Talk:Identity Evropa
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Identity Evropa article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
| You Will Not Replace Us was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 15 July 2017 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
| The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
| There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article. Editors are encouraged to use neutral mechanisms for requesting outside input, such as request for comments, third opinions, posting to noticeboard, or other mechanisms based on neutral criteria. If someone has asked you to provide your opinion here, examine the arguments, not the editors who have made them. Remember that, on Wikipedia, disputes are resolved by community consensus, not by majority vote. |
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
Reminder to expect paid brigading, sockpuppetry and astroturfing from Identity Evropa on this article
[edit]| This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
The rebranded American Identity Movement is looking to hire an SEO and PR firm to whitewash the Identity Evropa and American Identity Movement’s Wikipedia articles.
Text from their announcement:
Attention @all:
Those of you who've been paying attention will have noticed, likely to your dissatisfaction, that the atrocious Identity Evropa Wikipedia page now states that American Identity Movement is a rebrand of IE (incorrect). While our Wikipedia team's efforts have been heroic, it's becoming increasingly clear that we will be unable to win this without help. As such, we will be hiring a company to create a new AIM Wikipedia page. This will cost us thousands of dollars, but it will well be worth it. Oftentimes, the Wikipedia page for a particular entity is the first thing that comes up in a Google search; such is the case for our nascent organization. Thankfully, a generous member has donated $1000. Another has donated $300. The best package costs $3500„ so we're going to try to get as close to this number as possible. TO donate to our Wikipedia fund, you can send a contribution via Zelle to {REDACTED} or to via mail: {REDACTED}.
Thank you!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by My Wiki Alter Ego (talk • contribs) 20:59, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Swap the dragon's eye logo with the AIM logo?
[edit]Now that the organisation has rebranded, even though it is better known by its former name shouldn't you swap the positions on the page of the two logos? With the dragon's eye going into the spot in the article and the new AIM logo going into the infobox. Ptwinters (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Not as long as the article is called "Identity Evropa". Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:00, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Should we begin discussing moving the page then? Also I second that the logo should match the article tittle. Bgrus22 (talk) 19:55, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- We are not moving the article. They are most well-known as Identity Evropa; we will not be doing their white-wash job for them.--Jorm (talk) 20:04, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Should we begin discussing moving the page then? Also I second that the logo should match the article tittle. Bgrus22 (talk) 19:55, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
On the slogan "You will not replace us"
[edit]This slogan was used in part because it sounds similar to "Jews will not replace us", which is the core belief part of the great replacement conspiracy. Evidence of this is the tiki torch march at the unite the right rally and subsequent whitewashing claiming participants yelled "You will not replace us". Suggesting an edit to highlight the antisemitism of this group. Chudjak99 (talk) 01:41, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Discrimination articles
- Low-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report