Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a27eae766d875aae

Jump to content

Talk:Lady Dimitrescu/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kung Fu Man in topic GA Review

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 23:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    The article has a proper References section. --Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    All sources cited are recognized as either reliable sources or situational sources cited in the appropriate manner.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
    c. (OR):
    Spotcheck was performed, no original research was done or statements not supported by the checked sources. Specific sources include [13] and [14], which draw comparison between the character and previous series antagonists Mr. X and the Baker family in terms of approach, source [6] does discuss her design history in the details cited, and sources [55], [56] and [57] do discuss her reception in the matter cited with no OR performed based off their statements.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
    No copyright violations done. The majority of the article is original writing and quotes applied as needed.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

All issues addressed on User:GlatorNator's talk page, really only minor ones at all to bring up. Overall a very entertaining and thorough read!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 23:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Arigato gozaimasu for the review :). GlatorNator () 23:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply