Talk:Lady Dimitrescu

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lady Dimitrescu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 23:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   The article has a proper References section. --Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   All sources cited are recognized as either reliable sources or situational sources cited in the appropriate manner.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

   c. (OR):

   Spotcheck was performed, no original research was done or statements not supported by the checked sources. Specific sources include [13] and [14], which draw comparison between the character and previous series antagonists Mr. X and the Baker family in terms of approach, source [6] does discuss her design history in the details cited, and sources [55], [56] and [57] do discuss her reception in the matter cited with no OR performed based off their statements.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

   No copyright violations done. The majority of the article is original writing and quotes applied as needed.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:19, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

All issues addressed on User:GlatorNator's talk page, really only minor ones at all to bring up. Overall a very entertaining and thorough read!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 23:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Arigato gozaimasu for the review :). GlatorNator (ᴛ) 23:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

"Maggie Robertson" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Maggie Robertson has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 2 § Maggie Robertson until a consensus is reached. — ImaginesTigers (talk) 21:06, 2 July 2025 (UTC)