Talk:Kaph
Add topic | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I think "CoF" should be a redirect to Cradle Of Filth, with a disambiguation note about Kaph. --81.219.231.40 15:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
ךּ
[edit]I hoped that here I'd find an answer to a question I used to have whenever looking at the alef-bet chart in Hebrew school: When does final ךּ ever get used, given that kaf is one of the letters that's always aspirated at word-end? So it's always ך. Not answered here, and I actually can't find any information to pull into the article from outside sources. (Pointed versions: ךָ ךָּ) Can anyone point me to an explanation? Largoplazo (talk) 20:40, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
ךְ
[edit]Similarly to my previous petitioner, I always find final kaph with two dots at the position of a dagesh (and not at the lower position where it normally resides). I originally thought this was a final "ornamental" variant of the dagesh, hence denoting a kaph rather than a khaf. Obviously, it's instead a shva at a visually more appealing position. But I'm still not sure.
Maybe someone can inform us about this phenomenon in the article. --Markus Prokott (talk) 19:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Final kaf/khaf isn't the only final-form Hebrew letter that takes a vowel.
[edit]The article states:
"Kaf/khaf is the only Hebrew letter that can take a vowel in its word-final form, which is pronounced after the consonant, that vowel being the qamatz."
While this may be true of modern Hebrew, it's not true of Scripture, where the word-final nun also appears on occasion with a qamatz. Not sure how or whether the article should be amended to reflect this. Ted Hopp (talk) 19:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
So what's up with template:speculation up on this article? It's about a hebrew letter, and there is no clarification even on the talk page
[edit]I wonder whether it should be removed, as there is no room for speculation and I certainly don't notice any in the article.
LocalGoose1234 (talk) 10:18, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
- I agree, so I removed it. It was placed here on 23 March by User:Krishdesai7, so on the same day also tagged a few other Hebrew-related articles for unsourced material, but didn't put this tag on any of them. I think it was a matter of selecting an inapplicable tag for whatever their concern was. Largoplazo (talk) 12:42, 8 August 2025 (UTC)