Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a231f188e92fb1a9

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Content assessment/Requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page allows users to request article assessments from experienced Wikipedia editors.

You may submit a request if you disagree with an assessment, are unsure how to assess an article yourself, or have made substantial improvements that may warrant reassessment. Requests are reviewed by volunteers, so response times may vary. For articles covered by active WikiProjects, check whether the project offers its own assessment process.

Volunteers here may assess articles up to B-class. For Good Article status, see WP:GAN; for Featured Article status, see WP:FAC.

Instructions

[edit]

To request an article assessment:

  • Add each request to the top of the assessment list with one article per request. There is no request limit.
  • Sign your request with four tildes: ~~~~
  • Allow time for volunteers to review your request

If you are comfortable assessing articles, consider reviewing some requests yourself; additional volunteers are always welcome. For well developed articles, consider Peer Review as a possibility; PR guidelines here. Note: Do not rely solely on the Rater tool; its output should be treated as a suggested rating. Volunteer reviewers should be able to assess articles manually using the content assessment scale.

Requests from 2026

[edit]

Requests from July 2026

[edit]
❯ Please add your request at the
top of this section
.

Requests from June 2026

[edit]
Already done, and assessed B-class article. JoeNMLC (talk) 13:49, 15 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, assessed as C-class article, Neoptolemos7, good work. At article's Talk I added the B-class review template. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 13:43, 15 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Requesting reassessment of 1980 Challenge Cup final. The article, currently standing at B-Class, was submitted for approval as a draft well ahead of it being ready for mainspace by another user, so I feel the current rating is a little undeserved. I have since added a 'Summary' section that was in the works at the time of submission and made other additional edits. Hullian111 (talk) 21:08, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
B-class. Hullian111, good work. B-class is highest level assessment here. Would suggest Good Article nomination, at WP:GAN. Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 14:37, 13 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Already done. Sddarealone, now B-Class although I did add one "Citation needed" tag. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 14:25, 13 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Fundgy, assessed as C-class article. Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 14:19, 13 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]
 Done assessed as B class. Added Bio WikiProject. Overall, good work for this new article. Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 13:37, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Cinaroot, assessed as B class. For Good Article nomination, see WP:GAN. Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 14:12, 13 July 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Requests from May 2026

[edit]

Requests from April 2026

[edit]

Requests from March 2026

[edit]

Requests from February 2026

[edit]

Requests from January 2026

[edit]

Requests from 2025

[edit]