Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a221e202ff89b86e

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Rough guide to extended confirmed protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:ECRLIST)

Articles under extended confirmed protection (ECP) can be edited only by users with extended confirmed accounts – accounts that have made at least 500 edits to the English Wikipedia and after 30 days have passed since the account's first edit, or that have been manually added to the extended confirmed user group by an administrator (usually because they are legitimate alternative accounts of users who already have those rights). Extended confirmed (30/500) protection is therefore a stronger form of protection than semi-protection (see Wikipedia's rough guide to semi-protection for more information).

The official policy related to applying extended confirmed protection is located at Wikipedia:Protection policy § Extended confirmed protection; this page serves only as a rough guide that describes how this policy is currently being applied by administrators.

General considerations

Generally, articles should first be placed under semi-protection to see if semi-protection in combination with appropriate blocks can give sufficient protection to obviate the need for extended confirmed protection. If semi-protection proves too weak even in combination with blocks that are appropriate, extended confirmed protection can be deployed. In the rare case of a long history of disruptive editing of an unprotected article by multiple autoconfirmed accounts (usually due to sockpuppetry), administrators can bypass semi-protection and apply extended confirmed protection immediately.

Technical limitations

As of December 2024, Wikipedia does not have the ability to enforce ECP restrictions when those restrictions apply only to certain sections of articles, as they do for example, when ECR is applied to specific topic areas. In these cases, enforcement may be done by EC editors.

As arbitration enforcement

Deployment of extended confirmed protection may be mandated or permitted as a remedy in Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) decisions. Any protection made as arbitration enforcement is automatically logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log/Protections.[1]

The following topics are placed under the extended-confirmed restriction (ECR) by ArbCom:

The community has further authorized extended-confirmed restriction for the following topics:

In addition, a consensus of admins at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard (AE) may extend ECR to subtopics of WP:ARBIPA (India, Pakistan and Afghanistan) if such a sanction is necessary to prevent disruption; such extensions must be of a limited duration, not to exceed one year.[3]

Administrators may apply indefinite extended confirmed protection at any time to any page covered by ECR at their discretion, whether or not there has been disruptive editing on the page.[6] There is a general consensus that administrators should neither apply ECP to pages with only a tenuous link to the contentious topic nor seek out articles in the topic area to protect preemptively. Many administrators will only apply ECP in circumstances where there have been editing disputes involving accounts that fail the 30/500 rule.[6][7] As an exception, articles strictly within the Arab–Israeli conflict topic area should have ECP applied by default.

Pages within contentious topics that are not covered by ECR are not automatically eligible for ECP. However, ECP has been applied as a page restriction when necessary to prevent disruption within contentious topics.[8]

Discussion of an administrator's decision to apply ECP

As with other protection decisions, if a decision to apply ECP needs to be discussed, this should first be raised on the protecting administrator's talk page.

See also

Footnotes

  1. ^ To find such instances, search for "ECP", "30/500" and "500/30". The use of all three terms is required due to inconsistencies in how such protections have been logged. For historical reasons, protections before January 1, 2025 are found in the regular log.
  2. ^ Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Antisemitism in Poland § Extended confirmed restriction: "All IP editors, users with fewer than 500 edits, and users with less than 30 days' tenure are prohibited from editing articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland."
  3. ^ a b Per Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Indian military history § Indian military history extended-confirmed restriction
  4. ^ Per Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Indian military history § Caste-related topics in South Asia extended-confirmed restriction
  5. ^ Per motion, "The topic of Zak Smith is placed under the extended-confirmed restriction. This restriction is set to lapse automatically one year after the enactment of this motion. If an editor believes this restriction should be extended, they may request the Committee consider an extension by posting an amendment request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment in the final month of the restriction's timeframe."
  6. ^ a b Per Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive284#Extended confirmed protection & ArbCom sanctions
  7. ^ Per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee&oldid=758046416#Should_Arab-Israeli_conflict_pages_be_protected_pre-emptively.3F
  8. ^ Examples: