Talk:Juno (spacecraft)
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Juno (spacecraft) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| Juno (spacecraft) was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| News items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on July 5, 2016, and June 10, 2021. | ||||||||||
| A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 5, 2021. | ||||||||||
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
On 5 July 2016, Juno (spacecraft) was linked from Google, a high-traffic website. (Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
JIRAM mirror is stuck?
[edit]Astronomy professor Jason Perry at LCC, one of the scientists who are working with Juno data (specifically the JIRAM instrument) has mentioned yesterday – in passing – that the instrument's mirror is stuck.[1] I cannot find anything about this in either the present article, or in Jovian Infrared Auroral Mapper. A quick Google search also yields nothing. If the instrument is indeed damaged, I think that should be mentioned in the article!
References
- ↑ Jason Perry [@volcanopele] (13 November 2023). "(11/n) Where to go from here? Well, this study focused primarily on the M-band data from JIRAM, but yes, I did also measure L-band spectral radiances, so that's a path forward. Juno JIRAM, despite its stuck mirror, is still acquiring data at Io, and at Io's poles" (Tweet). Retrieved 14 November 2023 – via X (formerly Twitter).
Renerpho (talk) 18:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- A similar question was asked here by a different user in January 2022, but that question was archived before being answered. Renerpho (talk) 18:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Thebe flyby
[edit]Were any pictures taken? Double sharp (talk) 12:53, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
End of mission
[edit]Do we have any proper information regarding the end of mission? There is a bunch of information claiming end of September 2025, but there is no specific recent information on this.
I assume with the difficult space science funding situation in the US right now, the situation might be rather unclear, and the lack of communication might be related to hopes of a delayed mission extension. But I do not find any sources corraborating this hypothesis. -- MGChecker (talk) 13:58, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Juno team member here. The spacecraft continues to operate, and another perijove occurred in October with more upcoming. There is no decision yet on a second mission extension, but the spacecraft operations are stable enough that the spacecraft is being run as usual "until a later decision comes down." But that lack of certainty also means a lack of explicit sources on Juno's status. Dralwik|Have a Chat 15:34, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
- Since the space probe is running as usual, are there going to be any scientific observation? Jonathan Chone (talk) 09:19, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
- Juno team member here. The spacecraft continues to operate, and another perijove occurred in October with more upcoming. There is no decision yet on a second mission extension, but the spacecraft operations are stable enough that the spacecraft is being run as usual "until a later decision comes down." But that lack of certainty also means a lack of explicit sources on Juno's status. Dralwik|Have a Chat 15:34, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
Extended mission review
[edit]@Jonathan Chone: I reverted your attempt to resolve the citation needed tag I added to the lede section, in Special:Diff/1327613823. The problem is that that reference is from April 2025, when the plan still was that Juno's mission would be extended the usual way in September/October 2025. A lot has happened since then, due to the government shutdown mostly, and that source unfortunately does not establish that a review is taking place at this time. We need a source that was published after the recent events. Renerpho (talk) 08:21, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
- I've removed that sentence from the lede. There just aren't any news about the status of the spacecraft, so even if this happens to be true, it's little more than gossip. We'll get to know what happens to Juno eventually. Until then, noting that it's operational and in contact with Earth as of the time of the source is all we can be sure of. Renerpho (talk) 05:48, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- B-Class spaceflight articles
- Mid-importance spaceflight articles
- WikiProject Spaceflight articles
- B-Class Astronomy articles
- Mid-importance Astronomy articles
- B-Class Astronomy articles of Mid-importance
- B-Class Jupiter articles
- High-importance Jupiter articles
- Jupiter task force articles
- B-Class Solar System articles
- Mid-importance Solar System articles
- Solar System task force
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Articles linked from high traffic sites

