Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25bb201c9d86c75

Jump to content

Talk:Iggy Azalea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Nevlis in topic Edit request: Claim disputed by source
Former good article nomineeIggy Azalea was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 12, 2015Good article nomineeNot listed
November 29, 2015Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 May 2024

[edit]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 May 2024

[edit]

Incorrect views number / Change views number

[edit]

Hello, since I can't change this, can someone change the beginning statement "[]...her Youtube channel has accumulated 3.4 billion views" to change it to 4.1 billion, since it's not 3.4, and if necessary put 6.3 billion views overall including other artists. Thanks 89.201.185.88 (talk) 18:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Updating her info

[edit]

Briefly, her views count are incorrect, should be 4.2 billion SatelliteChange (talk) 07:05, 13 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Problems with additions

[edit]

@SatelliteChange: sorry if anything i've said is offending, but before you consider restoring these recent edits you make to the page, please make sure:

  • I'm sorry but that grammar is awful. There's so much you can learn by taking a look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Keep in mind that you have to use "Azalea" not "Iggy" when referring to her. Your additions are not a good representation of what the Wikipedia site should look like, especially taking into consideration this page gets a million page views annually. Without offense, your edit summaries have better grammar than the paragraphs you add.
  • On August 2023 Tory was sentenced to 10 years in prison and with that her upcoming 4th album was abandoned and she seemingly announced her retirement from music again in 2024 to focus on more creative projects. does not support what the reference says
  • In 2024 she launched her memecoin called Mother Iggy ("$MOTHER"). According to CNN Iggy has reached capitalization of about $200 million. Besides cryptocurrency, Iggy launched her own non-contract telecommunication service called "Unreal Mobile", as well as crowd-funding platform "Dream Vault".[citation needed] In 2024 She told Forbes about the "Dream Vault": "DreamVault is a platform that I created so that anybody who has a dream, it's a place where they can try to achieve it and create a community to help them achieve whatever it is that their goal is".[citation needed] if you can't source this then don't add it
  • She reportedly made $307.000 in first five days, and $48 million in first year the dot in "307.000" should be a comma (this may make users think that it's 307 dollars, not 307,000). how do we know whether it's talking about US dollar or AU dollar?

Personally I don't think all of the additions belong to this section, since "career" refers to her musical career. I think you should add that to a subsection in personal life or create a new section. Also Money Come should be stylised as "Money Come" not Money Come.

Without offending anyone the burden is on you to fix this; you were the one who added it, you should carry the responsibility to fix it (unless another editor decides to step in). As you said, "we are all here to help each other"; I'm helping you right now by giving you these suggestions. I'd recommend using Grammarly but personal opinion. Keep in mind that grammar like this may push users away from the site and therefore decrease users' trust in Wikipedia, especially considering this article gets a million views annually, as they may think that we're just some writers who don't care about the grammar of the site and therefore don't care about factual accuracy. Best, 750h+ 11:40, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thanks for detailed tips in order to change my edit that I was writing for a long period of time. I am a rap music fan, I like to update pop culture related articles and yes my first language is not english (still think it’s good for what I wrote) and I will change everything you pointed out. It seemed like you were mocking my grammar without even knowing how much effort did I put into this and hours outside researching info and data for Iggy. I am Iggy’s fan and I think some things you pointed out were fair enough and I will fix them, but please don’t disregard someones work just because you think itks not up to part or good enough. Its a common knowledge to update to most recent news and updates of any celebrity so I would still put her “business” addition to her career section because then judging by what you said “Personally I don't think all of the additions belong to this section, since "career" refers to her musical career. I think you should add that to a subsection in personal life or create a new section ” Beyonce, Britney Spears, Lady Gaga, Selena Gomez, and even rap artist Nicki Minaj and Cardi B wouldnt have half of their business projects on career section, she is an artist and its still part of her career if that makes sense. And I will use grammarly too. I will change everything you pointed out, fix my grammar, search for sources. SatelliteChange (talk) 05:44, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hey, just letting you know that I made grammatical corrections to your additions to the article (as my first language is English). You did an excellent job with what you added, and I'm sorry you felt mocked for what you contributed, although I don't think the other editor intended to mock you; proper grammar is just important to maintain, particularly on very frequently-visited articles like that of Azalea, because good presentation contributes to developing credibility.
I will let you know that I did delete a section you wrote regarding her OnlyFans. I had no issue with the text you wrote, or with the inclusion of that information, but I can explain my reasons for deleting it. I have experience with LADBible and Marca and have generally found them to be unreliable as sources; after a quick Google search, I saw those were the most credible of all the sources that mentioned her OF. (All the other sources were even worse!) I also had trouble with the fact that mentioning her OF broke up the chronology of that section, as it seemed to flow better when it only discussed her music career and the seeming "end" of her music career in January 2024, with brief mention of her post-music activities afterwards. However, she launched her OF in 2023, before ending her music career, yet the text in that section seemed to contradict the preceding text discussing the end of her music career (because it mentioned that she would post her music on OF); generally, the way it was included in the article didn't seem to flow well with the other text, at least in my opinion. Combined with the fact that the sources weren't terribly reliable, I made a decision to remove it.
If there are better sources to corroborate information about her OF, I encourage you to add them; please don't feel discouraged from contributing – but I do agree that they may be better suited in a subsection of the article dedicated to discussing her endeavors outside of her music career. Maybe the article could be slightly rearranged to accommodate that information more seamlessly. Afddiary (talk) 00:03, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Images from 2022

[edit]

I uploaded few images that might improve this article. If somebody wants, they can add them. No.cilepogača (talk) 21:11, 21 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Aborigine

[edit]

Why is there a [sic] after the word "Aborigine" when that is not an error? 2A00:23C6:A11B:8001:DE:14E2:153B:26FB (talk) 03:59, 27 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Because of adjective noun disagreement Aborigine is singular, people are plural, so it's not Aborigine people it's Aboriginal people. No.cilepogača (talk) 21:07, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 16 October 2025

[edit]

Change "Priscilla, Queen of the Desert (1997)" to "Priscilla, Queen of the Desert (1994)" AceGothstein (talk) 00:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Done Day Creature (talk) 01:49, 16 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 January 2026

[edit]

Xxxxcl

Edit request: Claim disputed by source

[edit]

Remove or change under Personal Life: "Azalea has a chronic wound on her leg following an infection."

In first source cited, Azalea states she had (past tense) a chronic unhealing wound from a PICC line in her arm (different body part). Nevlis (talk) 21:26, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply