Talk:Jurassic World
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jurassic World article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 May 2013. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2015, when it received 14,283,010 views. |
| This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 9 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
 | On 7 August 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to Jurassic World (film). The result of the discussion was not moved. |
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Redundant comparisons
[edit]Undoubtedly, this is a great film with outstanding performance in many aspects but I think we should delete all the other films and their revenue cited in the reception section since such info. is completely irrelevant to Jurassic World itself and not that meaningful. It's well enough to know that it has broken numerous records. Full lists are available on their main pages or references. In dialogue with Biomedicinal 13:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Horror film?
[edit]Reviewing the edit history for this article, I see that multiple IPs have removed the categorization of this film as a horror film, and have consistently been reverted. My question is: why? The lead doesn't describe JW as being a horror film, nor does the body of the article in its current form appear to describe it as such, and I didn't see that the edit summaries provided by the reverting editors ever included a rationale for reinstating the category.
As such, I've taken it upon myself to remove the 'horror film' category. Editors who believe JW should be classified as such are welcome to provide their reasoning here. DonIago (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- The Turner Classic Movie database classifies it as "horror," which was why editors were categorizing it as horror here. Mr Fink (talk) 16:00, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks; I don't have any objection to that, but it should be added to the article before the category is re-added, as categories are required to be supported by the article's verifiable content. DonIago (talk) 16:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Jurassic Park which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:03, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
- B-Class film articles
- B-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Low-importance American cinema articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class science fiction articles
- Mid-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report