Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23f8aed2dc1c465

Jump to content

Talk:Sheep dip (computing)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 73.240.193.182 in topic Bogus Article, should be deleted

Bogus Article, should be deleted

[edit]

The only reference to the term 'sheep dip' appears to be the sheep dip software project's sourceforge page, which this Wikipedia page closely resembles.

The webopedia reference is hardly primary.

I have trouble believing that this term is widely used in the security industry - this page looks like a shill for the sheep dip sourceforge project, and should, I believe, be removed.(talk) 01:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

I fully agree. 'Sheep Dip' is NOT a standard term in the IT security field, it's only reference seems to be this sourceforge project, so this article is misleading. Also, statements like "Such machines are a normal first line of defence against viruses in high-security computing environments and IT security specialists are expected to be familiar with the concept" (emphasis mine) have no place in Wikipedia and suggest that the article was, in fact, written by a shill. As there isn't really much worthwhile in it I suggest to delete the article.192.93.164.132 (talk) 09:49, 28 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
I've been in the IT field since the 90's and hadn't heard this term until it popped up on a practice test for a Comptia cert. If it were standard I believe I would have heard it at least once, giggled a bit, and easily remembered it since it is such an odd term.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.89.36.218 (talk) 15:31, 22 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
I've removed the PROD notice from this. The term has been around since the early 1990s, and mentions of it can be found in Google Books. The article could use more sources, but it's not a shill term. JohnMarkOckerbloom (talk) 20:50, 8 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
The historical usage of the term seems well cited now. The rest of the article was a bunch of WP:OR and opinions from one specific sourceforge project. I've removed all of that nonsense. 73.240.193.182 (talk) 06:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply