Wikipedia:Featured list candidates

Nominating featured lists in Wikipedia Welcome to featured list candidates! Here, we determine which lists are of a good enough quality to be featured lists (FLs). Featured lists exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and must satisfy the featured list criteria. Before nominating a list, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at peer review. This process is not a substitute for peer review. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured list candidate (FLC) process. Those who are not significant contributors to the list should consult regular editors of the list before nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. A list should not be listed at featured list candidates and another review process at the same time. Nominators who have previously successfully nominated a list may have two concurrent featured list nominations only if the first active nomination has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed. The featured list director, Giants2008, or his delegates, PresN and Hey man im josh, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. Each nomination will typically last at least twenty days, but may last longer if changes are ongoing or insufficient discussion or analysis has occurred. For a nomination to be promoted to FL status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. The directors determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews: actionable objections have not been resolved in a timely manner; or consensus for promotion has not been reached after significant time; or reviewers are unable to judge whether the criteria have been met. It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the process focuses on finding and resolving problems in relation to the criteria, rather than asserting the positives. Declarations of support are not as important as finding and resolving issues, and the process is not simply vote-counting. Once the director or a delegate has decided to close a nomination, they will do so on the nominations page. A bot will update the list talk page after the list is promoted or the nomination archived, typically within the day, and the {{FLC}} template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates or adds the {{Article history}} template. If a nomination is archived, the nominator should take adequate time to resolve issues before re-nominating.  – Table of contents – Closing instructions

Featured content: Featured articles Featured lists ← Featured pictures Featured topics Featured list tools: Featured list criteria Featured list candidates Featured list removal candidates Featured list statistics Wikipedians by promoted featured list nominations Today's featured list This month's queue TFL submissions TFL statistics Featured lists that have appeared as TFL Featured lists yet to appear as TFL Featured list log Random featured list Former featured lists Removal candidates log

Nomination procedure Before nominating a list, ensure that it meets all of the FL criteria and that any peer reviews are closed and archived. It is recommended that the list have no other open discussions. Place {{subst:FLC}} on the talk page of the nominated list. From the FLC template, click on the red "initiate the nomination" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text. If you are unsure how to complete a nomination, please leave a post on the FLC talk page for assistance. Below the preloaded title, complete the nomination page, sign with ~~~~ and save the page. Finally, place {{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/name of nominated list/archiveNumber}} at the top of the list of nominees on this page by first copying the above, clicking "edit" on the top of this page, and then pasting, making sure to add the name of the nominated list. When adding a candidate, mention the name of the list in the edit summary. Optional: Consider reviewing other open nominations – anyone is encouraged to review regardless of FLC experience. This does not imply quid pro quo. Helping to review lists helps the Wikipedia community by cutting down the backlog as a way to help pay it forward, and can increase how quickly your own nomination is reviewed. Reviewing procedure Please read a nominated list fully before deciding to support or oppose a nomination. To respond to a nomination, click the "Edit" link to the right of the list nomination (not the "Edit this page" link for the whole FLC page). To support a nomination, write * '''Support''', followed by your reason(s). If you have been a significant contributor to the list before its nomination, please indicate this. Supports are weighted more strongly if they are given alongside justifications that indicate that the list was fully reviewed; a nomination is not just a straight vote. To oppose a nomination, write * '''Oppose''', followed by your reason(s). Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to address the objection, the director may ignore it. Please focus your attention on substantive issues or inconsistencies, rather than personal style preferences. Reviewers who object are strongly encouraged to return after a few days to check whether their objection has been addressed, and nominators are encouraged to use {{reply to}} or other templates to notify reviewers when replying. To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s> ... </s>), rather than removing it. If a nominator feels that an oppose vote has been addressed, they should say so, rather than striking out the reviewer's text. Nominators should not cap, alter, strike, or add graphics to comments from other editors; replies are added below the signature on the reviewer's commentary. If a nominator finds that an opposing reviewer is not returning to the nomination page to revisit improvements, this should be noted on the nomination page. Graphics (such as {{done}} and {{not done}}) are discouraged, as they slow down the page load time. To provide constructive input on a nomination without specifically supporting or objecting, write * '''Comment''' followed by your advice.

Nominations urgently needing reviews edit · history · watch · refresh The following lists were nominated almost 2 months ago and have had their review time extended because objections are still being addressed, the nomination has not received enough reviews, or insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met. If you have not yet reviewed them, please take the time to do so: List of international goals scored by Dimitar Berbatov (FLC) List of 2026 Indian Premier League personnel changes (FLC) Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography (FLC) Monuments of national significance in Chernivtsi Oblast (FLC) Source reviews needed List of 2026 Indian Premier League personnel changes (FLC) edit · history · watch · refresh The following lists were nominated for removal more than 14 days ago:

Nominations

List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1973

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:29, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

With the list for 1971 having been promoted and the list for 1972 having some support, here's the list for 1973. In this particular year, Jim Croce had two number ones, the second of them sadly posthumously. Feedback as ever most gratefully received! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:29, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Brandon Flowers

Nominator(s): – SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · articles made) 05:47, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this article as I have recently greatly expanded it. I have updated citations so now every award is cited. Introductory statements for every award are also cited. The lead, as well as the infobox, have also been expanded and fixed to reflect Flowers' career and accolades.– SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · articles made) 05:47, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• The awards should all be in one table with the name of the awarding body as a column. The "lots of little tables" format has been deprecated for a long time. See List of awards and nominations received by SZA for an example -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:28, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Fixed. –SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · finished projects) 09:13, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• The infobox image needs alt-text. Besides this and the sorting issue that Chris pointed out below, accessibility looks good. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:10, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Brandon Flowers has received numerous accolades" - "numerous" seems a little generous here given the number of awards in the table
• "First rising to prominence as the frontman of rock group the Killers, Flowers has released seven studio albums with the band since 2002." - all unsourced
• "Flowers launched a successful solo career with the release of his debut single "Crossfire" in 2010" - unsourced
• "which sold more than 400,000 copies " - unsourced
• " The Desired Effect (2015), sold over 100,000 copies" - unsourced
• "earned Flowers' an AML Award for Lyrics in 2015" - no reason for apostrophe on his name
• In the table, "Crossfire" should sort under C, The Desired Effect should sort under D, and Flowers' name should sort under F
• His name should be linked on each use in the table
• Some of the refs have formatting issues. Refs 4, 11 and 12 show no publisher. Many have no retrieved date. Date formatting is inconsistent. The author of ref 10 is not NME because NME is not a person.
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:59, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Fixed. –SassafrassAlabass (talk · contribs · finished projects) 08:37, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Timeline of the 2000 Pacific hurricane season

Nominator(s): Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 18:50, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Another editor and I are hoping to make a good topic for 2000 Pacific hurricane season from this and two active GANs. This timeline is modeled after recently featured Pacific hurricane season timelines, namely the ones for 1996 and 1998. The season itself wasn't terribly active – 19 storms formed, but only six became hurricanes. However, Hurricane Carlotta killed 18 when it sank a freighter, the remnants of Tropical Storm Paul helped to cause severe floods in Hawaii, and two tropical storms made landfall in Mexico. I will endeavor to address any concerns as quickly as I can. (Disclaimer: this is a WikiCup nomination.) Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 18:50, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

List of left-handed presidents of the United States

Nominator(s): In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 01:00, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because this is a very interesting, well written article. It highlights an amazing rate of lefties in office. This is my first FL and I don't know exactly what to say, but I hope this is enough. Please tell me if it is not. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 01:00, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose. WP:FLCR says there must be a minimum of eight items and this only has seven. I don't think the additional two who were ambidextrous post-injury count. Even if they did, I don't think a list that's just bullet-pointed names with minimal context meets the other criteria of being comprehensive and engaging. It's still basically a stub and lacks visual appeal of a table with multiple columns of additional information or adequate substance otherwise for a star, unfortunately. Reywas92^Talk 02:02, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
• Oppose. I have to agree with User:Reywas92 here. Aside from the fact that there are only seven presidents listed and Featured Lists require at least eight of whatever, there is just not enough substance to this article for it to qualify as a Featured List. It is an interesting article, but it has so much more possibility. For example, has anything been written about a president's handedness beyond just "oh, he was left-handed"? Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:22, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
  • I looked at several of the sources, and it's all about cognition and left-handedness generically, can't imagine there's much to say about any one specifically. The page was at AFD a few years ago and was only kept by a 5-4 !vote. I tend to agree that it's rather trivial, even if there are some sources that focus on the trait in the most prominent job in the world. — Reywas92^Talk 03:45, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

List of World Heritage Sites in France

Nominator(s): Tone 19:29, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Well, the 2026 Tour de France just concluded, so I guess it is a good moment to nominate the French list of World Heritage Sites. Many were shown when the caravan was passing nearby! 54 sites on the main list and 33 tentative sites at the time of writing (will check for possible updates when the UNESCO session ends in a couple of days). Standard style. By the way, the list is massive and I guess there are many typos. Feel free to correct them on the fly, it will be faster for everyone. I'll take care of edits that require more in-depth work. Thanks in advance! In the meantime, the list for Spain lost the FL status, I'm getting it fixed eventually. Tone 19:29, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

List of constituencies of the Gujarat Legislative Assembly

Nominator(s): -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:44, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

FL review checklist:      Prose: 0/3 Done      Source: Pending      Accessibility: Pending      Image: Pending

The 15th in the Indian constituency series. I've improved the lead, included some history and brought the table accessibility to FL-standards. Similar, recent FL: Chhattisgarh. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:44, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• "Gujarat Legislative Assembly is the fifth-largest state in India..." --> I think there are some extra words in there by accident. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:14, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  Fixed. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 16:24, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Gujarat is the fifth-largest state in India, covering 196,024 km2 (75,685 sq mi);[4] and the ninth-most populous state with a population of 60.4 million" - semi-colon should be a comma
• "After the latest election in 2022, the assembly is governed by the Bharatiya Janata Party which won 156 out of the 182 seats" => "After the latest election in 2022, the assembly is governed by the Bharatiya Janata Party, which won 156 out of the 182 seats"
• That's it, I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:41, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude fixed both. Thanks for the review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:52, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Blue Swords Cup

Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:41, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

The Blue Swords Cup was the marquee figure skating competition of East Germany. After German unification, the competition continued for several more years before it was absorbed into the ISU's new Junior Grand Prix series. Fun fact: The 1989 competition was interrupted when the fall of the Berlin Wall began, allowing competitors to bring home pieces of the wall as souvenirs. Anyway, please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions, and I look forward to your constructive input. Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:41, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "The Blue Swords Cup was held every year from 1961 to 1996, after which point, it was incorporated into the new ISU Junior Grand Prix of Figure Skating series." => "The Blue Swords Cup was held every year from 1961 to 1996, after which point it was incorporated into the new ISU Junior Grand Prix of Figure Skating series."

•  Done

• It might be a silly question, but if the Blue Swords Cup has been held "numerous times" since 1996, why are those results not listed? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:45, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Those results are listed at ISU Junior Grand Prix in Germany. I have added an extra row to each table directing readers there. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:58, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• I would maybe change the note to "For results from 1997 onwards, see ISU Junior Grand Prix in Germany". But support nonetheless -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:55, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  I amended it to For results after 1996, see ISU Junior Grand Prix in Germany. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:08, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Prince

Nominator(s): NP (talk) 23:48, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I have been spending some time improving it, and I believe it now meets the criteria.

Thanks, NP (talk) 16:11, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• The infobox image should have alt-text.
• If the award already has an article, then wikilink it. If it isn't notable enough for an article, then remove that section completely.
• I'd suggest that you merge all the award sections together into one table.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 16:17, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824: Done. All captions and row scopes have been added. I also added alt-text to the infobox image and made sure all the awards were wikilinked. NP (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  • You actually have to add table captions and not just leave it as "caption_text", Also put that line above the header cells. That's where reviewers expect it.
  • I also see tables where the row scope wasn't done.
  • I tried to look for a recent award FL for a person, but could only find one for movies. Anyway, I believe you should make one large table like in List of accolades received by United 93 (film). It would make comparison easier and wouldn't create an unnecessarily long Table of Contents.
  • Another point still remains with awards like "Music & Media Year-End Awards". Since they aren't notable enough for an article, you should remove them completely. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:49, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

    I'll work on adding caption text soon. Which tables are lacking row scopes? I can't find them.

    I'll work on making the list one large table, plus I removed awards lacking a separate article; let me know if I missed any. NP (talk) 20:00, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

    @MPGuy2824: Just finished adding captions and merging everything into one table. NP (talk) 02:25, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose in current form. Literally dozens of the awards/nominations are unsourced -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:29, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Just finished adding sources to all the nominations. Let me know if I missed any. NP (talk) 18:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose. I agree with User:ChrisTheDude. You can't have that much unsourced content and expect this to be promoted. Either add the appropriate sources, or withdraw this nomination. Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:43, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Bgsu98: Just finished adding all the necessary sources. Let me know if I missed any. NP (talk) 18:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Okay, I will take a look at this in a little while. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:07, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "He was well known for his eclectic work across multiple genres, flamboyant and androgynous persona, and wide vocal range which included a far-reaching falsetto and high-pitched screams." - unsourced
• "Prince began his professional music career in 1975" - unsourced
• In the table, any entry that starts with "A" or "The" should sort based on the next word
• Any entry which starts with a " should sort based on the first actual word (unless that first word is "A" or "The", in which case it should sort based on the next word)
• Linking/lack of it is very random in the table. Within the first three rows, Purple Rain is linked but 1999 is not. Everything should be linked, basically
• Some song titles are not shown in quote marks (eg ASCAP Awards)
• "Death of the Prince" - why the Prince? Also, what does this even mean - he won an award for dying?
• I haven't looked at the sources but I am sure someone will do a full source review in due course -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:21, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Thank you for the review! Added sources, links, quotations, etc. to everything. I think "Death of the Prince" was just a poorly translated posthumous award, so I changed it to "Prince". NP (talk) 23:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  Sorting of titles starting with " or The is still not fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:23, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Also, on that 2016 award....."Best International Průser" - what does that mean? "Průser" is not a word in English -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Which awards start with "The"? I can't find any. Also, "Best International Průser" translated to "Best International Screw-up", which makes no sense. I can just remove it. NP (talk) 15:01, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Why was that even on there? Did you not verify these entries? Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:15, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  I verified all the English awards, but I don't know Czech so I assumed it was just poorly translated. The rest are in English and are verifiable. NP (talk) 19:29, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  "The Beautiful Ones" starts with The, as do "The Gold Experience" and "The Hits/The B-Sides" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

2026 Women's T20 World Cup squads

Nominator(s): Vestrian24Bio 06:15, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Here's the squads list from the recently concluded 2026 Women's T20 World Cup, I've used the same format for the article as 2026 Men's T20 World Cup squads which I got to FL status earlier this year... Vestrian24Bio 06:15, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Team captains during a promotional event for the T20 World Cup at the Waterloo Bridge" - it's just Waterloo Bridge, not the Waterloo Bridge
• "Each team was [singular] allowed a maximum squad size of 15 players and were [plural] required"
• "hosts England became the first team to announce their squad for the tournament; followed by" - semi-colon should be a comma
• "Domestic teams are the recent T20 league teams" => "Domestic teams are the most recent T20 league teams"
• That's it, I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:03, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Latvian Figure Skating Championships

Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:35, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

The Netherlands was just promoted, so here is another country I have recently finished. This one was some work. Special thanks to User:Egilus for their help at the Latvian Wikipedia. Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions, and I look forward to your constructive feedback. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:35, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• "but neither with each other nor with the same partners" - Jelena Sirokhvatova seems to have been a common partner to both. Please rewrite this sentence to make it clearer. The "neither with each other" also doesn't seem to be needed unless two men can pair up for this event.

• Jurijs Saļmanovs and Oļegs Šļahovs are tied for winning the most titles in pair skating (with four each), but neither with each other nor with the same partners. This whole situation is awkward. Firstly, Jurijs and Oļegs are not common names, so the average reader is not going to realize upfront that they are both men. Secondly, Jurijs won four titles, but not with the same partner. Oļegs also won four titles, but also not with the same partner. MPGuy2824: If you have suggestions to helping to make this more clear, then I am all ears and would appreciate the help. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:24, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• You could eliminate the phrase "but neither with each other nor with the same partners" completely. Instead of "Elena Garkushina and Andrei Sitik" you can say "Partners Elena Garkushina and Andrei Sitik" or something else to indicate that they won their 3 titles as partners. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

• User:MPGuy2824: I was making this way too difficult. Here's what I simplified that section to: "Deniss Vasiļjevs currently holds the record for winning the most Latvian Championship titles in men's singles (with seven), Angelīna Kučvaļska holds the record in women's singles (with five), and Jurijs Saļmanovs and Oļegs Šļahovs are tied for winning the most titles in pair skating (with four each). Elena Garkushina and Andrei Sitik hold the record in ice dance (with three), while Garkushina won an additional title with a subsequent partner." Bgsu98 (Talk) 10:24, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Works for me. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

• The width limitation of tables in the Latvia Trophy is causing the Disc. column cells to take up more height than strictly necessary.

•  Done

• I think Elena Garkushina can be removed from the last row of the Records table since she is mentioned in the row before that one. Elena's footnote can be added after Sitik's name as well.

• The standard format on all of these articles is that if one member of the record-holding team has extra wins beyond that partnership, then they are listed separately, but share the Ref. field. Garkushina and Sitik are the record-holders. Garkushina happened to win one more championship title with someone else, who has nothing to do with Sitik.

• Ok. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

• That's all I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 16:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:10, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

• In the lead, "all of which served as Latvia's national championships" is not an independent clause, so it has to be preceded by a comma, not a semicolon. Alternatively, keep the semicolon and change "all of which" to "all of the above", "all of these", etc.

•  Done

• In the history section, "were annexed" could be wikilinked to Soviet occupation of the Baltic states (1944), though this is optional and I could see it arguably being WP:EASTEREGGy

• I linked to Baltic states under Soviet rule (1944–1991).

• Image licenses and alt text check out, and no issues with accessibility. Great work! Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 17:43, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

User:Shwabb1: Thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Support on prose and pass accessibility and image reviews. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 17:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

List of members of the House of Representatives of the Netherlands, 2012–2017

Nominator(s): Dajasj (talk) 15:53, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I want to, at some point in the future, complete the either set of lists. It is again a somewhat simple, yet beautiful list, this time the longest term. Please see 2017–2021 and 2023–2025 for earlier succesful nominations. Dajasj (talk) 15:53, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility, but do mention any laws enacted during the term if they were of particular note. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 16:24, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks for taking the time to review and even more for the support! Interesting question. Before I look into that however, it might make more sense to include them in Second Rutte cabinet? Personally, I prefer limiting the list to personnel and some background on that :) Dajasj (talk) 16:45, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

List of constituencies of the Manipur Legislative Assembly

Nominator(s): -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:01, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

FL review checklist:      Prose: 2/3 Done      Source: Pending      Accessibility: Done      Image: Done

The 14th in the Indian constituency series. I've improved the lead, included some history and brought the table accessibility to FL-standards. Similar, recent FL: Haryana. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:01, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Dajasj

Minor thing, but in the first table, why did you switch from "Election(s)" to "Election/s"? Dajasj (talk) 08:10, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

And according to the infobox documentation, {{URL}} should be used for the website Dajasj (talk) 08:19, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Image and accessibility look okay to me. Slightly inconsistent that it is 'scope="row"' in the first and 'scope=row' in the second table. Dajasj (talk) 08:42, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

@Dasaj: I've removed the double quotes for all the scopes and fixed the other things you've pointed out. Thanks for the image and accessibility review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:59, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Also had a look at the prose, looks fine. Have a Support Dajasj (talk)

Shwabb1

• In footnote a, "Hung Assembly" should use sentence case
• Wikilink "Part-C state" to Part C state
• The slash issue is already fixed but for future reference, MOS:SLASH discourages the use of slashes, so "Election(s)" is indeed a better wording.
• That's it from me. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 10:18, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  @Shwabb1: Fixed both, thanks. I'll check the older FLs of this series for these issues as well. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:34, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  Support. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 10:55, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

List of consorts and children of the Wanli Emperor

Nominator(s): Min968 (talk) 12:31, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

This article is about list of consorts and children of the Wanli Emperor. I am nominating this for featured list status because I believe it meets all the FL criteria and it is an important part of the series of articles on the topic of the Ming dynasty that I am currently improving Min968 (talk) 12:31, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Note on table

I suggest using a sortable table for the entries.

• @Simongraham: Done. Min968 (talk) 11:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Image review – pass

There are four images included:

• The images all have appropriate captions and ALT tags.
• Ming Shenzong.jpg has an appropriate PD license.
• 孝端显皇后王氏（明神宗）.jpg lacks a US PD license.
• 孝靖显皇后王氏（明神宗）.jpg has an appropriate PD license.
• 明光宗皇帝.jpg has an appropriate PD license.
• While those that are included so far likely are the most relevant, consider including more images of his consorts and children if they are available, especially if the article is expanded through this review.

@Min968: This looks like it will be an interesting and useful FL once it has passed through this process. Please take a look at my comments above. simongraham (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

@Simongraham I think a bullet list is more practical and easier to navigate for Chinese emperors, who often had large numbers of consorts and children. Min968 (talk) 02:53, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "had 18 children by eight women, eight sons and ten daughters" - this reads a little confusingly, as at first glance it looks like he had 18 children by a combination of the women, his sons, and his daughters. I suggest "had 18 children, eight sons and ten daughters, by eight women. Of these, five sons...."
• "Empresses Dowager Li and Chen," => "Empress Dowagers Li and Chen,"
• "Lady Zheng was suspected of being involved in the "man with a stick" incident" - this really needs more explanation. What was this incident?
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:56, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude All done. Min968 (talk) 16:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1972

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

With the 1970 list having just been promoted, here's the 1972 list. In this particular year we saw the longest number-one song to date, and we saw one of the most influential early rock and roll stars finally reach the top spot with, ironically, one of his worst ever songs. Feedback as ever will be most gratefully received and swiftly acted upon..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• the final chart of 1971 - You can link the previous list.
• 7" single - Could be linked.
• 2021 - You can link the list for that year.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 08:44, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

@Alavense: - done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:47, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Support. Alavense (talk) 08:47, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (7/22/26)

• Support. The only issues I saw were some missing commas, which I just fixed myself. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:47, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• Many of the images are from much after 1972 and could use a "(pictured in X)" in their captions.
• I didn't see any other problems with the prose. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 17:04, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
  • @MPGuy2824: - I meant to add that but forgot. Done now! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:59, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:58, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Camilasdandelions

• Hey Chris! I'm reviewing this article.
• Suggest adopting {{Use American English}}
• As the third paragraph is talking about Chuck, what about moving his photo between second and third paragraph?
• Ref 5 -- As I know, Medium is unreliable source per WP:MEDIUM
• "in contrast Davis" -> "in contrast, Davis"
• "1957, but took" --> "1957, but it took"
• "Weeks at No. 1" -- why don't you adopt {{abbr}} here too
• Reviews done. I recently opened a FAC too, and if you don't mind, could you take a look for this article? Thank you :)! Camilasdandelions (✉️) 15:57, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• @Camilasdandelions: - all done except moving the lead image. In my experience lead images always go at the top rather than floating two thirds of the way down the lead -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:15, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Makes sense! Camilasdandelions (✉️) 16:18, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support Camilasdandelions (✉️) 16:18, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

John Huston filmography

Nominator(s): RobertFord II (talk) 14:19, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it presents a comprehensive overview of John Huston's work across film, television, and stage, and also his many credits as director, writer, and actor. Much of it is modeled after the featured lists of other Old Hollywood directors such as John Ford's and Michael Curtiz's filmographies. This is my second attempt at a featured lists so any help would be welcome. RobertFord II (talk) 14:19, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• Some of the "yes" cells are centred and others are not, and the two shades of green appear (at least to my ageing eyes) to be very slightly different. Any reason for this?
• Full review to come...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:05, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Thanks for pointing that out. Had to go and manually fixed the alignment. Also changed the colors to help denote what is uncredited. RobertFord II (talk) 20:19, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

  I see that you now have a key showing that yellow colour and a hash symbol denote something that is uncredited, but you haven't actually added the hash symbol to the relevant cells....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:19, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Thanks for the comment. Believe I've made the right change here. RobertFord II (talk) 21:46, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

You have yellow cells and green cells, both of which contain Yes as the only content. Cell color cannot be the sole means of conveying information. If you intend yellow to indicate that the actor's appearance was uncredited, I recommend changing Yes to Uncredited appearance. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:02, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98 - Thanks! Fixed those. RobertFord II (talk) 17:19, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. | Party becomes !scope=col | Party. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1 becomes !scope=row | 1. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:53, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Golden Globe Award for New Star of the Year – Actress

Nominator(s): PanagiotisZois (talk) 20:15, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

This page is admittedly somewhat peculiar. The Golden Globes are arguably the most famous awards when it comes to recognizing films and TV shows, right after the Oscars and Emmys, respectively. However, this particular award for New Actress of the Year isn't exactly something that one finds at the Oscars/Emmys; mostly. First given at the 5th Golden Globes all the way back in the late 1940s, this category was actually present for every years afterswards — with 2-3 exceptions — until it was suddenly discontinued in the early 80s. Why is that? Well, you can read the list and find out. To a certain extent, the fact that this award didn't have a concrete set of criteria over what counted as a "new star" probably didn't help its case either, as we often see actresses that had been in the business for a few years being nominated.

Quite subjectively, what caught my attention about this award is that Tippi Hedren won for The Birds, as you don't often see horror performances winning any major awards. Susan Flannery, who is more well-known as a soap opera actress also piqued my interest. Personally, I don't think it would be a bad idea for such an award to be brought back at the Golden Globes, with a well-defined set of criteria. I could definitely see Inde Navarrette being nominated for Obsession. Regardless, I hope you find this list somewhat interesting, and I would like to get a female-centric page improved.--PanagiotisZois (talk) 20:15, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• The photos down the left-hand side continue long after the table has ended, leaving a giant white space before the references. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:36, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

  The whitespace is now gone when I view this article on my desktop, but I wonder how it will view on other devices? Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:24, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "first presented at the 5th Golden Globes held in 1948 — alongside the New Star of the Year – Actor category — and awarded" - the dashes around the "alongside" bit, combined with the dash in the award title look a bit confusing. I would just just lose the former.
• "New Star of the Year – Actress was presented in every ceremony — excluding the 34th Golden Globes — until" - same here, although her I might be tempted to replace them with commas rather than losing them completely
• "The New Star of the Year – Actress award was presented 34 times, to 58 actresses and one actor" - huh?
• "In 1951 and 1982, the award was merged with its male counterpart to create a unisex New Star of the Year category" - oh I see. Well that's not the same award then, so it isn't really accurate to say that the "Actress" award was presented 34 times or once given to a guy
• "producer of Butterfly producer" => "the producer of Butterfly"
• "It was presumed that Riklis had bought the award for Zadora, and following these events, the New Star of the Year Award was discontinued by the Golden Globes." - might be worth saying "after the following year's ceremony" rather than "following these events", as the latter suggests that the award was discontinued immediately after the Zadora fiasco when it actually wasn't
• I concur with BGsu98 about the images. The huge white space after the table ends looks a bit silly
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: Thank you for the comments! I made all the necessary changes. Regarding the images and space, I removed a few of them, as I wanted to include only ones that were very high quality and large. Let me know if the page looks good now, or if I should remove a few more.--PanagiotisZois (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Not clear why you have the tables split by decade; you're allowed to, of course, it just means that the sortability is forced to only sort by decade instead of over the whole of the awards.
  • I followed other awards that are featured list like the Oscar for Best Actress on this. I did consider having it all be one thing, but separating it by decade also made editing slightly faster. Plus, given the nature of this award, it's not as if any actresses have been nominated twice.--PanagiotisZois (talk) 09:00, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:52, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• Pat Crowley and Carroll Baker are the only actresses to have received the award for two separate performances I also see that Bella Darvi in that same boat.
• Also, Caroll Baker is mentioned for 2 performances in 1957, but they were in 1956. Make it consistent with the other sentences of this paragraph.
• Carol Lynley was the only actress to be nominated twice in two separate ceremonies Why was this?
• the ref column in all the tables should be made unsortable. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:15, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Nevada's congressional delegations

Nominator(s): GoldRomean (talk) & Staraction (talk · contribs) 02:53, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Together with Staraction, I'm happy to present the list of congressional delegations from the Silver State! This is my first FLC, while Staraction has authored several other FLs from this series. Any and all feedback welcome—we will endeavour to respond to any comments promptly :). GoldRomean (talk) 02:53, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (7/21/26)

• Support. I read the entire article and honestly didn't find anything to critique. I will read through it again tomorrow just in case I've missed something, but I doubt I will find anything else. Well done! Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:56, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
• On the Senate table, what is the purpose of the alternating gray and white segments in the third and fifth columns? Bgsu98 (Talk) 08:57, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hey @Bgsu98, thanks for reviewing. Those indicate six-year periods corresponding to election cycles. So, for instance, Chic Hecht was elected in 1982 and served for one full six-year term before losing the election in 1988. Best, Staraction (talk · contribs) 12:34, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

  I'd argue they're not really necessary, but as they seem to be standard on previously-promoted FLs in this series, I'm not going to worry about it. My previous support still stands. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:00, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Key Pittman image caption needs a full stop and two off the words are the wrong way round ("the as")
• Why are some of the congress numbers (or whatever the correct term is) much bolder than others? Some of the tables have them super-bold and other don't, and in one table the level of boldness changes part way through. None of this is explained as far as I can see..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:01, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hey @ChrisTheDude! I've done the following:

  • Removed punctuation from all image captions per MOS:CAPFRAG, so now there are no full stops in any image captions
  • Fixed the as
  • Remove "superbolding" from all Congresssional sessions; this was simply an oversight

  Thank you for your comments and let me know if you've got any other feedback! Best, Staraction (talk · contribs) 12:29, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:32, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Dina Titus is in her eighth term, making her the second-longest serving, not Barbara Vucanovich. Reywas92^Talk 14:27, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Nice catch—thanks, and now fixed (removed the "second-longest serving" bit altogether). GoldRomean (talk) 15:09, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Dajasj

• Not a big deal at all, but the placement of the legend under Nevada's_congressional_delegations#Historical_timeline feels a bit awkward, because it is somewhat far away from the table. Although this hasn´t been done at other tables, wouldn´t it make more sense to create a separate column next to the colourstrip with the D/R/I? This way, you might not need a legend at all.
• Why have you chosen for upright=0.8? It might be just my screen, but right now it awkwardly breaks the caption of Walter S. Baring Jr. after "House of"
• Maybe more a matter of taste, but I don't think the sticky headers are useful in the House tables, because there are not many seats and the order is logical. It makes it more chaotic for me to scroll through.
• I would leave out "As of 2026, Nevada is represented in the House by Democrats Dina Titus, Susie Lee, and Steven Horsford, and by Republican Mark Amodei.", because there is a separate section dedicated to the current delegation, ánd it is in the introduction.
• You use {{Rp}} the first time you use reference 8 in the introduction, but then don't use it for the same information in the section "Current delegation" (I can´t access the source myself right now). I also believe these duplicate sources can be left out of the introduction altogether :)
• Again a matter of taste perhaps, but I really dislike the table in the first column of the current senators. Wouldn't it be more simple to add another row to that table and have the R+1 span two columns?

Anyway, because these are mostly things that have been approved previously, I will support in any case Dajasj (talk) 16:18, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback, Dajasj! My thoughts:

• If you mean writing out the party names in full next to each delegate's name, I personally do think that would be a bit unwieldy (at least for me, the redundancy of the colourstrip + D/R/I in parentheses makes it easy for me to identify parties and helps reduce how much I have to look back at the legend anyway).
• Happy to remove the upright=0.8 bit. Also changed US House of Representatives to U.S. House (with a non-breaking space to boot), which should fix the awkwardness regardless of image width.
• Removed the sticky headers for the House tables.
• I do think the information there would be helpful to a reader jumping directly to the Senate or House sections without reading the other parts, but I'm definitely open to convincing :).
• Fixed—the source is accessible as a website, so no page number necessary. Cut some of the citations from the lead, except for a couple less-cut cases where it's perhaps better to keep them just to be safe.
• I made an example implementation of what you're suggesting at Special:Permalink/1366232796#Current delegation—definitely a lot cleaner, but also leaves quite a bit of whitespace in the Nevada cell and makes it less clear the CPVI is applying to the whole state. Open to thoughts on which version is preferable.

Cheers, GoldRomean (talk) 23:54, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• I didn't mean writing out the name of the party, only placing the letter R/D/I directly next to the color it refers to. You're right that that doesn't solve the issue of writing out the name of the party somewhere.
• Even if you skip the introduction and the current delegation (which is easily accessible in the TOC), then you can also find the current delegation at the bottom of the last table. So that would make four different places to find the same information. Again, not a big deal, but not necessary if you ask me ;)

Thanks for the changes, I will look at your last point later. Kind regards, Dajasj (talk) 02:46, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Older nominations

List of hornbills

Nominator(s): EmergentAnarchy (talk) 17:59, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I've worked on it recently (mostly updating conservation and writing a lead) and think it meets the criteria. My changes are largely based on the featured List of cranes. Credit to user:Ikonact for making the range maps. All comments welcome, will respond as soon as possible. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 17:59, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

You have several species without any sources. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:10, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

What needs citing? just that the species exist? The IOC checklist is cited. The IUCN hasn't assessed all of them. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 18:49, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

I'd cite the sentence "Ranges are based on the IOC World Bird List for that species unless otherwise noted." to the IOC cite the same way you do the "This list follows the taxonomic treatment [...] of the IOC World Bird List.^[5]" to make it more clear that the ranges are coming from there; reviewers may be surprised there because in my long list of mammal FLCs I was citing the range to the IUCN by default, whereas birds have a nice single IOC source for text ranges.

Side note - right now some of your rows are taller than others, solely because the image is more vertical, which makes e.g. the Trumpeter hornbill stand out more than the rows around it. Change the "|image-size=180px" parameter to whatever number you want to get the heights to be more even; I usually do whatever caps it at 180px tall, but I also have more text in the rows about size and ecology that keeps the small/no image rows from going far below that. I'll leave it up to reviewers whether bird lists should have size/ecology/food like mammals; I know previous bird lists haven't. --PresN 18:08, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

I've added the IOC bird list citation, but i'm confused about the image sizes. They all already have an |image-size=180px parameter, but they aren't displaying as the same size. Is there something else I should do with it? I don't do much with tables. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 18:36, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, it's math, and a little annoying. The size parameter for images says how wide the image is, not how tall. So, if the image is wider than it is tall, 180px means that it's 180px wide, and less that that tall. but if the image is a vertical rectangle, then 180px wide lets it be as tall as that works out to be. So if you want the image to be 180px tall at most, then you have to work out what the corresponding width is. Taking Southern red-billed hornbill as an example, at 180px wide, it's 195px tall - so to make it 180px tall, you need it to be (180/195)*180 = 166px wide. --PresN 22:34, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Where do you get the 195px from? I can't find it on the file page EmergentAnarchy (talk) 22:44, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

I went right click->inspect, and read what the "height" value was; if you go to the file page instead, it says that the full image is 2,689 × 2,909 pixels, so (2689/2909)*180 = 166px wide in order to get the height down to 180. --PresN 14:29, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. I've made them all 180 in height. The rows look like they're exactly the same size. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 15:40, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (7/13/26)

Lead

• "Arboreal hornbills nest in tree cavities, in which females seal themselves during incubation."

Conventions

• "Population estimates are of the number of mature individuals and are taken from the IUCN Red List." --> This probably needs a citation.

Classification

• "The International Ornithologists' Union (IOU) recognises 64 species of hornbills in across two families and sixteen genera." --> Too many prepositions in that phrase.

Tables

• Some of these birds have citations (even without population estimates), while others do not.
• If previous bird lists do not have size/ecology/food information like the mammal lists do, then continue to follow the convention set by previous bird lists. Although adding that information would be useful.
• I would wikilink Angola and Namibia.
• I would wikilink Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda
• I'm not sure what you mean by "east central Congo"?
• I would wikilink Nigeria.
• I would wikilink Philippines.
• I would wikilink Palawan.
• I would wikilink Sri Lanka.
• I would wikilink Nepal.
• I would wikilink Myanmar and Thailand.
• Is "Indochina" a term still in use? Indochina redirects to Mainland Southeast Asia, so I would use "Southeast Asia". "Indochina" is a colonial term that should probably be avoided.
• Wikilink to Maluku Islands, which appears to be the dominant name.
• Definitely wikilink to Narcondam Island.
• Definitely wikilink to Sumba Island.
• Definitely wikilink to Sulawesi.
• Definitely wikilink to Luzon.
• Definitely wikilink to Mindoro.
• Definitely wikilink to Mindanao.

User:EmergentAnarchy: A very interesting list! Let me know when you have had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:07, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. I've added the links. East central congo presumably just means eastern and not north or south? not sure how i'd rewrite that. The only ones without citations are the ones that don't have IUCN assessments. Some also have IUCN assessments that don't give a population assessment. I've also added a note about Buceros taxonomy. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 10:15, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

User:EmergentAnarchy: No, I mean, what are you referring to as "Congo", as that is not the name of a country. Bgsu98 (Talk) 10:32, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

The Republic of the Congo is referred to as Congo. I can rephrase and wikilink if you want. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 11:11, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

It should be wikilinked as the Republic of the Congo. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:11, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

OK. Have changed that. Does anything else need doing? EmergentAnarchy (talk) 12:15, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:23, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Lead image could be made larger using the upright parameter
• "in which females seal themselves inside during incubation" - the word "inside" is redundant and can safely be removed
• "Species of fossil hornbills are known from the Miocene onward; however, the fossil record of the taxon is poor" - semicolon should be a comma
• Think that's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:19, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you. Have made all these changes EmergentAnarchy (talk) 09:26, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:59, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620

Birbs :,,,) I'm putting down a placeholder for an image review – ping me if I haven't followed through by the end of the weekend. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 11:59, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

As promised:

• File:Калао-трубач.jpg – source link is broken, Wayback Machine isn't working on it
• File:Wrinkled hornbill (Rhabdotorrhinus corrugatus).jpg – image doesn't seem to appear in the source given for it on Commons
• All images have alt text
• All images contribute encyclopedic value to the list
• All images are appropriately licensed for either Creative Commons or the public domain

@EmergentAnarchy: Fantastic work overall, just a couple issues in the way at present. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 20:23, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks. I've replaced the wrinkled hornbill image, which is tagged as Own work by the uploader. The link to the first one works for me, but commons has other photos of it. I can replace that one too if you want. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 20:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Actually that one's either in the wrong commons category, or the species was misidentified. I'll replace it. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 20:44, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Both have been replaced. The first one was tagged as a trumpeter hornbill on the original page, so someone's misidentified it somewhere. Not sure where the second one is from, as the wayback machine copy from when it was uploaded doesn't have it either. Reverse image search doesn't bring it up. EmergentAnarchy (talk) 20:53, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of those, EmergentAnarchy – I'm pleased to support now. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 10:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

98th Academy Awards

Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 18:58, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating the 2026 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I followed how the 1929, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025 ceremonies were written. Birdienest81talk 18:58, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "One Battle After Another won a leading six awards" - "leading" reads a little awkwardly here to me. Maybe "One Battle After Another won the most awards, with six"......?
• "Sinners led with a record-breaking sixteen nominations, the most in Oscar history" - I would suggest this warrants a mention in the lead
• "At the age of 30, Timothée Chalamet became the youngest actor to earn three acting nominations since Marlon Brando" - maybe say when this was
• "Best Cinematography winner Autumn Durald Arkapaw became first female and black winner in the category" => "Best Cinematography winner Autumn Durald Arkapaw became the first female and black winner in the category"
• "Jeff Ross and Mike Sweeney, long-time collaborators of O'Brien, would also return as producers for a second time; Sweeney would also serve as a writer." => "Jeff Ross and Mike Sweeney, long-time collaborators of O'Brien, also returned as producers for a second time; Sweeney also served as a writer."
• "Each of the shortlisted films would have its respective casting director would then showcase their in bake-off via written notes on the process" - I can't understand this at all.........?
• "Voters must now watching each" => "Voters must now watch each"
• "stating that the member watch the film" => "stating that the member watched the film"
• "In accordance to recommendations" => "In accordance with recommendations"
• "In the Best Picture category, films released from the first six months of the year" => "In the Best Picture category, films released in the first six months of the year"
• "voting privileges all Academy members were invited to participate in the nominations round" - again, I don't understand this
• "Robert Lloyd of Los Angeles Times wrote" => "Robert Lloyd of the Los Angeles Times wrote"
• "The show also had 8.4% of households watching the ceremony based on Nielsen estimates" => "The show had 8.4% of households watching the ceremony based on Nielsen estimates"
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:35, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: Done – I have read your comments and made the proper adjustments and corrections based on your feedback. Thanks for the help.

--Birdienest81talk 00:18, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• I'm still seeing "Each of the shortlisted films would have its respective casting director showcase their in bake-off via written notes" - I literally have no comprehension of what this means. What's an "in bake-off"? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:18, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: Done I've had added the word "work" as in "respective casting director showcase their work in a boke-off via written notes. I also added the word "highlighting" in case you were unsure what i meant was containing in the written notes.

--Birdienest81talk 06:44, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

I guess what I mostly mean (but maybe didn't express brilliantly) is that I just don't understand what a "bake-off" is in this context. My only understanding of that term is a competition to see who can produce the best cake. If it means something specific in the context of the Oscars, is there an appropriate link......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:00, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead. This is for the tables after the main Awards section.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 17:18, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• @MPGuy2824: Done – I added ! scope=row on the primary columns for each table.

--Birdienest81talk 07:39, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Fixed two issues and now I can support for accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:21, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

List of FA Cup winning managers

Nominator(s): NapHit (talk) 07:28, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because after doing some extensive work on the list over the past week or so, I believe it's now close to featured standard. All comments welcome, and I'll try to get to them as quickly as possible NapHit (talk) 07:28, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• "Thomas H. McIntosh" should sort under M, not H. The H is not part of his surname -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:16, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

  Ah that's a good spot @ChrisTheDude:, I've gone and fixed that. NapHit (talk) 13:29, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

More comments

• Wenger image caption is a complete sentence so it needs a full stop
• "The FA Cup is an association football competition contested between English clubs since 1872" - it started in 1871, not 1872
• "and is the oldest football competition in the world" => "which is the oldest football competition in the world"
• "Winning the competition was seen as an equal achievement" => "Winning the competition was previously seen as an equal achievement"
• "The role of the manager is to select the squad during the league season" - mentioning the league specifically could be taken to mean the role doesn't extend to the FA Cup
• "Due to the prestige of winning the FA Cup, the pressures on managers to succeed can be great" - does the source actually say this specifically (I can't access it for some reason)? I would imagine that pressure to win the FA Cup is one of the smallest pressures placed on a top-flight manager, yet this implies that managers are under massive pressure to win it..........

I've removed the reference to this. NapHit (talk) 07:34, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

• "while Ruud Gullit was player-manager when Chelsea won the 1997 final" => "and Ruud Gullit was player-manager when Chelsea won the 1997 final"
• Might be worth a note clarifying why so many early winning teams had no manager
• The Newcastle selection committee in 1924 is listed as Scottish. It seems highly unlikely to me that the entire committee was Scottish
• Under "see also", there's no reason to remove the word "the" from the link to History of the FA Cup -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:19, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments @ChrisTheDude:, I've addressed them all. NapHit (talk) 07:34, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:36, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• For the main table, I would switch the header cell to be the year instead of the manager. That would be the unique element in the row.
  • Do you mean the row scopes? So, they switch from the manager to the year cell? NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
    • Yes, the row scopes as well as the "!". -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
      • No problem, I'll get to this over the weekend. NapHit (talk) 08:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• For the FA Cup-winning managers by individual table, I think you can remove teh rank column.
  • Not so sure on this one. I think it's useful to have it, as it gives the reader a quick indication of where the managers rank in the list. NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
    • Ok, then to maintain consistency within this page, you'll have to add that column to the "By nationality" table. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
      • That's done now. NapHit (talk) 08:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• Please find someway to mention that this is a knockout competition.
  • added this to the lead NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
    • Sadly, this is now causing a MOS:SEAOFBLUE issue. If you can't find a good place to put "knockout" without causing this issue, then leave it out. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
      • Can I chime in to suggest "The FA Cup is an association football competition contested between English clubs since 1871. Organised on a knockout basis, it is the oldest football competition in the world". Mind you, you might also need to address the fact (I didn't think of this earlier - apologies!) that a small number of Welsh clubs take part (and historically some Scottish and Irish clubs took part as well)...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:44, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
• The lead sentence is still a bit unweildy. See if "The FA Cup is an association football competition contested between English clubs since 1871. It is the oldest football competition in the world, and winning the competition was previously seen as an equal achievement to winning ..." works better.
  • Problem with this change is that the second sentence then becomes unwieldly. I've shortened the first sentence. Another option is to have this: 'It is the oldest football competition in the world' as it's own sentence, which could work. NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
    • See if "The FA Cup, the oldest association football competition in the world, is a knockout tournament contested between English clubs since 1871." Separation of the phrase into its own sentence, as you suggested, works too. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
      • Changed it to your suggestion here, with a slight change from 'English clubs' to 'teams in domestic English football', which goes some way to alleviating @ChrisTheDude:'s point about Scottish and Welsh clubs. Though I'm not sure if we should make that more explicit. NapHit (talk) 08:04, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
        • I think that works, as the only Welsh and Scottish clubs that have been eligible to enter in the last 140 years or so have been eligible on the grounds that they play(ed) in the English football league system -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:22, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:27, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the comments, @MPGuy2824:, I've responded to all the points above. NapHit (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

List of governors of Taraba State

Nominator(s): Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:37, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

This is the list of governors of Nigeria's state of Taraba from when the area formed part of the Northern Region, through North-Eastern State and Gongola State, until Taraba was created from Gongola State alongside Adamawa. Recently rewrote it and would appreciate feedback. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:37, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• "Suntai's incapacitation after an aircraft crash in October 2012 produced a succession dispute in which Garba Umar and, after a Supreme Court ruling reinstating him as deputy governor, Sani Danladi served as acting governor." I think you can remove the phrase ", after a Supreme Court ruling reinstating him as deputy governor," from this unweildy sentence. It is explained in the History section.
• "Salihu was the final governor of Gongola State and remained in office when the state was replaced by Adamawa and Taraba states in August 1991." to "Salihu was the final governor of Gongola State and became the first governor of Adamawa State when the Gongola was split in August 1991."
• ", Nyame returned as governor and served until 2007. He was succeeded by Danbaba Suntai in 2007." to ", Nyame returned as governor. He was succeeded in 2007 by Danbaba Suntai." You could consider doing something similar for the 2023 switch as well.
• That's all that I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:14, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 All done, thank you for looking. Re the first point, that was a very shitty sentence I wrote, lol. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:48, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility.
• If you have the time and inclination, then please give a source/prose review for List of constituencies of the Manipur Legislative Assembly -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:45, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1971

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:16, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

With 1969 having just been promoted and 1970 having multiple supports, here's the 1971 list. In 1970 we had the first number one for the Jackson 5, and in this year we have the first number one from another set of brothers. Feedback as ever will be most gratefully received and swiftly acted upon...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:16, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments by Alavense

• No need to use a capital D for the Double A-sided single.
• the final chart of 1970 - A link to the previous list could be added.
• There's a discrepancy in the spelling of Cher's song: Gypsys on the chart, Gypsies on the image.

That's what I saw. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 09:51, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

@Alavense: - thanks for your review. All done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:53, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Nice work. Happy to support. Alavense (talk) 09:55, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (7/6/26)

• This is one sentence: "His wife Linda McCartney was also credited on the single, giving her her first number one; although she later joined her husband in the band Wings, which achieved much chart success, "Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey" was the only Hot 100 entry on which she was individually credited." This is very wordy, and would benefit from being split at some point.
  • Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
• "Four weeks later, Rod Stewart, one of the most successful vocalists of all time," --> That's going to need a citation.
  • There's a citation at the end of the sentence. This citation describes him as "one of the rock era's greatest hit-makers" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
• "Another singer with a long and successful career, Cher, achieved her first solo..." --> Just a suggestion, but I would slightly rephrase as "Cher, another singer with a long and successful career, achieved her first solo..."
  • Done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

User:ChrisTheDude: Let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:51, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

• @Bgsu98: - thanks for your review - see above -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support. I also have this article – Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Figure skating at the 2022 Winter Olympics/archive1 – which was a FAC before it was moved over here, in case you have a free minute. Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:44, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

NØ

• "retaining the position from the final chart of 1970" - I am not sure about the wikilink placement here, as it originally led me to believe it would be an article about that specific chart week. It could be removed or maybe transferred to "the position" instead
• "Later in the year, 13-year-old Donny Osmond topped the chart as a soloist for the first time with "Go Away Little Girl". The song was the first to top the Hot 100 for two different artists, having been a number one for Steve Lawrence in 1963. In the issue dated March 20, Janis Joplin was the third consecutive first-time chart-topper as her single "Me and Bobby McGee" reached number one." - That's three consecutive "top"s so how about something like "reach the summit" for the middle sentence?
• "Three Dog Night reached number one in April with "Joy to the World"" - No plural in the band's name so you could introduce them as a "band" or a "group" so it is obvious
• Maybe the release year in parenthesis after the mention of Tapestry
• "In September, Paul McCartney became the second member of the Beatles (after Harrison) to top the Hot 100 as a soloist when the song "Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey" spent a single week in the top spot; his wife Linda McCartney was also credited on the single, giving her her first number one." - It's unclear here whether Linda is a feature, lead artist, or just a songwriter. Would it be okay to say something like "In September, Paul McCartney became the second member of the Beatles (after Harrison) to top the Hot 100 as a soloist when "Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey", his collaboration with his wife Linda McCartney, spent a single week in the top spot; this gave Linda her first number one"?
• Great article as always. If you are interested, I have put up an FAC for a recent song and it would be nice to get your opinion. Regards.--NØ 11:17, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

@MaranoFan: - I have addressed all these points apart from the fourth one. It seems a little unnecessary to me to clarify that a single which was a big hit in mid-1971 was taken from an album which was released in 1971, as it's highly unusual for a hit single to be taken from an album which wasn't released at around the same time...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:35, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support--NØ 11:53, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620 (image review)

Shouldn't the caption for the photo of Carole King say three songs instead of two? It was two single releases, but one of them was a double A-side, so wouldn't both of those songs technically have topped the chart? Otherwise, everything checks out:

• All images have alt text
• All images contribute encyclopedic value to the list
• All images are appropriately licensed for either public domain or Creative Commons
• Sourcing verifies for each image

Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 22:23, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

• • @Dylan620: - a very valid first point. I changed the caption -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:18, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
    • Thanks for taking care of that – happy to support. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 12:32, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 01:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

List of general elections in Botswana

Nominator(s): splains (💬/📝) 23:58, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

I nominated this for FL twice in the past, I guess the third time's the charm (hopefully) splains (💬/📝) 23:58, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "an electoral system which relies on single-member constituencies that uses first-past-the-post voting" => "an electoral system which relies on single-member constituencies and uses first-past-the-post voting"
  • Fixed
• "The table below excludes European Advisory Council elections as members were elected by European residents, not citizens of the Protectorate themselves.[14][15] During these elections, Bechuanaland citizens also did not get to participate in the British Administration.[14]" - would be good to explain exactly when this happened, as these sentences are a bit context-free as it stands
  • Made clearer
    • I can see that you've added "during the colonial administration" but I still don't think this will be very clear to people who don't have a good knowledge of African/colonial history.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:52, 15 July 2026 (UTC)
• Any particular reason why the caption of the 2024 map differs from all the others?
  • Fixed
• Think that's all I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:28, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
  • ChrisTheDude, I believe I have addressed your concerns. --splains (💬/📝) 23:37, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

History6042's Review

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Title becomes !scope=col | Title.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
  • I'm pretty sure I already did this.

Other comments

• I think "N/A" is standard as opposed to "n/a".
  • Fixed
• Per WP:SEAOFBLUE, two links should not be places next to each other. This list contains a WP:SEAOFBLUE violation in "universal sufferage".
  • Fixed
• Appointed may not be the right term as the "appointed" members are "nominated by the President and elected by the assembly."
• "There are 61 elected members and 8 appointed members in the parliament" contradicts the National Assembly of Botswana article which states "Voters in single member constituencies directly elect 57 of these members for a term of 5 years through a plurality (or first-past-the-post) system. Six members, meanwhile, are nominated by the President and elected by the assembly. Finally, the remaining two (the President and Speaker of the National Assembly) are ex officio."
  • The number of single-member constituencies increased from 57 to 61 seats due to population growth adjustments. The 8 appointed members you mentioned are a combination of the 6 specially elected members (which are nominated by the president and voted on by the assembly) along with the 2 ex-officio members which are the president and the speaker.

@History6042: Simon seems to have taken care of the issues that you pointed out. Simon remember to always ping reviewers when you are done with all of their comments. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:55, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Support, History6042 😊 (Contact me) 16:25, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Image review

There are relevant 14 listed images, plus one in a infobox template:

• Coat of Arms of Boswana.svg. The image has the following tag:This is not a valid license as such, being a "public domain" statement for the coat of arms definition only. It must be completed with the copyright tag associated to the picture creation.
• Parliament of Botswana.svg claims that "this (election) apportionment diagram is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it contains no original authorship". It has a CC0 license.
• The other images are maps that have valid CC SA 4.0 licenses.
• The maps lack ALT tags for accessibility.
• Suggest also adding an ALT tag to the template:Politics of Botswana.
• Consider adding an image showing the change in voting intentions, as in the FA-rated article List of Liechtenstein general elections.[Liechtenstein elections graph.png]

@Splains: Excellent work, and congratulations on your perseverance. Please do take a look at my comments. simongraham (talk) 22:10, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

List of governors of Adamawa State

Nominator(s): Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:24, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

This is the list of governors of Nigeria's state of Adamawa from when the area formed part of the Northern Region, through North-Eastern State and Gongola State, until Adamawa was created from Gongola State alongside Taraba. Recently rewrote it and would appreciate feedback. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:24, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (7/4/26)

Lead

• Well-written, no concerns.

List of governors

• "Nyako returned after winning the rerun election and remained in office until his impeachment on 15 July 2014." --> "Rerun election" really sounds awkward; surely there is a better way to phrase that.
• "Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri, then Speaker of the State House of Assembly, served briefly as acting governor until a Federal High Court ruled that Nyako's deputy, Bala James Ngilari, had not validly resigned and should have been sworn in as governor." --> The past conditional is needed in that very last phrase.

User:Vanderwaalforces: Very few concerns. Let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:28, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98 Thank you for looking! Addressed. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:47, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support. My apologies; I didn't realize I had forgotten to come back to this. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:08, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Splains

Beeen --> Been. Will check some other stuff soon splains (💬/📝) 17:03, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
I couldn't find much, the article is in good shape. All images seem good, all have alt text. The article is stable enough, essentially a single author article. Tables are structured correctly. splains (💬/📝) 17:12, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

@Splains Thank you for spotting that embarrassing typo, bahaha, my big fingers :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:15, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

@Vanderwaalforces No worries. The article is in great shape. Support splains (💬/📝) 17:29, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from RandomEdits

Good to see the other governor list of yours is going to go through the GA process. I'll review this on prose over the next day or so. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 22:29, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

@RandomEditsForWhenIRemember Hi there, was wondering if you were able to look at this? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:53, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi Vander, apologies for the delay on this. Following the above reviewers, I'm mostly pleased with the text and prose. The list itself also looks good - I've added a "Military" colour for Salihu and Agboneni- Hussaini as used on other "List of heads" pages.

One addition I think is needed is a timeline; many political FLs include one so I was surprised not to see one here. See List of prime ministers of Canada, List of prime ministers of India, List of heads of government of Liechtenstein, General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam etc. I personally find these very useful for visualising how long each governor has been in office in comparison to the rest of the list.

