Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a27529ceff96c78f

Jump to content

Talk:Desert of Paran

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Leo1pard in topic Organization

Organization

[edit]

This article has good info that should be kept, but currently it appears in a jumbled, repetitive and not-so-organized format. I propose a better organization of the material into three sections per similar articles. One for the basic "meat" of the Biblical references, without any extraneous interpretations. The other two sections would be for the two major schools of thought on this: one section elaborating the sources for the view that it refers to Sinai, and one section elaborating the sources for the view that it refers to Hejaz. (Currently both of these views are repeated several times in both the "Biblical" section and the "Muslim" section, so dividing the article as I suggested would be a more logical division for avoiding repetition). I intend to reorganize this article along these lines (without losing any of the current information) a bit later on, assuming this is not controversial. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 17:02, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for that. I noticed a biased edit by a user who did not agree with the Islamic point-of-view. I would like to say to anyone who disagrees with either the Islamic or non-Islamic POV, that if anyone disagrees with either the Islamic or non-Islamic POV, then that person should keep it to himself or herself, and not vandalize this page, or other pages, to reflect his or her POV, because the purpose of this article is not necessarily to disagree with either the Islamic or non-Islamic POV of Paran. Leo1pard (talk) 13:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)Reply