Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24cde561dd6b1a9

Jump to content

Talk:The X-Files

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Lililolol in topic Critical section?
Good articleThe X-Files has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 8, 2006Good article nomineeListed
November 2, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
July 7, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 20, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
June 11, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
September 17, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
July 7, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
March 8, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Editing Desperately Necessary

[edit]

This page is filled with grammatical problems and poor sentence constructions. For example, this sentence...

"Tired of the comedies he had been working on for Walt Disney Pictures,[46] a report that 3.7 million Americans may have been abducted by aliens, the Watergate scandal and the 1970s horror series Kolchak: The Night Stalker, triggered the idea for The X-Files. He wrote the pilot episode in 1992."

...has a bizarrely misplaced modifier, causing the sentence to grammatical say that the alien report, the Watergate scandal and Kolchak were all tired of Disney comedies, not Chris Carter. As a result, that sentence makes NO sense whatsoever. It would be good if a competent, coherent writer with a strong grasp of grammar were to give his whole page a thorough editing.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.74.7 (talk) 12:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

See a problem Fix a problem. Sí? Turin07 (talk) 08:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
I've addressed the problem, though by no means comprehensively. rowley (talk) 00:20, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

The Event Series Query.

[edit]

Does anyone have any conflicting opinions on Series 10 being more accurately referred to as "The Event Series" in an edit as described in physical media release, as Series 10 was released as a comic-book series and was canon at the time; although both The Event Series and Series 11 ret-con or contradict some aspects of the comics, (such as the status of The Lone Gunmen). MrScottBull (talk) 08:05, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Tommy Westphall

[edit]

In the episode Bad Blood (The X-Files) the story is told through the eyes of each agent and their stories dont agree proving that what we are seeing is not necessarily the truth. Perhaps all of the episodes are being told through the eyes of Mulder or Scully and are not necessarily the truth. See Tommy Westphall. Just granpa (talk) 00:02, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Critical section?

[edit]

So, this article is a GA, but including season-by-season reviews seems like a violation of MOS:TVRECEPTION. I don't think it's necessary here, since each season already has its own page with detailed reception, so, why repeat them here? Lililolol (talk) 20:35, 6 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Also, the article is about 10,000 words, so it needs trimming or splitting. (WP:SIZERULE) Removing the season-by-season reviews would solve this. Lililolol (talk) 20:44, 6 June 2025 (UTC)Reply