Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2223a8e9a525645

Jump to content

Talk:Red team

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by ~2026-15807 in topic History of the term
Good articleRed team has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 2, 2023Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 10, 2023.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that red teams are used to test airport security?

Partisan source

[edit]

The United States Transportation Security Administration has used red teaming in the past. An analysis of some red team operations discovered that undercover agents were able to fool Transportation Security Officers and bring weapons, drugs, or explosives through security at some major airports at least 70% of the time in 2017, and 95% of the time in 2015.[1][2]

References

  1. Bennett, Brian (2 June 2015). "Red Team agents use disguises, ingenuity to expose TSA vulnerabilities". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 3 June 2023.
  2. Inserra, David. "Here's How Bad the TSA Is Failing at Airport Security. It's Time for Privatization". The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved 2023-06-02.

The Daily Signal is a highly partisan, dubiously reliable source. Is it needed, or can the statement be sourced entirely to the L.A. Times? If not, is there some other source that could be used instead? {{u|Sdkb}}talk 04:48, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. Thanks for spotting that. –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

SandyGeorgia feedback

[edit]

Copying here so I don't forget. Some ideas on how to further improve the article: work in more of the Further reading sources, and lower the HOW TO feeling of the Infiltration section. And there may still be a few MOS:BADITALICS here and there.Novem Linguae (talk) 21:50, 20 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sources

[edit]

How is "Talamantes, Jeremiah (2019). Physical Red Team Operations. Hexcode Publishing" a RS?

Google offers nothing on the publisher (barely 50 hits). But all the four books from the house, sold across different ecommerce websites, have one thing in common - authored by Jeremiah Talamantes! So, the book is self-published.
This book does not appear to be in any library of repute, acc. to Worldcat.
Going by Linkedin, Jeremiah Talamantes received his masters from an online university but appears to have decent industry experience. However, there is nothing that demonstrates either academics or MSM consider him to be some kind of an expert in the field of cybersecurity. So, WP:SPS appears to be not met with.

TrangaBellam (talk) 20:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I can go on making similar claims about "Rehberger, Johann (2020). Cybersecurity Attacks – Red Team Strategies. Packt Publishing" but that won't be needed. Starting reassessment in T minus 72h, pending nominator/reviewer comments to my observation on Talamantes (2019).
Btw, Novem, you might feel that I am targeting you — for the EFN episode — but it is not the case; I came across the GA badge on your u/p and started reading the article just because I found the concept (and, indeed, your writeup) interesting. Fwiw, every single GAR, I have done, is singularly focussed on the (poor) quality of sources. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:48, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hey there. No problem about the targeting. Fixing the article and helping me learn for future articles is the important thing. Do you have concerns about any of the other major sources, such as the books by Zenko, Hoffman, and Rehberger? Feel free to call out anything you see. Let's get it fixed. –Novem Linguae (talk) 20:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
To keep this as a GA, I need Talamantes and Rehberger out; the remainder of the sources, I take no concern with, as of now. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Go ahead and GAR it. I won't be able to replace those sources in 72 hours, since they're like two thirds the article. I'd rather start the GAR and get confirmation from others that those sources are unusable. I need to hear it from some other people before I take an axe to tens of hours of my work. –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sure, we can go RSN before opening the GAR; give me a day :) TrangaBellam (talk) 21:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Added Bogdan Dzakovic - FAA whistleblower and member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity

[edit]

I added:

Ironcurtain2 (talk) 14:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

History of the term

[edit]

Early Kriegsspiel of the Prussian military (Wargame) had the colors blue and red. Here mentioned by Prof. Jorit Wintjes of Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg. Youtube syi6SJ4j9Nk?t=2571 With blue being the Prussians.

So the terms red and blue team are from a century earlier and not something RAND came up with. Its just the historical colors for wargames since their inception. ~2026-15807 (talk) 18:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply