Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26fa2ad680ba9c0

Jump to content

Talk:Juno (spacecraft)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by Renerpho in topic Extended mission review
Former good article nomineeJuno (spacecraft) was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 23, 2015Good article nomineeNot listed
In the newsNews items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on July 5, 2016, and June 10, 2021.
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 5, 2021.

JIRAM mirror is stuck?

[edit]

Astronomy professor Jason Perry at LCC, one of the scientists who are working with Juno data (specifically the JIRAM instrument) has mentioned yesterday – in passing – that the instrument's mirror is stuck.[1] I cannot find anything about this in either the present article, or in Jovian Infrared Auroral Mapper. A quick Google search also yields nothing. If the instrument is indeed damaged, I think that should be mentioned in the article!

References

  1. Jason Perry [@volcanopele] (13 November 2023). "(11/n) Where to go from here? Well, this study focused primarily on the M-band data from JIRAM, but yes, I did also measure L-band spectral radiances, so that's a path forward. Juno JIRAM, despite its stuck mirror, is still acquiring data at Io, and at Io's poles" (Tweet). Retrieved 14 November 2023 via X (formerly Twitter).

Renerpho (talk) 18:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

A similar question was asked here by a different user in January 2022, but that question was archived before being answered. Renerpho (talk) 18:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thebe flyby

[edit]

Were any pictures taken? Double sharp (talk) 12:53, 19 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

End of mission

[edit]

Do we have any proper information regarding the end of mission? There is a bunch of information claiming end of September 2025, but there is no specific recent information on this.

With Juno, however, the evolution of its flight path in the extended mission meant that it no longer posed a risk to contaminate these ocean worlds, now beyond its reach. The spacecraft will continue its exploration of Jupiter, its ring system, and moons through September 2025. Then Juno’s orbit will degrade naturally, and Jupiter’s gravity will pull the spacecraft in to be consumed in the atmosphere.

I assume with the difficult space science funding situation in the US right now, the situation might be rather unclear, and the lack of communication might be related to hopes of a delayed mission extension. But I do not find any sources corraborating this hypothesis. -- MGChecker (talk) 13:58, 29 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Juno team member here. The spacecraft continues to operate, and another perijove occurred in October with more upcoming. There is no decision yet on a second mission extension, but the spacecraft operations are stable enough that the spacecraft is being run as usual "until a later decision comes down." But that lack of certainty also means a lack of explicit sources on Juno's status. Dralwik|Have a Chat 15:34, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Since the space probe is running as usual, are there going to be any scientific observation? Jonathan Chone (talk) 09:19, 15 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Extended mission review

[edit]

@Jonathan Chone: I reverted your attempt to resolve the citation needed tag I added to the lede section, in Special:Diff/1327613823. The problem is that that reference is from April 2025, when the plan still was that Juno's mission would be extended the usual way in September/October 2025. A lot has happened since then, due to the government shutdown mostly, and that source unfortunately does not establish that a review is taking place at this time. We need a source that was published after the recent events. Renerpho (talk) 08:21, 15 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

I've removed that sentence from the lede. There just aren't any news about the status of the spacecraft, so even if this happens to be true, it's little more than gossip. We'll get to know what happens to Juno eventually. Until then, noting that it's operational and in contact with Earth as of the time of the source is all we can be sure of. Renerpho (talk) 05:48, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply