 2026 Women's T20 World Cup, I've used the same format for the article as 2026 Men's T20 World Cup squads which I got to FL status earlier this year... Vestrian24Bio 06:15, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Team captains during a promotional event for the T20 World Cup at the Waterloo Bridge" - it's just Waterloo Bridge, not the Waterloo Bridge
• "Each team was [singular] allowed a maximum squad size of 15 players and were [plural] required"
• "hosts England became the first team to announce their squad for the tournament; followed by" - semi-colon should be a comma
• "Domestic teams are the recent T20 league teams" => "Domestic teams are the most recent T20 league teams"
• That's it, I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:03, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Latvian Figure Skating Championships

Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:35, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

The Netherlands was just promoted, so here is another country I have recently finished. This one was some work. Special thanks to User:Egilus for their help at the Latvian Wikipedia. Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions, and I look forward to your constructive feedback. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:35, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• "but neither with each other nor with the same partners" - Jelena Sirokhvatova seems to have been a common partner to both. Please rewrite this sentence to make it clearer. The "neither with each other" also doesn't seem to be needed unless two men can pair up for this event.

• Jurijs Saļmanovs and Oļegs Šļahovs are tied for winning the most titles in pair skating (with four each), but neither with each other nor with the same partners. This whole situation is awkward. Firstly, Jurijs and Oļegs are not common names, so the average reader is not going to realize upfront that they are both men. Secondly, Jurijs won four titles, but not with the same partner. Oļegs also won four titles, but also not with the same partner. MPGuy2824: If you have suggestions to helping to make this more clear, then I am all ears and would appreciate the help. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:24, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• You could eliminate the phrase "but neither with each other nor with the same partners" completely. Instead of "Elena Garkushina and Andrei Sitik" you can say "Partners Elena Garkushina and Andrei Sitik" or something else to indicate that they won their 3 titles as partners. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

• User:MPGuy2824: I was making this way too difficult. Here's what I simplified that section to: "Deniss Vasiļjevs currently holds the record for winning the most Latvian Championship titles in men's singles (with seven), Angelīna Kučvaļska holds the record in women's singles (with five), and Jurijs Saļmanovs and Oļegs Šļahovs are tied for winning the most titles in pair skating (with four each). Elena Garkushina and Andrei Sitik hold the record in ice dance (with three), while Garkushina won an additional title with a subsequent partner." Bgsu98 (Talk) 10:24, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Works for me. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

• The width limitation of tables in the Latvia Trophy is causing the Disc. column cells to take up more height than strictly necessary.

•  Done

• I think Elena Garkushina can be removed from the last row of the Records table since she is mentioned in the row before that one. Elena's footnote can be added after Sitik's name as well.

• The standard format on all of these articles is that if one member of the record-holding team has extra wins beyond that partnership, then they are listed separately, but share the Ref. field. Garkushina and Sitik are the record-holders. Garkushina happened to win one more championship title with someone else, who has nothing to do with Sitik.

• Ok. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

• That's all I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 16:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:10, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

• In the lead, "all of which served as Latvia's national championships" is not an independent clause, so it has to be preceded by a comma, not a semicolon. Alternatively, keep the semicolon and change "all of which" to "all of the above", "all of these", etc.

•  Done

• In the history section, "were annexed" could be wikilinked to Soviet occupation of the Baltic states (1944), though this is optional and I could see it arguably being WP:EASTEREGGy

• I linked to Baltic states under Soviet rule (1944–1991).

• Image licenses and alt text check out, and no issues with accessibility. Great work! Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 17:43, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

User:Shwabb1: Thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Support on prose and pass accessibility and image reviews. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 17:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• Full review to come, but I noticed that this seems inconsistent: Jurijs Saļmanovs and Oļegs Šļahovs are tied for winning the most titles in pair skating (with four each). Elena Garkushina and Andrei Sitik hold the record in ice dance (with three), while Garkushina won an additional title with a subsequent partner. - so....in the former case you give them credit for jointly holding the record on the basis they each won four titles as individuals, even though in each case these were with multiple different partners (i.e. you consider the record to be based on wins by an individual skater, not a pair). On that basis, should the second sentence not simply say that Elena Garkushina holds the record in ice dance with four wins.........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:55, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

  User:ChrisTheDude: I think it's that Elena Garkushina (who is the most individually-decorated ice dancer) and Elena Garkushina and Andrei Sitik (the most decorated ice dance team) are essentially the same. If, for example, Garkushina had won two championships with Joe Schmo, one with Joe Blow, and one with Joe Doe, she would hold the record, but none of those teams would. I believe that's how I've analyzed other nations. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:04, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

  On that basis I might consider In pair skating, Oļegs Šļahovs and Jeļena Berežnaja have won the most titles as a pair; Šļahovs won a further title with another partner and is tied with Jurijs Saļmanovs for the most titles in the discipline by an individual skater, with four each. Elena Garkushina and Andrei Sitik hold the record in ice dance (with three), and Garkushina won a fourth title with another partner. -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

  ChrisTheDude: I have it now as "Deniss Vasiļjevs currently holds the record for winning the most Latvian Championship titles in men's singles (with seven), while Angelīna Kučvaļska holds the record in women's singles (with five). Oļegs Šļahovs and Jeļena Berežnaja have won the most titles in pair skating as a team (with three); Šļahovs won an additional title with a subsequent partner, and is thus tied with Jurijs Saļmanovs for winning the most titles in pair skating as an individual (with four each). Elena Garkushina and Andrei Sitik hold the record in ice dance (with three), while Garkushina won an additional title with a subsequent partner." Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:15, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

  Perfect. I'll look at the rest today -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support - all good. Out of interest (I don't think this needs to be elaborated in the article), when there was only one competitor (e.g. in 1994 when there was only one competitor/pair in each category), did they still make them skate in order to win the championship or did they just hand it to them by default? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:36, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  No, they don't just get it by default. As you've seen in other articles, if they don't meet a minimum performance standard, then they don't earn the National Champion title. Some nations require a minimum standard be met before even allowing a skater to enter the national championships. But remember that the senior- and junior-levels are only the very top of a national competition; the bulk of the competition is made up of novice-level and juvenile competitors. Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:24, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

List of members of the House of Representatives of the Netherlands, 2012–2017

Nominator(s): Dajasj (talk) 15:53, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I want to, at some point in the future, complete the either set of lists. It is again a somewhat simple, yet beautiful list, this time the longest term. Please see 2017–2021 and 2023–2025 for earlier succesful nominations. Dajasj (talk) 15:53, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility, but do mention any laws enacted during the term if they were of particular note. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 16:24, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks for taking the time to review and even more for the support! Interesting question. Before I look into that however, it might make more sense to include them in Second Rutte cabinet? Personally, I prefer limiting the list to personnel and some background on that :) Dajasj (talk) 16:45, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

List of constituencies of the Manipur Legislative Assembly

Nominator(s): -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:01, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

FL review checklist:      Prose: 3/3 Done      Source: Done      Accessibility: Done      Image: Done

The 14th in the Indian constituency series. I've improved the lead, included some history and brought the table accessibility to FL-standards. Similar, recent FL: Haryana. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:01, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Dajasj

Minor thing, but in the first table, why did you switch from "Election(s)" to "Election/s"? Dajasj (talk) 08:10, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

And according to the infobox documentation, {{URL}} should be used for the website Dajasj (talk) 08:19, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Image and accessibility look okay to me. Slightly inconsistent that it is 'scope="row"' in the first and 'scope=row' in the second table. Dajasj (talk) 08:42, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

@Dasaj: I've removed the double quotes for all the scopes and fixed the other things you've pointed out. Thanks for the image and accessibility review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:59, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Also had a look at the prose, looks fine. Have a Support Dajasj (talk)

Shwabb1

• In footnote a, "Hung Assembly" should use sentence case
• Wikilink "Part-C state" to Part C state
• The slash issue is already fixed but for future reference, MOS:SLASH discourages the use of slashes, so "Election(s)" is indeed a better wording.
• That's it from me. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 10:18, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Shwabb1: Fixed both, thanks. I'll check the older FLs of this series for these issues as well. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:34, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  Support. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 10:55, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "The Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Order, 1976" should sort under D (or alternatively just remove the "The" - I would imagine the others probably technically/officially have a "The" at the start of their name)
  • Yup, you're right. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:23, 4 August 2026 (UTC)
• Note B is not a sentence so it should not have a full stop.
• That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  I would imagine the others probably technically/officially have a "The" at the start of their name You're right, they do. Fixed.

  @ChrisTheDude: Fixed both. Thanks for the review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:23, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:12, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Source review – pass

• Ref 4 is a population-projection report and does not clearly support the claim that Manipur is the "sixth smallest by area". I believe you should add a separate Census of India or other official area-ranking source.

  Good catch on the area ref. Not sure how I missed adding that ref.

  For the population part, the ref was from the same ministry and published in 2020. It seemed to me that their population figures for 2011 would be actual census figures from which the future numbers were projected. In any case, I've replaced this ref with one that is a summary of the Primary Census Abstract from 2011, the last published census. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

• Ref 5 supports the party seat totals, but not the statement that Congress is the "largest opposition party". The citation lists NPP with six seats and Congress with five, and does not identify which parties constitute the opposition. Reword this as seat totals or provide a source establishing government–opposition alignment.

  I've removed the sentence about the opposition for now, but I could add it back with a footnote to explain that the NPP is allied with the BJP. This news article can be used as a ref. What do you think? -MPGuy2824 (talk)

  @MPGuy2824: That would be absolutely fine. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:36, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• Ref 8 is explicitly an opinion article, and per WP:OPINION, it should be replaced with a reliable, preferably official, source for the 40 valley/20 hill constituency split.

  I don't think there is an official definition of where the hills end and the valley begins. Given that, I've removed to the sentence. It was an interesting aside, but not vital to the prose. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

• Ref 2: for a constitutional proposition, an authoritative legal source would be preferable. But even so, the citation gives page "2", although the relevant journal page is 908, and the publication year (2025?) is missing. I know that people do cite PDF page numbers, but the natural convention is to cite the numbered page as long as it is present, especially for a journal publication.

  Added the year (it was 2025) and changed the page number. I'm happy to add an additional constitution ref, if needed. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

• Standardise publisher names in the references: use names such as "India Code", "Ministry of Home Affairs" and "Election Commission of India", rather than raw domains such as www.indiacode.nic.in or liiofindia.org.

  Done, I think. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

• The principal table sources are otherwise strong; the official delimitation order supports the constituency names, reservation classifications and parliamentary-constituency groupings, while the ECI report is appropriate for the 2022 electorate figures.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

@Vanderwaalforces: Fixed all, but need your opinion on a point. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:25, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Looks good to me, so happy to pass review of sources with a support. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:50, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

List of consorts and children of the Wanli Emperor

Nominator(s): Min968 (talk) 12:31, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

This article is about list of consorts and children of the Wanli Emperor. I am nominating this for featured list status because I believe it meets all the FL criteria and it is an important part of the series of articles on the topic of the Ming dynasty that I am currently improving Min968 (talk) 12:31, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Note on table

I suggest using a sortable table for the entries.

• @Simongraham: Done. Min968 (talk) 11:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Image review – pass

There are four images included:

• The images all have appropriate captions and ALT tags.
• Ming Shenzong.jpg has an appropriate PD license.
• 孝端显皇后王氏（明神宗）.jpg lacks a US PD license.
• 孝靖显皇后王氏（明神宗）.jpg has an appropriate PD license.
• 明光宗皇帝.jpg has an appropriate PD license.
• While those that are included so far likely are the most relevant, consider including more images of his consorts and children if they are available, especially if the article is expanded through this review.

@Min968: This looks like it will be an interesting and useful FL once it has passed through this process. Please take a look at my comments above. simongraham (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

@Simongraham I think a bullet list is more practical and easier to navigate for Chinese emperors, who often had large numbers of consorts and children. Min968 (talk) 02:53, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "had 18 children by eight women, eight sons and ten daughters" - this reads a little confusingly, as at first glance it looks like he had 18 children by a combination of the women, his sons, and his daughters. I suggest "had 18 children, eight sons and ten daughters, by eight women. Of these, five sons...."
• "Empresses Dowager Li and Chen," => "Empress Dowagers Li and Chen,"
• "Lady Zheng was suspected of being involved in the "man with a stick" incident" - this really needs more explanation. What was this incident?
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:56, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude All done. Min968 (talk) 16:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1972

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

With the 1970 list having just been promoted, here's the 1972 list. In this particular year we saw the longest number-one song to date, and we saw one of the most influential early rock and roll stars finally reach the top spot with, ironically, one of his worst ever songs. Feedback as ever will be most gratefully received and swiftly acted upon..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• the final chart of 1971 - You can link the previous list.
• 7" single - Could be linked.
• 2021 - You can link the list for that year.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 08:44, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

@Alavense: - done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:47, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Support. Alavense (talk) 08:47, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (7/22/26)

• Support. The only issues I saw were some missing commas, which I just fixed myself. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:47, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• Many of the images are from much after 1972 and could use a "(pictured in X)" in their captions.
• I didn't see any other problems with the prose. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 17:04, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
  • @MPGuy2824: - I meant to add that but forgot. Done now! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:59, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:58, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Camilasdandelions

• Hey Chris! I'm reviewing this article.
• Suggest adopting {{Use American English}}
• As the third paragraph is talking about Chuck, what about moving his photo between second and third paragraph?
• Ref 5 -- As I know, Medium is unreliable source per WP:MEDIUM
• "in contrast Davis" -> "in contrast, Davis"
• "1957, but took" --> "1957, but it took"
• "Weeks at No. 1" -- why don't you adopt {{abbr}} here too
• Reviews done. I recently opened a FAC too, and if you don't mind, could you take a look for this article? Thank you :)! Camilasdandelions (✉️) 15:57, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• @Camilasdandelions: - all done except moving the lead image. In my experience lead images always go at the top rather than floating two thirds of the way down the lead -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Makes sense! Camilasdandelions (✉️) 16:18, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support Camilasdandelions (✉️) 16:18, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620

Image review forthcoming. Dylan620 in public/on mobile (he/him • talk) 14:48, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

As promised:

• All images contribute encyclopedic value to the list
• All images have adequate sourcing information—stated own works accepted in good faith
• All images are appropriately licensed for either Creative Commons or the public domain—I am especially impressed by how far the uploader of the Staple Singers photo went in explaining the lack of copyright restrictions there
• All images have adequate alt text

Image review passes; support on images. Dylan620 in public/on mobile (he/him • talk) 15:36, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

John Huston filmography

Nominator(s): RobertFord II (talk) 14:19, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it presents a comprehensive overview of John Huston's work across film, television, and stage, and also his many credits as director, writer, and actor. Much of it is modeled after the featured lists of other Old Hollywood directors such as John Ford's and Michael Curtiz's filmographies. This is my second attempt at a featured lists so any help would be welcome. RobertFord II (talk) 14:19, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• Some of the "yes" cells are centred and others are not, and the two shades of green appear (at least to my ageing eyes) to be very slightly different. Any reason for this?
• Full review to come...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:05, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Thanks for pointing that out. Had to go and manually fixed the alignment. Also changed the colors to help denote what is uncredited. RobertFord II (talk) 20:19, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

  I see that you now have a key showing that yellow colour and a hash symbol denote something that is uncredited, but you haven't actually added the hash symbol to the relevant cells....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:19, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Thanks for the comment. Believe I've made the right change here. RobertFord II (talk) 21:46, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

You have yellow cells and green cells, both of which contain Yes as the only content. Cell color cannot be the sole means of conveying information. If you intend yellow to indicate that the actor's appearance was uncredited, I recommend changing Yes to Uncredited appearance. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:02, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98 - Thanks! Fixed those. RobertFord II (talk) 17:19, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. | Party becomes !scope=col | Party. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1 becomes !scope=row | 1. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:53, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

   Done

  RobertFord II (talk) 18:16, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "For his work on the screenplays for Ehrlich, as well as for Howard Hawks' critically acclaimed 1941 biopic Sergeant York" => "For his work on the screenplays for Ehrlich and Howard Hawks' critically acclaimed 1941 biopic Sergeant York"
• "Bogart would solidify his status" => "Bogart solidified his status"
• "The second film adaptation of the Dashiell Hammett’s 1930 novel," - should be either "The second film adaptation of the Dashiell Hammett 1930 novel," or "The second film adaptation of Dashiell Hammett’s 1930 novel,", but not what you have here
• "The final production by Hecht-Hill-Lancaster (HHL); Written by Ben Maddow and David Wolff; based on Alan Le May's 1957 novel of the same name" => "The final production by Hecht-Hill-Lancaster (HHL); written by Ben Maddow and David Wolff based on Alan Le May's 1957 novel of the same name"
• " Co-director with Ken Hughes, Joseph McGrath, Robert Parrish, and Val Guest; screenplay by Wolf Mankowitz, John Law, and Michael Sayers; Loosely based" => " Co-director with Ken Hughes, Joseph McGrath, Robert Parrish, and Val Guest; screenplay by Wolf Mankowitz, John Law, and Michael Sayers; loosely based"
• "loosely based on the life of American saloon-keeper and Justice of the Peace in Val Verde County, Texas Roy Bean; " - to avoid a confusing sea of blue (I thought at first glance that Texas was part of the guy's name) I suggest "loosely based on the life of Roy Bean, an American saloon-keeper and Justice of the Peace in Val Verde County, Texas "
• "A longtime passion project for Huston, development originally began in the late-1950s" - this is a complete sentence so it needs a full stop
• " Co directed with Frank Capra, John Huston, Anthony Veiller, Hugh Stewart and Roy Boulting; Due to much of the original combat footage from Operation Torch having been lost, " => " Co directed with Frank Capra, John Huston, Anthony Veiller, Hugh Stewart and Roy Boulting; due to much of the original combat footage from Operation Torch having been lost, "
• "Also writer, narrator, and editor (uncredited); The film was" => "Also writer, narrator, and editor (uncredited); the film was" (either that or make the latter part a new sentence. This probably also applies to the other instances where you have a capital letter after a semi-colon.
• "when it aired as part of a PBS special.;" - don't need both a full stop and a semi-colon
• Why does the final table suddenly use small text?
• That's all I got - fabulous work overall! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:45, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude - I've made all the proper changes. Thank you for the review! RobertFord II (talk) 20:10, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Golden Globe Award for New Star of the Year – Actress

Nominator(s): PanagiotisZois (talk) 20:15, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

This page is admittedly somewhat peculiar. The Golden Globes are arguably the most famous awards when it comes to recognizing films and TV shows, right after the Oscars and Emmys, respectively. However, this particular award for New Actress of the Year isn't exactly something that one finds at the Oscars/Emmys; mostly. First given at the 5th Golden Globes all the way back in the late 1940s, this category was actually present for every years afterswards — with 2-3 exceptions — until it was suddenly discontinued in the early 80s. Why is that? Well, you can read the list and find out. To a certain extent, the fact that this award didn't have a concrete set of criteria over what counted as a "new star" probably didn't help its case either, as we often see actresses that had been in the business for a few years being nominated.

Quite subjectively, what caught my attention about this award is that Tippi Hedren won for The Birds, as you don't often see horror performances winning any major awards. Susan Flannery, who is more well-known as a soap opera actress also piqued my interest. Personally, I don't think it would be a bad idea for such an award to be brought back at the Golden Globes, with a well-defined set of criteria. I could definitely see Inde Navarrette being nominated for Obsession. Regardless, I hope you find this list somewhat interesting, and I would like to get a female-centric page improved.--PanagiotisZois (talk) 20:15, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• The photos down the left-hand side continue long after the table has ended, leaving a giant white space before the references. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:36, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

  The whitespace is now gone when I view this article on my desktop, but I wonder how it will view on other devices? Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:24, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "first presented at the 5th Golden Globes held in 1948 — alongside the New Star of the Year – Actor category — and awarded" - the dashes around the "alongside" bit, combined with the dash in the award title look a bit confusing. I would just just lose the former.
• "New Star of the Year – Actress was presented in every ceremony — excluding the 34th Golden Globes — until" - same here, although her I might be tempted to replace them with commas rather than losing them completely
• "The New Star of the Year – Actress award was presented 34 times, to 58 actresses and one actor" - huh?
• "In 1951 and 1982, the award was merged with its male counterpart to create a unisex New Star of the Year category" - oh I see. Well that's not the same award then, so it isn't really accurate to say that the "Actress" award was presented 34 times or once given to a guy
• "producer of Butterfly producer" => "the producer of Butterfly"
• "It was presumed that Riklis had bought the award for Zadora, and following these events, the New Star of the Year Award was discontinued by the Golden Globes." - might be worth saying "after the following year's ceremony" rather than "following these events", as the latter suggests that the award was discontinued immediately after the Zadora fiasco when it actually wasn't
• I concur with BGsu98 about the images. The huge white space after the table ends looks a bit silly
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: Thank you for the comments! I made all the necessary changes. Regarding the images and space, I removed a few of them, as I wanted to include only ones that were very high quality and large. Let me know if the page looks good now, or if I should remove a few more.--PanagiotisZois (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Not clear why you have the tables split by decade; you're allowed to, of course, it just means that the sortability is forced to only sort by decade instead of over the whole of the awards.
  • I followed other awards that are featured list like the Oscar for Best Actress on this. I did consider having it all be one thing, but separating it by decade also made editing slightly faster. Plus, given the nature of this award, it's not as if any actresses have been nominated twice.--PanagiotisZois (talk) 09:00, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:52, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• Pat Crowley and Carroll Baker are the only actresses to have received the award for two separate performances I also see that Bella Darvi in that same boat.
• Also, Caroll Baker is mentioned for 2 performances in 1957, but they were in 1956. Make it consistent with the other sentences of this paragraph.
• Carol Lynley was the only actress to be nominated twice in two separate ceremonies Why was this?
• the ref column in all the tables should be made unsortable. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:15, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Nevada's congressional delegations

Nominator(s): GoldRomean (talk) & Staraction (talk · contribs) 02:53, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Together with Staraction, I'm happy to present the list of congressional delegations from the Silver State! This is my first FLC, while Staraction has authored several other FLs from this series. Any and all feedback welcome—we will endeavour to respond to any comments promptly :). GoldRomean (talk) 02:53, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (7/21/26)

• Support. I read the entire article and honestly didn't find anything to critique. I will read through it again tomorrow just in case I've missed something, but I doubt I will find anything else. Well done! Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:56, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
• On the Senate table, what is the purpose of the alternating gray and white segments in the third and fifth columns? Bgsu98 (Talk) 08:57, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hey @Bgsu98, thanks for reviewing. Those indicate six-year periods corresponding to election cycles. So, for instance, Chic Hecht was elected in 1982 and served for one full six-year term before losing the election in 1988. Best, Staraction (talk · contribs) 12:34, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

  I'd argue they're not really necessary, but as they seem to be standard on previously-promoted FLs in this series, I'm not going to worry about it. My previous support still stands. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:00, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Key Pittman image caption needs a full stop and two off the words are the wrong way round ("the as")
• Why are some of the congress numbers (or whatever the correct term is) much bolder than others? Some of the tables have them super-bold and other don't, and in one table the level of boldness changes part way through. None of this is explained as far as I can see..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:01, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hey @ChrisTheDude! I've done the following:

  • Removed punctuation from all image captions per MOS:CAPFRAG, so now there are no full stops in any image captions
  • Fixed the as
  • Remove "superbolding" from all Congresssional sessions; this was simply an oversight

  Thank you for your comments and let me know if you've got any other feedback! Best, Staraction (talk · contribs) 12:29, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:32, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Dina Titus is in her eighth term, making her the second-longest serving, not Barbara Vucanovich. Reywas92^Talk 14:27, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Nice catch—thanks, and now fixed (removed the "second-longest serving" bit altogether). GoldRomean (talk) 15:09, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Dajasj

• Not a big deal at all, but the placement of the legend under Nevada's_congressional_delegations#Historical_timeline feels a bit awkward, because it is somewhat far away from the table. Although this hasn´t been done at other tables, wouldn´t it make more sense to create a separate column next to the colourstrip with the D/R/I? This way, you might not need a legend at all.
• Why have you chosen for upright=0.8? It might be just my screen, but right now it awkwardly breaks the caption of Walter S. Baring Jr. after "House of"
• Maybe more a matter of taste, but I don't think the sticky headers are useful in the House tables, because there are not many seats and the order is logical. It makes it more chaotic for me to scroll through.
• I would leave out "As of 2026, Nevada is represented in the House by Democrats Dina Titus, Susie Lee, and Steven Horsford, and by Republican Mark Amodei.", because there is a separate section dedicated to the current delegation, ánd it is in the introduction.
• You use {{Rp}} the first time you use reference 8 in the introduction, but then don't use it for the same information in the section "Current delegation" (I can´t access the source myself right now). I also believe these duplicate sources can be left out of the introduction altogether :)
• Again a matter of taste perhaps, but I really dislike the table in the first column of the current senators. Wouldn't it be more simple to add another row to that table and have the R+1 span two columns?

Anyway, because these are mostly things that have been approved previously, I will support in any case Dajasj (talk) 16:18, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback, Dajasj! My thoughts:

• If you mean writing out the party names in full next to each delegate's name, I personally do think that would be a bit unwieldy (at least for me, the redundancy of the colourstrip + D/R/I in parentheses makes it easy for me to identify parties and helps reduce how much I have to look back at the legend anyway).
• Happy to remove the upright=0.8 bit. Also changed US House of Representatives to U.S. House (with a non-breaking space to boot), which should fix the awkwardness regardless of image width.
• Removed the sticky headers for the House tables.
• I do think the information there would be helpful to a reader jumping directly to the Senate or House sections without reading the other parts, but I'm definitely open to convincing :).
• Fixed—the source is accessible as a website, so no page number necessary. Cut some of the citations from the lead, except for a couple less-cut cases where it's perhaps better to keep them just to be safe.
• I made an example implementation of what you're suggesting at Special:Permalink/1366232796#Current delegation—definitely a lot cleaner, but also leaves quite a bit of whitespace in the Nevada cell and makes it less clear the CPVI is applying to the whole state. Open to thoughts on which version is preferable.

Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 23:54, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• I didn't mean writing out the name of the party, only placing the letter R/D/I directly next to the color it refers to. You're right that that doesn't solve the issue of writing out the name of the party somewhere.
• Even if you skip the introduction and the current delegation (which is easily accessible in the TOC), then you can also find the current delegation at the bottom of the last table. So that would make four different places to find the same information. Again, not a big deal, but not necessary if you ask me ;)

Thanks for the changes, I will look at your last point later. Kind regards, Dajasj (talk) 02:46, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Older nominations

List of hornbills

Nominator(s): EmergentAnarchy (talk) 17:59, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I've worked on it recently (mostly updating conservation and writing a lead) and think it meets the criteria. My changes are largely based on the featured List of cranes. Credit to user:Ikonact for making the range maps. All comments welcome, will respond as soon as possible. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 17:59, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

You have several species without any sources. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:10, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

What needs citing? just that the species exist? The IOC checklist is cited. The IUCN hasn't assessed all of them. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 18:49, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

I'd cite the sentence "Ranges are based on the IOC World Bird List for that species unless otherwise noted." to the IOC cite the same way you do the "This list follows the taxonomic treatment [...] of the IOC World Bird List.^[5]" to make it more clear that the ranges are coming from there; reviewers may be surprised there because in my long list of mammal FLCs I was citing the range to the IUCN by default, whereas birds have a nice single IOC source for text ranges.

Side note - right now some of your rows are taller than others, solely because the image is more vertical, which makes e.g. the Trumpeter hornbill stand out more than the rows around it. Change the "|image-size=180px" parameter to whatever number you want to get the heights to be more even; I usually do whatever caps it at 180px tall, but I also have more text in the rows about size and ecology that keeps the small/no image rows from going far below that. I'll leave it up to reviewers whether bird lists should have size/ecology/food like mammals; I know previous bird lists haven't. --PresN 18:08, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

I've added the IOC bird list citation, but i'm confused about the image sizes. They all already have an |image-size=180px parameter, but they aren't displaying as the same size. Is there something else I should do with it? I don't do much with tables. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 18:36, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, it's math, and a little annoying. The size parameter for images says how wide the image is, not how tall. So, if the image is wider than it is tall, 180px means that it's 180px wide, and less that that tall. but if the image is a vertical rectangle, then 180px wide lets it be as tall as that works out to be. So if you want the image to be 180px tall at most, then you have to work out what the corresponding width is. Taking Southern red-billed hornbill as an example, at 180px wide, it's 195px tall - so to make it 180px tall, you need it to be (180/195)*180 = 166px wide. --PresN 22:34, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Where do you get the 195px from? I can't find it on the file page EmergentAnarchy (talk) 22:44, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

I went right click->inspect, and read what the "height" value was; if you go to the file page instead, it says that the full image is 2,689 × 2,909 pixels, so (2689/2909)*180 = 166px wide in order to get the height down to 180. --PresN 14:29, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. I've made them all 180 in height. The rows look like they're exactly the same size. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 15:40, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (7/13/26)

Lead

• "Arboreal hornbills nest in tree cavities, in which females seal themselves during incubation."

Conventions

• "Population estimates are of the number of mature individuals and are taken from the IUCN Red List." --> This probably needs a citation.

Classification

• "The International Ornithologists' Union (IOU) recognises 64 species of hornbills in across two families and sixteen genera." --> Too many prepositions in that phrase.

Tables

• Some of these birds have citations (even without population estimates), while others do not.
• If previous bird lists do not have size/ecology/food information like the mammal lists do, then continue to follow the convention set by previous bird lists. Although adding that information would be useful.
• I would wikilink Angola and Namibia.
• I would wikilink Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda
• I'm not sure what you mean by "east central Congo"?
• I would wikilink Nigeria.
• I would wikilink Philippines.
• I would wikilink Palawan.
• I would wikilink Sri Lanka.
• I would wikilink Nepal.
• I would wikilink Myanmar and Thailand.
• Is "Indochina" a term still in use? Indochina redirects to Mainland Southeast Asia, so I would use "Southeast Asia". "Indochina" is a colonial term that should probably be avoided.
• Wikilink to Maluku Islands, which appears to be the dominant name.
• Definitely wikilink to Narcondam Island.
• Definitely wikilink to Sumba Island.
• Definitely wikilink to Sulawesi.
• Definitely wikilink to Luzon.
• Definitely wikilink to Mindoro.
• Definitely wikilink to Mindanao.

User:EmergentAnarchy: A very interesting list! Let me know when you have had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:07, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. I've added the links. East central congo presumably just means eastern and not north or south? not sure how i'd rewrite that. The only ones without citations are the ones that don't have IUCN assessments. Some also have IUCN assessments that don't give a population assessment. I've also added a note about Buceros taxonomy. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 10:15, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

User:EmergentAnarchy: No, I mean, what are you referring to as "Congo", as that is not the name of a country. Bgsu98 (Talk) 10:32, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

The Republic of the Congo is referred to as Congo. I can rephrase and wikilink if you want. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 11:11, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

It should be wikilinked as the Republic of the Congo. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:11, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

OK. Have changed that. Does anything else need doing? EmergentAnarchy (talk) 12:15, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:23, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Lead image could be made larger using the upright parameter
• "in which females seal themselves inside during incubation" - the word "inside" is redundant and can safely be removed
• "Species of fossil hornbills are known from the Miocene onward; however, the fossil record of the taxon is poor" - semicolon should be a comma
• Think that's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:19, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you. Have made all these changes EmergentAnarchy (talk) 09:26, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:59, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620

Birbs :,,,) I'm putting down a placeholder for an image review – ping me if I haven't followed through by the end of the weekend. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 11:59, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

As promised:

• File:Калао-трубач.jpg – source link is broken, Wayback Machine isn't working on it
• File:Wrinkled hornbill (Rhabdotorrhinus corrugatus).jpg – image doesn't seem to appear in the source given for it on Commons
• All images have alt text
• All images contribute encyclopedic value to the list
• All images are appropriately licensed for either Creative Commons or the public domain

@EmergentAnarchy: Fantastic work overall, just a couple issues in the way at present. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 20:23, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. I've replaced the wrinkled hornbill image, which is tagged as Own work by the uploader. The link to the first one works for me, but commons has other photos of it. I can replace that one too if you want. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 20:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Actually that one's either in the wrong commons category, or the species was misidentified. I'll replace it. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 20:44, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Both have been replaced. The first one was tagged as a trumpeter hornbill on the original page, so someone's misidentified it somewhere. Not sure where the second one is from, as the wayback machine copy from when it was uploaded doesn't have it either. Reverse image search doesn't bring it up. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 20:53, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of those, EmergentAnarchy – I'm pleased to support now. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 10:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

98th Academy Awards

Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 18:58, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating the 2026 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I followed how the 1929, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 ceremonies were written. Please note that since around March 2026, some sources could not be archived using Wayback Machine due to blockage of bots. However these website should still be fine for usage because plenty of featured articles use such resources and it does not affect their status as featured content. Birdienest81talk 18:58, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "One Battle After Another won a leading six awards" - "leading" reads a little awkwardly here to me. Maybe "One Battle After Another won the most awards, with six"......?
• "Sinners led with a record-breaking sixteen nominations, the most in Oscar history" - I would suggest this warrants a mention in the lead
• "At the age of 30, Timothée Chalamet became the youngest actor to earn three acting nominations since Marlon Brando" - maybe say when this was
• "Best Cinematography winner Autumn Durald Arkapaw became first female and black winner in the category" => "Best Cinematography winner Autumn Durald Arkapaw became the first female and black winner in the category"
• "Jeff Ross and Mike Sweeney, long-time collaborators of O'Brien, would also return as producers for a second time; Sweeney would also serve as a writer." => "Jeff Ross and Mike Sweeney, long-time collaborators of O'Brien, also returned as producers for a second time; Sweeney also served as a writer."
• "Each of the shortlisted films would have its respective casting director would then showcase their in bake-off via written notes on the process" - I can't understand this at all.........?
• "Voters must now watching each" => "Voters must now watch each"
• "stating that the member watch the film" => "stating that the member watched the film"
• "In accordance to recommendations" => "In accordance with recommendations"
• "In the Best Picture category, films released from the first six months of the year" => "In the Best Picture category, films released in the first six months of the year"
• "voting privileges all Academy members were invited to participate in the nominations round" - again, I don't understand this
• "Robert Lloyd of Los Angeles Times wrote" => "Robert Lloyd of the Los Angeles Times wrote"
• "The show also had 8.4% of households watching the ceremony based on Nielsen estimates" => "The show had 8.4% of households watching the ceremony based on Nielsen estimates"
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:35, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: Done – I have read your comments and made the proper adjustments and corrections based on your feedback. Thanks for the help.

--Birdienest81talk 00:18, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• I'm still seeing "Each of the shortlisted films would have its respective casting director showcase their in bake-off via written notes" - I literally have no comprehension of what this means. What's an "in bake-off"? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:18, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: Done I've had added the word "work" as in "respective casting director showcase their work in a boke-off via written notes. I also added the word "highlighting" in case you were unsure what i meant was containing in the written notes.

--Birdienest81talk 06:44, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

I guess what I mostly mean (but maybe didn't express brilliantly) is that I just don't understand what a "bake-off" is in this context. My only understanding of that term is a competition to see who can produce the best cake. If it means something specific in the context of the Oscars, is there an appropriate link......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:00, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: I changed the phrase "bake-off" into a "shortlist presentation" since this phase of nomination voting involves submission of handwritten notes, a video on the casting process, and a Q&A with the casting branch which combined together functions as a presentations of the shortlisted (preliminary narrowed down list of potential nominees) nominees.

--Birdienest81talk 09:52, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:37, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead. This is for the tables after the main Awards section.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 17:18, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• @MPGuy2824: Done – I added ! scope=row on the primary columns for each table.

--Birdienest81talk 07:39, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Fixed two issues and now I can support for accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:21, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Medxvo

• "eight of the ten films nominated for Best Picture had earned a combined gross of nearly $750 million at the American and Canadian box offices at the time" - The eight figures listed in the article add up to approximately $661.7 million, rather than $750 million. This source reports a combined gross of $662 million and may be useful
• "segments were dedicated particularly to Rob Reiner, Diane Keaton, Catherine O'Hara, and Robert Redford, with special presentations by Billy Crystal, Rachel McAdams, and Barbra Streisand, respectively" - I don't think that four people can be mapped respectively to three presenters. Could this be reworded?
• "including Best Picture and Best Casting, becoming the inaugural recipient for the latter category" - I would suggest "including Best Picture and the inaugural award for Best Casting"
• "Ruth E. Carter became the most-nominated Black woman, across any category, with her fifth nomination for Best Costume Design" - I would suggest "With her fifth Best Costume Design nomination, Ruth E. Carter became the most-nominated Black woman in Oscar history across all categories"
• How are the press releases included in the "Ceremony information" section relevant or encyclopedic? They seem unnecessary to me, and I think they should be removed per WP:NOTPUBLICITY
• Source review
  • Sources appear reliable and consistently formatted
  • Spot-checked refs 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 18, 33, 38, 42, 48, 50, 52, 53 - no issues
  • Ref 31 does not appear to support that Alana Billingsley and Misty Buckley designed a new stage for the show
  • Ref 35 does not appear to support Ashley Nicole Black's appearance
  • Refs 2, 7, 41 are missing a publication date
  • Ref 28 links to an archived version of a different Variety article rather than the cited Entertainment Weekly article

That's all from me! Medxvo (talk) 16:57, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

List of FA Cup winning managers

Nominator(s): NapHit (talk) 07:28, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because after doing some extensive work on the list over the past week or so, I believe it's now close to featured standard. All comments welcome, and I'll try to get to them as quickly as possible NapHit (talk) 07:28, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• "Thomas H. McIntosh" should sort under M, not H. The H is not part of his surname -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:16, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

  Ah that's a good spot @ChrisTheDude:, I've gone and fixed that. NapHit (talk) 13:29, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

More comments

• Wenger image caption is a complete sentence so it needs a full stop
• "The FA Cup is an association football competition contested between English clubs since 1872" - it started in 1871, not 1872
• "and is the oldest football competition in the world" => "which is the oldest football competition in the world"
• "Winning the competition was seen as an equal achievement" => "Winning the competition was previously seen as an equal achievement"
• "The role of the manager is to select the squad during the league season" - mentioning the league specifically could be taken to mean the role doesn't extend to the FA Cup
• "Due to the prestige of winning the FA Cup, the pressures on managers to succeed can be great" - does the source actually say this specifically (I can't access it for some reason)? I would imagine that pressure to win the FA Cup is one of the smallest pressures placed on a top-flight manager, yet this implies that managers are under massive pressure to win it..........

I've removed the reference to this. NapHit (talk) 07:34, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

• "while Ruud Gullit was player-manager when Chelsea won the 1997 final" => "and Ruud Gullit was player-manager when Chelsea won the 1997 final"
• Might be worth a note clarifying why so many early winning teams had no manager
• The Newcastle selection committee in 1924 is listed as Scottish. It seems highly unlikely to me that the entire committee was Scottish
• Under "see also", there's no reason to remove the word "the" from the link to History of the FA Cup -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:19, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments @ChrisTheDude:, I've addressed them all. NapHit (talk) 07:34, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:36, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• For the main table, I would switch the header cell to be the year instead of the manager. That would be the unique element in the row.
  • Do you mean the row scopes? So, they switch from the manager to the year cell? NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
    • Yes, the row scopes as well as the "!". -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
      • No problem, I'll get to this over the weekend. NapHit (talk) 08:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

        Ok, I've done this now, @MPGuy2824:. NapHit (talk) 15:20, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

• For the FA Cup-winning managers by individual table, I think you can remove teh rank column.
  • Not so sure on this one. I think it's useful to have it, as it gives the reader a quick indication of where the managers rank in the list. NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
    • Ok, then to maintain consistency within this page, you'll have to add that column to the "By nationality" table. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
      • That's done now. NapHit (talk) 08:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Please find someway to mention that this is a knockout competition.
  • added this to the lead NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
    • Sadly, this is now causing a MOS:SEAOFBLUE issue. If you can't find a good place to put "knockout" without causing this issue, then leave it out. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
      • Can I chime in to suggest "The FA Cup is an association football competition contested between English clubs since 1871. Organised on a knockout basis, it is the oldest football competition in the world". Mind you, you might also need to address the fact (I didn't think of this earlier - apologies!) that a small number of Welsh clubs take part (and historically some Scottish and Irish clubs took part as well)...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:44, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• The lead sentence is still a bit unweildy. See if "The FA Cup is an association football competition contested between English clubs since 1871. It is the oldest football competition in the world, and winning the competition was previously seen as an equal achievement to winning ..." works better.
  • Problem with this change is that the second sentence then becomes unwieldly. I've shortened the first sentence. Another option is to have this: 'It is the oldest football competition in the world' as it's own sentence, which could work. NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
    • See if "The FA Cup, the oldest association football competition in the world, is a knockout tournament contested between English clubs since 1871." Separation of the phrase into its own sentence, as you suggested, works too. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
      • Changed it to your suggestion here, with a slight change from 'English clubs' to 'teams in domestic English football', which goes some way to alleviating @ChrisTheDude:'s point about Scottish and Welsh clubs. Though I'm not sure if we should make that more explicit. NapHit (talk) 08:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
        • I think that works, as the only Welsh and Scottish clubs that have been eligible to enter in the last 140 years or so have been eligible on the grounds that they play(ed) in the English football league system -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:22, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:27, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the comments, @MPGuy2824:, I've responded to all the points above. NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

    I should have addressed all the comments now, @MPGuy2824:. NapHit (talk) 15:21, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

    Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:06, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

List of governors of Taraba State

Nominator(s): Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:37, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

This is the list of governors of Nigeria's state of Taraba from when the area formed part of the Northern Region, through North-Eastern State and Gongola State, until Taraba was created from Gongola State alongside Adamawa. Recently rewrote it and would appreciate feedback. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:37, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• "Suntai's incapacitation after an aircraft crash in October 2012 produced a succession dispute in which Garba Umar and, after a Supreme Court ruling reinstating him as deputy governor, Sani Danladi served as acting governor." I think you can remove the phrase ", after a Supreme Court ruling reinstating him as deputy governor," from this unweildy sentence. It is explained in the History section.
• "Salihu was the final governor of Gongola State and remained in office when the state was replaced by Adamawa and Taraba states in August 1991." to "Salihu was the final governor of Gongola State and became the first governor of Adamawa State when the Gongola was split in August 1991."
• ", Nyame returned as governor and served until 2007. He was succeeded by Danbaba Suntai in 2007." to ", Nyame returned as governor. He was succeeded in 2007 by Danbaba Suntai." You could consider doing something similar for the 2023 switch as well.
• That's all that I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:14, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 All done, thank you for looking. Re the first point, that was a very shitty sentence I wrote, lol. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:48, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility.
• If you have the time and inclination, then please give a source/prose review for List of constituencies of the Manipur Legislative Assembly -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:45, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Vestrian24Bio

Placeholder. Will review.. Vestrian24Bio 04:01, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

List of general elections in Botswana

Nominator(s): splains (💬/📝) 23:58, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

I nominated this for FL twice in the past, I guess the third time's the charm (hopefully) splains (💬/📝) 23:58, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "an electoral system which relies on single-member constituencies that uses first-past-the-post voting" => "an electoral system which relies on single-member constituencies and uses first-past-the-post voting"
  • Fixed
• "The table below excludes European Advisory Council elections as members were elected by European residents, not citizens of the Protectorate themselves.[14][15] During these elections, Bechuanaland citizens also did not get to participate in the British Administration.[14]" - would be good to explain exactly when this happened, as these sentences are a bit context-free as it stands
  • Made clearer
    • I can see that you've added "during the colonial administration" but I still don't think this will be very clear to people who don't have a good knowledge of African/colonial history.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:52, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
      • @ChrisTheDude: I've removed the segment entirely, since they aren't general elections. The EAC held no legislative power, could not pass laws, and could not form a government. I'm working on a separate List of European Advisory Council elections in Botswana, which will be in a see also hatnote at the top of the list. splains (💬/📝) 01:44, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
• Any particular reason why the caption of the 2024 map differs from all the others?
  • Fixed
• Think that's all I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:28, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
  • ChrisTheDude, I believe I have addressed your concerns. --splains (💬/📝) 23:37, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

History6042's Review

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Title becomes !scope=col | Title.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
  • I'm pretty sure I already did this.

Other comments

• I think "N/A" is standard as opposed to "n/a".
  • Fixed
• Per WP:SEAOFBLUE, two links should not be places next to each other. This list contains a WP:SEAOFBLUE violation in "universal sufferage".
  • Fixed
• Appointed may not be the right term as the "appointed" members are "nominated by the President and elected by the assembly."
• "There are 61 elected members and 8 appointed members in the parliament" contradicts the National Assembly of Botswana article which states "Voters in single member constituencies directly elect 57 of these members for a term of 5 years through a plurality (or first-past-the-post) system. Six members, meanwhile, are nominated by the President and elected by the assembly. Finally, the remaining two (the President and Speaker of the National Assembly) are ex officio."
  • The number of single-member constituencies increased from 57 to 61 seats due to population growth adjustments. The 8 appointed members you mentioned are a combination of the 6 specially elected members (which are nominated by the president and voted on by the assembly) along with the 2 ex-officio members which are the president and the speaker.

