Talk:Dope.security
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by Arbor to SJ in topic Contested deletion
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion
[edit]This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... It includes citations to secondary sources coverage, so this organization meets notability guidelines. --Arbor to SJ (talk) 15:27, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Arbor to SJ:
- Crunchbase is not a reliable source.
- Dope Security's own website and company-authored document are primary sources, which can't establish notability.
- Silicon Republic looks reliable but a sizeable portion of the article is an interview with company staff, which is also a primary source.
- Security Week seems reliable, but given the problems with the other sources, I don't know if it's enough to establish notability.
- Crunchbase is not a reliable source.
- --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:39, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- The source cited was TechCrunch, not CrunchBase. Also, I've added another secondary source (FinSMEs); the number of secondary sources provided should be sufficient to meet WP:NOTABILITY. Arbor to SJ (talk) 01:26, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Computer security articles
- Low-importance Computer security articles
- Stub-Class Computer security articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Computer security articles
- Stub-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles