Talk:Runic inscriptions
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Dbachmann
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perhaps reduce scope to Elder Futhark inscriptions. THe Younger Futhark corpus should be treated at Runestone, or else in a standalone article. --dab (𒁳) 09:54, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Now I have moved it I think this was a bad idea, and perhaps Runic inscriptions was better. I suppose this will depend on how the article develops further. --dab (𒁳) 14:30, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Norse history and culture articles
- Low-importance Norse history and culture articles
- C-Class Archaeology articles
- Low-importance Archaeology articles
- C-Class history articles
- Low-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- C-Class Writing system articles
- Low-importance Writing system articles
- C-Class Sweden articles
- Low-importance Sweden articles
- All WikiProject Sweden pages