@History6042: Simon seems to have taken care of the issues that you pointed out. Simon remember to always ping reviewers when you are done with all of their comments. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:55, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Support, History6042 😊 (Contact me) 16:25, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Image review

There are relevant 14 listed images, plus one in a infobox template:

• Coat of Arms of Boswana.svg. The image has the following tag:This is not a valid license as such, being a "public domain" statement for the coat of arms definition only. It must be completed with the copyright tag associated to the picture creation.
  • The license seems fine to me...?
• Parliament of Botswana.svg claims that "this (election) apportionment diagram is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it contains no original authorship". It has a CC0 license.
• The other images are maps that have valid CC SA 4.0 licenses.
• The maps lack ALT tags for accessibility.
  • Added
• Suggest also adding an ALT tag to the template:Politics of Botswana.
  • Done
• Consider adding an image showing the change in voting intentions, as in the FA-rated article List of Liechtenstein general elections.[Liechtenstein elections graph.png]
  • Done

@Splains: Excellent work, and congratulations on your perseverance. Please do take a look at my comments. simongraham (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• • @Simongraham: All done! splains (💬/📝) 04:54, 2 August 2026 (UTC)
  • Hi @Simongraham: just a quick follow-up on this! I've addressed all of your previous feedback and the updates are ready for your review. Please let me know if anything else is needed. splains (💬/📝) 09:54, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

List of governors of Adamawa State

Nominator(s): Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:24, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

This is the list of governors of Nigeria's state of Adamawa from when the area formed part of the Northern Region, through North-Eastern State and Gongola State, until Adamawa was created from Gongola State alongside Taraba. Recently rewrote it and would appreciate feedback. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:24, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (7/4/26)

Lead

• Well-written, no concerns.

List of governors

• "Nyako returned after winning the rerun election and remained in office until his impeachment on 15 July 2014." --> "Rerun election" really sounds awkward; surely there is a better way to phrase that.
• "Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri, then Speaker of the State House of Assembly, served briefly as acting governor until a Federal High Court ruled that Nyako's deputy, Bala James Ngilari, had not validly resigned and should have been sworn in as governor." --> The past conditional is needed in that very last phrase.

User:Vanderwaalforces: Very few concerns. Let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:28, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98 Thank you for looking! Addressed. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:47, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support. My apologies; I didn't realize I had forgotten to come back to this. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:08, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Splains

Beeen --> Been. Will check some other stuff soon splains (💬/📝) 17:03, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
I couldn't find much, the article is in good shape. All images seem good, all have alt text. The article is stable enough, essentially a single author article. Tables are structured correctly. splains (💬/📝) 17:12, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

@Splains Thank you for spotting that embarrassing typo, bahaha, my big fingers :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:15, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

@Vanderwaalforces No worries. The article is in great shape. Support splains (💬/📝) 17:29, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from RandomEdits

Good to see the other governor list of yours is going to go through the GA process. I'll review this on prose over the next day or so. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 22:29, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

@RandomEditsForWhenIRemember Hi there, was wondering if you were able to look at this? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:53, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi Vander, apologies for the delay on this. Following the above reviewers, I'm mostly pleased with the text and prose. The list itself also looks good - I've added a "Military" colour for Salihu and Agboneni- Hussaini as used on other "List of heads" pages.

One addition I think is needed is a timeline; many political FLs include one so I was surprised not to see one here. See List of prime ministers of Canada, List of prime ministers of India, List of heads of government of Liechtenstein, General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam etc. I personally find these very useful for visualising how long each governor has been in office in comparison to the rest of the list.

Additionally, something to consider before someone takes a look at accessibility, images etc: I think it'd be worth adding Michika and Fintiri's pictures from their pages. While they aren't high-res, they're good enough to identify the two men and are better than nothing - currently the list looks a bit anemic in that regards with just Salihu.

RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 18:27, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

@RandomEditsForWhenIRemember Thank you so much. I can't and haven't added a timeline in any of my previous List of Nigerian state governors. I only added Fintiri's image because Michika's own serves no purpose here since there are two different people on focus in that image. Thank you again :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:35, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks @Vanderwaalforces. I admittedly had thought timelines were required for these sort of lists, but I can't find anything in the MOS about it and after posting the above have found a few FLs which don't' include them. So while I personally prefer a timeline, this isn't a DQ on the review so it's a support on prose RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 18:48, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Please fix this alt-text: "Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri on white traditional wears ." in both places.
• Support on accessibility in advance since the rest seems good.
• @Bgsu98: Please respond in your section above. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:04, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 Great catch, thank you MPGuy, fixed. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:12, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  Removing the space at the end isn't what I meant. Something like "Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri in white traditional clothing" will do IMO. A full stop isn't needed at the end since it isn't a full sentence. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 Ah, thank you. Fixed. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:27, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Source review - pass

Here'll be a source review from me! RedShellMomentum 02:33, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

This table lists 1 random passages from throughout the article (5.9% of 17 total passages). These passages contain 1 inline citations (2.6% of 39 in the article). Generated with the Veracity user script. RedShellMomentum 02:33, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

@Vanderwaalforces: Source review is all good. I've also recently opened up a peer review for Justin Timberlake; you may leave comments there if you wish. RedShellMomentum 02:41, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

@RedShellMomentum Thank you for looking, I'm loving your work ok JT, so I'll add it to my radar now :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 04:25, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Reference #	Letter	Source	Archive	Status	Notes
Fintiri was elected and re-elected on the platform of the PDP, but defected to the APC in February 2026.
26		Ogundapo 2026.		✅

Query

@FLC director and delegates: I believe this is okay and can proceed to closure soon? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:49, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Needs at least one more prose support before I would promote it. Please trust that I will promote it when it's ready. --PresN 01:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Timeline of the 1999 Pacific hurricane season

Nominator(s): Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 00:44, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

With Timeline of the 1998 Pacific hurricane season headed for promotion, here is another timeline for your consideration. The 1999 Pacific hurricane season was one of the quietest on record, but still boasted a few hurricanes, including two long-lived major hurricanes. One of them was Dora, which traversed all three North Pacific tropical cyclone basins. (Sound familiar?) Unfortunately, two hurricanes—Adrian and Greg—did cause damage and/or fatalities.

I will endeavor to address any concerns as quickly as I can. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 00:44, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• I'll take a look at this one. Nudge me if I haven't done so by the end of the weekend..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Support - I couldn't find anything to pick up on....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:03, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. I too couldn't find anything to fix. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:54, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

List of World Heritage Sites in Niger

Nominator(s): Tone 09:13, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Niger has 3 WHS and 19 sites on the tentative list. Standard style. I wanted to archive the references using the standard bot approach but for some reason it doesn't work - help appreciated. Tone 09:13, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Drive by comment

• I would add what you wrote just above, that Niger has 3 WHM in the lead of the section "World Heritage Sites". There should be a short lead that summarizes the table there. You did this in the next section already. Mattximus (talk) 14:16, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

After some considerations, why not. Added. I'll follow the suite in future lists, not sure if I want to go back and manually fix the previous ones. Maybe at some point. --Tone 06:30, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "An interesting feature [singular] are [plural] the mountains" - maybe the easiest way to avoid this would be to merge it with a later sentence to give "The area features mountains of blue marble which are an important stop for migratory birds crossing the Sahara"
• "It was located on important trade route" => "It was located on an important trade route"
• "Lougou was place of worship" => "Lougou was a place of worship"
• "but have almost completely disappeared from the region by the 1950s" => "but had almost completely disappeared from the region by the 1950s"
• "It is home the endangered addax," => "It is home to the endangered addax,"
• "however, not all parts are navigable at all times" => "however not all parts are navigable at all times"
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:06, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Thanks! Fixed all. --Tone 06:30, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:40, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Image review - support

All images are appropriate and have relevant licenses:

• Niger location map.svg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Montagnes Bleus1.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Elephants bath park w Niger 2006.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• 1997 277-9A Agadez mosque cropped.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license via Flicr.
• Zinder DSC 4487 (6328130381).jpg has an appropriate CC SA license via Flicr.
• La ville de Dosso 05.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Niger, Salewa (2), mosque.jpg has an appropriate GNU and CC SA license.
• Oasis-Bilma.jpg has an appropriate CC SA and GNU license.
• Djado-nah.jpg has an appropriate German CC SA license.
• Bastón de mando de piedra. Cultura Bura. Níger. Cronología sin determinar.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Giraffe koure niger 2006.jpg has an appropriate Flicr CC SA license.
• Termit1.jpg has an appropriate CC Attribution Unported license
• Réserve biosphère de Gadabedji 16.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Mare d'Ounsolo ou N'Solo de Téra (detilt).jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Lake Chad (MODIS 2018-06-07).jpg has an appropriate US PD license.
• Niger2.jpg has an appropriate GNU and CC SA license.
• 1997 278-10 Sahara glyph.jpg has an appropriate Flicr CC SA license.
• Museum of Natural History Sarcosuchus.jpg has an appropriate CC Attribution Generic license.
• Le lac de Madarounfa 03.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Waving fisherman on Lake Chad (detilt).jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.

All the images have ALT tags for accessibility.

That all seems good to me. simongraham (talk) 15:55, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

I have a booklet published by UNESCO detailing all of their sites in the Czech Republic. I think I got it last year when the ISU was promoting Prague as the host of the 2026 World Figure Skating Championships. If you want it, I'll be happy to send it to you. Just e-mail me your address. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:18, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• The row about Agadez doesn't have a header cell.
• "Niger comprises about a fifth of the Niger river catchment basin" to "Niger (the country) comprises about a fifth of the Niger river catchment basin", assuming that's what was meant.
• "Terminalia leiocarpa- The" I think you wanted to end the sentence after leiocarpa.
• That's all that I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:52, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  Fixed, thanks! Tone 18:42, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:56, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

List of George Washington paintings

Nominator(s): ReelCosmix (talk) 12:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the standard and is more developed than a lot of other lists on Wikipedia

Comments

• A couple of drive-by comments (in no way a full review):
  • The article should not start "A list of notable paintings" per MOS:THISISALIST
  • While (as far as I know) not prohibited it looks really weird to have the reference column as the very first column. If refs are in their own column, the norm is to have them at the end -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:48, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

  Okay, thank you for this feedback; I will make adjustments now! ReelCosmix (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (6/25/26)

• There is no reason for the Reference column to be sortable. Removing that will narrow the column. Also, replace Ref. with {{Abbr|Ref.|References}}.

Lead

• "the first U.S. president" --> "the first president of the United States".
• "one of the many Founding Fathers of the United States." --> "one of the country's many Founding Fathers."
• No reason for "Patriot" to be capitalized.
• "Washington presided over the Philadelphia Convention in 1787, which drafted the Constitution of the United States, and served as president of the United States from 1789 to 1797." --> As written, this implies that the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 served as president of the United States from 1789 to 1797, which we know is not correct.
• No reason for "Vice President" to be capitalized.
• "he was entombed at Mount Vernon estate in Fairfax County, Virginia, alongside his wife Martha Washington." --> Did Martha Washington die before him? Because I thought he died first.
• "Washington was painted many times throughout his life due to his high importance in the United States." --> This is a very banal sentence.
• "Because he was also the first president of the United States, people wanted official portraits for government buildings, statehouses, and public institutions." --> Source no. 12 says nothing about any of this.
• "There were also no cameras during his lifetime, as they were invented about 50 years after he died, meaning paintings were the main way to preserve his likeness." --> Sources no. 13 and 14 say nothing about cameras.
• However, sources 12, 13, and 14 do discuss the questionable validity as to how accurate these portraits of George Washington actually were, which your lead does not discuss.
• "One of the most widely recognized paintings of Washington is the Athenaeum Portrait." --> Source no. 15 does not confirm this statement. The citation is also improperly formatted.
• All of the citations need to be cleaned up and archived.
• Note a: "This painting was never complete, although, many complete copies exist" --> Get rid of that second comma, and end the sentence with a period.

User:Realcosmixyt: To be honest, the quality of the prose is beneath what I would expect from a Featured Article/List. It needs to be cleaned up and strengthened to make it more engaging. It reads more like an essay a student might write for a high school history class. Oppose for now until major improvements are made. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:39, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello! I am really thankful for this feedback as I didn't realize pretty much all of the mistakes you pointed out. I have since fixed a couple of them, and I am planning to fix more. ReelCosmix (talk) 21:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

I think this is a very interesting topic, and I will certainly be happy to change my vote if the prose is strengthened up. I haven’t looked at the formatting of the table yet, but the contents of the table look good. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:06, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Another drive-by comment

• What's the ordering of the entries within the tables based on? As far as I can see it isn't chronological by date or alphabetical by either the title or the name of the artist. It just seems to be completely random........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:16, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hey! Thanks for pointing that out! I've ordered them by date now. Oldest to newest. ReelCosmix (talk) 17:46, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620 (image review)

I've just finished looking over the images, and unfortunately there are some issues. Getting the positives out of the way: all images add encyclopedic value to the list, and are appropriately licensed for either Creative Commons or the public domain. Sourcing also verifies for most images, though I went over to Commons to fix some broken links (see my edits there), and I don't consider Christie's to be an adequate source for File:Thomas Sully, Portrait of General George Washington, 1842.jpg. The biggest issue is the complete absence of alt text. Quoting from WP:MOSALT: In situations where the image is not available to the reader, perhaps because they have turned off images in their web browser or are using a screen reader due to a visual impairment, the alternative text ensures that no information or functionality is lost. Alt text needs to be added to every image before this list can pass FLC; until then, this list falls short on accessibility. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 15:17, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Hey! Thank you for pointing this out! I have added some alt text to a few of the paintings, and I'll finish the rest later when I have the time. Thank you again for pointing this out! I probably should have requested a peer review before blindly nominating this list for FLC. ReelCosmix (talk) 16:01, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

👍 please ping me when you're done, Realcosmixyt. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 17:42, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Hey @Dylan620 I've finished adding all alt text, so hopefully that fixes that issue. ReelCosmix (talk) 17:49, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Also, I think Christie's is the WP:RS for this painting; I couldn't find any other sources. ReelCosmix (talk) 17:55, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

And so it is! My apologies—the Commons upload didn't link to the website, which I've now fixed, and the word "Christie's" on its own sounded very vague. And fantastic work on the alt texts. I'm happy to support on images. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 21:45, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much! ReelCosmix (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1 becomes !scope=row | 1. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead. The row header doesn't have to be the first cell, so for this one it should probably be the title, not the image.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:45, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

List of international goals scored by Cyle Larin

Nominator(s): kline / talk / contribs 20:34, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Round four for FL nominations! I decided to pick this list this time around because it's FIFA World Cup time, and what isn't a better way to celebrate then nominating one of Canada's best goalscorers. Cyle Larin debuted in 2014 and made his climb, passing Dwayne De Rosario to hold the all-time goalscorer record for Canada for two years before being surpassed by Jonathan David in 2024. Hope you enjoy! kline / talk / contribs 20:34, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "A full international for Canada, Larin" - you literally just said that in the previous sentence, there's no need to say it again
• "Larin scored his first and only international hat-trick for Canada " - last two words are redundant - who else would he have scored it for?
• "World Cup Qualification campaign overall" - no need for a capital Q on qualification
• "a remarkable run" - this is POV
• As the table is sortable, stadium names and competitions need to be linked each time (as countries already are)
• That's all I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude All concerns should be addressed. kline / talk / contribs 16:20, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:22, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Larin scored his first and only international hat-trick as Canada opened their 2022 World Cup qualifying campaign with a 5–1 win over Bermuda on March 25, 2021" - I would advise you link hat-trick since this is the first mention and it's a technical term that readers may find beneficial.

• "against Mexico in a 2022 FIFA World Cup qualifier on November 17, 2021" - same here for 2022 FIFA World Cup qualifiers. Or are you avoiding the links here because they are linked in the table below?

• More of a general comment, but some of the info in paragraph 2 seems redundant. In paragraph 1 you have "Larin's record lasted two years with Jonathan David surpassing him as Canada's record goalscorer with his 31st goal on November 19, 2024", then in paragraph 2 you talk about it again, "Larin's record lasted two years with David surpassing him as Canada's record goalscorer with his 30th goal on November 19, 2024, in a 3–0 win against Suriname", which has a bit more detail. I advise you find a way to merge them for better flow.

• More of a comment here too, but this sentence "Larin became Canada's joint all-time top scorer alongside De Rosario when he scored twice against Mexico in a 2022 FIFA World Cup qualifier on November 17, 2021, in a 2–1 win" is after the "e became Canada's all-time top scorer on January 30, 2022, when he scored his 23rd international goal against the United States, surpassing Dwayne De Rosario's record" from paragraph 1, which feels chronologically off. I had to re-read the two paragraphs a few times to avoid confusion about what came first. I would advise you copyedit this to ensure it flows in chronological order where applicable -- hope that makes sense.

• "At the 2026 FIFA World Cup, played on home soil, Larin scored the equalizing goal in a 1–1 draw against Bosnia and Herzegovina during Canada's opening group stage game, giving Canada their first ever World Cup point." - It would be great to link 2026 FIFA World Cup Group B, since that is where the match details could be expanded by you or other editors in the future.

• That's all I have for now! I made a few changes to the article too, feel free to check it out. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 03:41, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

  @Morogris All concerns should be addressed. kline / talk / contribs 00:47, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

  Great, thank you! Moving to Support for this nom. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 01:23, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• All tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• All tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• All images should have alt-text. Including the flag ones. You might have to ask for changes to the template to achieve this.

  @PresN: Do the football flag icons need this? I see that even {{Flag icon}} doesn't have alt text. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:23, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

  MOS:BLANKALT seems to be applicable. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:29, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

  Yeah, flagicons get blank alts as decorative. --PresN 14:10, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

• Color/bolding should not be used as the sole visual means of conveying information; use a symbol in addition.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:58, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824; I've implemented alt text on the one image, requested an edit to the template with the flags, and scrapped the color table so that symbols won't be needed. I can't tell where the columns and rows do not have scopes so if you could point that out specifically where, I'd be able to implement your suggestions. Cheers, kline / talk / contribs 19:10, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

  I can't tell where the columns and rows do not have scopes The tables "Appearances and goals by year" and "Goals by opponent" don't have row scopes. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:05, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

List of murines

Nominator(s): PresN 20:32, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Hey y'all, mammal list #78 in our perpetual series and rodent list #23: Murinae. This is our final species list of the last family in this series, the giant family of Muridae. The subfamily Murinae, is, unfortunately, itself giant, there being over 600 species of Old World mice and rats, and it's not even really dividable into smaller sublists, as they're scattered throughout 136 genera. There's just an absurd number of mice and rats in the world, but I was determined to keep the pattern of the prior 77 lists, and in the end I've managed to find ways to keep it well under the page size limits, including as with our other large mammal lists having the IUCN cites be to the genus pages rather than the species ones so that we don't have 600+ of them. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 20:32, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Image license review

Not checking the maps or alt text (since there's a lot to do). This image review only goes through Hellwald's spiny rat, about halfway down. FWIW, if an image with a broken source link has passed a previous review where source links were generally being checked, that works for me.

• The following may or may not have images at https://collections.nmnh.si.edu/search/mammals/; I looked at the given source links and couldn't quickly determine the answer:
• File:Apomys musculus.jpg
• File:Apomys sacobianus.jpg
• File:Apomys insignis.jpg
• File:Apomys microdon.jpg
• File:Batomys dentatus.jpg

• These done. The NMNH has the worst website for this, but for future reference- if you search for the species name, even though it looks like a gallery of results it's actually just examples, if you click on an image it pulls up a box with all of the images from that collection sample, including these. Links fixed.
  • Thanks, making a note of that. - Dank (push to talk) 00:20, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

• Continuing:
• File:Batomys granti.jpg: Broken source link: very few species images found at that site
• File:Batomys salomonseni.jpg: broken source link: site no longer exists
• File:Bunomys chrysoccomus.jpg: No source link. Also, a search for that species at Naturalis Bioportal (https://bioportal.naturalis.nl/en) comes up empty.
• File:Carpomys melanurus.jpg: source link broken
• File:Carpomys phaeurus.jpg: ditto
• File:Chrotomys silaceus.jpg: ditto
• File:Chrotomys whiteheadi.jpg: ditto
• File:Chrotomys mindorensis drawing.jpg: Opinions welcome on the quality of the image.
• File:Hapalotis albipipes Gould.jpg: Source link goes to a 301-page book. I didn't check every page.

• Worse, it goes to volume 1, but the image was from volume 3. Fixed.

• File:Crateromys australis drawing.jpg: Opinions welcome on the quality of the image.
• File:Crateromys schadenbergi AB Meyer.jpg: source link missing
• File:Crateromys paulus drawing.jpg: Opinions welcome on the quality of the image.
• File:Crunomys fallax.jpg: broken source link
• - Dank (push to talk) 11:59, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
• Let me know if you want help with any of this. - Dank (push to talk) 02:20, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

• Responded inline for the ones I could correct; removed all others. --PresN 21:51, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Thanks much. I'll keep going ... I'll cover about half of the image list, since this is a long one. - Dank (push to talk) 00:38, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

The following two have no source link, and it's the same search as one of the failed searches above.

• File:Echiothrix leucura.png:
• File:Lenomys meyeri.png:

• Removed both

• Continuing:
• File:Echiothrix centrosa.jpg: fixed the source link
• File:Komodomys rintjanus.jpg: source link found and added
• File:Lenothrix cana.jpg: [The file name is wrong, you correctly have Lenothrix canus]: Searched on lenothrix at the Smithsonian, followed the various links, couldn't find this image.

• Found and fixed

• File:Leporillus apicalis - Gould.jpg: page not found, and nothing found at https://museumsvictoria.com.au in a search

• Found in the book from the first section and fixed

• File:Limnomys sibuanus Mearns, 1905 - USNM 125228.jpg: fixed the source link
• Okay, that covers down through Hellwald's spiny rat, which should be about halfway. Hopefully some kind soul will finish up! - Dank (push to talk) 03:08, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

• Thank you! --PresN 14:20, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
  • De nada. Looks good. - Dank (push to talk) 17:55, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Continuing . - Dank (push to talk) 02:55, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

• File:Maxomys-whiteheadi-1.jpeg: no source link

• Removed, arkive is a long-dead site and very hard to search in archive.org

• File:Mesembriomys macrurus.jpg: It's on p. 333, I added the page number at Commons
• File:Micromysminutus1.jpg: The page says the uploader was User:Hecke, but that account doesn't seem to exist on the English or German Wikipedias. There's a User:Hecke at Commons, don't know if it's the same (last comment was 18 years ago).

