Wikipedia:Deletion review/Perennial requests
 | This is an explanatory essay about the deletion policy. This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. |
This is a list of perennial requests on deletion review. Please read this before requesting undeletion of any of these articles. Repeated requests every time some new, tiny snippet appears on the web have a tendency to be counter-productive—it is almost always best to wait unless you can decisively overcome the issues identified at deletion.
Please be aware that requesting review of a frequently-reviewed case without an exhaustive and compelling case, or bringing substantial new evidence not seen in previous reviews, may be seen by some as tendentious.
Century Financial Consultancy
Promotional article about a company that has been repeatedly recreated. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 April 12#Century Financial LLC.
Chris Chan
Article used in a harassment campaign, recreated under a dozen different titles and deleted and salted each time. Note that the current article with the title Chris Chan is about a different person.
Due to the extent of the campaign, there is strong community consensus against allowing this article to be recreated in any way, shape, or form. This prohibition extends to drafts and lists of sources that cover the subject. See the following:
Template:Support
Along with Template:Oppose, etc. Though these templates are widely used on other Wikimedia wikis, the consensus on the English Wikipedia, demonstrated over numerous discussions, is that they encourage voting rather than discussion aimed at the generation of consensus. Editors wishing to add the images to discussions can add the text importScript('User:Pythoncoder/Scripts/voteSymbols.js'); to their personal JavaScript page to provide the functionality of the templates. Any request for undeletion should provide new arguments, rather than simply asserting that prior consensuses were wrong, or it is likely to be closed speedily.
Priyanka Choudhary
AKA Priya Choudhary, Priyanka Chahar, Pari Choudhary. Actress and reality TV contestant where consensus is she has not met notability requirements. Article keeps being recreated at variations on her name. See AFDs (1, 2), DRVs (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), SPIs (1, 2, 3, 4).
Jack Massey Welsh
The YouTuber Jack Massey Welsh, also known as JackSucksAtLife, is not notable per WP:NBIO and WP:NYOUTUBE. His article on the English Wikipedia was deleted as a result of a 2018 AfD discussion, and a differently-titled article about him was deleted in this 2020 AfD discussion. Since then, articles and drafts about him under different titles, on the English Wikipedia and elsewhere, have been repeatedly recreated and deleted since then. See also: this MfD discussion, this discussion on the Simple Wikipedia and the source assessment on Jack.