Talk:Rotzo Formation
Add topicLatest comment: 6 years ago by Buidhe in topic GA Review
 | Rotzo Formation was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 29, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Should be nominated for Featured List, not GA
[edit]Hi Yewtharaptor, I noticed that you nominated this list article for GA. However, as a list, it should instead be nominated as a Featured List. See the criteria here. Thanks, Enwebb (talk) 15:26, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
- Is this some kind of joke? This article is far from anywhere near a GA. See for better examples Tremp Formation. Tisquesusa (talk) 01:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- And of course this is not a list, but a formation. Tisquesusa (talk) 01:10, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Rotzo Formation/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 04:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Procedural fail: This article is organized as a list, not a prose article. Therefore, it should be nominated for recognition at WP:FLC, not here. buidhe 04:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)