Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25e2e6afd605b65

Jump to content

Talk:Pat Robertson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Jjhenjj in topic Military Service

This sentence makes no sense

[edit]

The following sentence (n.53) makes no sense: 'Robertson added that Jerusalem is a "spiritual symbol that must not be given away" because "Jesus Christ the Messiah will come down to the part of Jerusalem that the Arabs want," and this would be "not good."' As it stands, it alleges that PR is opposed to the Second Coming happening at Jerusalem. Can you Wikipeople write English? 145.224.21.211 (talk) 01:07, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

You could have made your point just fine without adding insults to it. Please review the civility policy. ButlerBlog (talk) 01:18, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
I do not see anything particularly wrong with that sentence in the article. The text (quote and all) is taken almost exactly from the referenced source. There are not many ways to summarize what Robertson said. Any better phrasing would only come after finding a better source than what was used and one which had the full text of Robertson's remarks. Whether the text of the article "alleges that PR is opposed to the Second Coming happening at Jerusalem" (your statement) appears to be your conclusion, not necessarily that of Robertson, nor that of the WP article writer. The reader can determine for himself what Robertson might have meant by his remarks. --L.Smithfield (talk) 06:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hypocrisy on Sex Before Marriage

[edit]

Despite being a stalwart against sex before marriage Robertson married his wife six months after impregnating her, lied about it and worse. This should very definitely be added to the Family and relationships section. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/local/1987/10/09/no-big-deal-for-robertson/09870d6b-2a44-4d14-8438-cb101c2ce1c3/ 2404:440C:27BF:7338:E9A2:8A9F:B60F:8491 (talk) 10:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 26 May 2025

[edit]

Please add that Pat Robertson won the 2008 Super Sage Award for having the closest prediction out of 100 celebrities in the 2008 Scripps Howard Celebrity Super Bowl Poll. He accepted the award on The 700 Club. 2600:4040:2DB0:9A00:3873:7BCB:916C:614C (talk) 19:37, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: Being the winner of a celebrity Super Bowl prediction contest is far too trivial to warrant inclusion in the article. Day Creature (talk) 07:38, 27 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
It actually wasn't trivial at all. The Scripps Howard Celebrity Super Bowl Poll was something hundreds of celebrities participated in every year from 1986-2013. And Robertson joined notables like Arnold Palmer, Penn & Teller and Bob Weir by winning the Super Sage Award, as noted here: ScrippsNews He thought it was important enough for him to receive the award on his TV show. This page has plenty of information --- good and bad --- about him. Adding this information would showcase another side of him for the readers. 2600:4040:2DB0:9A00:786A:5790:7C9:DEAC (talk) 20:31, 31 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. M.Bitton (talk) 00:46, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hi --- was the request for consensus directed to me or Day Creature? If toward me, could you please let me know how consensus is typically reached before making an edit? I'm not an active Wikipedia user. I only used the semi-protected template because that appeared to be the only way I could add the item to this page. Thank you. 96.241.233.167 (talk) 03:40, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
I'd like to add information to Mr. Robertson's page about him winning the Scripps Howard Super Sage Award, as it shows a side of him that few people are familiar with. Day Creature disagrees. What is the next step to resolve this? Thank you 2600:4040:2DB0:9A00:A52E:DE4C:1210:FB30 (talk) 12:37, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Military Service

[edit]

The description of Pat Robertson's military service is a gloss of what really took place. see https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-09-25-mn-10039-story.html https://www.chicagotribune.com/1988/03/06/cloud-still-hangs-over-robertsons-military-service/ https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/08/pat-robertson-obituary https://www.chicagotribune.com/1988/03/02/robertson-to-drop-libel-suit/

As it stand now, this Wikipedia page is allowing Pat Robertson to engage in stolen valor posthumously.

One reason I am personally upset with this page is that I had one uncle who served in Korea during the Korean conflict and another who served during the occupation. Also, I knew Dr. Birney Dibble who traveled on the same troupe ship to Korea. Dr. Dibble told me that Pat Robertson left the ship in Japan. Robertson later turned up on the Korean peninsula after an outcry. Out of respect to the memory of my uncles and Dr. Dibble, I would like to see some evidence that Pat Robertson actually served in combat before we allow him to claim that he was exposed to any sort of danger or hardship. Alternatively, a simple mention of the credible accusations of stolen valor (or whatever the correct terminology) referencing some of the above links or other links could also be appropriate. Jjhenjj (talk) 04:23, 12 August 2025 (UTC)Reply