Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a45dd4c1ddbecf83

Jump to content

Wikipedia:Content assessment/Requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page allows users to request article assessments from experienced Wikipedia editors.

You may submit a request if you disagree with an assessment, are unsure how to assess an article yourself, or have made substantial improvements that may warrant reassessment. Requests are reviewed by volunteers, so response times may vary. For articles covered by active WikiProjects, check whether the project offers its own assessment process.

Volunteers here may assess articles up to B-class. For Good Article status, see WP:GAN; for Featured Article status, see WP:FAC.

Instructions

[edit]

To request an article assessment:

  • Add each request to the top of the assessment list with one article per request. There is no request limit.
  • Sign your request with four tildes: ~~~~
  • Allow time for volunteers to review your request.

If you are comfortable assessing articles, consider reviewing some requests yourself; additional volunteers are always welcome. For well-developed articles, consider Peer Review as a possibility; PR guidelines here. Note: Do not rely solely on the Rater tool; its output should be treated as a suggested rating. Volunteer reviewers should be able to assess articles manually using the content assessment scale.

Requests from 2026

[edit]

Requests from October 2026

[edit]
❯ Please add your request at the
top of this section
.

Requests from September 2026

[edit]

Requests from August 2026

[edit]
Could it be C now? Dopcol (talk) 19:06, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply
I'd defer to someone else as i'm not familiar enough with the subject matter. Theevu (talk) 19:17, 16 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Requests from July 2026

[edit]
I request a second opinion. Thank you Billsmith60 (talk) 10:10, 19 August 2026 (UTC)reply
I can gladly give a second opinion. I will take a look now. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:30, 20 August 2026 (UTC)reply
@Billsmith60: I have completed a second review and agree with @JoeNMLC's C-class assessment for now. The article is substantial and close to B-class, but B-class requires the article to meet each criterion. Length and the amount of work put into an article do not override factual and writing problems.
Check the article talk page. I marked the referencing, structure, supporting material and readability criteria as passes. I marked coverage and accuracy as a fail because the article contains factual problems, including the incorrect date of the 1921 act, the false statement that no injured person testified and the claim that Widgery placed no blame on the soldiers. I also marked the writing criterion as a fail because the article contains several grammatical and citation-formatting errors. These are fixable problems, and I believe the article could qualify for B-class once they are addressed.
I also need to say that the way you addressed JoeNMLC was uncalled for. JoeNMLC is an experienced editor who assessed the article, added the relevant WikiProject banners and sought input from editors who may know more about the subject. Calling that a “cop-out” and making the Adolf Hitler comparison was unnecessary. It is fine to disagree with an assessment or request a second opinion, but the discussion should remain focused on the article and other volunteer editors should be treated with respect. Ktkvtsh (talk) 15:57, 20 August 2026 (UTC)reply
Thank you very much for your contribution Billsmith60 (talk) 16:54, 20 August 2026 (UTC)reply
I had a look and Kotthu is correct: this article is nowhere near a C class and I've reassessed it at Start Billsmith60 (talk) 19:56, 7 August 2026 (UTC)reply

Requests from June 2026

[edit]

Requests from May 2026

[edit]

Requests from April 2026

[edit]

Requests from March 2026

[edit]

Requests from February 2026

[edit]

Requests from January 2026

[edit]

Requests from 2025

[edit]