Talk:Kyle Busch
Add topic| A news item involving Kyle Busch was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 22 May 2026. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
“Last Race” section is incorrect.
[edit]Busch’s last race was the 2026 NASCAR All-Star Race at Dover Motor Speedway, not the race at Watkins Glen nor the 2024 Charlotte race which has now been put up. ~2026-30753-25 (talk) 22:50, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
- @~2026-30753-25 The “Last Race” line in the infobox only counts points-paying races, which the All Star Race was not. I disagree with this as well, but it cannot be changed at the moment without a clear consensus on the NASCAR Wikiproject as doing so would require thousands of edits to NASCAR-related pages. Electricmemory (talk) 23:32, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I was going to then say would the Dover truck race he won be seen as his last, but I see on the NASCAR app that he gained no points in that race as well. ~2026-30753-25 (talk) 13:22, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- Added an efn note about the situation. --Super Goku V (talk) 05:45, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Front picture
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Given how the picture in KB's infobox has changed 3 times since the news, I feel like we need a consensus about his front picture. 45BearsFan (talk) 01:48, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- I've reverted to what it was before his death. Wiki has a weird habit of changing to old photos for some reason after someone dies. Electricmemory (talk) 15:05, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- While I agree- especially in people that died young- the 2026 is a little blurry and shows the side of his face, while the 2020 is a frontal picture from up close. I think it should go back to that. Additionally he's with the M&M scheme which is much more instantly recognizable and iconic regarding his career. Ideally it should be a picture showing his bare face IMO, there a are few in Commons. Otisu(talk) 15:15, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- Personally, I am fine with whatever is picked as long as it is within the last ten years for recognizably. --Super Goku V (talk) 15:34, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, I like the 2020 one. shows a clear picture of his face, while also being with his m&m’s sponsorship as that was easily his most notable. 45BearsFan (talk) 16:24, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- I have no opinion on this particular picture but with regards to "Wiki has a weird habit of changing to old photos for some reason after someone dies", typically for living people, the most recent photo is the best representation of who that person is while for a dead person, the most representative photo is one when they were most well known (typically when they were younger). Sxg169 (talk) 19:11, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- Because it is mainly a tradition for deaditors to change celebrity pictures to older pictures after they die, I feel like this image may be the best choice for the lead image of Kyle Busch's page after his death. 0ver3stlmatingAnEdit (talk) 00:41, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- We are not concerned with "traditions" when editing on Wikipedia. The 2008 image is of worse quality than the current 2025 one or the proposed 2020 one. The 2020 one is probably the best choice. Electricmemory (talk) 13:53, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- See the pages of Bill Russell, Hulk Hogan, Roddy Piper, Randy Savage, Jim Brown, Alan Kulwicki, Jerry West, Ultimate Warrior, and even Elizabeth II. Their current lead images are as well grainy and are taken from their younger years. 0ver3stlmatingAnEdit (talk) 13:57, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- All of those articles are for people who were much older than Busch, meaning the images are going to be lower quality by default. Kulwicki's image is from two years before his death. Just because other editors chose grainy low quality images for those articles doesn't mean we need to do the same here; plus if you want a photo from when he was at the height of his career, the 2020 one works as it's several months after his second Cup Series championship. Electricmemory (talk) 14:00, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- See the pages of Bill Russell, Hulk Hogan, Roddy Piper, Randy Savage, Jim Brown, Alan Kulwicki, Jerry West, Ultimate Warrior, and even Elizabeth II. Their current lead images are as well grainy and are taken from their younger years. 0ver3stlmatingAnEdit (talk) 13:57, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- We are not concerned with "traditions" when editing on Wikipedia. The 2008 image is of worse quality than the current 2025 one or the proposed 2020 one. The 2020 one is probably the best choice. Electricmemory (talk) 13:53, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- I get that, but it's often way overdone, plus that doesn't really apply in this case. The 2020 photo suggested above would be from right after he won his second series championship anyways. Electricmemory (talk) 13:54, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- This debate has to be resolved through a poll anyway. 0ver3stlmatingAnEdit (talk) 18:24, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- Agreed. I feel like holding a pole would be the best. How would we nominate pictures though? SPFan2479 (talk) 22:46, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- This debate has to be resolved through a poll anyway. 0ver3stlmatingAnEdit (talk) 18:24, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- Because it is mainly a tradition for deaditors to change celebrity pictures to older pictures after they die, I feel like this image may be the best choice for the lead image of Kyle Busch's page after his death. 0ver3stlmatingAnEdit (talk) 00:41, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- While I agree- especially in people that died young- the 2026 is a little blurry and shows the side of his face, while the 2020 is a frontal picture from up close. I think it should go back to that. Additionally he's with the M&M scheme which is much more instantly recognizable and iconic regarding his career. Ideally it should be a picture showing his bare face IMO, there a are few in Commons. Otisu(talk) 15:15, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- Busch in 2008
Proposed better infobox photos without dark glasses
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
How about these photos of Kyle Busch without dark glasses for the infobox and also clearer view of his face?
- Option A (2013)
- Option B (2016)
- Option C (2017)
- Option D (2017)
- Option E (2025)
- Option F (2025)
- Option G (2018) (added by KagedCroc1)
- Options A, E, and F seem like the best out of the choices. – MysticCipher87(alt-account) (talk) 17:55, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- I feel like Option E or F would be best to show the most recent image of him. Jelloistired (talk) 18:03, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- Note: I have added a new ‘Option G’ image from 2018, because I do believe it highlights his career and his ‘prime’ pretty well.
- Option A seems too early (and is misleading regarding his career), and I feel like options E and F are too close to his death rather than his most achievable period. Whereas options, B, C, D, and the image that I have added, G, are all during his ‘prime’. I believe that B and D are slightly too blurry to be lead images, and C shows him in a slightly odd position. Thus, I believe Option G (my included image) seems to be the best option out of all these, with the only (minor) negatives being the microphone, the phone, and not facing the camera that much. KagedCroc1 ⭐️ 20:37, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- Tagging users in discussion JIC: @DvTor8303, @MysticCipher87(alt-account), @Jelloistired KagedCroc1 ⭐️ 20:44, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- I think that due to G not showing his face well, it would not be a good front photo. – MysticCipher87(alt-account) (talk) 20:49, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- One more note: If he were still alive though, I would support F more. KagedCroc1 ⭐️ 11:26, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- Tagging users in discussion JIC: @DvTor8303, @MysticCipher87(alt-account), @Jelloistired KagedCroc1 ⭐️ 20:44, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- Option A is not a good photo. He looks like an airline pilot on his first day. Option G is a better option, and 2018 is a good year to represent given the regular season championship win. Options E and F are also good, as this isn't a case where the most recent images are significantly different from when the subject was most notable. AntiCompositeNumber (they/them) (talk) 23:17, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- I'd go with Option C, D, or G. 45BearsFan (talk) 23:31, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- Well, I feel like my choice nonetheless is still good, as whether or not he has sunglasses in the image or not, the date of the picture, alongside its focus on his face and the candid nature of him signing autographs on fan material, can justify it being the main image for KB's article. 0ver3stlmatingAnEdit (talk) 18:08, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- My preference would be Option E and Option F due to his appearance looking more recognizable than the others. --Super Goku V (talk) 04:13, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- I think F looks best. G is not terrible either but I would go with one where his mouth is closed or smiling. Otisu(talk) 07:10, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- In order of preference, I'd go F, G, E, C, D, B. glman (talk) 15:31, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- After further thought, I'd go with option F as it seems like that is the ongoing consensus. 45BearsFan (talk) 15:20, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
- I think Option E and F are the best options Imdeadinside12 (talk) 12:18, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
- For what it is, G is a great photo, but I would also support Option F here. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 23:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
- Would anyone be opposed to me opening a Request for Comment with options for status quo, and Options A, C, E, F, and G (the ones with !votes here)? I don't think we'll get a real consensus with so many options without wider input from the community. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 23:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
- Well, this talk is mostly in support for Option F, followed by Option G as the runner up. We are in a new month and I hardly believe that other people will suddenly support another option. KagedCroc1 ⭐️ 15:01, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- Agreed. I think we have enough consensus here. glman (talk) 15:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- Fair enough, then. I think Options A and G have a place within the article as well. But the infobox seems settled. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 21:14, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- I agree, maybe we can move it to those two pictures to the NASCAR career of Kyle Busch, during the respective year, but if Option F is the consensus on his picture, I can do it now. 45BearsFan (talk) 45BearsFan (talk) 21:40, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- I concur with GhostOf, I do think they have a place. 45Bears, I am not opposed to this. Would you like to go ahead and add them to the respective sections as they fit? glman (talk) 13:01, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
- I agree, maybe we can move it to those two pictures to the NASCAR career of Kyle Busch, during the respective year, but if Option F is the consensus on his picture, I can do it now. 45BearsFan (talk) 45BearsFan (talk) 21:40, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- Fair enough, then. I think Options A and G have a place within the article as well. But the infobox seems settled. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 21:14, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- Agreed. I think we have enough consensus here. glman (talk) 15:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- Well, this talk is mostly in support for Option F, followed by Option G as the runner up. We are in a new month and I hardly believe that other people will suddenly support another option. KagedCroc1 ⭐️ 15:01, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- Would anyone be opposed to me opening a Request for Comment with options for status quo, and Options A, C, E, F, and G (the ones with !votes here)? I don't think we'll get a real consensus with so many options without wider input from the community. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 23:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Should we split Rowdy Energy into its own article?
[edit]Wouldn't seem like a bad idea although it would be a stub. (Zakk😎) 15:12, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose - as Rowdy Energy is not notable enough for a standalone article per WP:NORG. I performed the merge 5 years ago as an alternative to nominating the article for deletion at WP:AfD, before the company ceased operations and there's nothing that's happened in the interim that's change my stance. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (hihi) 23:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 July 2026
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Infobox says he had 29 years in the Truck Series when he only had 24 AJRay203 (talk) 22:57, 17 July 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Mid-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Nevada articles
- Low-importance Nevada articles
- C-Class Las Vegas articles
- Mid-importance Las Vegas articles
- WikiProject Las Vegas articles
- WikiProject Nevada articles
- C-Class NASCAR articles
- Top-importance NASCAR articles
- WikiProject NASCAR articles
- C-Class Food and drink articles
- Low-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report