• That one looks like a personal photo so I believe it

• File:Paramelomys platyops.jpg: The source link goes to a page that links to another page with 22K images.

• That's the entire mammal dataset... can't find it by searching, dropped.

• File:Rattus leucopus 3170.jpg: I don't see an image at the linked page

• Can't find, dropped

• File:Celænomys silaceus and Rhynchomys soricoides.jpg: broken source link

• Removed

• File:Archboldomys kalinga 2008 stamp of the Philippines.jpg: I don't see an image at the linked page

• It's there, details only show up if you log in

• File:Giant White-tailed Rat.jpg: Your call. Source link goes to a page that says all the images are copyrighted; last line of that page has a link to terms of use, which say "You are free to use any of my photos for personal and educational purposes provided ..."

• I don't think that's good enough for CC, replaced with a verified iNaturalist photo.

• That's all of them.
• - Dank (push to talk) 03:50, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

• @Dank: Done, thank you so much! --PresN 14:20, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

• Passed image license check. No problem, my pleasure (when I can find the time). - Dank (push to talk) 17:58, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• "grasslands, and savannas, and deserts, though some species can be found in deserts ..." Remove deserts from one part of the sentence.
• In Cheesman's vlei rat, "Taylor" goes to an article about a football manager. There are a few other places too where this article is wikilinked.
• Bush rat has 4 subspecies according to its article and the range map.
• File:Distribution Archboldomys.svg can be used unless you see a problem with it.
• In Vandeleuria, "Diet: Fruit, buds, and shoorts": I guess you meant "shoots".
• That's all that I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:19, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824: All fixed; I couldn't use the image because it didn't cite where it got the distribution info from, but I went and manually verified that it matched the IUCN and updated the image page so now I can. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 14:07, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:25, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

List of Kim Seon-ho live performances

Nominator(s): Preferwiki (talk) 06:22, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello! This is my third proposal for a feature list nomination. With two of the other lists already promoted to feature lists (Kim Seon-ho filmography and List of awards and nominations received by Kim Seon-ho, here's the latest in this series focusing on his live performances. I have tried my best to incorporate suggestions from my past experience in prior featurelist nominations into this page. Thanks in advance for reviewing! -- Preferwiki (talk) 06:22, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620

• I feel like the lede should be expanded. At the risk of comparing apples to oranges (theater performers to musicians), the two most recently promoted live performance FLs—Coldplay and Justin Timberlake—both have longer ledes, substantially so in the case of Coldplay.
• Following his 2017 television debut, which was...? This is related to the above – I don't think the lede in its current state has enough detail, though what's already here is well-written.
• I do like the lede image – it portrays him well, the sourcing and licensing both verify, and props for including alt text.

That's it for now. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 19:07, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Dylan620, sorry it took me awhile. I’ve expand the lede a bit. Would you mind to take a look. Thank you in advance. Preferwiki (talk) 06:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for expanding the lede, but we have new issues:

• What is a joint concert? Did Kim perform with other musicians? If so, then who?
• television debut as supporting role – this currently reads like a placeholder. I would either replace supporting role with the role in question, or as with in a.
• He has also headlined solo tours across Asia. I assume this is referring to solo concert tours? I don't see anything in the body of the list about solo concerts. If the recent Coldplay FL is anything to go from, then each concert should be listed somehow. You know better than I whether this would enter dynamic list territory, but as it currently stands, I'm seeing that my earlier concerns with a lack of comprehensiveness were justified. I note that a cursory Google search for 'kim-seon ho concerts' yielded mentions of a Love Factory Tour – each show from that tour, and any others, should be added to the list.

I'm sorry, Preferwiki, but I must oppose for now per my above concerns, especially the last. I don't think this is comprehensive enough to be featured at this time. I do believe there is a lot of potential here, and I will reconsider my oppose if Kim's solo tours/concerts are added to the list. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 21:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Dylan620. I have added the tour as per your suggestion and also made some updates incorporating your three points above. Please have a look. Thank you. Preferwiki (talk) 00:52, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Much appreciated Preferwiki. I'll take a closer look later today or tonight, but I've struck my oppose as you've addressed the main reason for it. Both new images pass the image review, too (alt text, check; appropriate licensing, check; encyclopedic value, check; sourcing, check). Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 07:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Preferwiki: I'm happy with the changes made, and close to supporting. I have one more concern with the prose: what is meant by digital fan single? Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 19:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Dylan620 He wrote the digital single for his fans. Should I rephrase that to clarify? Preferwiki (talk) 20:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Preferwiki: I would say so, because the current wording on its own could imply that it was a fanmade single. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 21:19, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Dylan620, I rephrase into this: On April 30, 2024, Kim released the digital single "Miracle" across major music platforms. Written for his fans, the song was co-written by Kim and lyricist Kim Ji-hyang. Preferwiki (talk) 21:31, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

That works for me and I'm pleased to support. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 21:56, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your help @Dylan620 Preferwiki (talk) 22:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Of course! Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 22:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. | Party becomes !scope=col | Party. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead. You have scopes for most of your columns, but not the sub-column headers.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:44, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hi @PresN, I have tried to incorporate ur feedbacks. Would you mind to take a look? Sorry it took me a while. Thanks in advance. Preferwiki (talk) 06:38, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  Looks good! --PresN 01:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks for ur feedback @PresN Preferwiki (talk) 06:23, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

List of songs recorded by My Chemical Romance

Nominator(s): Gavetheman555 (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

My Chemical Romance is one of those bands you could listen to over and over and never get bored. I can't say I haven't listened to I Brought You My Bullets thousands of times and still find new stuff to like about it. I've been working on this for almost two weeks now and I believe it is finally ready for FL status, not much more to really say. (P.S thank you to zmbro for additionally cleaning up the article in preparation for this :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Image review

Here shall be an image review from me. Arconning (talk) 13:39, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

• File:My Chemical Romance rain.jpg - CC BY 2.0, do add an archived page as the license has changed on the website.
• File:Thursday @ Claremont Showgrounds (5 3 2012) (7005619497).jpg - CC BY 2.0, do add an archived page as the license has changed on the website. Caption is unsourced, please do add one.
• File:Howard Benson.png - CC BY-SA 4.0, source for caption as well
• File:Bob Dylan (1965).jpg - Public domain
• File:Rob Cavallo.jpg - CC BY 2.0, source for caption as well
• File:Queen News Of The World (1977 Press Kit Photo 01).jpg - Public domain
• Every image seems to have alt-text for accessibility and are relevant to the article.

Implemented all the changes, thank you for the support! Gavetheman555 (talk) 14:01, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Pass. Arconning (talk) 10:08, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments from zmbro

Hey there! I was happy to be of assistance! I'm not a MCR fan, but I thought I'd provide some comments and thoughts based on my past knowledge of song lists.

• While the lead is good, I think it should focus less on critical reception and more on the songs themselves (i.e. music and lyrics). For instance, The album initially did not receive many reviews from critics after its release,[3] with many divided on the album's writing and themes.[A] Such as...? To me, that would be more beneficial on a page such as this compared to what critics thought of it.

I agree with this 100% Gavetheman555 (talk) 22:52, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

• On the table, are the BMI references required or can the writing credits from the album liner notes suffice? For unreleased songs and the like those are fine, but I question why both are needed for almost every single song... (almost all of them are missing archives too).

I don't think they are required? IMO I think they are simply there to justify the writing credits but I think you could easily verify those without the BMI references Gavetheman555 (talk) 22:52, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

• I don't personally mind it, but in the past, editors have gotten on me about linking every single name in the writer column because it's a sortable table.
• I've usually seen breaks between writers on these types of pages rather than the / separator you have here. I don't mind it here though, as some pages that have it (such as List of songs recorded by Red Hot Chili Peppers) really make the page longer than it should be.

Those are some initial thoughts. Hope these help! – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 18:07, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments! Gavetheman555 (talk) 22:52, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

I apologize, I completely forgot about this. A few more comments before I offer my full support:

• The lead looks a lot better. However, I think there is a little too much detail for this specific page in some areas. For instance,

• Is "however connections between the tracks have generally only been made by fans." that important?

Trimmed and slightly reworded. Gavetheman555 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Do the last 3 sentences of paragraph 2 warrant that much detail?

I slightly agree, tho I attempted to trim it down but couldn't successfully do so without it sounding clunky. Gavetheman555 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• I think It also includes several influences from 1970s classic rock that had not previously been present on Three Cheers for Sweet Revenge,[11][33][37] which include pop music,[11] soft rock,[38] arena rock,[38] metal,[38] and gothic rock.[39] this whole thing is way too overboard for this page. If you think it's warranted, you can leave the first part but remove everything after the comma.

Done, left the first part. Gavetheman555 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• There's quite a few instances of "however", which is a word to watch when editorializing.

Got it, trimmed it down from 4 to 1 instance. Gavetheman555 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• For a non-lead point, is "War Beneath the Rain" now considered unreleased? It's mentioned as a "previously unreleased track" in the lead but it's still in the unreleased songs table.

Done, removed "previously" as its never had an official proper studio release by the band. Gavetheman555 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

That's all for now. – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 15:05, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

@Zmbro: Addressed all the comments above! :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620

The Black Parade is their only album I know well, but it's an absolute belter—I've got it on vinyl! I usually do image reviews, but since that has already been taken care of, I'm going to review prose instead.

• I Brought You Brought Me Your Love is considered an emo... – missing a couple words in the album title
• I agree with Zmbro (courtesy ping) that the lede should focus more on the songs and less on their reception. Take, for instance, Their following studio album, The Black Parade, was released in October 2006.[11] The Black Parade received critical acclaim upon its release, with some hailing it as My Chemical Romance's best album.[A] This tells me nothing about what the album's songs sound like, or what their lyrics are about. I think it would be worth mentioning that The Black Parade is a rock opera and includes influences from genres the band didn't toy with on Three Cheers for Sweet Revenge.
• Unlike the band's previous works, which were typically concept albums... – The Black Parade is indeed a concept album, but a) my understanding is that Bullets is only considered a concept album by some fans, and b) the band scrapped the idea of making Three Cheers a concept album; see these sources from the album's article.
• I would remove the word later from the sentence about Danger Days, as its inclusion implies that its release followed the Conventional Weapons EPs when the reverse is true.
• I think it would be worth mentioning that "The Foundations of Decay" contains more influence from progressive rock than their previous works (at least, from the genres I've seen used to describe them).

That's about it for now. Great work, Gavetheman555. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 18:18, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments, all have been implemented! :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 21:22, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

@Gavetheman555: (listening to The Black Parade and "Foundations" as I type this, heh) That is a considerable improvement. Reading the lede again, I do still have a few reservations/suggestions (with the caveat that I've corrected a couple typos myself):

• The length distribution of each paragraph feels a little off now. I would maybe break up the first paragraph after In August 2003, the band announced that they had signed a deal with Reprise Records, leaving Eyeball. This would make for a fitting end to the first paragraph, which would focus on Bullets, while also setting up the next paragraph, which would begin with the release of Three Cheers.
• I'd like to see a little information on lyrical topics for Bullets, and also the incorporation of the two sources I linked above regarding Three Cheers transitioning from a concept album to something more personal, as I think this information is pertinent to the list's scope. (And then maybe split off The Black Parade into its own paragraph?)
• Related to the first point, I suggest merging the two paragraphs that mention Danger Days, as it currently feels like that era of the band's history is split across the two.
• I think it would be worth mentioning that Danger Days is also a rock opera, and maybe give a brief mention of the album's story like you did for The Black Parade.
• The Paper Kingdom also would have been a concept album... I imagine by now you can see where I'm going here 😅
• the band scrapped the project due to being unsatisfied → the band scrapped the project because they were unsatisfied (I'm being a little nitpicky here, but I do think this version flows better)
• with its lyrics reflecting on the band's origins and legacy,[68] and also taking elements from doom metal... → with its lyrics reflecting on the band's origins and legacy.[68] Musically, the song incorporates elements from doom metal... The sentence as currently written implies that the lyrics are partly about those genres, when instead they were musical influences as opposed to lyrical.

