Talk:Digital Legends

AdriSoft (talk) 16:04, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Requested move 29 May 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Clear consensus based on COMMONNAME. (closed by non-admin page mover) 1isall (talk | contribs) 11:57, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

---

Digital Legends → Digital Legends EntertainmentDigital Legends Entertainment – I propose moving this article from Digital Legends to Digital Legends Entertainment.

The article identifies the company as Digital Legends Entertainment. "Entertainment" appears to be part of the studio's full name rather than merely a legal suffix such as Inc., Corp. or LLC. Several video game studio articles use the full studio name when "Entertainment" is part of the recognizable name, such as Blizzard Entertainment, Obsidian Entertainment and Rovio Entertainment.

The current title, Digital Legends, should remain as a redirect. Chocococooo (talk) 03:46, 29 May 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 09:55, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Weak oppose. The resulting redirect would mean that the renamed article was no harder to find, so the move would do no damage. It's just a case of not fixing what is not broken. There is no policy-based argument proposed to support the move, and a search for Digital Legends Entertainment already gets this article as the first result. A redirect to this article from the proposed new name would be a good idea. Andrewa (talk) 05:40, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
• Comment. Just to add one point: the company’s current website branding also supports the proposed title. The website logo/header and footer use ‘‘Digital Legends Entertainment’’, while the contact page gives the legal name as ‘‘Digital Legends Entertainment S.L.’’. That suggests that ‘‘S.L.’’ is the corporate/legal suffix, while “Entertainment” is part of the branded studio name.

I agree that ‘‘Digital Legends’’ should remain as a redirect for the shorter form, but this official branding supports ‘‘Digital Legends Entertainment’’ as a recognizable, natural and more precise title under WP:CRITERIA. Chocococooo (talk) 15:04, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose. It should titled whatever its WP:COMMONNAME is, not what the studios calls itself or what its website is. The WP:OTHERSTUFF arguments falls apart, because it's Blizzard Entertainment, because it's different from a blizzard, while obsidian is a type of volcanic glass and Rovio has many meanings. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 15:05, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

This official branding does nothing of the sort. Primary sources such as this have some relevance but are given very little weight against the other criteria. Andrewa (talk) 04:29, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.