Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23224e3c975a594

Jump to content

Talk:Dog flea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by 2001:569:BD1A:EC00:A8F1:93D2:36FA:E053 in topic List of Treatment products...

Untitled

[edit]

Wow, for such a prevelant pest, to dogs, thier owners and houses, this page certaily lacks detail. I would make the effort to improve this, but i know very little, so Biology Buffs out there, this ones yours :p —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.164.199.67 (talk) 13:27, 6 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Separate out flea treatment/prevention to own section?

[edit]

I'm thinking about separating out the flea treatment & prevention section into its own article, that can be referenced for both dogs and cats. Thoughts? Adelle Frank (talk) 03:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

List of Treatment products...

[edit]

I'm concerned the list of treatment products by brand is inappropriate for an encyclopaedia article. Perhaps a separate article listing notable brands would be better, or no list at all (this isn't a shopping catalogue). There are also some instructional 'how-to' elements which aren't appropriate. Your thoughts? 77.99.12.140 (talk) 22:46, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

i agree. I had expected a list of various brands in a chart with details. Also, the links are pathetic--surely there are more academic articles that provide basic details. This is such a common topic--and this page is reinforcing all the teachers who claim that wikipedia is not a good source  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:BD1A:EC00:A8F1:93D2:36FA:E053 (talk) 05:57, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dog flea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dog flea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply