Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2395dcef8743cd0

Jump to content

Talk:Dead!

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Cathodography in topic GA review

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 01:21, 9 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Matlock in 2023
Matlock in 2023
Improved to Good Article status by Launchballer (talk), Georgeykiwi (talk), and Issan Sumisu (talk). Number of QPQs required: 3. Nominator has 268 past nominations.

Launchballer 21:33, 12 January 2025 (UTC).Reply

  • Nominations by a veteran DYK contributor, including a GA, make for some of the easiest DYK reviews. The Matlock and Dead! articles are new, long enough, and well-sourced. The GA is recent. The image looks very good. I see neither neutrality nor copyright concerns in any of the articles. Could you remind me of the DYK rule allowing for orthography bending outside of April's Fools hooks, Launchballer? I see that the band is often called DEAD! in the cited sources. Perhaps such all caps would be better than either dead! or Dead! in ALT0. Would it be fun and semantically appropriate to replace "formed" with "had" or "has"? The separate alternative hooks are all very interesting too, though it might be kinder to let Sam shine in his own right. I do love the meta element in ALT3. Surtsicna (talk) 11:45, 13 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Sorry to keep you waiting on this; I hit a wall shortly between nominating and your comment. (I put Dead! and Sam Matlock together quite quickly.) I don't see anything at WP:DYKG regarding capitalisation but WP:DYKAPRIL suggests it can only be done for hooks on that day. There are some interesting hooks in such as "that Sam Matlock of Wargasm and Dead! has likened paid meet and greets to prostitution", but I'd need to add them to the article. For now, I can suggest ALT3a: "that Wargasm, featuring Dead! guitarist Sam Matlock, have been described as "looking like the Wikipedia definition of modern rock stars"?"--Launchballer 15:35, 19 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
I still like ALT0 best, Launchballer. It is concise and very punchy. The sense of urgency created by the interrobang is irresistible. It drew me in despite the topic being outside my normal zone of interest. What do you think about replacing dead! with DEAD!, as I see it written in some sources? ALT0a: ... that Sam Matlock (pictured) formed Wargasm with a woman who photographed DEAD!? Surtsicna (talk) 15:08, 20 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Fine by me. I added a note to the lead.--Launchballer 16:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm new to the QPQ process, but as far as I can see, this looks good to go. I think the hook ALT0a is the strongest. Jno.skinner (talk) 01:01, 21 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Dead!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Launchballer (talk · contribs) 04:37, 18 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Cathodography (talk · contribs) 13:17, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I'm happy to review this. This is only my third review and I appreciate your patience. Cattos💭 13:17, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nice work on this short article. Happy to  Pass !
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Comments

[edit]
  • Earwig looks solid at 12.3%.
  • Nothing strikes me as unreliale, though the website and author parameters need some working. Ex. "Classic Rock – issue 01/2025". yumpu.com and thesoundboardreviews (30 January 2018). "ALBUM REVIEW: 'The Golden Age Of Not Even Trying' by Dead!". The Soundboard
I think I got them all.--Launchballer 21:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • The genres in the infobox should be sourced.
I cut them.--Launchballer 21:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • The lead claims that the band moved to London on March 2016, but the body says June 2016.
Fixed lead.--Launchballer 21:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • "Matlock told CM Kavanagh" which Matlock?
Sam.--Launchballer 21:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • "that the band took its name from a folder he had compiled of songs he had made in case he was hit by a bus and the ! was added as the band were fans of Dangerous!." --> "that the band's name came from a folder of songs he had compiled in case he was hit by a bus. The exclamation mark was added because the band were fans of the punk band Dangerous!."
Amended.--Launchballer 21:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • "The band's members are from the Isle of Wight but formed a band in 2012"; "formed a band" is slightly redundant given that "The band's members... formed".
Changed "The band's" to "Its".--Launchballer 21:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • "and played their first gig that year." The word "gig" is also informal. Could be "The band's members are from the Isle of Wight but formed in 2012 while at Southampton Solent University, playing their first live performance that year."
Amended.--Launchballer 21:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • "They were Zane Lowe's "Next Big Hype" the year after." What exactly does this mean? Is this a quote?
Cut.--Launchballer 21:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • "In 2014, the band released the EP 'Tu Me Manques' " EPs are italicized per MOS:POPMUSIC.
Amended. I think that's everything.--Launchballer 21:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • "manufacturing their own zines and clothes" could be "creating their own zines and clothes" or "producing their own zines and clothes" for slightly better flow. "Manufacturing" sounds a bit industrial for zines/clothes made by a band.
Changed to reviewed.--Launchballer 12:43, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • The capitalization of "The" in "The Damned Restless Future" should be reviewed.
I added quote marks.--Launchballer 12:43, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Added.--Launchballer 12:43, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • "A further single release, October's 'The Golden Age of Not Even Trying' " This wording may come across as confusing, especially for "October's".
I moved the last sentence of the previous paragraph into this one. I think this makes things clearer.--Launchballer 12:43, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • "both took their title from the fact that the band felt society was living in it." --> "both titles reflected the band's view that society was living in such an age." The current phrasing is a bit clunky.
Amended.--Launchballer 12:43, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • "Matlock later formed Wargasm with the band's photographer Milkie Way, while Frank Carter, whom Dead! had supported in 2016, later became the lead vocalist of the Sex Pistols at Louis's suggestion." This sentence is a bit of a run-on. It combines two distinct pieces of information. It would be clearer as two separate sentences or by using a semicolon.
Moved Carter to earlier.--Launchballer 12:43, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
In "Also in 2016, Dead! supported Frank Carter, who later became the lead vocalist of the Sex Pistols at Louis's suggestion", does this mean that since 2016 Carter supported Dead, or in 2016 he became the vocalist for Sex Pistols? (it also doesn't mention Carter as a member in Sex Pistols#Band members, just a touring musician.)
Neither. It means they supported Carter in 2016 and that at some later point - which is almost certainly about but I don't believe there's a source that has it that mentions Dead! and is therefore undue - Carter became the vocalist for the Sex Pistols.--Launchballer 17:53, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
The sentence implies that Frank Carter became the official Sex Pistols frontman, but that's not how the source frames it. It omits that at the time, Frank Carter was performing with Frank Carter and the Rattlesnakes, not as a solo act. It also describes a more informal reunion involving Carter at Louis's suggestion, rather than a formal Sex Pistols lineup change. It may be unnecessary to include Carter's later involvement in Sex Pistols, since this event doesn't tie to Dead!'s career or notability.
I trimmed this.--Launchballer 18:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Done all five.--Launchballer 12:43, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
  • "You're so Cheap" (2018) in Singles list: The "History" section states "by the following month [June 2016], they had moved to London and released 'You're so Cheap' ". However, the "Singles" discography lists "You're so Cheap" as (2018).
"You're so Cheap" appears to have been released in 2016, hence why it's in prose, and given a rerelease in 2018 that received no coverage. I listed it as 2018 in the Discography section as I can't find any evidence the former received an official release rather than, say, a SoundCloud or a YouTube upload, hence why it's listed as that in the Discography section.--Launchballer 12:43, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
If 2016 is the initial release, update the discography to reflect that. If 2018 was a re-release, you can optionally clarify that in the discography.
Again, I can't find evidence that the 2016 version was an official release. I added 'a music video for', as the source confirms that.--Launchballer 17:53, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Spotcheck

[edit]
  • [1] Dead! comprised Alex Mountford, Sam Chappell, Sam Matlock, and Louis Matlock.
  • [3]a Sam told CM Kavanagh of The Edge that the band's name came from a folder of songs he had compiled in case he was hit by a bus. The exclamation mark was added because the band were fans of the punk band Dangerous!. The connection to the word "Dead" might not be obvious to all readers. Maybe something like "came from a folder of songs labelled 'Dead' "?
  • [4]a Its members are from the Isle of Wight but formed a band in 2012 while at Southampton Solent University
  • [8] By September, they were performing in unusual places and producing their own zines and clothes as part of a movement they called "The Damned Restless Future" after a lyric from an early demo of theirs
  • [10] In March 2017, they released "Enough, Enough, Enough", a track about Mountford's personality defects
  • [14]a The band released that album in January 2018; consisting entirely of songs recorded live You can include the day the album was released since it is mentioned in the source.
  • [21] although a very negative review came from The Soundboard.
  • [24] Rob Wacey of AllMusic described the band as a "hard rock outfit that flirt with elements of pop-punk and grunge"
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.