Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a244825fe8a9725b

Jump to content

Talk:Cyril and Methodius

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Split

[edit]

We should have separate articles on the brothers, perhaps with this article remaining to cover their joint memorialization. Srnec (talk) 20:18, 9 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The size of the article (3556 words) is well below 6000 words threshold (WP:SIZERULE), and thus there is no reason size-wise to split. Moreover, there are two major questions:
  • Their biography is most often presented as being together (I say this without being an expert on this). Do we have enough sources to describe their work separately to justify separate articles?
  • Note that this article had been subject of national sensitivities over the years. Splitting might be a Pandora's box. I am just saying.
Finally, do we need to split? If needed new articles can be created where the biography of each is described, and the collaborative work is described here. See example of joined articleHilaire Belloc and G. K. Chesterton and the separate articles Hilaire Belloc and G. K. Chesterton. A.Cython(talk) 20:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
In the future, 3 articles will probably be necessary (as pointed out), as there are sources discussing them as a group and sources discussing them individually. But for now, it is short and splitting is difficult. If you split, it is best to write all articles in draftspace first. I can assist, and you can feel free to make use of my Cyrillomethodian bibliography (which contains but a tiny fraction of the literature on the topic). Ⰻⱁⰲⰰⱀⱏ (ⰳⰾ) 22:21, 9 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I say it not because of the size of the article but because they have separate albeit intertwined biographies. I suspect that the current article misleads some people about how intertwined their careers were. I was provoked to post by the recent article "Constantine the Philosopher at the Caliph’s Court", which is entirely about an episode in Constantine/Cyril's life. In any case, there is no rush. And thanks for the Cyrillomethodian bibliography! Srnec (talk) 00:49, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

"St.Cyril and Methodius Day" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect St.Cyril and Methodius Day has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 22 § St.Cyril and Methodius Day until a consensus is reached. 𝔅𝔦𝔰-𝔖𝔢𝔯𝔧𝔢𝔱𝔞? 21:44, 22 April 2026 (UTC)Reply