Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2276f90d8f5cf36

Jump to content

Talk:Calgary Police Service

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by HistoryMaker2001 in topic HAWC1

Untitled

[edit]

This article is short and awful... someone needs to update it.

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakesthey're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. - Qyd 03:13, 24 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Anyone care to add a 'Critisism' section of the CPS? As a resident in Calgary, I have noticed quite a few shortcomings. Arrogance, agression and abuse of power being just a few issues when dealing with the (hopefully) minority of constables. What with all the hoo-ha of the Vancouver RCMP killing that poor Polish guy at the airport by tasering him a while back, I guess its relvant.

Adding critisism would be suspect of having a second agenda or Anti-Social political views. There would be no NPOV in any of it.Twhanna (talk) 00:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Anyone with articles or news stories we could pad this out with? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.210.58.185 (talk) 21:51, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

HAWC1

[edit]

Just so everyone knows, I've just finished fixing references that state that HAWC1 is a Eurocopter EC120. Simply put, it's not. It is an MD Helicopters MD 520N, a NOTAR design. This is glaringly obvious, as HAWC2 has a clearly visible tail rotor, while HAWC1 does not.

Feel free to dispute me on this.

HistoryMaker2001 (talk) 06:15, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply