Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26296314ecc26b9

Jump to content

Talk:George IV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by ItsShandog in topic George vs Prince George
Featured articleGeorge IV is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starGeorge IV is part of the British monarchs series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 2, 2006.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 5, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
March 5, 2007Featured article reviewKept
June 14, 2007Featured topic candidateNot promoted
February 24, 2026Featured topic candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 26, 2017, and June 26, 2025.
Current status: Featured article

"Regency Bill" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Regency Bill has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 7 § Regency Bill until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) 14:29, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

RfC of interest

[edit]

(non-automated message) Greetings! I have opened an RfC on WT:ROYALTY that may be of interest to users following this article talk page! You are encouraged to contribute to this discussion here! Hurricane Andrew (444) 20:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Samuel Chifney#The Escape scandal and Escape (horse)#Newmarket sensation

[edit]

Is there a reason this incident isn't mentioned in the article? I feel like it was one that affected him pretty profoundly? There's no mention of horses or Newmarket at all. Valereee (talk) 15:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

George vs Prince George

[edit]

I understand his father was also named George, but throughout most of the article he's referred to as "The King," while George IV is called "George" in both the third paragraph of the lead and the start of the early life section. It’s unclear why that would be considered acceptable there but potentially confusing elsewhere in the article. In many places, the article also uses phrasing like "George and his father," which makes the distinction even clearer. Since this is George IV's article, it’s obvious to readers who’s being discussed. George III's grandfather was also named George, yet he’s still referred to simply as "George" — not "Prince George" — throughout his own article without causing confusion, so I don't see why this page should be treated differently. ItsShandog (talk) 15:15, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

For example:
  • "Acting on George's authority, the Whig leader Charles James Fox declared that the story was a calumny." I don't find it clear which George is meant.
  • "His father refused to assist him, forcing him to quit Carlton House and live at Fitzherbert's residence. In 1787, George's political allies proposed to relieve his debts with a parliamentary grant." The preceding sentence relates to King George, so in ordinary grammar, the George in the second sentence also relates to the King, which is incorrect.
  • "George's brother Prince Frederick, Duke of York and Albany, declared that George ..." Unclear. You have to know beforehand that Frederick is George III's son not brother.
These are just three examples. The changes were wholesale and led to unclear text. As I said in the edit summary, copy edits need to be done with greater care. DrKay (talk) 15:34, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the explanation, I see where you are coming from now. ItsShandog (talk) 16:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)Reply