Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22ce870583b452a

Jump to content

Talk:D4vd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 day ago by RandomEditor6772314 in topic Dropped from label(s)

Dropped from label(s)

Per Billboard, he was dropped by Darkroom/Interscope last year, so I removed those Categories. PSPazW (talk) 20:50, 15 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

When an artist is no longer carried by a label, does the category usually get removed? In other words, does the category include formerly associated artists? If dropping is special (being in bad standing), let's talk about it. We have a section that can adequately textually convey the drops. Once released, a track or album appears published and rather permanently studioed. I don't have a particular opinion on it at the moment. I just want to clarify this edit on the metrics of category inclusion. JFHJr () 01:53, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I undid your edit because these categories include former associates as well as current ones. Publications are forever and can't be undone. Dropping can be conveyed textually, but the categories are still valid because publications won't unhappen. JFHJr () 17:29, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
  1. The fact that a person can be “dropped” from a label shows that “Labels” is more like “current contract employer / company residence” (basically). Common usage and implication.
  2. Also the info box is about the person, not any published albums.
  3. Also info box template says “ label - The record label or labels to which the act has been signed” —the act (person), not existing publications.
Being “dropped” means the person is now not on those Labels. So it seems what we need is a better terms or clarity around the “Labels” field in the info box: it should be something like “Published on: “ (where past tense indicates unchangeable historical facts)or “Associated Labels” if it’s really about past publications.RandomEditor6772314 (talk) 20:50, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Infobox reversion

Recently, there was a reversion in the infobox markup that I didn't do but I support. The markup is solely for articles about convicted persons with iboxes, as far as WP:BLP is concerned. Same goes for other similar markup and categories. I'm posting here to offer proponent/s a forum for discussion if one is needed. JFHJr () 22:20, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply