Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a45fa3997fb1c526

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klaus Lynggaard Hougesen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. North America1000 03:41, 15 July 2015 (UTC)reply


Klaus Lynggaard Hougesen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable bio and company article, possibly written by Hougesen himself - tagged since 2010. Google searches show no significant coverage. References and content don't establish notability (most of the refs are self-published). GermanJoe (talk) 22:12, 22 June 2015 (UTC)reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:04, 23 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)reply
  • Delete -- Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. It's a promotional article created by the subject with no evidence of notability and no independent reliable sources. I'm surprised it was never tagged for speedy deletion and that the PROD tag was removed without improvement. — CactusWriter (talk) 16:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 13:50, 30 June 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 17:21, 7 July 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.