Additionally, something to consider before someone takes a look at accessibility, images etc: I think it'd be worth adding Michika and Fintiri's pictures from their pages. While they aren't high-res, they're good enough to identify the two men and are better than nothing - currently the list looks a bit anemic in that regards with just Salihu.

RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 18:27, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

@RandomEditsForWhenIRemember Thank you so much. I can't and haven't added a timeline in any of my previous List of Nigerian state governors. I only added Fintiri's image because Michika's own serves no purpose here since there are two different people on focus in that image. Thank you again :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:35, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks @Vanderwaalforces. I admittedly had thought timelines were required for these sort of lists, but I can't find anything in the MOS about it and after posting the above have found a few FLs which don't' include them. So while I personally prefer a timeline, this isn't a DQ on the review so it's a support on prose RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 18:48, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Please fix this alt-text: "Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri on white traditional wears ." in both places.
• Support on accessibility in advance since the rest seems good.
• @Bgsu98: Please respond in your section above. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:04, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 Great catch, thank you MPGuy, fixed. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:12, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  Removing the space at the end isn't what I meant. Something like "Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri in white traditional clothing" will do IMO. A full stop isn't needed at the end since it isn't a full sentence. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:22, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 Ah, thank you. Fixed. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:27, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Source review - pass

Here'll be a source review from me! RedShellMomentum 02:33, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

This table lists 1 random passages from throughout the article (5.9% of 17 total passages). These passages contain 1 inline citations (2.6% of 39 in the article). Generated with the Veracity user script. RedShellMomentum 02:33, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

@Vanderwaalforces: Source review is all good. I've also recently opened up a peer review for Justin Timberlake; you may leave comments there if you wish. RedShellMomentum 02:41, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

@RedShellMomentum Thank you for looking, I'm loving your work ok JT, so I'll add it to my radar now :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 04:25, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Reference #	Letter	Source	Archive	Status	Notes
Fintiri was elected and re-elected on the platform of the PDP, but defected to the APC in February 2026.
26		Ogundapo 2026.		✅

Query

@FLC director and delegates: I believe this is okay and can proceed to closure soon? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:49, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Needs at least one more prose support before I would promote it. Please trust that I will promote it when it's ready. --PresN 01:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Percy Jackson and the Olympians

Nominator(s): Max263 (talk) 12:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Percy Jackson and the Olympians is an American fantasy adventure television series created by Rick Riordan and Jonathan E. Steinberg for streaming service Disney+, based on Riordan's book series of the same name. This article is a list of all awards and nominations received by the series, a total of 16 wins from 57 nominations.

I think the list is high quality, comparable with similar lists and FL-worthy. Please note that the series is still airing and will (almost definitely) pick up more awards in the future, but I will endeavour to keep the list to the same high standard. This list differs from recent FLs for television accolades (Sherlock, Loki) by splitting up major accolades, but if desired these can easily be incorporated into the main table. Additionally, I reckon the refs in the lead are not necessary as the information is cited in the table. Thanks! Max263 (talk) 12:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments from TechnoSquirrel69

Welcome to FLC! I took a quick look at this on request at the Wikimedia Discord server, so I might as well leave my comments here.

• Reduce the number of citations in the lead per MOS:LEADCITE.
• Use {{sort}} on cells with quotation marks so they sort in order.
• Is there a reason the first few tables are unsortable?
• I would recommend moving this back to the List of awards and nominations received by Percy Jackson and the Olympians (TV series) title to match the base article Percy Jackson and the Olympians (TV series). That's not strictly within FLC's court, but I'll throw out a courtesy ping anyway to Alex 21, who made the move.
• Don't use !scope="rowgroup" for individual rows (where the rowspan is 1) per MOS:DTAB.

More! —TS

• Most of the first paragraph needs citations; shouldn't be too hard to pull those from the main article.
• "title character" I think "titular character" would sound more idiomatic.
• Ideas seems to be a little out of order in the first paragraph. The plot summary should probably come before the airing date, which itself is attached awkwardly to the information about the adaptation. Careful about unnecessary repetition of the series' title.
• "Praise was given for its worldbuilding ..." {{cn}}
• I wonder if the detail about the "most successful Disney Branded Television premiere" is due; particularly considering the viewership figure is pretty underwhelming.
• The series' first season
• "writing and directing nominations cited" Seems like an odd word choice. The awards were given for that episode, right?
• "Scobell and Jeffries received recognition for their performances" seems redundant with the information above about them being praised in reviews.
• "Composer Bear McCreary won ... for his work on the show's musical themes." Indeed, it would be rather surprising if he won for anything else. :P Same applies to his portrait caption.

Discussion

Good luck with the nomination! —TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 17:01, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Done all except title change. Thanks! Max263 (talk) 18:10, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Per WP:NCTV, If the main TV series page title was disambiguated from other entertainment properties (e.g. other TV series, films, novels, etc.), related list pages may or may not need to be further disambiguated, depending on whether other list articles exist. Otherwise, the series title is sufficient. See the examples provided at NCTV. Disambiguation stands alone; i.e. as there was no article titled List of awards and nominations received by Percy Jackson and the Olympians, there was no need for it to be titled List of awards and nominations received by Percy Jackson and the Olympians (TV series). -- Alex _talk 22:51, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the context! That makes sense to me now. Max263, thanks for addressing these, more comments above. —TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 01:48, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification Alex. Comments have been addressed. Max263 (talk) 12:07, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Nice work, Max263, I'm happy to support! Noting for the coordinators that I haven't done sourcing spot-checks or assessed the list's completeness, which I hope another reviewer will be able to tackle. —TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 22:21, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (7/2/26)

Lead

• "At the 3rd Children's and Family Emmy Awards, the show won eight of the sixteen awards for which it was nominated (a record number of nominations until surpassed by Star Wars: Skeleton Crew the following year),[11][12] including Outstanding Young Teen Series." --> I really dislike the use of parentheses in prose. You might think of something like, "At the 3rd Children's and Family Emmy Awards, it received a record sixteen nominations, ultimately winning eight, including Outstanding Young Teen Series." The mention of Star Wars is really not relevant in this article.
• "Scobell earnt" --> That's "earned".

Tables

• I'm not sure I see the need for two types of notes.
• Your tables have column scopes, but not row scopes. See MOS:DTAB for more information.

User:Max263: I do like how you have separated out the major awards, and it is appropriate to have the sort function in place even with only one item on the list, because, as you've said, the show is still in production and will likely receive more nominations. Please let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:22, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Thanks for the suggestions, implemented lead suggestions and rowscopes. I think the two types of notes is justified, as they are a fully different type of footnote (giving more nominees instead of providing explanatory context) and this makes the notelist neater as a result. Max263 (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Four paragraphs for a lead is excessive, and in this case, unnecessary as the paragraphs are relatively short. Personally, I would merge the first two paragraphs into one larger paragraph. No rephrasing needed. And I would merge the last two together, omitting the “Additionally” from the first sentence of what is now the fourth paragraph. The first two paragraphs naturally fit together, as do the last two. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:54, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

I kinda disagree with this, I think the four paragraphs are fairly distinct: show info, general reception, general awards, cast awards (have made slight adjustment to fit this). I think the paragraphs would become a bit chunky if merged, but am open to adjusting if others agree with merging. Max263 (talk) 05:36, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

User:Max263: That second paragraph is only two sentences, which is very short. If you don't like my previous suggestion, you might consider linking the second and third paragraphs together, since they both deal with acclaim that the series received. In the end, you would have three paragraphs, which, while not ideal, would also not be terrible. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:01, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Have adjusted into three paragraphs. Max263 (talk) 15:47, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:06, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Source review (7/2/26)

• No. 2 – checks out
• No. 8 – checks out
• No. 13 – unable to verify; website locked up due to a popup ad. Edited to add: verified content using archive link.
• No. 24 – link is dead. Switch to archive link.
• No. 27 – checks out
• No. 35 – checks out
• No. 38 – checks out

I would recommend checking to make sure that the links are still active. If not, set the citation to dead so the archive link is automatically used instead. I only found No. 24 which needs changed, but there may be others. Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:54, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Good catch on the archive links. Max263, you may find this report helpful. —TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 03:50, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

I have checked every source and all are now archived, with No. 24 (now 23) above marked dead as suggested. Max263 (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Source review passed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:54, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

Pierre Gill's entry in the big table sorts incorrectly. That's all I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Sorted, good spot. Max263 (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:53, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620

Image review:

• All images have alt text
• All images contribute encyclopedic value to the list
• All images are appropriately licensed for either public domain or Creative Commons
• Sourcing verifies for each image; good faith assumed where claimed as uploader's own work

Support on images. If you have any time or inclination, I have a couple fairly old nominations (one, two) and would appreciate feedback. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 23:14, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1 becomes !scope=row | 1. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead. You have rowscopes called out, but it has to be a '!' cell, not a '|' cell; also you have commas in your cell styling? Not sure why.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:48, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  @PresN: I think I've sorted it, please may you have a quick look to see if all is in order? Max263 (talk) 16:05, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  Looks good; the captions don't need to be that long but it's okay that they are. --PresN 19:34, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Promoting. --PresN 01:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

Timeline of the 1999 Pacific hurricane season

Nominator(s): Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 00:44, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

With Timeline of the 1998 Pacific hurricane season headed for promotion, here is another timeline for your consideration. The 1999 Pacific hurricane season was one of the quietest on record, but still boasted a few hurricanes, including two long-lived major hurricanes. One of them was Dora, which traversed all three North Pacific tropical cyclone basins. (Sound familiar?) Unfortunately, two hurricanes—Adrian and Greg—did cause damage and/or fatalities.

I will endeavor to address any concerns as quickly as I can. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 00:44, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• I'll take a look at this one. Nudge me if I haven't done so by the end of the weekend..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Support - I couldn't find anything to pick up on....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:03, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. I too couldn't find anything to fix. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:54, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

List of World Heritage Sites in Niger

Nominator(s): Tone 09:13, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Niger has 3 WHS and 19 sites on the tentative list. Standard style. I wanted to archive the references using the standard bot approach but for some reason it doesn't work - help appreciated. Tone 09:13, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Drive by comment

• I would add what you wrote just above, that Niger has 3 WHM in the lead of the section "World Heritage Sites". There should be a short lead that summarizes the table there. You did this in the next section already. Mattximus (talk) 14:16, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

After some considerations, why not. Added. I'll follow the suite in future lists, not sure if I want to go back and manually fix the previous ones. Maybe at some point. --Tone 06:30, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "An interesting feature [singular] are [plural] the mountains" - maybe the easiest way to avoid this would be to merge it with a later sentence to give "The area features mountains of blue marble which are an important stop for migratory birds crossing the Sahara"
• "It was located on important trade route" => "It was located on an important trade route"
• "Lougou was place of worship" => "Lougou was a place of worship"
• "but have almost completely disappeared from the region by the 1950s" => "but had almost completely disappeared from the region by the 1950s"
• "It is home the endangered addax," => "It is home to the endangered addax,"
• "however, not all parts are navigable at all times" => "however not all parts are navigable at all times"
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:06, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Thanks! Fixed all. --Tone 06:30, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:40, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Image review - support

All images are appropriate and have relevant licenses:

• Niger location map.svg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Montagnes Bleus1.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Elephants bath park w Niger 2006.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• 1997 277-9A Agadez mosque cropped.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license via Flicr.
• Zinder DSC 4487 (6328130381).jpg has an appropriate CC SA license via Flicr.
• La ville de Dosso 05.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Niger, Salewa (2), mosque.jpg has an appropriate GNU and CC SA license.
• Oasis-Bilma.jpg has an appropriate CC SA and GNU license.
• Djado-nah.jpg has an appropriate German CC SA license.
• Bastón de mando de piedra. Cultura Bura. Níger. Cronología sin determinar.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Giraffe koure niger 2006.jpg has an appropriate Flicr CC SA license.
• Termit1.jpg has an appropriate CC Attribution Unported license
• Réserve biosphère de Gadabedji 16.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Mare d'Ounsolo ou N'Solo de Téra (detilt).jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Lake Chad (MODIS 2018-06-07).jpg has an appropriate US PD license.
• Niger2.jpg has an appropriate GNU and CC SA license.
• 1997 278-10 Sahara glyph.jpg has an appropriate Flicr CC SA license.
• Museum of Natural History Sarcosuchus.jpg has an appropriate CC Attribution Generic license.
• Le lac de Madarounfa 03.jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.
• Waving fisherman on Lake Chad (detilt).jpg has an appropriate CC SA license.

All the images have ALT tags for accessibility.

That all seems good to me. simongraham (talk) 15:55, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

I have a booklet published by UNESCO detailing all of their sites in the Czech Republic. I think I got it last year when the ISU was promoting Prague as the host of the 2026 World Figure Skating Championships. If you want it, I'll be happy to send it to you. Just e-mail me your address. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:18, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• The row about Agadez doesn't have a header cell.
• "Niger comprises about a fifth of the Niger river catchment basin" to "Niger (the country) comprises about a fifth of the Niger river catchment basin", assuming that's what was meant.
• "Terminalia leiocarpa- The" I think you wanted to end the sentence after leiocarpa.
• That's all that I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:52, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  Fixed, thanks! Tone 18:42, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:56, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

List of George Washington paintings

Nominator(s): ReelCosmix (talk) 12:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the standard and is more developed than a lot of other lists on Wikipedia

Comments

• A couple of drive-by comments (in no way a full review):
  • The article should not start "A list of notable paintings" per MOS:THISISALIST
  • While (as far as I know) not prohibited it looks really weird to have the reference column as the very first column. If refs are in their own column, the norm is to have them at the end -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:48, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

  Okay, thank you for this feedback; I will make adjustments now! ReelCosmix (talk) 15:49, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (6/25/26)

• There is no reason for the Reference column to be sortable. Removing that will narrow the column. Also, replace Ref. with {{Abbr|Ref.|References}}.

Lead

• "the first U.S. president" --> "the first president of the United States".
• "one of the many Founding Fathers of the United States." --> "one of the country's many Founding Fathers."
• No reason for "Patriot" to be capitalized.
• "Washington presided over the Philadelphia Convention in 1787, which drafted the Constitution of the United States, and served as president of the United States from 1789 to 1797." --> As written, this implies that the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 served as president of the United States from 1789 to 1797, which we know is not correct.
• No reason for "Vice President" to be capitalized.
• "he was entombed at Mount Vernon estate in Fairfax County, Virginia, alongside his wife Martha Washington." --> Did Martha Washington die before him? Because I thought he died first.
• "Washington was painted many times throughout his life due to his high importance in the United States." --> This is a very banal sentence.
• "Because he was also the first president of the United States, people wanted official portraits for government buildings, statehouses, and public institutions." --> Source no. 12 says nothing about any of this.
• "There were also no cameras during his lifetime, as they were invented about 50 years after he died, meaning paintings were the main way to preserve his likeness." --> Sources no. 13 and 14 say nothing about cameras.
• However, sources 12, 13, and 14 do discuss the questionable validity as to how accurate these portraits of George Washington actually were, which your lead does not discuss.
• "One of the most widely recognized paintings of Washington is the Athenaeum Portrait." --> Source no. 15 does not confirm this statement. The citation is also improperly formatted.
• All of the citations need to be cleaned up and archived.
• Note a: "This painting was never complete, although, many complete copies exist" --> Get rid of that second comma, and end the sentence with a period.

User:Realcosmixyt: To be honest, the quality of the prose is beneath what I would expect from a Featured Article/List. It needs to be cleaned up and strengthened to make it more engaging. It reads more like an essay a student might write for a high school history class. Oppose for now until major improvements are made. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:39, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello! I am really thankful for this feedback as I didn't realize pretty much all of the mistakes you pointed out. I have since fixed a couple of them, and I am planning to fix more. ReelCosmix (talk) 21:05, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

I think this is a very interesting topic, and I will certainly be happy to change my vote if the prose is strengthened up. I haven’t looked at the formatting of the table yet, but the contents of the table look good. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:06, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Another drive-by comment

• What's the ordering of the entries within the tables based on? As far as I can see it isn't chronological by date or alphabetical by either the title or the name of the artist. It just seems to be completely random........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:16, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hey! Thanks for pointing that out! I've ordered them by date now. Oldest to newest. ReelCosmix (talk) 17:46, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620 (image review)

I've just finished looking over the images, and unfortunately there are some issues. Getting the positives out of the way: all images add encyclopedic value to the list, and are appropriately licensed for either Creative Commons or the public domain. Sourcing also verifies for most images, though I went over to Commons to fix some broken links (see my edits there), and I don't consider Christie's to be an adequate source for File:Thomas Sully, Portrait of General George Washington, 1842.jpg. The biggest issue is the complete absence of alt text. Quoting from WP:MOSALT: In situations where the image is not available to the reader, perhaps because they have turned off images in their web browser or are using a screen reader due to a visual impairment, the alternative text ensures that no information or functionality is lost. Alt text needs to be added to every image before this list can pass FLC; until then, this list falls short on accessibility. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 15:17, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Hey! Thank you for pointing this out! I have added some alt text to a few of the paintings, and I'll finish the rest later when I have the time. Thank you again for pointing this out! I probably should have requested a peer review before blindly nominating this list for FLC. ReelCosmix (talk) 16:01, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

👍 please ping me when you're done, Realcosmixyt. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 17:42, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Hey @Dylan620 I've finished adding all alt text, so hopefully that fixes that issue. ReelCosmix (talk) 17:49, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Also, I think Christie's is the WP:RS for this painting; I couldn't find any other sources. ReelCosmix (talk) 17:55, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

And so it is! My apologies—the Commons upload didn't link to the website, which I've now fixed, and the word "Christie's" on its own sounded very vague. And fantastic work on the alt texts. I'm happy to support on images. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 21:45, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much! ReelCosmix (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1 becomes !scope=row | 1. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead. The row header doesn't have to be the first cell, so for this one it should probably be the title, not the image.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:45, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Glossary of sound laws in the Indo-European languages

Nominator(s): ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:36, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

It is difficult to overstate the importance of Indo-European linguistics on historical and comparative linguistics as a whole. This glossary, which began as a nearly unreferenced list of fewer than three dozen well-known sound laws, has been a nearly two-and-a-half-year effort and I learned more than I could ever hope to know about phonological change (and editing Wikipedia!) as a result. I humbly submit this list as my first FLC. If it passes, this will be only the second glossary ever to achieve FL status after Glossary of bird terms, which I based my style and formatting on. I look forward to all your comments. ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:36, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

• Comments and Support by Kisseran

Fantastic work! I only have some comments about the content for now:

• Melchert has changed his position on Čop's law in Anatolian here[1]

• Incredible catch! I had missed this publication entirely. ThaesOfereode (talk) 23:50, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

• Sturtevant's law should read "after Proto-Anatolian" instead of "after Proto-Indo-European" (see footnote 74 of Yates 2019 and elsewhere)

• Fixed. Good catch again. ThaesOfereode (talk) 23:50, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

• Laryngeal metathesis could probably make this list, as discussed in any of Byrd's overviews of PIE phonology

• I considered this, but I wanted to ensure the list contained entries that were distinctly IE; "laryngeal metathesis" could very well describe a sound law in a completely different family than IE. I can still add it, but I wanted to explain my having left it out. ThaesOfereode (talk) 23:50, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

• Have you checked Collinge's "Further Laws of Indo-European"[2]? The relevant ones he lists include Oettinger's (Hittite), Nyman's (Latin), and Lorentz's (Germanic).

• Incredible catch again. I was hoping to avoid Collinge's horrifically byzantine writing style, but this is great stuff I haven't caught before. Just when you think you've got all the named laws, right? Will review and integrate as appropriate. ThaesOfereode (talk) 23:50, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

• Is there any pattern to the parentheticals (not fully accepted), (not widely accepted), (controversial), and (not fully solved)? I find it unlikely that fine distinctions can be made between all of these labels. It would probably help to lay out the criteria for labeling a sound law as one of these in the lead. Also, if these labels are to be used, then they seem to be missing from some entries that are controversial, e.g. the Kortlandt effect.

• Yes-ish. "Not fully accepted" indicates that there are notable hold outs against it (usually Pronk or Kortlandt), "not widely accepted" means there are notable hold outs for it, "controversial" means that I couldn't make a determination as to the general acceptability but that there were substantive challenges or deeply entrenched pro- and anti-camps, and "not fully solved" means that the law is generally accepted but there are substantive instances where the law should apply but doesn't and no one has provided an explanation for the exceptions yet. I'll mill through and make sure I didn't miss any; I think one of the Thurneysen laws probably needs a tag. I don't remember the Kortlandt effect being challenged in the literature. Do you have a source for that? ThaesOfereode (talk) 10:37, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

• Matasovic explicitly calls the Kortlandt effect "still-disputed" in the new Leiden volume this year.[3] Kisseran (talk) 17:28, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

• Incredible catch again. Thank you! ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• the redlink ejective theory in Winter's law should link to glottalic theory (or perhaps create a new redirect if you have seen the term used, but I personally don't remember such a term in usage)

• Did both here since it's so named in the source iirc. I don't know how I got my wires so crossed I forgot what glottalic theory is. ThaesOfereode (talk) 23:50, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

• In the lead "Sound laws are processes..." is slightly confusing because I do not think Neogrammarians (or many subsequent scholars) would consider sound laws to be processes. Trask, the cited source, doesn't call them processes either. I would perhaps characterize them instead as "instances of phonological change" or "regular sound correspondences".

• Yeah, fair enough. I think they are kind of processes, but you're correct that that's not reflected in the source. ThaesOfereode (talk) 23:50, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Kisseran (talk) 11:35, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

@Kisseran: Genuinely a treat to work with someone well-versed in IE linguistics here on the quality articles side of WP, and especially someone so new! I look forward to your contributions to the project at large. Thank you for the kind words and constructive comments. I will work on the integration of the new Collinge source, but in the meantime, I believe all other comments have been addressed. ThaesOfereode (talk) 23:50, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

@ThaesOfereode: Thank you for the praise! I'm glad you found my comments helpful. In fact I was inspired to start editing partially from seeing your IE linguistics work. I have gone through the page more thoroughly for some more comments:

Some further comments on factual content:

• Lubotsky's law is conditioned by clusters beginning with voiced unaspirated (glottalic per Lubotsky) stops, see Lubotsky's original 1981 paper and Lubotsky's Indo-Iranian chapter in the HSK handbook (ch. 110)

• Done. ThaesOfereode (talk) 22:40, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• Adjarian's law should be reworded to explain that it is conditioned by the reflex of the PIE voiced aspirates, since the prose is currently both ambiguous and assumes a value for the Armenian stop series when there is debate (see the Armenian chapter in the new Leiden volume again)

• Done. ThaesOfereode (talk) 22:40, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
• Should be good to go. As usual, let me know if something is wrong. ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:04, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

• Centumization should mention this article by Melchert[4] published in Sound of Indo-European 2, which states that Anatolian is centum in traditional terms, with Luvo-Lycian (aka Luvian aka Luwian aka Luwic) being the centum counterpart to Albanian. Also relevant in considering the presentation of Anatolian might be Ringe 2024 (p. 116), although the words "centum" and "satem" are not used there.

• I'll review Melchert here, but Kloekhorst[5] describes Anatolian (specifically using Luvo-Lycian as examples) as maintaining all three series, as do Hyllested & Joseph in Olander (2022), p. 239. Probably a good idea to describe the placement of Albanian though so I'll add a footnote. Also, just for clarity, when you discuss Ringe (2024) you mean this, right? Or am I missing a publication somewhere? ThaesOfereode (talk) 18:32, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• The question here isn't so much as whether (Proto-)Anatolian maintained all three series, but whether centumization can be an "eventual" process after sound changes have already produced distinct outcomes from the etymological three series. In Melchert's newer paper, his implicit position seems to be that "if Albanian is satem, then Anatolian is centum, and Albanian is satem". Of course this position is slightly less appealing according to the previous received opinion (Melchert 1994) that the contrast was maintained unconditionally, rather than conditionally. Given that centum languages and satem languages are already not considered clades, I think this is a reasonable presentation. There's no factual inconsistency with Kloekhorst's opinion (although I don't think Kloekhorst has published anything relevant since Melchert's new paper); the main issue is the rather arbitrary definition of centum and satem.Kisseran (talk) 18:49, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

  Yeah, this is all fair enough. I think what I've added works, but if not, just ping me again. ThaesOfereode (talk) 20:49, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

• Also, yes, that is the Ringe 2024 I'm referring to. I had mistakenly assumed that it would have already been in the bibliography.Kisseran (talk) 18:52, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• The two entries for the thorn clusters should be marked (post-Anatolian) or some equivalent, incorporating this Jasanoff paper[6]. See also Ringe's 2024 discussion of thorn clusters. They should also explain that these clusters were identified as containing the dental fricative, rather than as the dental fricative.

• Reviewing Jasanoff, it looks like this might be post-Tocharian too, or am I misreading? Also, Byrd seems to indicate that the "thorn clusters" were seen as simply a dental fricative not as a part of a cluster (p. 24), unless again I'm misreading. ThaesOfereode (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Thorn cluster metathesis, which is not listed here (although it probably could be) is undoubtedly a post-Tocharian development, but otherwise Tocharian's treatment of thorn clusters is unclear (see footnote 10 in the Jasanoff paper). I don't think you are misreading Byrd, but he's certainly made a mistake here: the segment thorn was seen as a dental fricative, but thorn clusters are so named because they are clusters containing thorn, i.e. *kþ, gð, gðʰ. This is correctly described in Jasanoff's paper, and e.g. also this paper by Kloekhorst[7] and this paper by Watkins[8]. You can also check the original Brugmann and contemporary sources for yourself. In Byrd's chapter in the HSK handbook, he adds a citation to Schindler's classic paper in the same passage, which correctly describes the original conception, indicating that Byrd probably made an honest mistake in his prose here, understandably, as he probably wrote that quite early on in his PhD thesis.Kisseran (talk) 18:49, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Lachmann's law should specify "etymological voiced unaspirated stop" instead of "underlyingly voiced stop": the fact that it doesn't operate with etymological voiced aspirates is significant, and underlying works only for the generative accounts from Kiparsky, while etymological is neutral, applicable to all accounts, and also the verbiage of the cited Jasanoff paper.

• Fair point. Fixed. ThaesOfereode (talk) 18:02, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Some further minor comments on the prose and formatting:

• Sturtevant's law should be labeled (Hittite) per the previously noted change

• Done. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Lubotsky's law "Some linguists have rejected the law on the basis that they believe Proto-Indo-European had the vowel *a" should be clarified to explain that they reject putative examples of the law that they believe should be reconstructed with *a and without a laryngeal

• Done. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Rix's law "the laryngeal undergoes coloring" should be clarified to explain that it is the epenthetic vowel that the laryngeal colors, per the cited source.

• My understanding was that epenthesis was a possible-but-not-necessary step; Höfler (2024)'s table uses the "direct vocalization" approach (cf. Byrd [2015, p. 27]), so I've moved that citation forward and added a footnote describing the debate. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Pinault's law could mention Byrd's reformulation of the conditioning environment to be the onset of a syllable. .

• Good idea. Added. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Grassmann's law should probably mention that it was independently innovated in Greek and Sanskrit. The label (pre-Proto-Tocharian) is understandable in the context that Grassmann's law remained productive synchronically in Greek and Sanskrit, but to be consistent with the labeling of other sound laws it is probably less confusing to just label it (Tocharian) as Ringe 2024 does.

• Yeah, fair points. I've added a bit (plus apparently Grassmann's is pre-Vedic per HSK). ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• The labels (Ingvaeonic languages) and (High German languages) could probably be changed to (Ingvaeonic) and (High German) for consistency with the rest of the article, unless there's some nuance I'm missing with the differing usages

• Yes to Invaeonic, though I think the simple "High German" is more confusing than necessary since that usually refers to Hochdeutsch alone rather than other HG varieties like Yiddish. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Similarly the label of (Ancient Greek) for the two parts of Grassmann's law could probably be changed to just (Greek) for consistency.

• For sure, done. I wonder if we might just change it to "Hellenic" for consistency at large. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• I personally think "Hellenic" would be unnecessary additional jargon that doesn't even enjoy much scholarly popularity either. If there's ever any cause for confusion (e.g. the unlikely event that Tsakonian has a named sound law to itself) then I would be in favor of changing it. Having Hellenic as a heading makes sense to me too, if not only for the reason that if the heading were named Greek, plenty of people would be rushing to change it back to Hellenic on sight. Kisseran (talk) 19:16, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• The formulation of Osthoff's law is rather confusing and syntactically ambiguous. I would either be sightly more elaborate with the description (as done by Trask and Collinge) or adopt Byrd's clean prosodic formulation.

• I think I've fixed this (+ examples). ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Eichner's law: "a-coloring and o-coloring laryngeals"

• Done. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• Joseph's law: "During the period between Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Celtic"

• Done. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• In the lead, it might make sense to state negatively that in families with many well-attested members—Slavic, Germanic, Italic, and Indo-Iranian—sound laws affecting only one descendant language are excluded. There are more branches without many well-attested members, and it is also otherwise unclear what counts as well-attested.
• The following sentence is also somewhat strange, since my understanding of Olander's "neo-traditional" model involves the primary branches of PIE being Anatolian and Indo-Tocharian. I don't think referring to any of the "main branches" of IE requires any explicit acknowledgment at all, since this is neither common practice in the literature nor is it actually relevant to any entry in the list. There aren't really any notable named sound laws that are prominently attributed to more contentious subgroupings like Italo-Celtic or Greco-Armenian (and if there were, then the subgroupings probably wouldn't be so contentious), or the minor languages like Phrygian or Messapic.

• So three things here:

• By "neo-traditional" here, I was mostly trying to avoid the various outdated "traditional" models (like Schleicher's) which contained phylogenetic branches like "Aryo-Greco-Italo-Celtic" and "Slavo-Germanic" which are now contrary to modern scholarship. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
• While descriptions of this model are not necessarily found in other literature, I think its inclusion here is helpful. For one, it seems like something that could be reasonably challenged so I wanted to get head of that. For another, it's more likely that a reader will develop an interest in historical/comparative linguistics for the first time from reading Wikipedia on their phone than they are to randomly select Szemerényi's or Beekes's introductions to IE ling off a bookshelf. I think it's important to guide that nascent (or simply uneducated) interest with what the current view of IE linguistics is. Obviously, this page is hugely technical (but still appropriate given the level, I think), but it's a jumping off point. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
• Third, some laws did have some putative "higher-order" approaches; I've included Cowgill's Italo-Celtic view of the pius law, for example. I think it's the only one here right now (I'm admittedly sympathetic to – but not convinced of – Italo-Celtic), but given that these laws sometimes linger in rather obscure papers, there may be other laws that "may apply" to less widely-accepted groupings. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• I probably didn't word my concern very well here. I assumed that by "main branches", you meant something different from "primary branches", in the sense of PIE's immediate descendant nodes on the phylolinguistic tree, since you didn't write "Anatolian and Indo-Tocharian". However, I get the sense that even in the outdated models with more intermediate nodes within core IE, those groupings were never treated with greater importance than the lower level uncontroversial groups. I also thought that this could not be reasonably challenged, although I was clearly mistaken on account of you thinking otherwise. Perhaps it is helpful to write that Anatolian split off first, then Tocharian, then the rest is uncertain, but my main concern with the current way it's phrased is that it makes the position seem more controversial than it really is, potentially giving undue weight to holdouts against the scholarly consensus without even mentioning them by name. After all, the lead doesn't explicitly say that the list adopts laryngeal theory, for example. Kisseran (talk) 19:16, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

  No worries, I think I see. So in accordance with WP:ONEDOWN, I've aimed to have this accessible to a late-undergraduate-to-early-graduate linguistics student. I think this is a very difficult page to pare down to my usual target of high school student, in part because a glossary demands a particular kind of terseness to be useful (see also: WP:TECH-CONTENT). I think we may be diving into silicate chemist territory here, but special care needs to be taken in the lede (from ONEDOWN: The lead section should be particularly understandable). I don't think your average early undergrad (certainly not a high schooler) really knows the branches outright, especially if they're not historical/comparative-focused, so I feel it's important to say "look, here is the main model and this is supported by most people" and I don't think that necessarily creates undue weight. My understanding is that laryngeal theory does not have any serious critics at this point; there is still debate about Italo-Celtic and other subgroups in the two branching models (Ringe's and Gray's; cf. Olander 2022, p.6) and I believe Kortlandt had (has?) some other ideas. I can see the standard phylogenetic view of IE languages changing in the near term (i.e., 10–20 years); I don't see that for laryngeal theory.

  
  

  All that having been said, do you think I should change it from "main" to "primary" branches? I'm happy to write about Anatolian breaking off first, though Tocharian's being next (though I agree) is not noted in Olander's neo-traditional model, only in the branch model. ThaesOfereode (talk) 01:16, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

  Yes, while the sentence itself is clearly ONEDOWN, I fail to see its particular importance for understanding anything in the body. I get that most people new to the topic won't know the branches by heart, but for each sound law, the important thing to understand is what branches are subject to that law, which is made perfectly clear in each entry. If there were many entries of the form like (all branches except Anatolian, Tocharian, and Germanic), then yes, you'd need to keep in mind which branches are there for it to make sense. I think the wording of "this glossary uses..." is what really sets me off: considering that the example of Romance sound changes in the first paragraph is most certainly less relevant to the content of the body, but it is clear that it provides context for the reader in understanding the content, and not a practical, arbitrary decision with other sensible alternatives. If you had simply wrote in wikivoice in the first paragraph something like "Anatolian was the first to branch off, and the internal relations of the rest, Albanian, Armenian, ... Tocharian, are undetermined", then that would seem to me as completely appropriate mundane background information and I wouldn't have any reason to comment on that.

  There are no serious critics of the "neo-traditional model" because the point of the concept is to reflect the state of academic consensus. It doesn't state that the core IE branches have no intermediate relations with each other, but merely that its undetermined (Olander p.5). Nobody seriously disputes the facts that (a) Anatolian branches off first and (b) the rest of the relationships are undetermined, even though they might have personal opinions about the organization of core IE.

  I don't think you should change it from "main" to "primary", because that would be incorrect: Indo-European has two primary branches, one of which is Anatolian. In the interest of avoiding confusion perhaps it is best to avoid both terms altogether. You are right that Olander doesn't put Tocharian next in his neo-traditional model; I should have double checked before saying that. Kisseran (talk) 16:19, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

  Ah, I see now. I apologize sincerely for the confusion. I think maybe when I wrote that bit I was simply trying to explain why the branches are set out the way they are so that the target audience (late under–early grad) wouldn't go hunting for Celtic under Italo-Celtic, though saying it out loud (or typing it out loud?) does make that seem a little silly in retrospect. What do you think about replacing that sentence with something like "While there is consensus that the Anatolian languages broke off first, the internal relations of the other widely-accepted subfamilies – Albanian, Armenian, ... Tocharian – are undetermined. This glossary uses this model, known as the "neo-traditional" model, to organize laws." or words to that effect? Open to input here too. ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:04, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

  I think having the first sentence would make sense to me. I think if you don't say it, then it goes without saying that the organization of a list is going to adhere to academic consensus (and would be obvious to anyone looking at the TOC). Also, while the contents of the model are accepted by everyone, I'm pretty sure that the name "neo-traditional model" is just a neologism Olander made up, and I don't think it has found too much usage yet. Also, this glossary isn't actually organized by such a model, because both Anatolian and the core IE branches are second-level headings. If you really were to organize the page according to the neo-tradtional model, then all the core IE branches should be third level headings, but clearly that would not be a good organizational decision. I suppose you could mention that instead, but then again I really doubt that it would be a cause for confusion otherwise. Kisseran (talk) 14:41, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

• The external links section is empty, as it probably should be, but the heading is still there

• Looks like someone beat me to it. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• I presume the further reading section is just the leftover sources that happen to have been left out from citation? Otherwise I don't really see any purpose or intent in the organization of the section. Given how meticulously referenced the list already is, I feel that a further reading section is quite unnecessary. For the laws with their own pages, it would make more sense to add the relevant further reading to those pages, and for the laws mentioned in the list but without their own page, it might be more useful to integrate those into the prose of their respective entries. For the general reference works, I think they absolutely do not belong in the "further reading" on this page since this page is already more comprehensive and detailed than every general reference work I can think of.

• This is a artifact of my writing process; often I will have found a potentially useful source that I just don't have the energy or time to mine so I will plug the DOI into Citer (which is amazing if you haven't used it before) and put in further reading until I can get to it. This is in part so I don't lose it, in part because I don't want to re-template the citation, and in part because I think sources I don't get to (or find out later don't really have the information I was looking for, are entirely redundant from other sources, etc.) are still useful to other readers.

• I agree with the IP user on the talk page that the see also section is somewhat bloated. I think keeping all of the links to other named sound laws makes sense, since those are clearly in the same defining category as this page. It is also natural for a reader to wonder about named sound laws in other language families once finishing this page, and for the Indo-European ones linked it could have the additional utility of preventing future editors from mistakenly adding them to the list. For someone who is concerned about named sound laws in general (and not just in IE), they might struggle to find all of the linked sound laws on their own without having heard of them beforehand (although in the ideal world there'd simply be a page named Glossary of Sound Laws in general). For the other links, I don't see the same utility, nor do I think they're in the same defining category. Phonological history of Old Irish and Historical Chinese phonology are pages that anyone who knows about the existence of Old Irish and Chinese would be able to navigate to, and it might be sensible to have them listed at the bottom of Proto-Indo-European phonology. Grammatical aspect in the Slavic languages feels out of place because it is so specific and also the only page of its kind linked in the section. Perhaps it would feel less out of place to link a comparable "Grammatical developments in the Indo-European languages" page if such a page existed, but I can't really see any relation between the two pages aside from the trivial ones of both being broadly about Indo-European linguistics and being written by you. I think Caland system and Indo-European ablaut are given enough prominence in the navbox already, but I don't think those two links would stand out to me in either possible treatment.

• I think I agree with you. The thought process behind the Slavic aspect one was that it was also about IE change, but you're right that it's a stretch to include it here. I've removed the others as requested, though I kept the Old Irish one just because it's basically a collection of sound laws, just unnamed sound laws. I asked for guidance elsewhere on whether this is allowed, but I thought a good way of reducing bloat here would be to keep the other IE laws (e.g., Jakubinskij's), remove the tangentially related ones (e.g., Slavic aspect), and collapse the rest into simply Category:Sound laws. Would that work from your perspective? ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

This has been discouraged by an admin I spoke with. Will consider other ideas in the meantime. ThaesOfereode (talk) 17:52, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

• I think the clear ideal eventual solution is having some sort of "List(s) of Sound Laws" page to link to, but in the meantime I'm ambivalent with regard to keeping or removing non-IE sound laws from the section. Perhaps as a compromise (and to ensure that it doesn't grow out of hand), the section could link to only the named non-IE sound laws with their own page? Kisseran (talk) 19:31, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

  My knee-jerk reaction is that, given that naming sound laws is a primarily IE thing to do, maybe there should be a "Glossary of non-IE sound laws" page, but I feel like maybe there's a better approach. ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:17, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

Kisseran (talk) 17:28, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

@Kisseran: Thanks for the kind words. Glad to see my editing is having some downstream effect too! This is all tremendously helpful and I'm working on integrating the larger issues into the page right now, but wanted to let you know I've addressed some of the smaller problems.

@ThaesOfereode: I've responded to some of the responses so far, and in the interest of not dragging on the review any more than it needs to be I'm just going to add some final comments without waiting for you to finish the previous batch:

• Several things with Bugge's rule: "become voiced fricatives whenever accent falls...". Also, is there any reason why "not less than three syllables" is directly quoted? I think it wouldn't be OR to just write "three or more syllables". The following sentence about hemp and kannabis is wrong, or at least mistates the cited Collinge passage: Bugge accepted the correspondence despite hænep being voiceless-initial.

• No reason for the quote on second look; must've just struck me at the time. Fixed the accent issue and removed parts of the rule. Using this space to once again curse Collinge's nightmarish writing style. ThaesOfereode (talk) 23:25, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

• Kluge's law: "common Germanic"—did you mean "Common Germanic"? It would probably be clearer to just write Proto-Germanic.

• I think I meant it as in "common to all Germanic languages", but your suggestion works to so done. ThaesOfereode (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

• Bartoli's law: words ending in short-long metrical feet... the word becomes paroxytone...

• Good catch. Fixed with a tweak. ThaesOfereode (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

• Exon's law: "do not undergo this process as they succeed the law chronologically" or some other clear equivalent phrasing.

• Yep, done. ThaesOfereode (talk) 20:59, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

• Thurneysen-Havet's law: I'm pretty sure "heterosyllabic" is completely redundant to specify in that position and also not stated in any of the cited sources.

• Fixed. ThaesOfereode (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

• Interlanguage links on authors in the bibliography is somewhat confusing as I assumed the labels were about the texts, but I don't know if anything can or should be done about that. The titles make it pretty obvious what language the texts are in.

• Yeah, not much to be done there unfortunately. I wish they would let us use {{ill}} templates in the citations but alas... ThaesOfereode (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

• Are you sure the archive.org links to full books aren't copyright violations?

• This should be good to go now, I think. Let me know if anything else looks a little sketchy. ThaesOfereode (talk) 00:10, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

• All the images are encyclopedic and properly licensed. The modern Irish song and modern Persian video seem rather bizarre to me as choices for illustration here, but they are properly licensed, and a more general audience may well find them helpful, but I wouldn't know. Kisseran (talk) 11:59, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

• Yeah, I really wasn't sure what to put here, but felt like it would be helpful to hear what the languages sound like and felt those two groups were probably the least likely to have been heard by the audience before. I would love to have used something like File:Celtic languages over time.gif, but of course it's uncited and there's a lot of information to mill through to confirm (if such reading even did confirm it). I'll try to look for something more pertinent in the meantime though; I hadn't really thought about these media in quite some time as I was working to get the rest of the laws filled in, so to speak. ThaesOfereode (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

@Kisseran: Should be all caught up here, but let me know if there's still something missing. ThaesOfereode (talk) 22:40, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Seems good to me. Support. In terms of FLC criteria, this article is already clearly superior to Collinge 1985, the only comparable reference work in this subject, in both breadth and prose quality. Kisseran (talk) 04:09, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Shwabb1

• Will review this (for compliance with MOS, clarity, accessibility, and images). For now, just one comment: per MOS:DASHVAR, in the case of en dashes with spaces on both sides, the first space should be non-breaking. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 11:09, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

• Thanks for taking the time to review! I believe the dash issue has been resolved now, but if you find another error, just let me know. ThaesOfereode (talk) 18:26, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Continuing...

• In the lead, link "phonological" to Phonology
• For asno law, link diphthongs. Later on, a reader not familiar with the topic may not know what "[gen. sg.]" stands for, so I also recommend linking to Genitive case and Grammatical number.
• For aspirate throwback, "for whatever reason" can be removed. Also, link "stop" to Plosive.
• For Beekes's law, link "resonant" to Sonorant and "laryngeal" to Laryngeal consonant or Laryngeal theory
• For boukólos rule, link "labiovelars" to Labialized velar consonant
• For centumization, link "assibilate" to Assibilation
• For métron rule, link Gaulish
• For Pinault's law, link "onset" to Syllable#Onset
• For footnote f, link schwa
• For Schwebeablaut, link "syllable code" to Syllable#Coda and "metathesizes" to Metathesis (linguistics).
• For Stang's law, link "acc." to Accusative case
• For Weise's law, I would separate the consonants *ḱ *ǵ *ǵʰ with commas following the structure at the sections ruki sound law and satemization.
• For Rosenthall's law, link "morphophonological" to Morphophonology
• For Čop's law, "syllable contained" → "syllable contains". Later on, link lentition.
• For Ebeling's law, I assume "the language" refers to Proto-Balto-Slavic but this is not clear.
• For Dolobko's law, link "encliticized" to Clitic#Enclitic. Later on, "The law is named after ... who wrote about the law" → "The law is named after ... who wrote about it", or rephrase in another way (the two instances of "the law" not far from each other make the sentence seem clunky to me; this change is just a suggestion, not a requirement). Also, it seems that Illich-Svitych wasn't Russian; "Soviet" would be a more accurate adjective to refer to both linguists.
• For Hartmann's law, missing the closing bracket after (bobróvyj
• So far, very well written, and I have no major complaints. Most of my suggestions are extra wikilinks which should be easy to add (unless you disagree with anything, in which case feel free to contest). I'll go over everything after Balto-Slavic tomorrow. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 22:24, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Continuing...

• Going back to Szemerényi's law, link fricatives. And for Havlík's law, link "moraic" to Mora (linguistics). Now continuing from where I stopped.
• For High German consonant shift, link affricates
• For Thurneysen's law, I believe "stress-bearing" is a compound adjective and should thus be spelled without the hyphen when used predicatively (per MOS:HYPHEN), though I'm not entirely sure on this one (I couldn't find enough evidence of the similarly structured "word-initial" and "word-final" used without a hyphen so not sure whether the same applies here).
• For Verner's law, the first sentence has awkward wording (unless I am misreading it). It would be more clear with an extra "is": "and not word-initial or abutting" → "and is not word-initial or abutting".
• All file licenses check out. Alt text is present and sufficient, and I detected no issues with accessibility. This is it from me, then. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 21:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

List of international goals scored by Cyle Larin

Nominator(s): kline / talk / contribs 20:34, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Round four for FL nominations! I decided to pick this list this time around because it's FIFA World Cup time, and what isn't a better way to celebrate then nominating one of Canada's best goalscorers. Cyle Larin debuted in 2014 and made his climb, passing Dwayne De Rosario to hold the all-time goalscorer record for Canada for two years before being surpassed by Jonathan David in 2024. Hope you enjoy! kline / talk / contribs 20:34, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "A full international for Canada, Larin" - you literally just said that in the previous sentence, there's no need to say it again
• "Larin scored his first and only international hat-trick for Canada " - last two words are redundant - who else would he have scored it for?
• "World Cup Qualification campaign overall" - no need for a capital Q on qualification
• "a remarkable run" - this is POV
• As the table is sortable, stadium names and competitions need to be linked each time (as countries already are)
• That's all I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude All concerns should be addressed. kline / talk / contribs 16:20, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:22, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "Larin scored his first and only international hat-trick as Canada opened their 2022 World Cup qualifying campaign with a 5–1 win over Bermuda on March 25, 2021" - I would advise you link hat-trick since this is the first mention and it's a technical term that readers may find beneficial.

• "against Mexico in a 2022 FIFA World Cup qualifier on November 17, 2021" - same here for 2022 FIFA World Cup qualifiers. Or are you avoiding the links here because they are linked in the table below?

• More of a general comment, but some of the info in paragraph 2 seems redundant. In paragraph 1 you have "Larin's record lasted two years with Jonathan David surpassing him as Canada's record goalscorer with his 31st goal on November 19, 2024", then in paragraph 2 you talk about it again, "Larin's record lasted two years with David surpassing him as Canada's record goalscorer with his 30th goal on November 19, 2024, in a 3–0 win against Suriname", which has a bit more detail. I advise you find a way to merge them for better flow.

• More of a comment here too, but this sentence "Larin became Canada's joint all-time top scorer alongside De Rosario when he scored twice against Mexico in a 2022 FIFA World Cup qualifier on November 17, 2021, in a 2–1 win" is after the "e became Canada's all-time top scorer on January 30, 2022, when he scored his 23rd international goal against the United States, surpassing Dwayne De Rosario's record" from paragraph 1, which feels chronologically off. I had to re-read the two paragraphs a few times to avoid confusion about what came first. I would advise you copyedit this to ensure it flows in chronological order where applicable -- hope that makes sense.

• "At the 2026 FIFA World Cup, played on home soil, Larin scored the equalizing goal in a 1–1 draw against Bosnia and Herzegovina during Canada's opening group stage game, giving Canada their first ever World Cup point." - It would be great to link 2026 FIFA World Cup Group B, since that is where the match details could be expanded by you or other editors in the future.

• That's all I have for now! I made a few changes to the article too, feel free to check it out. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 03:41, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

  @Morogris All concerns should be addressed. kline / talk / contribs 00:47, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

  Great, thank you! Moving to Support for this nom. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 01:23, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• All tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• All tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• All images should have alt-text. Including the flag ones. You might have to ask for changes to the template to achieve this.
• Color/bolding should not be used as the sole visual means of conveying information; use a symbol in addition.
• (please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:58, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

List of murines

Nominator(s): PresN 20:32, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Hey y'all, mammal list #78 in our perpetual series and rodent list #23: Murinae. This is our final species list of the last family in this series, the giant family of Muridae. The subfamily Murinae, is, unfortunately, itself giant, there being over 600 species of Old World mice and rats, and it's not even really dividable into smaller sublists, as they're scattered throughout 136 genera. There's just an absurd number of mice and rats in the world, but I was determined to keep the pattern of the prior 77 lists, and in the end I've managed to find ways to keep it well under the page size limits, including as with our other large mammal lists having the IUCN cites be to the genus pages rather than the species ones so that we don't have 600+ of them. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 20:32, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Image license review

Not checking the maps or alt text (since there's a lot to do). This image review only goes through Hellwald's spiny rat, about halfway down. FWIW, if an image with a broken source link has passed a previous review where source links were generally being checked, that works for me.

• The following may or may not have images at https://collections.nmnh.si.edu/search/mammals/; I looked at the given source links and couldn't quickly determine the answer:
• File:Apomys musculus.jpg
• File:Apomys sacobianus.jpg
• File:Apomys insignis.jpg
• File:Apomys microdon.jpg
• File:Batomys dentatus.jpg

• These done. The NMNH has the worst website for this, but for future reference- if you search for the species name, even though it looks like a gallery of results it's actually just examples, if you click on an image it pulls up a box with all of the images from that collection sample, including these. Links fixed.
  • Thanks, making a note of that. - Dank (push to talk) 00:20, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

• Continuing:
• File:Batomys granti.jpg: Broken source link: very few species images found at that site
• File:Batomys salomonseni.jpg: broken source link: site no longer exists
• File:Bunomys chrysoccomus.jpg: No source link. Also, a search for that species at Naturalis Bioportal (https://bioportal.naturalis.nl/en) comes up empty.
• File:Carpomys melanurus.jpg: source link broken
• File:Carpomys phaeurus.jpg: ditto
• File:Chrotomys silaceus.jpg: ditto
• File:Chrotomys whiteheadi.jpg: ditto
• File:Chrotomys mindorensis drawing.jpg: Opinions welcome on the quality of the image.
• File:Hapalotis albipipes Gould.jpg: Source link goes to a 301-page book. I didn't check every page.

• Worse, it goes to volume 1, but the image was from volume 3. Fixed.

• File:Crateromys australis drawing.jpg: Opinions welcome on the quality of the image.
• File:Crateromys schadenbergi AB Meyer.jpg: source link missing
• File:Crateromys paulus drawing.jpg: Opinions welcome on the quality of the image.
• File:Crunomys fallax.jpg: broken source link
• - Dank (push to talk) 11:59, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
• Let me know if you want help with any of this. - Dank (push to talk) 02:20, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

• Responded inline for the ones I could correct; removed all others. --PresN 21:51, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Thanks much. I'll keep going ... I'll cover about half of the image list, since this is a long one. - Dank (push to talk) 00:38, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

The following two have no source link, and it's the same search as one of the failed searches above.

• File:Echiothrix leucura.png:
• File:Lenomys meyeri.png:

• Removed both

• Continuing:
• File:Echiothrix centrosa.jpg: fixed the source link
• File:Komodomys rintjanus.jpg: source link found and added
• File:Lenothrix cana.jpg: [The file name is wrong, you correctly have Lenothrix canus]: Searched on lenothrix at the Smithsonian, followed the various links, couldn't find this image.

• Found and fixed

• File:Leporillus apicalis - Gould.jpg: page not found, and nothing found at https://museumsvictoria.com.au in a search

• Found in the book from the first section and fixed

• File:Limnomys sibuanus Mearns, 1905 - USNM 125228.jpg: fixed the source link
• Okay, that covers down through Hellwald's spiny rat, which should be about halfway. Hopefully some kind soul will finish up! - Dank (push to talk) 03:08, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

• Thank you! --PresN 14:20, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
  • De nada. Looks good. - Dank (push to talk) 17:55, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Continuing . - Dank (push to talk) 02:55, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

• File:Maxomys-whiteheadi-1.jpeg: no source link

• Removed, arkive is a long-dead site and very hard to search in archive.org

• File:Mesembriomys macrurus.jpg: It's on p. 333, I added the page number at Commons
• File:Micromysminutus1.jpg: The page says the uploader was User:Hecke, but that account doesn't seem to exist on the English or German Wikipedias. There's a User:Hecke at Commons, don't know if it's the same (last comment was 18 years ago).

• That one looks like a personal photo so I believe it

• File:Paramelomys platyops.jpg: The source link goes to a page that links to another page with 22K images.

• That's the entire mammal dataset... can't find it by searching, dropped.

• File:Rattus leucopus 3170.jpg: I don't see an image at the linked page

• Can't find, dropped

• File:Celænomys silaceus and Rhynchomys soricoides.jpg: broken source link

• Removed

• File:Archboldomys kalinga 2008 stamp of the Philippines.jpg: I don't see an image at the linked page

• It's there, details only show up if you log in

• File:Giant White-tailed Rat.jpg: Your call. Source link goes to a page that says all the images are copyrighted; last line of that page has a link to terms of use, which say "You are free to use any of my photos for personal and educational purposes provided ..."

• I don't think that's good enough for CC, replaced with a verified iNaturalist photo.

• That's all of them.
• - Dank (push to talk) 03:50, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

• @Dank: Done, thank you so much! --PresN 14:20, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

• Passed image license check. No problem, my pleasure (when I can find the time). - Dank (push to talk) 17:58, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• "grasslands, and savannas, and deserts, though some species can be found in deserts ..." Remove deserts from one part of the sentence.
• In Cheesman's vlei rat, "Taylor" goes to an article about a football manager. There are a few other places too where this article is wikilinked.
• Bush rat has 4 subspecies according to its article and the range map.
• File:Distribution Archboldomys.svg can be used unless you see a problem with it.
• In Vandeleuria, "Diet: Fruit, buds, and shoorts": I guess you meant "shoots".
• That's all that I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:19, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824: All fixed; I couldn't use the image because it didn't cite where it got the distribution info from, but I went and manually verified that it matched the IUCN and updated the image page so now I can. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 14:07, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:25, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

List of Kim Seon-ho live performances

Nominator(s): Preferwiki (talk) 06:22, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello! This is my third proposal for a feature list nomination. With two of the other lists already promoted to feature lists (Kim Seon-ho filmography and List of awards and nominations received by Kim Seon-ho, here's the latest in this series focusing on his live performances. I have tried my best to incorporate suggestions from my past experience in prior featurelist nominations into this page. Thanks in advance for reviewing! -- Preferwiki (talk) 06:22, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620

• I feel like the lede should be expanded. At the risk of comparing apples to oranges (theater performers to musicians), the two most recently promoted live performance FLs—Coldplay and Justin Timberlake—both have longer ledes, substantially so in the case of Coldplay.
• Following his 2017 television debut, which was...? This is related to the above – I don't think the lede in its current state has enough detail, though what's already here is well-written.
• I do like the lede image – it portrays him well, the sourcing and licensing both verify, and props for including alt text.

That's it for now. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 19:07, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Dylan620, sorry it took me awhile. I’ve expand the lede a bit. Would you mind to take a look. Thank you in advance. Preferwiki (talk) 06:37, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for expanding the lede, but we have new issues:

• What is a joint concert? Did Kim perform with other musicians? If so, then who?
• television debut as supporting role – this currently reads like a placeholder. I would either replace supporting role with the role in question, or as with in a.
• He has also headlined solo tours across Asia. I assume this is referring to solo concert tours? I don't see anything in the body of the list about solo concerts. If the recent Coldplay FL is anything to go from, then each concert should be listed somehow. You know better than I whether this would enter dynamic list territory, but as it currently stands, I'm seeing that my earlier concerns with a lack of comprehensiveness were justified. I note that a cursory Google search for 'kim-seon ho concerts' yielded mentions of a Love Factory Tour – each show from that tour, and any others, should be added to the list.

I'm sorry, Preferwiki, but I must oppose for now per my above concerns, especially the last. I don't think this is comprehensive enough to be featured at this time. I do believe there is a lot of potential here, and I will reconsider my oppose if Kim's solo tours/concerts are added to the list. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 21:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Dylan620. I have added the tour as per your suggestion and also made some updates incorporating your three points above. Please have a look. Thank you. Preferwiki (talk) 00:52, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Much appreciated Preferwiki. I'll take a closer look later today or tonight, but I've struck my oppose as you've addressed the main reason for it. Both new images pass the image review, too (alt text, check; appropriate licensing, check; encyclopedic value, check; sourcing, check). Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 07:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Preferwiki: I'm happy with the changes made, and close to supporting. I have one more concern with the prose: what is meant by digital fan single? Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 19:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Dylan620 He wrote the digital single for his fans. Should I rephrase that to clarify? Preferwiki (talk) 20:58, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Preferwiki: I would say so, because the current wording on its own could imply that it was a fanmade single. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 21:19, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

@Dylan620, I rephrase into this: On April 30, 2024, Kim released the digital single "Miracle" across major music platforms. Written for his fans, the song was co-written by Kim and lyricist Kim Ji-hyang. Preferwiki (talk) 21:31, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

That works for me and I'm pleased to support. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 21:56, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your help @Dylan620 Preferwiki (talk) 22:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Of course! Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 22:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. | Party becomes !scope=col | Party. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead. You have scopes for most of your columns, but not the sub-column headers.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:44, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

  Hi @PresN, I have tried to incorporate ur feedbacks. Would you mind to take a look? Sorry it took me a while. Thanks in advance. Preferwiki (talk) 06:38, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

  Looks good! --PresN 01:03, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks for ur feedback @PresN Preferwiki (talk) 06:23, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

List of songs recorded by My Chemical Romance

Nominator(s): Gavetheman555 (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

My Chemical Romance is one of those bands you could listen to over and over and never get bored. I can't say I haven't listened to I Brought You My Bullets thousands of times and still find new stuff to like about it. I've been working on this for almost two weeks now and I believe it is finally ready for FL status, not much more to really say. (P.S thank you to zmbro for additionally cleaning up the article in preparation for this :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Image review

Here shall be an image review from me. Arconning (talk) 13:39, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

• File:My Chemical Romance rain.jpg - CC BY 2.0, do add an archived page as the license has changed on the website.
• File:Thursday @ Claremont Showgrounds (5 3 2012) (7005619497).jpg - CC BY 2.0, do add an archived page as the license has changed on the website. Caption is unsourced, please do add one.
• File:Howard Benson.png - CC BY-SA 4.0, source for caption as well
• File:Bob Dylan (1965).jpg - Public domain
• File:Rob Cavallo.jpg - CC BY 2.0, source for caption as well
• File:Queen News Of The World (1977 Press Kit Photo 01).jpg - Public domain
• Every image seems to have alt-text for accessibility and are relevant to the article.

Implemented all the changes, thank you for the support! Gavetheman555 (talk) 14:01, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Pass. Arconning (talk) 10:08, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments from zmbro

Hey there! I was happy to be of assistance! I'm not a MCR fan, but I thought I'd provide some comments and thoughts based on my past knowledge of song lists.

• While the lead is good, I think it should focus less on critical reception and more on the songs themselves (i.e. music and lyrics). For instance, The album initially did not receive many reviews from critics after its release,[3] with many divided on the album's writing and themes.[A] Such as...? To me, that would be more beneficial on a page such as this compared to what critics thought of it.

I agree with this 100% Gavetheman555 (talk) 22:52, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

• On the table, are the BMI references required or can the writing credits from the album liner notes suffice? For unreleased songs and the like those are fine, but I question why both are needed for almost every single song... (almost all of them are missing archives too).

I don't think they are required? IMO I think they are simply there to justify the writing credits but I think you could easily verify those without the BMI references Gavetheman555 (talk) 22:52, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

• I don't personally mind it, but in the past, editors have gotten on me about linking every single name in the writer column because it's a sortable table.
• I've usually seen breaks between writers on these types of pages rather than the / separator you have here. I don't mind it here though, as some pages that have it (such as List of songs recorded by Red Hot Chili Peppers) really make the page longer than it should be.

Those are some initial thoughts. Hope these help! – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 18:07, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments! Gavetheman555 (talk) 22:52, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

I apologize, I completely forgot about this. A few more comments before I offer my full support:

• The lead looks a lot better. However, I think there is a little too much detail for this specific page in some areas. For instance,

• Is "however connections between the tracks have generally only been made by fans." that important?

Trimmed and slightly reworded. Gavetheman555 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Do the last 3 sentences of paragraph 2 warrant that much detail?

I slightly agree, tho I attempted to trim it down but couldn't successfully do so without it sounding clunky. Gavetheman555 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• I think It also includes several influences from 1970s classic rock that had not previously been present on Three Cheers for Sweet Revenge,[11][33][37] which include pop music,[11] soft rock,[38] arena rock,[38] metal,[38] and gothic rock.[39] this whole thing is way too overboard for this page. If you think it's warranted, you can leave the first part but remove everything after the comma.

 Done Left the first part. Gavetheman555 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• There's quite a few instances of "however", which is a word to watch when editorializing.

Got it, trimmed it down from 4 to 1 instance. Gavetheman555 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• For a non-lead point, is "War Beneath the Rain" now considered unreleased? It's mentioned as a "previously unreleased track" in the lead but it's still in the unreleased songs table.

 Done Removed "previously" as its never had an official proper studio release by the band. Gavetheman555 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

That's all for now. – zmbro _{(talk) (cont)} 15:05, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

@Zmbro: Addressed all the comments above! :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 19:20, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Dylan620

The Black Parade is their only album I know well, but it's an absolute belter—I've got it on vinyl! I usually do image reviews, but since that has already been taken care of, I'm going to review prose instead.

• I Brought You Brought Me Your Love is considered an emo... – missing a couple words in the album title
• I agree with Zmbro (courtesy ping) that the lede should focus more on the songs and less on their reception. Take, for instance, Their following studio album, The Black Parade, was released in October 2006.[11] The Black Parade received critical acclaim upon its release, with some hailing it as My Chemical Romance's best album.[A] This tells me nothing about what the album's songs sound like, or what their lyrics are about. I think it would be worth mentioning that The Black Parade is a rock opera and includes influences from genres the band didn't toy with on Three Cheers for Sweet Revenge.
• Unlike the band's previous works, which were typically concept albums... – The Black Parade is indeed a concept album, but a) my understanding is that Bullets is only considered a concept album by some fans, and b) the band scrapped the idea of making Three Cheers a concept album; see these sources from the album's article.
• I would remove the word later from the sentence about Danger Days, as its inclusion implies that its release followed the Conventional Weapons EPs when the reverse is true.
• I think it would be worth mentioning that "The Foundations of Decay" contains more influence from progressive rock than their previous works (at least, from the genres I've seen used to describe them).

That's about it for now. Great work, Gavetheman555. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 18:18, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments, all have been implemented! :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 21:22, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

@Gavetheman555: (listening to The Black Parade and "Foundations" as I type this, heh) That is a considerable improvement. Reading the lede again, I do still have a few reservations/suggestions (with the caveat that I've corrected a couple typos myself):

• The length distribution of each paragraph feels a little off now. I would maybe break up the first paragraph after In August 2003, the band announced that they had signed a deal with Reprise Records, leaving Eyeball. This would make for a fitting end to the first paragraph, which would focus on Bullets, while also setting up the next paragraph, which would begin with the release of Three Cheers.
• I'd like to see a little information on lyrical topics for Bullets, and also the incorporation of the two sources I linked above regarding Three Cheers transitioning from a concept album to something more personal, as I think this information is pertinent to the list's scope. (And then maybe split off The Black Parade into its own paragraph?)
• Related to the first point, I suggest merging the two paragraphs that mention Danger Days, as it currently feels like that era of the band's history is split across the two.
• I think it would be worth mentioning that Danger Days is also a rock opera, and maybe give a brief mention of the album's story like you did for The Black Parade.
• The Paper Kingdom also would have been a concept album... I imagine by now you can see where I'm going here 😅
• the band scrapped the project due to being unsatisfied → the band scrapped the project because they were unsatisfied (I'm being a little nitpicky here, but I do think this version flows better)
• with its lyrics reflecting on the band's origins and legacy,[68] and also taking elements from doom metal... → with its lyrics reflecting on the band's origins and legacy.[68] Musically, the song incorporates elements from doom metal... The sentence as currently written implies that the lyrics are partly about those genres, when instead they were musical influences as opposed to lyrical.

Please ping me when you've addressed the above points. Cheers (pun intended), Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 11:50, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

@Dylan620: I think I got everything, let me know if you have anymore comments! :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 13:07, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

I think we're good to go. Happy to support on prose. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 13:21, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 14:42, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

@PresN: I think I did it correctly, can you review it over and check to make sure? Gavetheman555 (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Triple Crown of Thoroughbred Racing (Japan)

Nominator(s): RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 10:47, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Japan's Thoroughbred scene is quite rare in that it has five national Triple Crown titles up for grabs, rather than the usual one or two. While individually there isn't reams of paragraphs to say on each of them, they're still very important in the horse racing world, and still remain very elusive; while there's been many close calls, there's only 17 horses that have achieved any of them (Could have been 18 if the rain had held off in the Takarazuka Kinen today!) I think the article is in pretty good shape now, and gives a very comprehensive overview of the Crowns and their winners.

While I have a FA under my belt, this is my first FL submission (and I believe this is the first thoroughbred related FL submission in general?), so I look forward to your comments. :) As one note for the later 'list of individual X Crown winners' part, I'm happy if that should be moved to its own page if desired by reviewers, seemed to be 50/50 on including based on similar articles. As you can imagine, many of these horses have entries on the Japanese wiki, so ILL links could be added if desired - I'd erred on doing that as I figured a sea of red might be offputting. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 10:47, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi @FLC director and delegates: , a month in and I've not had any reviews on this yet. At the time I didn't realise lists could go through the GAN process. Could this be closed so I can nominate it there and get a preliminary look there before resubmitting please? RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 18:32, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Lists cannot go through the GAN process; it's more accurate to say that some articles are hazy on if they're lists or prose articles. It's up to you if you think this is enough of a prose article to go there, but if you're saying that then it doesn't make sense to bring it back to FLC afterwards. Let me know which route you want to go with. Sorry that you haven't received any reviews; consider asking at relevant wikiprojects, or doing reviews of other nominations and linking back to this one. --PresN 01:39, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

Ah, interesting. I'd seen at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of governors of Ebonyi State/archive1 the list there got recommended to go through GAN, where it got promoted. Is that because it didn't have enough entries to become a FL?

I recommended that, because I felt that article had enough prose/list ratio to justify it. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:12, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Ah I see, thanks for the clarification. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 22:41, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

Either way I guess it's probably best to keep this here then; I'd definitely like to get this to Featured status at some point (or at least, if it fails know where to go next). I'll shop about a bit to see if I can drum up some interest. Thanks for the info! RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 12:45, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• Symbols like ₮, §, ฿ and ₩ are hard to pick out and differentiate at small font sizes. Can you use clearer ones please?
• I think you can remove the "Individual Triple Crown race winners" section completely. Essentially, they are horses that came close, but didn't win the triple crown for that year. If you decide to have pages for these individual triple crowns, then maybe that particular table would be more relevant there.
• Support on accessibility.
• Expect a prose review soon. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:28, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look MP! I get what you mean about the individual winners, I've been mulling that for a while. I'll look to port that over to its own page ala List of winners of Triple Crown of Motorsport races today or tomorrow.

For the symbols, I've changed these all to block symbols (●▲■★); are these any better? Happy to change these again if not - other pages I looked at weren't consistent in their picks. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 11:43, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Update: I've spun off the individual winners to List of winners of Japanese Thoroughbred Triple Crown races RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 11:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

These symbols are better than the previous ones, yes. But, if another reviewer gives you a better suggestion, use that. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:55, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Prose review

• Spring and Autumn Triple Crowns respectively. Unbold the "and".
• "The original races' forms were different" to "The forms of the original races were different"
• "oversee regional level racing instead of the JRA's national focus." Try "oversee regional level racing as compared to the JRA's national focus."
• "aiming to encourage the best Japanese to focus" - I couldn't find this supported by the refs, but it could be a translation issue on my end.
• "2026; but like his father, he lost" to "2026; but he also lost"
• "As of June 2026, no horse has won the Spring Triple Crown since its establishment." Add a ref for this.
• A few refs are missing their archive links. See if iabot has any luck. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

All done! IABot missed quite a few refs out for some reason... The Spring sentence you pointed out got a bit mangled at some point - that part about promoting horses to race in Spring should have been about the Osaka Hai's promotion, not the Triple Crown. I've rewritten that and put a more explicit reference in. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 18:27, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Three of the four captions for the lead image have full stops, but none of them are sentences, so they should not have full stops
• "each a series of three races ran within a single year" => "each a series of three races run within a single year"
• "The Classic Triple Crown title is bestowed to any horse" => "The Classic Triple Crown title is bestowed on any horse"
• "and ran at Yokohama Racecourse over 1,850 meters" => "and run at Yokohama Racecourse over 1,850 meters"
• "and with the exception of Saint Lite, won their year's Best Three-Year-Old Colt award.[" => "and, with the exception of Saint Lite, won their year's Best Three-Year-Old Colt award.["
• "but was discontinued and re-organised into the Queen Elizabeth II Cup in 1976" => "but it was discontinued and re-organised into the Queen Elizabeth II Cup in 1976"
• " the Tiara's shorter distances has led to more frequent winners of the Tiara" => " the Tiara's shorter distances have led to more frequent winners of the Tiara"
• Notes b and c are not sentences so should not have full stops
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks Chris! The full stops for the captions/notes always gets me... I've taken care of all of these now; only one I haven't is the Yokohama as I think ran is correct there (the Satsuki Shō isn't ran on that course anymore). RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 22:48, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support - I think the wording in the Yokohama sentence is ambiguous but I concede that the current wording is probably OK -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:52, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Cillian Murphy on stage and screen

Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 20:56, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it provides an exhaustive list of Cillian Murphy's roles on stage and screen as well as other performances in music videos. I largely modeled this list after a filmography of Robin Williams which was my first to be promoted to featured list status. Comments are welcome. Birdienest81talk 20:56, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "He later made his feature film debut as a bartender in the Irish in the Irish drama"
• "Murphy and Walsh would continue to collaborate" => "Murphy and Walsh continued to collaborate" per MOS:WOULDCHUCK
• "Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man (2026), of which he also co-produced" => "Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man (2026), which he also co-produced"
• Titles starting with "A" or "The" should sort based on the next word in the title
• Roles where the character has a surname should sort based on the surname, not the forename
• Notes and ref columns should not be sortable
• Venue column being sortable in the theatre column is also probably of minimal usefulness
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:51, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: - Done: I have read your comments and everything should look exactly how it is based on your feedback.

--Birdienest81talk 20:19, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:48, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Three of the column headers in each table are missing scopes.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 19:44, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

  All of these seem to have been taken care of. Support on accessibility in addition to the prose. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:35, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Medxvo

• Per WP:SDEXAMPLES, I think the short description should be something along the lines of "Screen and stage credits of Irish actor"
• "a nomination Golden Globe Award" - "for the" is missing before "Golden Globe"
• "The Delinquent Season (2018), Small Things like These (2024)" - "and" is missing before "Small Things like These (2024)"
• "Town Hall Theater" in the entry for The Playboy of the Western World should probably be "Town Hall Theatre" (Irish English, and for consistency with the other uses of Town Hall in the list)
• "From Galway to Broadway and back again." - should this be "From Galway to Broadway and Back Again" instead?
• I believe the "Role" column in the Music videos section should be renamed "Artist"
• Murphy also co-wrote Watchmen, should this be added? (source)
• Should the short films At Death's Door (1999) (source), Zonad (2003) (source), and The Overcoat (2018) (source) be included?

That's all from me. Great work! Medxvo (talk) 11:43, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

• @Medxvo: Done - I have addressed most of your comments with a few exceptions.

• From Galway to Broadway and back again. is written how it appeared based on how the theatre company and producers released it as.
• The problem is that the sources that you provided for the the last point all do not mention the roles Murphy played in those productions. I am not sure if that would pass a source review.

Otherwise I addressed everything else.

--Birdienest81talk 17:27, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

I have now added the three short films with sources that I believe support all the required information, please feel free to revise anything as needed. I'm happy to support the FLC at this stage. Medxvo (talk) 08:59, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

Vestrian24Bio

Source review

This table lists all 8 passages in the article (containing 8 inline citations from 7 unique sources). Generated with the Veracity user script. Vestrian24Bio 11:34, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Reference #	Letter	Source	Archive	Status	Notes
Cillian Murphy is an Irish actor who has had an extensive career in film, television and stage. Murphy made his professional debut in playwright Enda Walsh's 1996 play Disco Pigs, a role he later reprised in the 2001 screen adaptation.
1		rte.ie	web.archive.org	✅
He later made his feature film debut as a bartender in the Irish drama Sweety Barrett (1998).
2	a	slashfilm.com	web.archive.org	✅
While he found film and theatre work throughout the late 1990s and early 2000s, his breakthrough came with his lead role as pandemic survivor Jim in Danny Boyle's horror film 28 Days Later.
3		variety.com	web.archive.org	✅
Other films that followed included Intermission (2003), Red Eye (2005), The Wind That Shakes the Barley (2006), and Sunshine (2007).
2	b	slashfilm.com	web.archive.org	✅
He portrayed a transgender Irish woman in the comedy-drama Breakfast on Pluto (2005), which earned him a Golden Globe nomination for Best Actor in a Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy.
4		sfgate.com	web.archive.org	✅
Murphy began his collaboration with filmmaker Christopher Nolan in 2005, playing the Scarecrow in The Dark Knight trilogy (2005–2012) as well as appearing in Inception (2010) and Dunkirk (2017).
5		deadline.com	web.archive.org	✅
He portrayed J. Robert Oppenheimer in Nolan's Oppenheimer (2023), for which he won several accolades including BAFTA and Academy Award for Best Actor.
6		hollywoodreporter.com	web.archive.org	✅
In addition to his roles in film and theatre, he is known for his role as Tommy Shelby in the BBC period drama series Peaky Blinders (2013–2022), a role he reprised in the feature film Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man (2026), which he also co-produced.
7		theguardian.com	web.archive.org	✅

• Is behindthevoiceactors.com a reliable source..?
• Not sure why, but the CBR sources are marked as unreliable by the script..

Vestrian24Bio 11:34, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Other comments

• Add an appropriate ENGVAR template to the page.

That's all I got. Vestrian24Bio 11:34, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

• @Vestrian24Bio: Done – I've read your comments and added the Use British English template. For the other comments, this is what I found.

• According to WP:Perennial Sources, Behind the Voice Actors is a reliable website for voice acting credits per WP:BTVA
• I have no idea why the script for CBR is indicated as unreliable, but that website has bee used in recent featured status quality film articles such as Ghostbusters, Starship Troopers, and Terminator 2: Judgement Day.

--Birdienest81talk 11:39, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

• Source review: pass. Vestrian24Bio 07:29, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

  All good then, support. Vestrian24Bio 07:29, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

• Image review – The lead image (the only one in the article) has appropriate free licensing, caption and alt text. Everything seems good to go in this aspect. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:14, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

Promoting. --PresN 01:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

Monuments of national significance in Chernivtsi Oblast

Nominator(s): Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 18:36, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

List #4 of the Ukrainian monuments of national significance series. Chernivtsi Oblast is the smallest oblast by area and population, and is on the whole quite rural, which is reflected by the many inscribed vernacular-style churches (PS: perhaps too many; I'm not convinced that they are all nationally important). The obvious highlights are the Residence of Metropolitans (the first World Heritage Site of the series) and the Khotyn Fortress. Same structure as the previous lists, and this time I've prepared a Q&A that covers some old questions as well as other possible issues. Thank you in advance for reviewing. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 18:36, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (6/8/26)

No issues with the prose.

Table

• Some columns are rowspanned and others are not?
  • I believe I've addressed this at the Mykolaiv Oblast nomination, unless you mean something else? Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 14:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
• Is it just me, or is Wikipedia having problems with images loading and displaying properly?
  • Images are loading without a problem on my part. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 14:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

User:Shwabb1: Really just the one question. I know the issue with photos displaying is not with this article, but probably with my browser. Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:16, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Thank you for the comments. I've replied in line. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 14:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• I'm not sure I understand the lack of rowspanning, but it's not a big deal, especially if it's consistent among lists. Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:16, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:27, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography

Nominator(s): GeogSage ^{(⚔Chat?⚔)} 23:33, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the featured list criteria, and that if it doesn't, it can be made to meet those criteria. GeogSage ^{(⚔Chat?⚔)} 23:33, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Title becomes !scope=col | Title.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1 becomes !scope=row | 1 (on its own line).
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• The image in the infobox should have alt-text.
• The refs column should be unsortable.
• The authors column needs to be sortable based on the last name.

(please mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Comment: Most of this seems technical and I'll work it out. The main concern I have is sorting by last names. Multiple publications have multiple authors; how should that be handled? GeogSage ^{(⚔Chat?⚔)} 06:14, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

• Added a table caption for screen readers.
• Added column scopes.
• Added row scopes.
• Ref column is unsortable.
• Opened talk page discussion on Template talk:Infobox book series about how to add alt-text. I don't see an option on this template, and might need one added.
• Waiting for clarification on author last name.

GeogSage ^{(⚔Chat?⚔)} 06:42, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

• Added alt text for image in infobox.

GeogSage ^{(⚔Chat?⚔)} 06:56, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

• I looked at the current FL nominations and found List of accolades received by the Before trilogy which sorts based on last name of the first person when there are multiple in a cell.
• Usually leads in newer FLs have 2-3 paragraphs of text. See if you can move some/all of the content from the history section.
• You referred to them as publications in a few places. Any problem with calling them books?
• See if you can change/eliminate the sentence in the lead which has "may have".
• A 1-line description of the concepts covered in each book would be nice as a new column in the table.
• This is a British publication. Why is the rate given in dollars?
• Unless there is a particular reason, I suggest that you keep the see-also links normal sized.
• The navigation template can be removed since this page isn't included in it (WP:BIDIRECTIONAL).
• Do remember to ping reviewers once you have taken care of all of their comments. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:05, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

@GeogSage: Do you intend to continue with this nomination? --PresN 00:33, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Yes, sorry, this got away from me after something came up at work and I meant to come back to it. The main issue left is the "1-line description of the concepts covered in each book." Looking at this, I don't think it is possible or necessary. There aren't really a ton of 3rd party descriptions for each installment, some have them but most do not. Each book is on a single topic, which is where they get the title. A description of this would either be original research (me describing the exact topic and how it is covered within the text) or heavily reliant on primary (using the text itself to generate a description of it). While the concepts are fairly technical, if a user doesn't know what it is, they would be better off trying to find a Wikipedia page on the concept, or just reading the CATMOG in question (The link is included to the archive, most are available to download for free). I'll work on getting the names sortable by last this weekend, and just adjusted the text by merging one section into the lede. GeogSage ^{(⚔Chat?⚔)} 01:38, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

List of 2026 Indian Premier League personnel changes

Nominator(s): Vestrian24Bio 10:56, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

I am back with a list from the recently concluded 2026 Indian Premier League; I formatted the page based on the 2025 list which I took to FL earlier this year. Vestrian24Bio 10:56, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• "third most expensive player in the history of IPL" => "third most expensive player in the history of the IPL"
• "became the joint-most expensive uncapped players in the history of IPL" - same
• "Meanwhile the 79 unsold players included players" => "The 79 unsold players included players"
• "Right-to-Match (RTM) cards were not available for mini auction." - please explain "right-to-match" cards. The link just goes to the generic IPL article so that's not really much help.
• "Any auctioned player withdrew before the 2025 season without legitimate reason or injury are banned" => "Any auctioned player who withdrew before the 2025 season without legitimate reason or injury are is banned"
• "Ten sets of players divided based on their specialisation" => "Ten sets of players were divided based on their specialisation"
• "batters, all-rounders, wicket keeper batters, fast bowlers and spin bowlers; and status: capped and uncapped went up for bidding first" - I don't understand which group(s) the last five words relate to
• I don't understand the totals mentioned in the lead: 369 players were shortlisted, 77 were sold, and 79 were unsold. What happened to the other 113 players.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:43, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude

  • Removed RTM since it was not relevant to this season anyways.
  • Player groups: capped batters & uncapped batters, capped bowlers & uncapped bowlers etc.
  • Resolved the players count; only 156 were featured in the auction.

  All else done. Vestrian24Bio 11:10, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

• I still don't understand this part "Ten sets of players were divided based on their specialisation: batters, all-rounders, wicket keeper batters, fast bowlers and spin bowlers; and status: capped and uncapped went up for bidding first" - who exactly went up for bidding first? It seems like there are some words missing...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:20, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: this is the order they went up in

  1. Capped batters
  2. Capped all-rounders
  3. Capped wicket-keepers
  4. Capped fast bowlers
  5. Capped spin bowlers
  6. Uncapped batters
  7. Uncapped all-rounders
  8. Uncapped wicket-keepers
  9. Uncapped fast bowlers
  10. Uncapped spin bowlers

  I'm just not sure how to explain it all in a prose summary. Vestrian24Bio 11:34, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

In that case I would phrase it as "Ten sets of players were divided based on their specialisation: batters, all-rounders, wicket-keeper batters, fast bowlers and spin bowlers; and status: capped and uncapped. The capped players went up for bidding first followed by the uncapped players." -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:36, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: done. Vestrian24Bio 11:39, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:42, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Comments by Birdienest81

• "The 2026 Indian Premier League was the 19th edition of the Indian Premier League (IPL), a professional Twenty20 (T20) cricket league held in India, organised by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI)." This looks like a run on sentence. Maybe replace the comma after India with the phrase "which was"
• "Organised" in that same sentence is spelled wrong. Should be "organized".
  • "Organised" is the correct spelling in Indian English, which basically mirrors British spellings -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:06, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
• Add a comma after United Arab Emirates per MOS:GEOCOMMA

That should be it for now. Could you proofread Cillian Murphy on stage and screen for its featured list candidacy when you have the chance?

--Birdienest81talk 01:15, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

@Birdienest81: Added the comma, but I'm not entirely sure what to do with the first point..? Vestrian24Bio 07:31, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

@Vestrian24Bio: I've added the phrase "which was" after the second comma of that sentence. It should be fine now. This list has my support.

---Birdienest81talk 07:56, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

List of Left Democratic Front (Kerala) members

Nominator(s): TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 05:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it satisfies the Featured List criteria. The list documents the composition and representation of the Left Democratic Front, which is one of Kerala's two major political alliances. The list covers constituent parties, electoral data, and historical changes in membership. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 05:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions,

which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.

• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. !Flag becomes !scope=col | Flag. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. |[[Communist Party of India (Marxist)]] becomes !scope=row | [[Communist Party of India (Marxist)]]. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 19:39, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Contents and sourcing

• Whilst superficially, the tables look nice, there is material that lacks proper sourcing. In "Ideology" column, the list seems to extract labels from article infoboxes, that are often arbitrary, dubious or unsourced. What ideology is "Anti-merger Group"? The notion that NCP would be "Gandhian Socialist" is quite dubious, the label "Manism" is weird, and so forth. The whole "Associate Members" section is a WP:OR invention. True, there are a number of parties that are not LDF members per se that the LDF allocated seats to contest (and even gets to have ministers in LDF govts), but there is no formal Associate Member status. And there is a difference between a party like INL (who gets to be part of seat sharing for elections, for multiple elections over many years) and MLPI(RF) who declares support for LDF from outside. --Soman (talk) 10:35, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

@TheGreatEditor024: Do you intend to continue with this nomination? --PresN 16:59, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

I am intending to continue the nomination. Also, I made the INL as an associate member because the sources claimed that they were associate members.

Secondly, associate members means that the parties that support the LDF from outside and parties that are currently going to join LDF. I will rename it to "Parties that provide outside support to the Aliiance."

Manism, well that what the party claims as their ideology. Anti-merger group ideology was started by the KC(ST), their goal was to not unify all the Kerala Congress factions. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 11:41, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

Also, the INL is a member, the Wahab faction is the party that provides outside support. The NSC is a special case that does get seats during seat-sharing but is not an actual member. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 11:44, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

driveby

• There is still no caption, per PresN's feedback
• Please see MOS:BOLDLINK
• In ideology, it might be worth using bullets to distinguish
• I would consider leaving out the image of the leader for simplicity. This page isn´t about them.
• I agree with Soman that these ideologies should have a source.
• Sources for the two remaining founding members is missing
• Maybe I don´t understand, but the lead says it was founded in 1980 while the table says otherwise.

Kind regards, Dajasj (talk) 15:12, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

This nomination has been open for more than 8 weeks without any support, and with multiple comments left unaddressed. I'm going to close it for inactivity; feel free to renominate in the future once these concerns are addressed, and consider reaching out to others for reviews or performing more reviews of your own if you do so to get more attention to your nomination. --PresN 01:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

List of international goals scored by Dimitar Berbatov

Nominator(s): TNM101 (chat) 17:37, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

My first time nominating any article for either GA or FA/FL, would gladly accept any feedback on improving the list TNM101 (chat) 17:37, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Comments

• Image caption needs a full stop
• "He subsequently went on to make 78 appearances for the national team and was the captain from 2006 until May 2010.[2][3] Until his retirement in May 2010, he scored 48 goals and finished as the country's joint all-time top scorer with Hristo Bonev" - this would read better as "He subsequently went on to make 78 appearances for the national team and was the captain from 2006 until his retirement in May 2010.[2][3] He scored 48 goals and finished as the country's joint all-time top scorer with Hristo Bonev"
• "He scored his first goal for the Trikolyorite" - nickname should be in quote marks, not italics
• "in a 2–3 friendly loss to Chile" => "in a 3–2 friendly loss to Chile"
• "Despite appearing in 24 FIFA World Cup qualifiers for the 2002, 2006, and 2010 editions, he was not able to guide the nation to the competition proper since their last appearance in 1998." => "Despite appearing in 24 FIFA World Cup qualifiers for the 2002, 2006, and 2010 editions, he was not able to guide the nation to the competition proper, in which they had last appeared in 1998."
• "He appeared at UEFA Euro 2004, where he made 3 appearances" => "He appeared at UEFA Euro 2004, where he made three appearances"
• "This would be the only major tournament that he would play in for Bulgaria" => "This was the only major tournament that he played in for Bulgaria"
• "After retiring at 29, many believed that he lacked the motivation and drive to impel a weak squad and that his performances for the team were sometimes too "languid" or laid back" - people only thought this after he retired? Nobody thought it while he was playing?

Reworded this TNM101 (chat)

• "The list below shows each of his international goals, in order from the first to the last goal." - no need to say this, as it's obvious
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:02, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you. I have implemented all of your comments TNM101 (chat) 05:40, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• The lead image needs alt-text. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:32, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

  Done TNM101 (chat) 05:44, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Comments by Reidgreg

• subsequently went on to make → made
• I don't feel we should use "Trikolyorite" without defining it as a nickname of the team, and at that point we'd be going off topic.
• This was the only major tournament that he played in for Bulgaria. I feel that we can remove "in" here.
• Overlinking in the Goals table; only have to link something on its first mention in the table (generally left–right, top–bottom).

Did the ones above TNM101 (in solidarity · chat) 14:57, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

• Is the single source used for the Goals table of sufficient reliability/quality for FA? The author of that page is credited as Roberto Mamrud, and his work for that website is used as a source for some 50 Wikipedia articles, including at least one FA. I'd appreciate someone else taking a look at this.

@Reidgreg: If another source is needed to pass this, I can try finding one TNM101 (in solidarity · chat) 17:20, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments by NapHit

• "Despite appearing in 24 FIFA World Cup qualifiers for the 2002, 2006, and 2010 editions, he was not able to guide the nation to the competition proper..." I'd reword the bit about him guiding the team, as that makes it sound like it was his sole responsibility, and even like he was managing the team
• I would have a caption on the main table and have the source next to the caption, rather than at the bottom underneath the table
• Ref 1, 6, 7, 10, 12 and 14 need an en dash
• Also not sure if the dates in the ref should be changed from this format 2025-03-22 to 22 March 2025, as I think that's the preferred method of presenting dates, but I'm not 100% sure on the guidelines
• You have www.rsssf.org and Rec.Sports.Soccer Statistics Foundation in the refs. You need to pick one and stick with it. Ideally, it would be the latter
• I have no issue with the single source citing the table, that's quite common in these lists, and it's a reliable source

NapHit (talk) 09:59, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

@NapHit I have done all that you mentioned above; I would appreciate if you took another look at the en dashes just so I didn't miss any. TNM101 (in solidarity · chat) 09:15, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

• Support all my concerns have been addressed. NapHit (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Comments from Z1720

Prose review:

• Most of the sentences in the first paragraph begin with "He". Suggest changing the sentence structure of one of the sentences to avoid this.
• "on 17 November 1999, as a substitute for" I don't think the comma is necessary here.

Source review:

• Suggest archiving the sources. I use IA Bot.
• Refs 2, 5, and 9 are missing publication dates that should be added to the article.
• Refs 3 and 4 are missing the publication date and author
• Refs 1, 6, 7, and 8 have "last updated" statements at the bottom of the page which could be used as publication dates. They also have statements on who maintains the page, which should be listed as the author.

Addressed these TNM101 (in solidarity · chat) 08:59, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Please ping when the above are addressed. Z1720 (talk) 22:32, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

@Z1720: Please check the changes TNM101 (in solidarity · chat) 12:41, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Nominations for removal

List of Czech submissions for the Academy Award for Best International Feature Film

Notified: Example user, Example WikiProject

This article was promoted to Featured List in 2008; however, there are numerous unsourced entries. Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:25, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delist unless someone volunteers to work on the list. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:00, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

List of mammals of Korea

Notified: Example user, Example WikiProject

I am nominating this for featured list removal because

• It probably needs updating. some of the sources were last accessed in 2006. Some of the IUCN assessments probably need updating, and some of the taxonomy has probably been changed too by now.
• Images lack alt text
• Several CS1 errors
• at least one unsourced statement

EmergentAnarchy (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

• Tables violate MOS:DTAB with pseudo-headers. Delist unless someone undertakes an improvement. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:58, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
• Delist unless someone volunteers to work on this. Looks like it might not need a huge effort but I don't know enough about suitable sources on this topic to attempt it myself. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:39, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

List of tallest buildings in Albuquerque

Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Skyscrapers

Unfortunately this list was nominated almost 20 years ago and the standards have significantly shifted. Here are a few issues:

• Lead is short and doesn't accurately summarize the list.
• Citations tags include: contain dead links, and failed verifications, and contain user generated content (I believe this refers to one of the references used not being appropriate, and has been there for 7 years)
• The "notes" section is sparse and underdeveloped. Consider Grade I listed buildings in Oxford for how the notes for buildings should be. If there is nothing notable about the building, then it shouldn't be on this list, as wikipedia is not a directory.
• History section should be updated and expanded (when it says some buildings are not downtown, where are they?)
• Outdated wording "this list is..."
• None of the images have alt-texts and fail accessibility.
• Page could really use a map
• The one note, is just repeated in the notes section.

Mattximus (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

• I'd expect at least something in the empty notes, plus the citations need to be updated/fixed. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:55, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
• Delist unless someone undertakes an improvement. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:00, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Delist Yeah, it's quite dated and could use a clean-up. LivinAWestLife (talk) 20:47, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

• Delist. Please let me know if anyone starts work on this so I can amend my "Delist". Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:43, 30 July 2026 (UTC)

List of Naruto characters

Notified: WikiProject Anime and manga, WikiProject Fictional characters, WikiProject Lists

I am nominating this for featured list removal because 3 weeks ago I made a talk page post and pinged numerous editors active there in the past, where I outlined the problems: "After List of Boruto characters was merged here, this gained a lot of unreferenced content (ex. section on Moegi Kazamatsuri; there are others). My second concern is that even entries on notable characters (ex. Hinata) contain just plot summary and info on voice actors, there is no reception / analysis (which some of the articles on individual characters have, some are even GA like aforementioned Hinata).". Since then, User:BinaryBrainBug also observed that at "Approximately 24,000 words, that's too large". In ter of WP:FLCR, the issuses are 3a (comprehensivness) and 3b (poor referencing). To my concern on comprehensivness, I'll add that the list has cherry-picked random information for various characters and is not very up to date. For example, the newest (Boruto) arc antagonist is Jūra, yet his entry is very short; while for example some less relevant characters (ex. Ao) have much longer plot summaries. This is a minor issue, but the main is the lower quality content when it comes to the merged Boruto entries and lack of summary of reception/analysis for many characters. For example, Boruto character Sumire section is just an unreferenced plot summary, despite sources like [9] or [10] existing. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:45, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Could indeed be better summarized and referenced. Shouldn't be hard to get back in featured list territory. Not my research area. Let's wait for other opinions. Selbstporträt (talk) 00:13, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

• Delist unless someone volunteers to improve it. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:45, 30 July 2026 (UTC)