Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22764dd1f3c6bf7

Jump to content

Talk:Anora

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 109.77.197.90 in topic Minor awards should not be mentioned in lead section

Minor awards should not be mentioned in lead section

[edit]

There is no need to mention minor foreign awards in the lead section I could understand maybe mentioning the Globes in the lead but the BAFTAs are minor and there is no need to highlight them in the lead section over and above many other more important awards. -- 109.77.194.109 (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Upon what do you base this opinion? Kire1975 (talk) 10:41, 4 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
First the lead is supposed to summarize, and the Oscars are far and above more important than any other awards. Secondly this film is not British, and has no particular British connection, it is weird and unnecessary to highlight a British award in the lead section. -- 109.77.198.49 (talk) 23:42, 4 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Anyone? Am I really the only one who thinks it is weird (WP:UNDUE) that the lead section mentions the Oscars and the BAFTAs, like as if the British award is anywhere near as important as the Oscars and is really worth bringing to the attention of normal readers by highlighting it in the lead? The lead is supposed to highlight key points! -- 109.77.197.90 (talk) 12:46, 10 March 2025 (UTC)Reply