Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26352330e00c235

Jump to content

Talk:Xoloitzcuintle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sentence

[edit]

Hm, why was the sentence "it is believed to have functioned as pets in the Mayan and Aztec civilizations" removed?

You might want to ask on Infrogmation's talk page. I don't know if he has this page on his watch list -- sannse 11:34 11 Jun 2003 (UTC)
The earlier version said "they are believed to have functioned as pets in the Mayan and Aztec civilizations approximately 3500 years ago." Possibly the breed is that old (I don't know), but Maya and Aztec civilization were not. The Aztecs may not even have existed as a distinct people until about the 13th century. If you want the earlier version of that sentence to go back in, I think you need to provide some evidence for a very major rewrite of Mesoamerican archeology :-) Anyway, I think the breed was most common in central Mexico in Pre-Columbian times. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 18:44 11 Jun 2003 (UTC)
Thank you for your thorough explanation. I guess I messed up really bad by putting the "3500 years ago" into the same sentence, which I obviously didn't mean to. I guess I'll put that sentence back in, then, but without the dubious time :-) Timwi 22:09 11 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Pronuciation

[edit]

I'm happy to learn how to pronounce the name of this breed in Nahuatl, but surely English speakers use an anglicized version. The fact that the dogs are refered to as "Xolos" in the text hints that this process has taken place. Would it be possible to add the prevailing English pronunciation so I can speak to my dog-loving friends without embarrassment? Show-low or Zolo? Enquiring minds want to know. Biggleston (talk) 01:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

show-low 92.21.251.15 (talk) 20:41, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Genetics discussion duplication and errors

[edit]

There are two different places in the genetics section where it's discusses the genetic expression of the coat type. The first one says that a homozygous coated dog will die before fully developed in the womb, meaning that the coated variety is "genetically inseparable" from the hairless. However, without citation, somebody put in later:

"Breeding coated to coated will only produce coated pups because only the coated allele is present to be passed on."

This really needs a look. I don't feel qualified to edit though. Oogalook (talk) 03:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 21 October 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) cyberdog958Talk 00:40, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


XoloitzcuintleMexican Hairless Dog – Per WP:USEENGLISH and recognisability and naturallness. I see 'Mexican Hairless Dog' more often in the literature and the name is easier to recognise for an English speaker. Google Trends supports the idea that it is the more commonly recognised name, too. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Oppose per above. I also disagree with your comment that it's easier to recognize. Alexeyevitch(talk) 23:42, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:25, 19 October 2025 (UTC)Reply