Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a265157e0e4d1de6

Jump to content

Talk:Breed-specific legislation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pitbull like and wolf like breeds

[edit]

I find it immoral and unacceptable when dog breeds are taken away just because they look like pitbulls or wolves. Dennis the mennis (talk) 20:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

In Studies, the “Fatal dog attacks in USA & Canada 1982 - 2019“ hyperlink leads to a website about why Rottweilers aren’t dangerous dogs 2600:6C50:147F:BF55:303E:F8AB:1DBF:318C (talk) 23:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Clarified attribution and added peer-reviewed sources to balance advocacy

[edit]

I updated the lead section to correct a sourcing issue and clean up the attribution. The sentence claiming the effectiveness of breed-specific legislation is "disputed" was sourced to Dana Campbell's 2009 GP-Solo article, which relies heavily on material from the National Canine Research Council, a pit bull advocacy group. That position was being presented in Wikipedia’s voice, without attribution or balance, which isn’t in line with WP:NPOV or WP:RS.

I rephrased it to clearly attribute that stance to advocacy groups and added two peer-reviewed studies that support the opposite view:

Bini et al. (2011) in Annals of Surgery showed pit bulls were disproportionately involved in severe and fatal maulings. Raghavan et al. (2013) in Injury Prevention found a statistically significant reduction in dog bite hospitalizations following Winnipeg’s BSL implementation.

All references were cleaned up and moved to the ==References== section per formatting best practices. No other content was changed. Let me know if anyone has concerns, but this brings the section into better alignment with core content policies. VeritasClaritas (talk) 06:38, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:51, 18 August 2025 (UTC)Reply