Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24442474deb5094

Jump to content

Talk:Mustafa Letter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2001:2020:432F:D2B8:3922:871C:CEDC:46BF in topic Allegedly false.

Personal thoughts on the Mostapha letters

[edit]

JJhashisreasons (talk) 15:54, 25 June 2012 (UTC) - I know my signature is unconventional, but here goes. There are two Mostafa letters in the Wikipedia 'book', and I would give them the iCup (a joke where the victim has to spell out I C U P, which is homophonous to I See You Pee because if I got a Mostafa/Mohamed/Qadafi letter I would forward it to law enforcement as race hate. I'm indifferent to religion but Islamophobia isn't just Islamophobia. It's also what I call Islamofraternophobia (the hatred of fraternising with Muslims, or those who do), and Islamofraternofraterno.....phobia, recursively.Reply

References

[edit]

I see no way of verifying the references. None can be found online. Can someone find a reference? One in Norwegian will do. Jason from nyc (talk) 14:44, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Here is one from TV2 (a section from a longer article about the history of Frp): "Fremskrittspartiet var i mange år et parti med liten oppslutning, men ved lokalvalget i 1987 endret dette seg. Carl I. Hagen mottok det berømte «Mustafa-brevet» som skulle ha vært skrevet av en muslimsk innvandrer. En rystet Hagen leste høyt fra brevet som beskrev hvordan Norge skulle omdannes til en muslimsk stat, der kirkene skulle erstattes av moskeer. Brevet viste seg senere å være falskt, men innvandring var blitt en av Fremskrittspartiets viktigste saker." Iselilja (talk) 19:17, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, that's helpful. It also shows the significance of the fraudulent letter. Jason from nyc (talk) 23:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Horrible POV

[edit]

The article was leaving out important pieces of information mentioned in the sources. Added them for clarification. If anyone wants to contest the changes, let's use this thread to discuss the content.

--Arsaces (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Allegedly false.

[edit]

We don't know for sure who wrote it. Why would an immigration-critic send such a letter to Carl I Hagen? Sounds far fetched.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:2020:432F:D2B8:3922:871C:CEDC:46BF (talk) 10:46, 17 July 2025 (UTC)Reply