Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
Mona Lisa was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsVisual arts
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Latest comment: 9 days ago4 comments3 people in discussion
It seems odd that the header image for this painting is of a digitally retouched version of the painting. Why would we not want to use an image of the actual painting as it appears in real life? User:Jonwilliamsl(talk|contribs) 13:01, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
The version in the infobox is drastically yellower overall and darker in the lower regions than the image on the Louvre website, which presumably was selected for fidelity by comparing it to the painting in person. There's a discussion of various retouched versions here . Ewulp (talk) 06:55, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Section about so called golden ratio features should be removed, or, alternatively, a section about square features should be added, where we'll slap random squares onto the painting and make up a story about them ~2026-49395-09 (talk) 14:12, 12 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
I've removed it. I have never seen it given much attention in academic literature by art historians, and certainly not enough to warrant an entire section. Aza24 (talk)15:40, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Article states that the French Republic acquired the painting - obviously the First French Republic would not come for centuries after. Simple fix for anyone who would like to touch it up. Ik102030 (talk) 23:22, 23 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
