Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a4500140edda1293

Jump to content

Talk:Steve Scalise

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Environment

[edit]

The phrase "scientific consensus" is a broad-brush term used to promote a particular viewpoint and set of beliefs. The "consensus" has been imposed on many in the scientific community who, when they opt out of controversy, are presumed to "consent" to particular theories, even though much of the data supporting these theories is questionable.

Edit request

[edit]

Add "Category:People with multiple myeloma"

2600:4041:57B1:3E00:C492:2D12:6133:C5C8 (talk) 14:17, 18 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 14:35, 18 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nazi Reference on the American Flag in Scalise's Office

[edit]

On 10/16/2025 Stephen Colbert of CBS reported and showed a social media post from a staffer of Mike Scalise with the image of an American Flag defaced with a swastika woven into the flag design itself. The swastika of course being an icon of the Nazi Party as well as a symbol of white supremacist terrorist organizations movement and more recently, an alignment with the MAGA base in general and the Young Republicans organization, who lauded Hitler and the principles of the Nazi Party. 2603:6010:8A02:8100:857F:EC3C:85D0:8F75 (talk) 17:01, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Does The Text About The Committees this person is on need to be updated?

[edit]

I noticed that the text about the Committees that Steve Scalise is part of may be outdated. Was it updated recently? If not, that part should be updated. Thank you.

Ps. I was trying to get modern information for school. ~2026-80600-3 (talk) 20:02, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Like most of Wikipedia now, this article is right wing slop

[edit]

I mean the anti Trump domestic terrorist bit is just comical. Just read other people who have been attacked for political reasons, such as Josh Shapiro or Paul Pelosi, there's no effort made to editorialize the issue. This is why I never give money when Wikipedia begs, it's a bunch of RW tech bros pretending to be an encyclopedia. ~2026-48392-97 (talk) 20:03, 21 September 2026 (UTC)Reply