Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2578998ec0b22ce

Jump to content

Talk:Bill Cosby

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 27 days ago by AjaxSmack in topic WP:UNDUEWEIGHT issues


Whole lot of unsubstantiated claims.

[edit]

Two things. There's an enormous amount here about claims of sex offenses made decades after the claimed event. I'm not convinced that's ok. We have a statute of limitations for a reason (for several reasons, actually). There is also the fact that memory is plastic and fallible. It may be the case that these victims are remembering correctly, it may be the case that they aren't. Shouldn't some of this counter-argument be present here? I can't possibly be the first person to object to the one-sided coverage of this issue. The other thing is, if I understand correctly, his conviction was overturned. That means he was not "convicted" as we would reasonably understand the term.~2025-31506-44 (talk) 18:14, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Many institutions connected to Cosby have publicly acknowledged the abuse allegations and consequently severed ties with him, primarily by revoking honorary degrees and removing his name from scholarships/buildings. These actions represent a formal institutional acknowledgment that the reported conduct was inconsistent with their values. While Cosby has consistently denied the allegations, his 2005 deposition, in which he admitted to obtaining Quaaludes with the intent of giving them to women he wanted to have sex with, was a turning point in public and institutional opinion. --~2025-37349-71 (talk) 09:17, 3 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
There's a difference between a conviction being overturned and being found innocent. At no point was Cosby found innocent, the conviction was overturned on a technicality. --~2026-42741-7 (talk) 15:31, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
In the common-law system followed in the US, there's no such thing as being "found innocent". Though there is a presumption of innocence, as a legal outcome there is only guilty or not guilty. —  AjaxSmack  16:21, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Starting in 2014, dozens of allegations of sexual assault were made against him. By 2018, these had ended his career and sharply diminished his status as a pop culture icon."

[edit]

This sentence should be part of the first paragraph in the lead. It's far too short to be a separate paragraph ~2026-42741-7 (talk) 15:28, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Agree it’s beyond ridiculous to bury it. ~2026-34301-42 (talk) 21:54, 10 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

WP:UNDUEWEIGHT issues

[edit]

This is something that plagues many celebrity articles, but the current version of this article has serious WP:UNDUEWEIGHT issues that violate WP:ENCYCLOPEDIC / WP:NOTTABLOID. The volume of text in the Legal issues and Personal life sections is greater than that in the Career section. And in the Legal issues section, there are 18 paragraphs of allegations, but only 6 paragraphs about legal activities.

The solution already exists: there are spinoff articles at Bill Cosby sexual assault cases, Trial of Bill Cosby and Constand v. Cosby for full coverage of legal issues. —  AjaxSmack  16:50, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply