Talk:Mihna
Add topicLatest comment: 18 years ago by Paul Willocx in topic Rewrite
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mihna article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program. |
Rewrite
[edit]Salatintoo has rewritten the Mihna article from the bottom up; however, I'm not sure that the rewritten article is better than the original...
Salatinoo has written a very biased report of the Mihna; it is completely and totally neglecting both Sunni and Shi'ite interpretations and focuses on trying to mitigate the role of the Mutazilates - a role that all Sunni histories mention. I think the article needs someone else to add to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.132.144.144 (talk) 18:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- The Sunni histories do indeed blame the Mu'tazila, and perhaps someone should write a paragraph on the backlash against all things Mu'tazilite that occurred after the mihna, but the historical research of Nawas and the others makes fairly clear that it's not entirely fair to blame the Mu'tazilites, I think. So I think the article is good enough for the most part... Paul Willocx (talk) 16:51, 4 February 2008 (UTC)