Talk:Emoticons (Unicode block)
Add topic | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]There is a nice (if graphics heavy) list of all emojis and how various software renders them on the official Unicode website.--Henke37 (talk) 19:47, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Variation sequences
[edit]@Electro twisted wizard: You've edited this article multiple times to add variation sequences for U+1F611-1F616. Variation sequences for emoji are defined in http://www.unicode.org/Public/emoji/5.0/emoji-variation-sequences.txt as part of The Unicode Standard. U+1F610 is the only code point in the Emoticons Unicode block to have defined variation sequences. Why do you believe U+1F611-1F616 also have them? DRMcCreedy (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Reply 1
[edit]Um....... The other blocks are also emoji and in the same group.(Emoticons)Electro twisted wizard (talk) 05:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Text variant forms aren't displayed as text
[edit]I don't know how to fix this (use U+FE0E explicitly?), but in the "Variant forms" section, the "text presentation" examples... aren't. I assume they are meant to be something like :( etc. David Brooks (talk) 23:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Text presentation doesn't work that way. You'll still see a single graphic character but it won't be in color. See UTS #51. DRMcCreedy (talk) 04:30, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
"😵" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect 😵 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 29 § 😵 until a consensus is reached. – Scyrme (talk/solidarity) 16:45, 29 July 2026 (UTC)