Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Denmark

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion and merging of articles related to Denmark. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and neither does removing an AfD from this page remove it from the main page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:deletion sorting|Denmark|sig=~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Denmark. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Europe.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

• WikiProject Deletion sorting/Denmark/archive

watch

• See also: Wikipedia:Danish Wikipedians' notice board

Scan for Denmark related AfDs Scan for Denmark related Prods Scan for Denmark related TfDs

Denmark

St Joseph's School, Roskilde

St Joseph's School, Roskilde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEOFRE didn't yield anything with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. Won't mind withdrawing if useful sources are located. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 17:19, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Denmark. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 17:19, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
• Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related AfD discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:44, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dz5t 8O12 (talk) 20:05, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
• Comment - a quick first look finds some SIGCOV: school's founding history on Roskilde municipal website; 2018 TV2 news story "Roskilde school dominates inventor competition" about school winning national science competition; and 2025 county analysis of school's Kindergarten class. There's also multiple small mentions in local newspaper, like school's ballet program and first international class, etc. And two of the school's science teachers winning dkk300,000 national teacher award . Probably more out there. Might add up to a pass for WP:GNG. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 00:18, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

  Umm....school students winning competitions and the teachers winning awards are pretty ROUTINE news reportage. Although I don't have a strong feeling....but I think the local newspaper reportage and the municipal website accompanied with the pdf is enough to save the page. I won't immediately withdraw....let's have a stronger consensus. Thanks BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 02:19, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Aalborghus Gymnasium

Aalborghus Gymnasium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. My BEOFRE didn't yield anything with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. The two other Wikis didn't help. Won't mind withdrawing if someone finds useful sources. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 17:18, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Denmark. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 17:18, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Sleeping Child (Michael Learns to Rock song)

Sleeping Child (Michael Learns to Rock song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Colours (Michael Learns to Rock album), as I don't believe the requirements of WP:NSONG and therefore WP:GNG are met.

After doing a search for sources I cannot find any significant coverage from reliable sources. As there is already a standalone article for the album in full I think a merge would be preferable to a deletion. sksatsuma 13:17, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music, and Denmark. sksatsuma 13:17, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
• Redirect to Colours (Michael Learns to Rock album). There is nearly nothing about this song anywhere. I found only one borderline source: . WidgetKid ^Converse 01:09, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Sdr. Nærå Fri- og Efterskole

Sdr. Nærå Fri- og Efterskole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Årslev#Sdr. Nærå Fri- og Efterskole because this fails in GNG as well as WP:NSCHOOL. My BEFORE didn't yield anything useful. The two other wikis didn't help. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 15:37, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Denmark. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 15:37, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:49, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Roskilde Gymnasium

Roskilde Gymnasium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose redirecting to Roskilde#Education and sport because this fails in WP:NSCHOOL as well as GNG. My BEFORE didn't yield anything with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability....just a few trivial mentions and directories out there. Won't mind withdrawing if someone can find useful sources. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 15:31, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, and Denmark. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 15:31, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:49, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Ghost Ship Games

Ghost Ship Games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to Coffee Stain Studios because the studio seems to fail WP:CORPDEPTH and is best talked about in the context of its parent company. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:45, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Companies, and Denmark. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:45, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
• Merge per nominator. That said, an argument could be made for keeping here. Studio notability can be established through extensive coverage of titles created by the studio (in this case Deep Rock Galactic). But I do think the nominator is correct - a lot of these sources don't really go in-depth about the studio specifically. Redvelvetvanilaaaaaaaaa (talk) 15:28, 22 September 2026 (UTC)

  In the case of businesses, they cannot become notable through their products. See WP:INHERITORG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:42, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

The Finans.dk coverage I found highlights the sale. But I am unsure about the target Coffee Stain Studios because that formed another holding Coffee Stain Group, which arguably Coffee Stain and Ghost Ship with their publishing labels are the most important parts. I think I would merge to a new legacy section on Embracer Group instead. Stephen Totilo covered the new Coffee Stain Group. IgelRM (talk) 22:38, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:09, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Merge to Deep Rock Galactic. After reconsidering, most of the article fits perfectly under #Development there. Coffee Stain Studios shouldn't be the primary target per my reasoning above, although a selective merge is possible. IgelRM (talk) 17:53, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Merge to Deep Rock Galactic, do not merge to Coffee Stain Studios as incorrect or Embracer Group as WP:UNDUE. Sourcing is split between DRG, which they are almost entirely solely notable for, and corporate transactions. As per Embracer Group#Divested subsidiaries, Coffee Stain and Ghost Ship are members of the same successor company, but Ghost Ship is not a subsiduary of Coffee Stain Studios, the current topic of that article. Embracer is/was a massive conglomerate and covering GSG in detail would be undue. ~ A412 ^talk! 20:09, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Copenhagen Atomics

Copenhagen Atomics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to List of small modular reactor designs because the article seems to fail WP:CORP: Out of 11 sources, 7 are written by the company, and none provide the required significant, reliable, independent, and secondary coverage required for notability. I searched online but was unable to find sources satisfying all criteria. I was able to find significant coverage in industry publications like NuNet or World Nuclear News, which have questionable independence and are largely reporting press releases. The page also appears to have been created by an employee of the company. H2so4aq (talk) 23:10, 21 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Engineering, and Denmark. H2so4aq (talk) 23:10, 21 September 2026 (UTC)
• keep - the article now has 4 cites from the mainstream nuclear trade press plus one from a Tuskish MSM, which I think count as significant, reliable, independent, and secondary coverage for this kind of technical company (plenty of other nuclear articles rely of mainstream nuclear trade press cites). I think this is adequate, though could still be improved. I only count 6 of the now 14 as Copenhagen Atomics content, though I have not evaluated 3 of the cites which seem to be minor sources. I think the article is too big to be rolled into List of small modular reactor designs, so I think it should be kept. (I notice Danish EnergyWatch, which appears to be a trade online magazine though not sure if RS, says CA is looking to a US IPO, so article seems likely to grow.) Rwendland (talk) 11:33, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you for your improvements to the article and for finding additional sources. I still have a couple concerns. We're relying pretty heavily on trade publications to prove notability, which WP:CORP heavily discourages. Both WNN sources lean more towards churnalism than independent coverage, as does EIC funds thorium reactor in NEI Magazine. Proving MSR Reliability in NEI is an interview with the company's CEO, while Copenhagen Atomics: the story so far in NEI is written by an employee of the company. For reference, here are the relevant press releases from CA's website: . I'm unable to read the NucNet article, although the Türkiye Today one appears to be satisfactory coverage. But I'm not confident this article passes a strict reading of CORP; I'm concerned that almost all information about CA is still being traced to press releases and finding reliable, independent sources is proving challenging. Let me know your thoughts. H2so4aq (talk) 21:35, 23 September 2026 (UTC)

  Yes, I can see your concerns. I had not previously read (as I generally edit technical/product articles not their company articles), so had not really appreciated that ordinary trade press articles don't contribute to establishing notability - which makes sense in that even inconspicuous small companies will often be mentioned in the trade press. But now with the seemingly very independent MSN article plus the Türkiye Today article we seem to minimally pass muster. I think the fact that the EU European Innovation Council has selected them for funding also demonstrates some notability. The situation is difficult for one-product companies as really it is often the product that gives most notability rather than the company vehicle. Rwendland (talk) 16:09, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

  The MSN source does not appear reliable: MSN is a news aggregation service, and that story is really from a site called thingstodoindubai.info, whose reliability appears very low. H2so4aq (talk) 21:34, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

  Whoops, you are right. I fell into the trap of confusing it with MS NOW/MSNBC which is ok by WP:RSP. Sorry. Rwendland (talk) 22:24, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

  No worries; looking at the sources now though, it seems we're down to effectively one (Türkiye Today) independent source at all. NucNet is a reliable source, and has significant coverage, but it's still a trade publication and anyway I can't verify its independence without being able to read it. I don't think this is enough for a full article, but if you disagree we could consider asking the folks at WP:RSN to weigh in. H2so4aq (talk) 04:52, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Yet, the Turkish article lacks any substance about the nature of the deal. Apparently, it is about the future production of thorium-based fuel.--Wickey (talk) 12:53, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

Websites like NEI, WNN and NucNet are indeed little more than collections of press releases and advertorials, while CA already promisses reactors for a fixed price of $50 million per 100 MW_th reactor. The company is still in the early stages of development. I don't see the value of keeping track of each step.--Wickey (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Oppose merger - you can't just merge a company article to a topic article! SH360! (Must edit! Must report!) 10:02, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Why not? There's already an entry under List of small modular reactor designs for Copenhagen Atomics, and several for designs/companies that don't have their own pages, so it seems like the most appropriate place. I am unaware of any policy or guideline against doing so. H2so4aq (talk) 22:23, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - fails WP:NCORP - most of this article as it stands is sourced to press releases; if and when it becomes notable the article will be better if built from scratch then. Improve the section explaining their proposed design in the List of small modular reactor designs article.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Avatar317 (talk • contribs) 23:58, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete - per H2so4aq; → List of small modular reactor designs#Copenhagen Atomics: Denmark.--Wickey (talk) 08:24, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

Others

See also

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Denmark/Article alerts, a bot-maintained listing of a variety of changes affecting Denmark related pages including deletion discussions