Please ping me when you've addressed the above points. Cheers (pun intended), Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 11:50, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

@Dylan620: I think I got everything, let me know if you have anymore comments! :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 13:07, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

I think we're good to go. Happy to support on prose. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 13:21, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:42, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

@PresN: I think I did it correctly, can you review it over and check to make sure? Gavetheman555 (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Triple Crown of Thoroughbred Racing (Japan)

FL review checklist:      Prose: 2/3 Done      Source: Pending      Accessibility: Passed      Image: Pending

Nominator(s): RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 10:47, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Japan's Thoroughbred scene is quite rare in that it has five national Triple Crown titles up for grabs, rather than the usual one or two. While individually there isn't reams of paragraphs to say on each of them, they're still very important in the horse racing world, and still remain very elusive; while there's been many close calls, there's only 17 horses that have achieved any of them (Could have been 18 if the rain had held off in the Takarazuka Kinen today!) I think the article is in pretty good shape now, and gives a very comprehensive overview of the Crowns and their winners.

While I have a FA under my belt, this is my first FL submission (and I believe this is the first thoroughbred related FL submission in general?), so I look forward to your comments. :) As one note for the later 'list of individual X Crown winners' part, I'm happy if that should be moved to its own page if desired by reviewers, seemed to be 50/50 on including based on similar articles. As you can imagine, many of these horses have entries on the Japanese wiki, so ILL links could be added if desired - I'd erred on doing that as I figured a sea of red might be offputting. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 10:47, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi @FLC director and delegates: , a month in and I've not had any reviews on this yet. At the time I didn't realise lists could go through the GAN process. Could this be closed so I can nominate it there and get a preliminary look there before resubmitting please? RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 18:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Lists cannot go through the GAN process; it's more accurate to say that some articles are hazy on if they're lists or prose articles. It's up to you if you think this is enough of a prose article to go there, but if you're saying that then it doesn't make sense to bring it back to FLC afterwards. Let me know which route you want to go with. Sorry that you haven't received any reviews; consider asking at relevant wikiprojects, or doing reviews of other nominations and linking back to this one. --PresN 01:39, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Ah, interesting. I'd seen at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of governors of Ebonyi State/archive1 the list there got recommended to go through GAN, where it got promoted. Is that because it didn't have enough entries to become a FL?

I recommended that, because I felt that article had enough prose/list ratio to justify it. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:12, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Ah I see, thanks for the clarification. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 22:41, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Either way I guess it's probably best to keep this here then; I'd definitely like to get this to Featured status at some point (or at least, if it fails know where to go next). I'll shop about a bit to see if I can drum up some interest. Thanks for the info! RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 12:45, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• Symbols like ₮, §, ฿ and ₩ are hard to pick out and differentiate at small font sizes. Can you use clearer ones please?
• I think you can remove the "Individual Triple Crown race winners" section completely. Essentially, they are horses that came close, but didn't win the triple crown for that year. If you decide to have pages for these individual triple crowns, then maybe that particular table would be more relevant there.
• Support on accessibility.
• Expect a prose review soon. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:28, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look MP! I get what you mean about the individual winners, I've been mulling that for a while. I'll look to port that over to its own page ala List of winners of Triple Crown of Motorsport races today or tomorrow.

For the symbols, I've changed these all to block symbols (●▲■★); are these any better? Happy to change these again if not - other pages I looked at weren't consistent in their picks. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 11:43, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Update: I've spun off the individual winners to List of winners of Japanese Thoroughbred Triple Crown races RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 11:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

These symbols are better than the previous ones, yes. But, if another reviewer gives you a better suggestion, use that. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:55, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Prose review

• Spring and Autumn Triple Crowns respectively. Unbold the "and".
• "The original races' forms were different" to "The forms of the original races were different"
• "oversee regional level racing instead of the JRA's national focus." Try "oversee regional level racing as compared to the JRA's national focus."
• "aiming to encourage the best Japanese to focus" - I couldn't find this supported by the refs, but it could be a translation issue on my end.
• "2026; but like his father, he lost" to "2026; but he also lost"
• "As of June 2026, no horse has won the Spring Triple Crown since its establishment." Add a ref for this.
• A few refs are missing their archive links. See if iabot has any luck. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

All done! IABot missed quite a few refs out for some reason... The Spring sentence you pointed out got a bit mangled at some point - that part about promoting horses to race in Spring should have been about the Osaka Hai's promotion, not the Triple Crown. I've rewritten that and put a more explicit reference in. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 18:27, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose (in addition to accessibility which was mentioned above.-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:35, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Three of the four captions for the lead image have full stops, but none of them are sentences, so they should not have full stops
• "each a series of three races ran within a single year" => "each a series of three races run within a single year"
• "The Classic Triple Crown title is bestowed to any horse" => "The Classic Triple Crown title is bestowed on any horse"
• "and ran at Yokohama Racecourse over 1,850 meters" => "and run at Yokohama Racecourse over 1,850 meters"
• "and with the exception of Saint Lite, won their year's Best Three-Year-Old Colt award.[" => "and, with the exception of Saint Lite, won their year's Best Three-Year-Old Colt award.["
• "but was discontinued and re-organised into the Queen Elizabeth II Cup in 1976" => "but it was discontinued and re-organised into the Queen Elizabeth II Cup in 1976"
• " the Tiara's shorter distances has led to more frequent winners of the Tiara" => " the Tiara's shorter distances have led to more frequent winners of the Tiara"
• Notes b and c are not sentences so should not have full stops
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks Chris! The full stops for the captions/notes always gets me... I've taken care of all of these now; only one I haven't is the Yokohama as I think ran is correct there (the Satsuki Shō isn't ran on that course anymore). RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 22:48, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support - I think the wording in the Yokohama sentence is ambiguous but I concede that the current wording is probably OK -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:52, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks both, greatly appreciated! RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 17:06, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Monuments of national significance in Chernivtsi Oblast

Nominator(s): Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 18:36, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

List #4 of the Ukrainian monuments of national significance series. Chernivtsi Oblast is the smallest oblast by area and population, and is on the whole quite rural, which is reflected by the many inscribed vernacular-style churches (PS: perhaps too many; I'm not convinced that they are all nationally important). The obvious highlights are the Residence of Metropolitans (the first World Heritage Site of the series) and the Khotyn Fortress. Same structure as the previous lists, and this time I've prepared a Q&A that covers some old questions as well as other possible issues. Thank you in advance for reviewing. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 18:36, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (6/8/26)

No issues with the prose.

Table

• Some columns are rowspanned and others are not?
  • I believe I've addressed this at the Mykolaiv Oblast nomination, unless you mean something else? Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 14:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
• Is it just me, or is Wikipedia having problems with images loading and displaying properly?
  • Images are loading without a problem on my part. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 14:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

User:Shwabb1: Really just the one question. I know the issue with photos displaying is not with this article, but probably with my browser. Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:16, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Thank you for the comments. I've replied in line. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 14:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• I'm not sure I understand the lack of rowspanning, but it's not a big deal, especially if it's consistent among lists. Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:16, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:27, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

ThaesOfereode

Neat topic. Saving a space so I can dig my oar into it later. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:34, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Nominations for removal

List of Czech submissions for the Academy Award for Best International Feature Film

Notified: Example user, Example WikiProject

This article was promoted to Featured List in 2008; however, there are numerous unsourced entries. Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:25, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delist unless someone volunteers to work on the list. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

List of mammals of Korea

Notified: Example user, Example WikiProject

I am nominating this for featured list removal because

• It probably needs updating. some of the sources were last accessed in 2006. Some of the IUCN assessments probably need updating, and some of the taxonomy has probably been changed too by now.
• Images lack alt text
• Several CS1 errors
• at least one unsourced statement

EmergentAnarchy (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

• Tables violate MOS:DTAB with pseudo-headers. Delist unless someone undertakes an improvement. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:58, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
• Delist unless someone volunteers to work on this. Looks like it might not need a huge effort but I don't know enough about suitable sources on this topic to attempt it myself. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

List of tallest buildings in Albuquerque

Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Skyscrapers

Unfortunately this list was nominated almost 20 years ago and the standards have significantly shifted. Here are a few issues:

• Lead is short and doesn't accurately summarize the list.
• Citations tags include: contain dead links, and failed verifications, and contain user generated content (I believe this refers to one of the references used not being appropriate, and has been there for 7 years)
• The "notes" section is sparse and underdeveloped. Consider Grade I listed buildings in Oxford for how the notes for buildings should be. If there is nothing notable about the building, then it shouldn't be on this list, as wikipedia is not a directory.
• History section should be updated and expanded (when it says some buildings are not downtown, where are they?)
• Outdated wording "this list is..."
• None of the images have alt-texts and fail accessibility.
• Page could really use a map
• The one note, is just repeated in the notes section.

Mattximus (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

• I'd expect at least something in the empty notes, plus the citations need to be updated/fixed. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:55, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
• Delist unless someone undertakes an improvement. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:00, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Delist Yeah, it's quite dated and could use a clean-up. LivinAWestLife (talk) 20:47, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delist. Please let me know if anyone starts work on this so I can amend my "Delist". Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:43, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Sadly many of these featured tallest buildings lists are very outdated, and should probably all be reassessed. Almost all have a very sparsely filled out and random "notes" section, which really should look something like the notes on Grade I listed buildings in Oxford, and many of the other similar issues I raised above (including critical ones like accessibility issues). It would be great for an updated featured list quality list of tallest buildings that can be used as a template for others. Mattximus (talk) 00:54, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

List of Naruto characters

Notified: WikiProject Anime and manga, WikiProject Fictional characters, WikiProject Lists

I am nominating this for featured list removal because 3 weeks ago I made a talk page post and pinged numerous editors active there in the past, where I outlined the problems: "After List of Boruto characters was merged here, this gained a lot of unreferenced content (ex. section on Moegi Kazamatsuri; there are others). My second concern is that even entries on notable characters (ex. Hinata) contain just plot summary and info on voice actors, there is no reception / analysis (which some of the articles on individual characters have, some are even GA like aforementioned Hinata).". Since then, User:BinaryBrainBug also observed that at "Approximately 24,000 words, that's too large". In ter of WP:FLCR, the issuses are 3a (comprehensivness) and 3b (poor referencing). To my concern on comprehensivness, I'll add that the list has cherry-picked random information for various characters and is not very up to date. For example, the newest (Boruto) arc antagonist is Jūra, yet his entry is very short; while for example some less relevant characters (ex. Ao) have much longer plot summaries. This is a minor issue, but the main is the lower quality content when it comes to the merged Boruto entries and lack of summary of reception/analysis for many characters. For example, Boruto character Sumire section is just an unreferenced plot summary, despite sources like or existing. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:45, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Could indeed be better summarized and referenced. Shouldn't be hard to get back in featured list territory. Not my research area. Let's wait for other opinions. Selbstporträt (talk) 00:13, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

• Delist unless someone volunteers to improve it. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)