Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Modeneis - SouJava Leader
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thomas Modeneis - SouJava Leader (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only hits I can find are non-independent coverage. So are the sources in the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. He sounds like quite a cool guy, but there's no assertion of notability per WP:AUTHOR, WP:BIO or WP:ACADEMIC. No significant coverage online in WP:Reliable sources. Altered Walter (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash [talk] 09:50, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. —Ed!(talk) 15:44, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.