Talk:DirtyTooth

Contested deletion

Hi to all.

This is my first article in Wikipedia and I'm totally neutral with DirtyTooth. In fact, I have more ideas for further articles related with computer security flaws like this one. I´m only trying to be part of the community and I really don't understand where is the advertisement point of my article. There is not any company involved, its only a security flaw that I think is important to be known.

I rewrote it twice, removing a lot of content and using the same layout and following the writing guides from another Wikipedia articles ,like for example HeartBleed.

¿Where is the difference between my article and this one about BlueBorne? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlueBorne_(security_vulnerability) Even mine doesn't have any reference to any company.

Please, rethink the deletion of this draft, I think this article about DirtyTooth is totally neutral and it is no promoting anything. I´ve made some last minute changes again on the article. Thanks a lot.

I've withdrawn the proposed deletion. I believe the article was misunderstood amd incorrectly tGged. Resubmit when you are ready. I'd suggest adding some more sources. Legacypac (talk) 08:16, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

• Comment: Legacypac - A very fair point, and my apologies for mislabelling it. That said, with two YouTube videos and a Spanish blog as its sourcing, I'm fairly confident it doesn't demonstrate Notability through reliable sources. KJP1 (talk) 12:29, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

• Comment: As I understand this, it is not a product or business, but a computer software flaw. Therefore it is purely educational with nothing to sell. Legacypac (talk) 08:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

• Comment: Just as much an advertisement as it was when declined earlier today. KJP1 (talk) 21:13, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

---