Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28e8c5d1d2f365e

Jump to content

Talk:Harvard Extension School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Johndowning in topic See also: Lyceum movement
Good articleHarvard Extension School has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 8, 2015Good article nomineeNot listed
April 30, 2016Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Degree development

[edit]

It strikes me that this section is too heavily focused on the Degree-name controversy. Although this is an issue for our time, it is not the primary purpose of the article on HES, or even this section. Perhaps the section can either be moved lower in the page, below Degree Programs, which is certainly more central to the topic, or integrated into degree programs as a sub topic. I am going to go ahead and move the section, if anyone objects, feel free to move it back up in the article. Johndowning (talk) 14:29, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

See also: Lyceum movement

[edit]

I propose removing this link. The historical significance to HES seems a bit tenuous for a main level link. Perhaps it can be listed in notes or references if there is a relevant linking article? Johndowning (talk) 15:17, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

I went ahead and just removed the Lyceum movement reference link. It may be best to add it back as a reference. I'm not sure which is preferable. It just seemed a bit out of place near the top of this article. Johndowning (talk) 14:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply