Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23f63ad08f4cc78

Jump to content

Talk:Capoeira

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 day ago by Wrangler1981 in topic Original research, unreliable sources
Former good article nomineeCapoeira was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 2, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2021 and 9 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jrcabral, Saravgleason. Peer reviewers: Guglielg.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pronunciation

[edit]

I don't speak Portuguese, but I've done Capoeira for years with people who do. Most of them tap the "r" in the word so it sounds like a "d". It's usually a sign that someone doesn't know their stuff when they say "cap-O-WHERE-ruh instead of Cap-uh-WEY-duh. It seems to me like the phonetics on this page are wrong, but again, not a speaker of Portuguese, so I wanted to ask here of someone who does and also understand those phonetics. Thanks. DolyaIskrina (talk) 20:03, 16 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Capoeira 47.196.62.196 (talk) 00:37, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Spiritual elements?

[edit]

The article mentions that it was accepted after some 'spiritual elements' were removed from the practice.

WHAT 'spiritual' elements were there in it which were removed?

"Shortly after the abolition of slavery in Brazil in 1888, capoeira was declared illegal in 1890.[16] However, in the early 1930s, Mestre Bimba created a form of capoeira that held back on its spiritual elements and incorporated elements of jiu jitsu, gymnastics and sports.[17] In doing so, the government viewed capoeira as a socially acceptable sport." UnderEducatedGeezer (talk) 00:57, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Afro-Diasporic Legacies

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2026 and 22 April 2026. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cheesybananacheesepull (article contribs). Peer reviewers: HeatMiserX.

— Assignment last updated by SMBFSU (talk) 22:07, 9 February 2026 (UTC)Reply


Wiki Education assignment: Modern Brazil

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2026 and 4 May 2026. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cmv2024 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Katherine.Holt (talk) 15:34, 6 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

AI

[edit]

Hi - I tagged this article as AI-generated based on the 2023 edits by Mladifilozof, some of which are here. Much of the current text is derived from those edits, which display many WP:AISIGNS -- undue emphasis on significance (all the "pivotal role" crap), didactic disclaimer (the "It's important to know" bit that got cut), vocab distro typical of 2023-24 LLM output, etc. Based on the edit history the edits also seem to have contained many harv/sfn errors, repeatedly even after warnings, which are also signs of unreviewed AI output. Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:55, 1 April 2026 (UTC)Reply


Original research, unreliable sources

[edit]

Wikipedia depends on reliable sources. Info on this page not supported by reliable sources should be removed. I am in the process of re-writing the page to eventually get it up to the level of a Good Article, in line with previous suggestions presented on this talk page. If there is disagreement with my re-writing, we should discuss it here. Kind regards. Wrangler1981 (talk) 20:12, 30 July 2026 (UTC)Reply